Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion Research Articles

Relationship between intervertebral disc height and post operative dysphagia secondary to single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion- a retrospective study

BackgroundOne goal of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is to restore the loss of intervertebral disc height (IDH) results from the degenerative process. However, the effects of IDH on postoperative dysphagia after ACDF remain unclear.MethodsBased on the results of a one-year telephone follow-up, A total of 217 consecutive patients after single-level ACDF were enrolled. They were divided into dysphagia and non-dysphagia groups. The age, BMI, operation time and blood loss of all patients were collected from the medical record system and compared between patients with and without dysphagia. Radiologically, IDH, spinous process distance (SP) of the operated segment, and C2-7 angle (C2-7 A) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. The relationship between changes in these radiological parameters and the development of dysphagia was analyzed.ResultsSixty-three (29%) cases exhibited postoperative dysphagia. The mean changes in IDH, SP, and C2-7 A were 2.84 mm, -1.54 mm, and 4.82 degrees, respectively. Changes in IDH (P = 0.001) and changes in C2-7 A (P = 0.000) showed significant differences between dysphagia and non-dysphagia patients. Increased IDH and increased C2-7 A (P = 0.037 and 0.003, respectively) significantly and independently influenced the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. When the change in IDH was ≥ 3 mm, the chance of developing postoperative dysphagia for this patient was significantly greater. No significant relationship was observed between the change in spinous process distance (SP) and the incidence of dysphagia. The age, BMI, operation time and blood loss did not significantly influence the incidence of postoperative dysphagia.ConclusionThe change in IDH could be regarded as a predictive factor for postoperative dysphagia after single-level ACDF.

Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-to-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated With Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Retrospective Cohort. This study aims to assess the easily measurable radiographic landmarks of screw-to-vertebral body ratio and changes in screw angle to identify if they are associated with early subsidence following an Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing 1-3 level ACDF with allograft or PEEK cages. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 6-month postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure intradiscal height (or distance between 2 vertebral bodies) as an anterior vertebral distance (AVD), middle (MVD), and posterior (PVD), screw angle, screw-to-vertebral body length ratio, and interscrew distance. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were performed. 92 patients were included (42 single-level, 32 two-level, and 18 3-level ACDFs). In single-level ACDFs, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with a decrease in AVD (=.001) and MVD (P = .03). A decrease in the PVD was associated with a decrease in segmental lordosis (P < .001). For two-level ACDFs, a higher caudal screw-to-body ratio was associated with a lower MVD (P = .01). Six months following an ACDF for degenerative pathology, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with an increase in radiographic subsidence at the antero-medial aspect of the disc space albeit largely subclinical. This suggests that the caudal screw angle change may serve as a reliable radiographic marker for early radiographic subsidence. Furthermore, a greater screw-to-vertebral body ratio may be protective against radiographic subsidence in two-level ACDF procedures.

Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. To assess the radiographic risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine pathologies. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 2023. The primary inclusion criteria were degenerative spinal conditions treated with ACDF, comparing radiological parameters in patients with and without postoperative ASD. The radiographic parameters included intervertebral disc height, cervical sagittal alignment, sagittal segmental alignment, range of motion, segmental height, T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and plate to disc distance (PPD). Risk of bias was assessed for all studies. The Cochrane Review Manager was utilized to perform the meta-analysis. From 7044 articles, 13 retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Three studies had "not serious" bias and the other 10 studies had serious or very serious bias. The total number of patients in the included studies was 1799 patients. Five studies included single-level ACDF, 2 studies included multi-level ACDF, and 6 studies included single or multi-level ACDF. On meta-analysis, the significant risk factors associated with ASD development were reduced postoperative cervical lordosis (mean difference [MD] = 3.35°, P = .002), reduced last-follow-up cervical lordosis (MD = -3.02°, P = .0003), increased preoperative to postoperative cervical sagittal alignment change (MD = -3.68°, P = .03), and the presence of developmental cervical canal stenosis (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.17, P < .001). Decreased postoperative cervical lordosis, greater change in cervical sagittal alignment and developmental cervical canal stenosis were associated with an increased risk of ASD following ACDF.

Effect of Osteoporosis on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following One-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Retrospective study. This study aimed to evaluate how osteoporosis affected the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plating. The incidence of complications associated with implants is high when ACDF is performed in patients with poor bone quality. In total, 101 patients without (T-score ≥1.0, group A) and 25 with (T-score ≤-2.5, group B) osteoporosis who underwent single-level ACDF with plating were followed up for >2 years. The clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups. The fusion rate and implant-related complications were evaluated. Although clinical outcomes such as visual analog scale scores for the arm (2.0±2.3 vs. 2.4±2.9, p=0.490) and neck pain (1.4±1.9 vs. 1.8±2.2, p=0.343) and neck disability index (7.7±7.1 vs. 9.9±7.5, p=0.225) were slightly higher in group B, no statistically significant difference was noted. Cage subsidence (13.9% vs. 16.0%, p=0.755) and plate migration (7.9% vs. 8.0%, p=1.000) rates did not differ between the two groups. The fusion rate at 1 year postoperatively was higher in group A than in group B (80.3% vs. 68.2%, p=0.139) and slightly increased in both groups (94.6% vs. 86.4%, p=0.178) at the final follow-up. Osteoporosis did not significantly affect the rate of cage subsidence or plate migration after cervical fusion. After ACDF, increased cage subsidence and implant migration rates had no significant effect on clinical outcomes.

Elective Single-Level Primary Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Spondylotic Cervical Myelopathy is Associated With Decreased Resource Utilization Versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare elective single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) in terms of (1) cost, (2) length of hospital stay, and (3) discharge destination in Medicare patients. A sub-analysis of potential cost drivers was also performed. In the era of value-based medicine, there is substantial interest in reducing the cost of care. Both ACDF and PCDF are used to treat DCM but carry different morbidity and risk profiles that can impact hospital resource utilization. However, this has not been assessed on a national level. Patients undergoing single-level elective ACDF and PCDF surgery were identified using the 2019 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) Limited Data Set (LDS) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2019 Impact File. Multivariate models of hospital cost of care, length of stay, and discharge destination were performed, controlling for confounders. A univariate sub-analysis of 9 revenue centers was performed. In all, 3942 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean cost of elective single-level cervical fusion for myelopathy was $18,084±10,783, and the mean length of stay was 2.45±2.95d. On multivariate analysis, ACDF was independently associated with decreased cost of $5,814 (P<0.001), shorter length of stay by 1.1 days (P<0.001), and decreased risk of nonhome discharge destination by 58% (adjusted odds ratio: 0.422, P<0.001).On sub-analysis of 9 revenue centers, medical/surgical supply ($10,497, 44%), operating room charges ($5401, 23%), and accommodations ($3999, 17%) were the largest drivers of charge differences. Single-level elective primary ACDF for DCM was independently associated with decreased cost, decreased hospital length of stay, and a lower rate of nonhome discharge compared with PCDF. Medical and surgical supply, operating room, and accommodation differences between ACDF and PCDF are potential areas for intervention. Increased granularity in reimbursement structures is warranted to prevent the creation of disincentives to the treatment of patients with DCM with pathology that is better addressed with PCDF. Level-III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Late-week Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Associated with Increased Length of Stay.

Retrospective analysis of clinical data from a single institution. To assess the day of surgery during the week as a possible predictor of length of stay (LOS) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Surgeries later in the week may result in longer LOS and higher costs for joint arthroplasty, yet this is unclear following spine surgery. Procedures performed later in the week may lead to weekend admissions when there are limited services that may contribute to an extended LOS. We attempt to identify associations between day of surgery and LOS, readmission, and complications following single- and multilevel ACDF. Patients at a single institution undergoing ACDF by 7 primary surgeons in both orthopedic and neurosurgery spine departments between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by surgery day at either the beginning (Monday/Tuesday) or end (Thursday/Friday) of the week and by single- or multilevel ACDF. Surgery for trauma, infections, adjacent level disease, or revision were excluded. Patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), LOS, postoperative complications, and readmission rates were assessed. Six hundred fifty-two patients underwent ACDF. For single-level ACDF, 222 were reviewed, with 112 having surgery at the beginning and 110 at the end of the week. For multilevel ACDF, 431 were reviewed, with 192 having surgery at the beginning and 239 at the end of the week. No differences in pre- or postoperative variables were determined for single-level ACDF. Despite no differences in pre-operative variables, CCI, operative duration, or number of levels, late-week multilevel ACDF had longer average LOS (2.8±3.0 days) compared to early-week surgery (2.0±2.0 days) (P=0.018). Late-week multilevel ACDF was associated with an increased LOS, as it may prove beneficial to surgical planning. This conflicts with previous reports that day of week was not associated with LOS following ACDF. III.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of non-window-type bioactive glass–ceramic cage in single-level ACDF versus PEEK cage filled with autologous bone

Bioactive glass–ceramic (BGC) cage is a substitute for polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Only a few comparative studies exist using PEEK and non-window-type BGC cages (CaO–SiO2–P2O5–B2O3) in single-level ACDF. This study compared PEEK cages filled with autologous iliac bone grafts and BGC cages regarding clinical safety and effectiveness. A retrospective case series was performed on 40 patients who underwent single-level ACDF between October 2020 and July 2021 by a single orthopedic spine surgeon. The spacers used in each ACDF were a PEEK cage with a void filled with an autologous iliac bone graft and a non-window-type BGC cage in 20 cases. The grafts were compared pre-operatively and post-operatively at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Post-operative complications were investigated in each group. Clinical outcome was measured, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of neck and arm pains, Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Dynamic lateral radiographs were used to assess the inter-spinous motion (ISM) between the fusion segment and subsidence. The fusion status was evaluated using a computed tomography (CT) scan. Overall, 39 patients (19 and 20 patients in the PEEK and BGC groups, respectively) were recruited. Eighteen (94.7%) and 19 (95.0%) patients in the PEEK and BGC groups, respectively, were fused 12 months post-operatively, as assessed by ISM in dynamic lateral radiograph and bone bridging formation proven in CT scan. The PEEK and BGC groups showed substantial improvement in neck and arm VAS, JOA, and NDI scores. No substantial difference was found in clinical and radiological outcomes between the PEEK and BGC groups. However, the operation time was considerably shorter in the BGC group than in the PEEK group. In conclusion, a non-window-type BCG cage is a feasible substitute for a PEEK cage with an autologous iliac bone graft in single-level ACDF.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile VA spacer device: a clinical and radiological study with two-year follow-up

Study designA retrospective study.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a novel zero-profile variable-angle (Zero-P VA) spacer and a traditional poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage and plate system in cases pertaining to cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy.Summary of background dataThere are two conventional types of ACDF procedures aimed at treating symptomatic cervical spondylosis. The first one involves an uninstrumented “stand-alone” approach utilizing bone graft/cage, while the second incorporates bone graft/cage in conjunction with a front plate positioned before the vertebral bodies. Both procedures have their own inherent advantages and disadvantages. The Zero-P VA spacer, however, represents a unique synthesis by amalgamating the advantages of both traditionally typical procedures. Notably, this spacer can potentially circumvent the issue related to prevertebral soft-tissue disturbance and reduce the occurrence of dysphagia.MethodsUsing our surgical database, the authors systematically conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing all patients who underwent single-level ACDF between January 2018 and January 2019, with a minimum two-year follow-up. Patients either received a Zero-P VA implant or PEEK cage coupled with plating. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for arm and neck pain were documented. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (ETA-10). Additional parameters such as cervical alignment, fusion rate and the incidence of postoperative complications were assessed.ResultsAccording to the outcomes of the statistical analysis, there was no substantial disparity that emerged in the advancements observed in the JOA and VAS metrics between the two study cohorts. Noteworthy, however, the ETA-10 scores were statistically significantly reduced in the Zero-P VA group compared to the cage and plating group (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in the height of the operated segment, Cobb angle of the fused segment, C2–C7 Cobb angle and fusion rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, postoperative complications were slightly lower in patients with the Zero-P VA group (7.69%) as compared to the cage and plating group (16.67%).ConclusionThe clinical outcomes observed with the Zero-P VA spacer used for single-level ACDF were found to be satisfactory. The performance of this device is comparable or even superior to the traditional cage and plating method in preventing postoperative dysphagia and mitigating potential complications associated with the use of a plate.

Is single-level cervical disc arthroplasty associated with a lower reoperation rate than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Long-term meta-analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) trials report lower rates of subsequent cervical spine surgical procedures with CDA compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The objective of this study was to compare the rate of subsequent cervical spine surgery in single-level CDA-treated patients to that of a matched cohort of single-level ACDF-treated patients by using records from 2010 to 2021 included in a large national administrative claims database (PearlDiver). This retrospective matched-cohort study used a large national insurance claims database; 525,510 patients who had undergone a single-level ACDF or CDA between 2010 and 2021 were identified. Patients with other same-day spine procedures, as well as those for trauma, infection, or tumor, were excluded, yielding 148,531 patients. ACDF patients were matched 2:1 to CDA patients on the basis of clinical and demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of all-cause cervical reoperation after index surgery. Secondary outcomes included readmission, any adverse event within 90 days, and overall reintervention after index surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for covariates and were employed to estimate the effect of the index ACDF or CDA procedure on patient outcomes. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, and differences between ACDF- and CDA-treated patients were compared using log-rank tests. After the patients were matched, 28,795 ACDF patients to 14,504 CDA patients were included. ACDF patients had higher rates of 90-day adverse events (18.4% vs 14.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82, p < 0.001) and readmission (11.5% vs 9.7%, aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93, p < 0.001). Over a mean 4.3 years of follow-up, 5.0% of ACDF patients and 5.4% of CDA patients underwent reoperation (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19, p = 0.059). The rate of aggregate reintervention was higher in CDA patients than in ACDF patients (11.7% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.10, p = 0.002). The Kaplan-Meier 10-year reoperation-free survival rate was worse for CDA than ACDF (91.0% vs 92.0%, p = 0.05), as was the rate of reintervention-free survival (81.2% vs 82.0%, p = 0.003). Single-level CDA was associated with a similar rate of reoperation and higher rate of subsequent injections when compared with a matched cohort that underwent single-level ACDF. CDA was associated with lower rates of 90-day adverse events and readmissions.

The Effect of Hyperlipidemia as a Risk Factor on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To analyze the effect of hyperlipidemia (HLD) on postoperative complications in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF represents the standard procedure performed for focal anterior nerve root or spinal cord compression with low complication rates. HLD is well known as a risk factor for major complications after vascular and transplant surgery, and orthopedic surgery. To date, there have been no studies on HLD as a risk factor for cervical spine surgery. Patients who underwent ACDF from 2010 through quarter 3 of 2020 were enrolled using the MSpine subset of the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. The patients were divided into single-level ACDF and multilevel ACDF groups. In addition, each group was divided into subgroups according to the presence or absence of HLD. The incidence of surgical and medical complications was queried using relevant International Classification of Disease and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Charlson Comorbidity Index was used as a broad measure of comorbidity. χ 2 analysis, with populations matched for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, was performed. A total of 24,936 patients who underwent single-level ACDF and 26,921 patients who underwent multilevel ACDF were included. In the multilevel ACDF group, wound complications were significantly higher in the patients with HLD. Among medical complications, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and urinary tract infection/urinary incontinence were significantly higher in the patients with HLD in both groups. Revision surgery and readmission were significantly higher in the patients with HLD who underwent multilevel ACDF. In patients who underwent ACDF, several surgical and medical complications were found to be higher in patients with HLD than in patients without HLD. Preoperative serum lipid concentration levels and management of HLD should be considered during preoperative planning to prevent postoperative complications in patients undergoing ACDF.

Comparison of Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon After Single-Level and Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

A prospective cohort study. This study aims to assess the influence of the number of fused segments on cervical paravertebral muscles by comparing the changes of the cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) after single-level versus multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). A total of 115 patients underwent ACDF were retrospectively recruited, and divided into 1-level group (n=44), 2-level group (n=40) and 3-4-level group (n=31). The flexion relaxation experiment was carried out 3 days preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively by surface electromyography (SEMG). Patients were examined by the neck Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and C2-7 range of motion (ROM). There was a significant difference in the time-related changes of FRR among the three groups before and after surgery (F=85.701, P<0.001). 35 patients (79.55%) with 1 level ACDF and 11 patients (27.5%) with 2 levels ACDF had FRP restored to normal at 12 months postoperatively. However, only one patient (3.33%) had normalized FRP after 3-4 levels ACDF. There were significant differences in the time-related changes of the normalized SEMG RMS values in each phase before and after surgery (P=0.018, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001). A significant correlation was found between the changes in C2-7ROM and FRR in three groups (P=0.007, 0.003 and 0.036). Single-level ACDF contributes to normalize the FRP of cervical paravertebral muscles, which, however, is not ideally recovered by 2-level ACDF. On the contrary, 3 or 4-level ACDF could not normalize the cervical FRP. Our research supported the passive structure hypothesis.

Single-level Anterior Cervical discEctomy and Fusion has Lower Five-year Revisions than Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in a Large National Cohort.

Retrospective cohort study using the 2010-2020 MSpine PearlDiver administrative dataset. To compare perioperative adverse events and five-year revisions for single-level ACDF versus PCF. Cervical disc disease can often be treated surgically using single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). Prior studies have suggested that posterior approaches provide similar short-term outcomes as ACDF; however, posterior procedures may have an increased risk of revision surgery. The database was queried for patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF or PCF (excluding cases performed for myelopathy, trauma, neoplasm, and/or infection). Outcomes including specific complications, readmission and reoperations were assessed Multivariable logistic regression was used to ascertain odds ratios (OR) of 90-day adverse events controlling for age, sex, and co-morbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine 5-year rates of cervical reoperation in the ACDF and PCF cohorts. A total of 31,953 patients treated by ACDF (29,958, 93.76%) or PCF (1,995, 6.24%) were identified. Multivariable analysis, controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities, demonstrated that PCF was associated with a significantly greater odds of aggregated serious adverse events (OR 2.17, P<0.001), wound dehiscence (OR 5.89, P<0.001), surgical site infection (OR 3.66, P<0.001), and pulmonary embolism (OR 1.72, P=0.04). However, PCF was associated with significantly lower odds of readmission (OR 0.32, P<0.001), dysphagia (OR 0.44, P<0.001), and pneumonia (OR 0.50, P=0.004). At five years, PCF cases had a significantly higher cumulative revision rate compared to ACDF cases (19.0% vs. 14.8%, P<0.001). he current study is the largest to date to compare short-term adverse events and five-year revision rates between single-level ACDF and PCF for non-myelopathy elective cases. Perioperative adverse events differed by procedure, and it was notable that the incidence of cumulative revisions was higher for PCF. These findings can be used in decision making when there is clinical equipoise between ACDF and PCF.

Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Retrospective cohort. To assess preoperative arm pain severity influence on postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There is evidence that preoperative symptom severity can affect postoperative outcomes. Few have evaluated this association between preoperative arm pain severity and postoperative PROMs and MCID achievement following ACDF. Individuals undergoing single-level ACDF were identified. Patients were grouped by preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) arm ≤8 vs. >8. PROMs collected preoperatively and postoperatively included VAS-arm/VAS-neck/Neck Disability Index (NDI)/12-item Short Form (SF-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS)/SF-12 mental composite score (MCS)/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF). Demographics, PROMs, and MCID rates were compared between cohorts. A total of 128 patients were included. The VAS arm ≤8 cohort significantly improved for all PROMs excepting VAS arm at 1-year/2-years, SF-12 MCS at 12-weeks/1-year/2-years, and SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at 6-weeks, only (p ≤0.021, all). The VAS arm >8 cohort significantly improved for VAS neck at all timepoints, VAS arm from 6-weeks to 1-year, NDI from 6-weeks to 6-months, and SF-12 MCS/PROMIS-PF at 6-months (p ≤0.038, all). Postoperatively, the VAS arm >8 cohort had higher VAS-neck (6 weeks/6 months), VAS-arm (12 weeks/6 months), NDI (6 weeks/6 months), lower SF-12 MCS (6 weeks/6 months), SF-12 PCS (6 months), and PROMISPF (12 weeks/6 months) (p ≤0.038, all). MCID achievement rates were higher among the VAS arm >8 cohort for the VAS-arm at 6-weeks/12-weeks/1-year/overall and NDI at 2 years (p ≤0.038, all). Significance in PROM score differences between VAS arm ≤8 vs. >8 generally dissipated at the 1-year and 2-year timepoint, although higher preoperative arm pain patients suffered from worse pain, disability, and mental/physical function scores. Furthermore, clinically meaningful rates of improvement were similar throughout the vast majority of timepoints for all PROMs studied.

Cannabis use is associated with decreased opioid prescription fulfillment following single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)

Recently, there has been increasing legalization of marijuana within the United States, however data are mixed with respect to its efficacy in treating acute pain. Our goal was to identify a difference in opioid utilization in patients with known cannabis use before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared with those that report no cannabis use. This study was a retrospective case-control design using PearlDiver. Patients who underwent a single level ACDF between January 2010 and October 2020, were included. Patients were placed in the study group if they had a previous diagnosis of cannabis use, dependence, or abuse. Patients were excluded if they were under the age of 18 or if they had filled an opioid prescription within 3 months of their procedure. A control group was then created using a propensity score match on age, gender, and Charleston comorbidity index (CCI), and had no diagnosis of cannabis use. The primary outcome was the number of morphine milliequivalents (MME) dispensed per prescription following surgery. A total of 1,339 patients were included in each group. The number of patients filling prescriptions was lower in the cannabis group than in the control group at 3 days postoperatively (p<.001). The average total MME per day as prescribed was lower in the cannabis group than the control group at 60 days post-op (48.5 vs. 59.4, respectively; p=.018). Patients who had a previous diagnosis of cannabis use, dependence or abuse filled fewer opioid prescriptions postoperatively (at 3 days postoperatively) and required lower doses (reduced average daily MME, at 60 days postoperatively) when compared with the control group.

Up to 10-year surveillance comparison of survivability in single-level cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in New York.

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is an alternative treatment to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which is the current gold standard, for degenerative cervical diseases such as cervical spondylotic myelopathy and cervical radiculopathy. CDR has several theoretical benefits over ACDF, including preservation of motion, earlier return to unrestricted activity, and potentially a lower risk of adjacent-segment disease. Recent literature has reported positive clinical results for CDR, but few studies have investigated the long-term risk of revision surgery of CDR versus ACDF. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the epidemiological, clinical, and operative risk factors that affect revision rates following single-level CDR and ACDF procedures. A retrospective cohort was extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System using ICD-9 and CPT codes. Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing primary, subaxial (C3-7), single-level ACDF or CDR for cervical radiculopathy and/or cervical spondylotic myelopathy between 2005 and 2013. Survivability was defined as the time between the index procedure and the presence of a subsequent discharge record for cervical spinal fusion or disc replacement. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests, t-tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and a Kaplan-Meier plot. A total of 7450 patients were included in this study (6615 ACDF and 835 CDR). When adjusted for patient demographics, the hazard ratios showed no significant differences in the incidence of revision risk between the two cohorts. The CDR cohort had a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia (p < 0.05). Patients undergoing ACDF had a longer average hospital stay (2.8 vs 1.9 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in time to revision surgery (p = 0.486). CDR and ACDF have both been shown to be effective treatments for cervical spine disease. CDR patients had a shorter average inpatient hospital stay compared with ACDF patients but tended to experience dysphagia more frequently. There was a tendency toward increased survivability of CDR; however, this was not found to be statistically significant at any time point. The large size and heterogeneity of each cohort and the availability of > 10 years of surveillance data differentiate this study from other published literature. This investigation has limitations inherent to large data analysis studies, including the implementation and inaccuracy of diagnosis and procedural coding; however, this reflects real-world use of coding by practitioners.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Microendoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A 1-Year Cost-Utility Analysis.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are the most common surgical approaches for medically refractory cervical radiculopathy. Rigorous cost-effectiveness studies comparing ACDF and PCF are lacking. To assess the cost-utility of ACDF vs PCF performed in the ambulatory surgery center setting for Medicare and privately insured patients at 1-year follow-up. A total of 323 patients who underwent 1-level ACDF (201) or PCF (122) at a single ambulatory surgery center were compared. Propensity matching generated 110 pairs (220 patients) for analysis. Demographic data, resource utilization, patient-reported outcome measures, and quality-adjusted life-years were assessed. Direct costs (1-year resource use × unit costs based on Medicare national allowable payment amounts) and indirect costs (missed workdays × average US daily wage) were recorded. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Perioperative safety, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation rates were similar between groups. Both groups experienced significant improvements in all patient-reported outcome measures at 3 months that was maintained at 12 months. The ACDF cohort had a significantly higher preoperative Neck Disability Index and a significantly greater improvement in health-state utility (ie, quality-adjusted life-years gained) at 12 months. ACDF was associated with significantly higher total costs at 1 year for both Medicare ($11 744) and privately insured ($21 228) patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ACDF was $184 654 and $333 774 for Medicare and privately insured patients, respectively, reflecting poor cost-utility. Single-level ACDF may not be cost-effective in comparison with PCF for surgical management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy.

Comparison of Single-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Radiculopathy.

Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are 2 commonly used surgical approaches to address cervical radiculopathy. Demonstrating superiority in clinical outcomes and durability of one of the approaches could change clinical practice on a large scale. This is the largest reported single-institutional retrospective cohort of single-level PCFs compared with single-level ACDFs for cervical radiculopathy. Patients undergoing either ACDF or PCF between 2014 and 2021 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics, and reoperations. Statistical analysis included t tests for continuous characteristics and c2 testing for categorical characteristics. In total, 236 single-level ACDFs and 138 single-level PCFs were included. There was no significant difference in age (51.0 vs 51.3 years), body mass index (BMI; 28.6 vs 28.1), or Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.89 vs 1.68) between patients who underwent ACDF and those who underwent PCF. There was no difference in the rate of reoperation (5.1% vs 5.1%), time to reoperation (247 vs 319 days), or reoperation for recurrent symptoms (1.7% vs 2.9%) for ACDF vs PCF. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was longer for ACDF compared with PCF (1.65 vs 1.35 days, P = 0.041), and the overall readmission rate after ACDF was 20.8% vs 10.9% after PCF (P = 0.014). Overall reoperation rates or reoperation for recurrent symptoms between ACDF and PCF were not significantly different, demonstrating that either procedure effectively addresses the indication for surgery. There was a significantly longer LOS after ACDF than PCF, and readmission rates at 90 days and 1 year were higher after ACDF.

Biomechanical performance of the novel assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element analysis.

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely accepted as the gold standard surgical procedure for treating cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. However, there is concern about the low fusion rate in the early period after ACDF surgery using the Zero-P fusion cage. We creatively designed an assembled uncoupled joint fusion device to improve the fusion rate and solve the implantation difficulties. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical performance of the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level ACDF and compare it with the Zero-P device. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element (FE) of a healthy cervical spine (C2-C7) was constructed and validated. In the one-level surgery model, either an assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage or a zero-profile device was implanted at the C5-C6 segment of the model. A pure moment of 1.0Nm combined with a follower load of 75N was imposed at C2 to determine flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The segmental range of motion (ROM), facet contact force (FCF), maximum intradiscal pressure (IDP), and screw-bone stress were determined and compared with those of the zero-profile device. Results: The results showed that the ROMs of the fused levels in both models were nearly zero, while the motions of the unfused segments were unevenly increased. The FCF at adjacent segments in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group was less than that that of the Zero-P group. The IDP at the adjacent segments and screw-bone stress were slightly higher in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group than in those of the Zero-P group. Stress on the cage was mainly concentrated on both sides of the wings, reaching 13.4-20.4Mpa in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group. Conclusion: The assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage provided strong immobilization, similar to the Zero-P device. When compared with the Zero-P group, the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage achieved similar resultant values regarding FCF, IDP, and screw-bone stress. Moreover, the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage effectively achieved early bone formation and fusion, probably due to proper stress distributions in the wings of both sides.

Postoperative Segmental Motion up to 1 Year Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Plate versus Non-plate.

Retrospective observational study. This study aimed to investigate the impact of plating on postoperative serial segmental motion and its correlation with clinical outcomes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for up to 1 year. The advantages and disadvantages of using cervical plating in ACDF have been well discussed; however, few studies compared the early serial segmental motions at the postoperative level between plating and non-plating. In retrospectively collected data, 149 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for degenerative disease were enrolled and divided into non-plating (n=66) and plating (n=83). Interspinous motion (ISM) at the arthrodesis segment, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for neck pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were serially evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Predictable factors for fusion, including age, sex, plating, diabetes, smoking, and type of grafts, were investigated, and fusion was defined as ISM <1 mm. In both groups, ISM was the highest at 3 months and gradually decreased thereafter, and the plating group showed significantly lower serial ISM than the non-plating group at 12 months. The plating group had lower NRS and NDI scores than the nonplating group at 12 months, and the difference in the NRS scores was statistically significant, particularly at 3 and 6 months, although that of the NDI scores was not. In a multivariate analysis, plating was the most powerful predictor for fusion. Plating significantly decreases the serial ISM compared with non-plating in single-level ACDF, and such decreased motion is correlated with decreased neck pain until 12 months postoperatively, particularly at 3 and 6 months. Given that plating was the most predictive factor for fusion, we recommend plating even in single-level ACDF for better early clinical outcomes.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Usage Has Leveled Out From 2010 to 2021.

Descriptive epidemiologic study. To compare trends in utilization and predictive factors for single-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) relative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) over the years. CDA is an alternative to ACDF for the treatment of cervical spine pathologies. With both procedures performed for similar indications, controversy on best practices exists. Patients who underwent single-level CDA or ACDF were identified in the 2010 through 2021 PearlDiver M151Ortho data set. The yearly number of CDAs performed and proportionality was assessed. Predictive patient factors for undergoing CDA as opposed to ACDF were determined. Kaplan Meyer survival analysis with an endpoint of cervical spine reoperation compared 5-year outcomes between CDA and ACDF. From 2010 to 2021, 19,301 single-level CDAs and 181,476 single-level ACDFs were identified. The proportional utilization of CDA relative to ACDF increased from 4.00% in 2010 to 14.15% in 2018 ( P < 0.0001), after which there was a plateau between 2018 and 2021 where proportional utilization was 14.47% ( P = 0.4654). Multivariate analysis identified several predictors of undergoing CDA rather than ACDF, including: younger age [odds ratio (OR) per decade decrease: 1.72], having surgery performed in the Midwest, Northeast, or West (relative to South, OR: 1.16, 1.13, 2.26, respectively), having Commercial insurance (relative to Medicare, OR: 1.75), and having surgery performed by an orthopedic surgeon (relative to a neurological surgeon, OR: 1.54) ( P < 0.0001 for each). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival to further cervical spine surgery between CDA and ACDF at 5 years (97.6% vs. 97.7%, P = 0.4249). Although the use of CDA relative to ACDF rose from 2010 to 2018, its use has subsequently plateaued between 2018 and 2021 and remained a relatively low percentage of the single-level anterior cervical surgeries performed (14.47% in 2021). The causes for such changes in the trend are unclear.