Simultaneous Masked Thresholds Research Articles

A sound coding strategy based on a temporal masking model for cochlear implants.

Auditory masking occurs when one sound is perceptually altered by the presence of another sound. Auditory masking in the frequency domain is known as simultaneous masking and in the time domain is known as temporal masking or non-simultaneous masking. This works presents a sound coding strategy that incorporates a temporal masking model to select the most relevant channels for stimulation in a cochlear implant (CI). A previous version of the strategy, termed psychoacoustic advanced combination encoder (PACE), only used a simultaneous masking model for the same purpose, for this reason the new strategy has been termed temporal-PACE (TPACE). We hypothesized that a sound coding strategy that focuses on stimulating the auditory nerve with pulses that are as masked as possible can improve speech intelligibility for CI users. The temporal masking model used within TPACE attenuates the simultaneous masking thresholds estimated by PACE over time. The attenuation is designed to fall exponentially with a strength determined by a single parameter, the temporal masking half-life T½. This parameter gives the time interval at which the simultaneous masking threshold is halved. The study group consisted of 24 postlingually deaf subjects with a minimum of six months experience after CI activation. A crossover design was used to compare four variants of the new temporal masking strategy TPACE (T½ ranging between 0.4 and 1.1 ms) with respect to the clinical MP3000 strategy, a commercial implementation of the PACE strategy, in two prospective, within-subject, repeated-measure experiments. The outcome measure was speech intelligibility in noise at 15 to 5 dB SNR. In two consecutive experiments, the TPACE with T½ of 0.5 ms obtained a speech performance increase of 11% and 10% with respect to the MP3000 (T½ = 0 ms), respectively. The improved speech test scores correlated with the clinical performance of the subjects: CI users with above-average outcome in their routine speech tests showed higher benefit with TPACE. It seems that the consideration of short-acting temporal masking can improve speech intelligibility in CI users. The half-live with the highest average speech perception benefit (0.5 ms) corresponds to time scales that are typical for neuronal refractory behavior.

Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise

The notched noise method is an effective procedure for measuring frequency resolution and auditory filter shapes in both human and animal models of hearing. Briefly, auditory filter shape and bandwidth estimates are derived from masked thresholds for tones presented in noise containing widening spectral notches. As the spectral notch widens, increasingly less of the noise falls within the auditory filter and the tone becomes more detectible until the notch width exceeds the filter bandwidth. Behavioral procedures have been used for the derivation of notched noise auditory filter shapes in mice; however, the time and effort needed to train and test animals on these tasks renders a constraint on the widespread application of this testing method. As an alternative procedure, we combined relatively non-invasive auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and the notched noise method to estimate auditory filters in normal-hearing mice at center frequencies of 8, 11.2, and 16 kHz. A complete set of simultaneous masked thresholds for a particular tone frequency were obtained in about an hour. ABR-derived filter bandwidths broadened with increasing frequency, consistent with previous studies. The ABR notched noise procedure provides a fast alternative to estimating frequency selectivity in mice that is well-suited to high through-put or time-sensitive screening.

The influence of different earphones on measurement values of simultaneous masking threshold.

In many psychoacoustic experiments, earphones or headphones are used to replay sound signals. In this paper, the influence of earphones on measurement values of simultaneous masking threshold is investigated. Three kinds of earphones (DT770 pro HD250 and ER-2) are used to measure the simultaneous masking threshold in four critical bands for ten normal-hearing subjects by using a 90% MLE procedures. These earphones had been calibrated with B&K 4153 artificial ear before used. We conclude that the characters of headphones have important impact on the measurement values of simultaneous masking threshold.

The role of temporal-masking patterns in the determination of subjective duration and loudness for ramped and damped sounds

The association between temporal-masking patterns, duration, and loudness for broadband noises with ramped and damped envelopes was examined. Duration and loudness matches between the ramped and damped sounds differed significantly. Listeners perceived the ramped stimuli to be longer and louder than the damped stimuli, but the outcome was biased by the stimulus context. Next, temporal-masking patterns were measured for ramped- and damped-broadband noises using three (0.5, 1.5, and 4.0 kHz) 10 ms probe tones presented individually at various temporal delays. Predictions of subjective duration derived from masking results underpredicted the matching results. Loudness estimates derived from models that assume persistence of neural activity after stimulus offset [Glasberg B. R., and Moore, B. C. J. (2002). "A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds," J. Audio. Eng. Soc. 50, 331-341; Chalupper, J., and Fastl, H. (2002) "Dynamic loudness model (DLM) for normal and hearing-impaired listeners," Acust. Acta Acust. 88, 378-386] were greater for ramped sounds than for damped sounds and were close to the average results obtained via the matching task. Differences in simultaneous-masked thresholds for these stimuli could not account for the loudness-matching results. Decay suppression of the later occurring portion of the damped stimulus may account for the differences in perception due to the stimulus context; however, a parsimonious implementation of this process that accounts for both subjective duration and loudness judgments remains unclear.

Phase effects in masking: within- versus across-channel processes.

The effects of bandwidth and component phase on masking were investigated using 200-ms narrowband (1-ERB(N)) and broadband (5-ERB(N)) cosine-phase (CP) and random-phase (RP) harmonic complex maskers, centered at 1 or 6 kHz. A continuous notched-noise was used to restrict off-frequency listening. The masker fundamental frequency (F0) was 25 Hz. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for sinusoidal signals at 1 and 6 kHz, gated with the maskers. Thresholds were lower in the CP than in the RP masker, for both bandwidths, but the effect was markedly greater for the wider bandwidth. For the CP maskers, thresholds were markedly lower for the 5-ERB(N) than for the 1-ERB(N) bandwidth; for the RP maskers, there was a small effect in the opposite direction. Experiment 2 used 1- and 6-kHz CP maskers. The masker components in the ERB(N) around the signal frequency were presented to one ear, and the remaining components were presented contralaterally. Thresholds were much higher than when all components were presented to the same ear, and were higher than for the 1-ERB(N) masker alone, suggesting that the low thresholds for broadband monaural presentation do not depend on "high level" across-channel comparisons. Simultaneous masked thresholds could be predicted well using a model based on a simulated auditory filter, a level-dependent compressive nonlinearity, and a sliding temporal integrator; it was not necessary to assume the involvement of across-channel processes or of selective listening in the masker dips.

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds were measured at 0.5 and 2.0 kHz in bandpass maskers as a function of masker bandwidth and in a broadband masker with the goal of estimating psychophysical suppression. Suppression was operationally defined in two ways: (1) as a change in forward-masked threshold as a function of masker bandwidth, and (2) as a change in effective masker level with increased masker bandwidth, taking into account the nonlinear growth of forward masking. Subjects were younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with cochlear hearing loss. Thresholds decreased as a function of masker bandwidth in forward masking, which was attributed to effects of suppression; thresholds remained constant or increased slightly with increasing masker bandwidth in simultaneous masking. For subjects with normal hearing, slightly larger estimates of suppression were obtained at 2.0 kHz rather than at 0.5 kHz. For hearing-impaired subjects, suppression was reduced in regions of hearing loss. The magnitude of suppression was strongly correlated with the absolute threshold at the signal frequency, but did not vary with thresholds at frequencies remote from the signal. The results suggest that measuring forward-masked thresholds in bandlimited and broadband maskers may be an efficient psychophysical method for estimating suppression.

A masking level difference due to harmonicity.

The role of harmonicity in masking was studied by comparing the effect of harmonic and inharmonic maskers on the masked thresholds of noise probes using a three-alternative, forced-choice method. Harmonic maskers were created by selecting sets of partials from a harmonic series with an 88-Hz fundamental and 45 consecutive partials. Inharmonic maskers differed in that the partial frequencies were perturbed to nearby values that were not integer multiples of the fundamental frequency. Average simultaneous-masked thresholds were as much as 10 dB lower with the harmonic masker than with the inharmonic masker, and this difference was unaffected by masker level. It was reduced or eliminated when the harmonic partials were separated by more than 176 Hz, suggesting that the effect is related to the extent to which the harmonics are resolved by auditory filters. The threshold difference was not observed in a forward-masking experiment. Finally, an across-channel mechanism was implicated when the threshold difference was found between a harmonic masker flanked by harmonic bands and a harmonic masker flanked by inharmonic bands. A model developed to explain the observed difference recognizes that an auditory filter output envelope is modulated when the filter passes two or more sinusoids, and that the modulation rate depends on the differences among the input frequencies. For a harmonic masker, the frequency differences of adjacent partials are identical, and all auditory filters have the same dominant modulation rate. For an inharmonic masker, however, the frequency differences are not constant and the envelope modulation rate varies across filters. The model proposes that a lower variability facilitates detection of a probe-induced change in the variability, thus accounting for the masked threshold difference. The model was supported by significantly improved predictions of observed thresholds when the predictor variables included envelope modulation rate variance measured using simulated auditory filters.

Effects of masker harmonicity on masked threshold

The role of masker harmonicity in auditory masking is not yet fully understood. This paper compares the effect of harmonic and inharmonic maskers on the simultaneous masked thresholds of narrow bandwidth noise probes using a three-alternative, forced-choice method. The harmonic masker had an 88-Hz fundamental and 45 consecutive partials (random starting phases). The inharmonic masker differed in that the partial frequencies were adjusted to nearby prime numbers. Maskers were presented at several levels, and the probe at several frequencies. Thresholds were consistently lower for the harmonic masker (4–8 dB). The masking release persisted when masker and probe bandwidths were equal, so it is not due to comodulated auditory filter outputs. The difference between maskers disappeared when the harmonic partials were separated by more than 176 Hz, suggesting that the effect may be related to critical bandwidth. Further, the threshold of noise probes located between two partials was always lower for the harmonic masker. However, the threshold for a tonal probe at the frequency of an omitted partial was higher with the harmonic masker than with the inharmonic masker. The results are consistent with a harmonic template model that proposes inhibition at the template frequencies and disinhibition between those frequencies.

Simultaneous masked thresholds as a function of masker bandwidth for different signal delays.

The improvement in signal detectability as signal onset is delayed relative to masker onset was measured as a function of masker bandwidth for notched and unnotched maskers. The signal was a 250-Hz-wide noise band centered at 2500 Hz. In two conditions, the 20-ms signal was gated 1 ms or 250 ms after the onset of a 420-ms masker. Signal thresholds were higher in the short-delay than in the long-delay condition. This difference generally increased as masker bandwidth increased and was similar in magnitude across the two masker types. Further, this difference was greatest for maskers whose spectra were symmetric about the signal frequency, and was smaller, and similar, for maskers that extended exclusively above or below the signal frequency. In a third condition, the signal was gated 1 ms after the onset of a 23-ms masker. Thresholds were highest in this condition, and varied differently as a function of masker bandwidth than in the other two conditions, particularly for the notched maskers. [Work supported by NIDCD award to Dennis McFadden.]<ep;balance>

Forward masking by maskers of uncertain frequency content

Large amounts of simultaneous masking can be produced when the frequency content of multicomponent maskers is changed with each presentation. This study examined whether such masker uncertainty also influences forward masking. The forward maskers were a 1000-Hz sinusoid, a broadband noise, and tonal complexes composed of 2-100 sinusoids drawn at random from a 300 to 3000-Hz range. A 10-ms signal at 1000 Hz followed the offset of 200-ms, 60 to 80-dB maskers with delays of 4-32 ms. For comparison, simultaneous-masked thresholds were measured for a 200-ms signal at 1000 Hz for a subset of conditions or taken from an earlier study. Unlike simultaneous masking, forward masking showed little effect of masker uncertainty. As confirmed by fitting a three-parameter descriptive model of forward masking, the pattern of results was similar for the sinusoidal, noise, and multicomponent forward maskers and there was no reduction in masking with decreased masker uncertainty. Performance in simultaneous masking improved to equal that in forward masking when the signal was shortened from 200 to 10 ms. Thus temporal disparities between masker and signal can offset the effects of spectral uncertainty and help separate the relative contribution of peripheral versus more central processes.

Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia

Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities were assessed through psychophysical tests in 11 left-CVA aphasic, four right-CVA nonaphasic, and eight normal male subjects selected from the same age group. The tests included frequency discrimination, gap detection, gap discrimination, frequency sweep discrimination, assessment of the magnitude of the frequency uncertainty effect in the detectability of tones in noise, and assessment of frequency selectivity through simultaneous masked thresholds. Results of these tests were compared to measures of auditory comprehension obtained from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, the Porch Index of Communicative Ability, and the Token Test. Nonlinguistic auditory performance of the three subject groups differed significantly from each other. For the left-CVA subjects, frequency sweep discrimination, frequency discrimination, and the frequency uncertainty effect in tone-in-noise detection were the best predictors of verbal auditory comprehension. The right-CVA subjects displayed marked deficits with regard to all pitch-related tests. The findings stress the importance of considering the presence of nonlinguistic auditory dysfunctions when evaluating linguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia.