Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplantation Research Articles

#2932 Our experience in combined and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: recipient and kidney graft survival

Abstract Background and Aims Simultaneous combined liver-kidney transplantation is a definitive treatment in patients with terminal failure of both organs, but sometimes, assessing the indication for said combined transplantation can be difficult. The liver from the same donor as the kidney graft protects the kidney immunologically and this provides long-term follow-up with a lower risk of rejection. No such protection is observed when both organs come from different cadaveric donors. There are no differences in graft survival in simultaneous or isolated transplants (liver or kidney), being prolonged in both cases. However, patient survival is lower, due to the complexity of this procedure and the clinical characteristics of the patients. The main aim is to analyze the evolution of patients with combined and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in our center in terms of graft survival and overall survival of the recipient. Method It is a retrospective observational study. The computerized clinical history of 50 patients with combined liver-kidney transplantation was reviewed from August 1998 to November 2023. The data were recorded in an Excell-type database. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed for the analysis. Results 50 combined liver-kidney transplants have been performed, of which 28 (56%) died, and 23 of them (82%) with the kidney graft functioning. The main causes of death were neoplasms (11 patients) and infections (7 patients). The survival of the patients at 5 years was approximately 70%. There were 5 cases of kidney graft loss, excluding death. Chronic rejection was the main cause (70-80%) of kidney graft loss. 60% received a kidney transplant again and died with the graft functioning; 20% died while on hemodialysis; and the remaining 20% are awaiting hemodialysis and are being studied for another kidney transplant. Conclusion Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation is a good therapeutic option for patients with terminal disease of both organs. However, it is a complex procedure in patients with multiple comorbidities, which affects overall survival. In contrast, kidney graft survival is prolonged and many recipients die with functioning grafts. It seems to be related to the immunological protective function of the liver. Consequently, there are few rejections and, the vast majority are chronic rejection.

Kidney after liver transplantation does not have an increased risk of rejection compared to liver alone.

Simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplant protects against acute cellular rejection. In 2017, UNOS implemented a "safety net" policy to allow patients with renal recovery to avoid renal transplantation. Whether kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) increases the risk of rejection is unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database of adult patients who received liver transplant, SLK or KALT between 2010 and 2020. We examined rejection of the liver within 6 months and 1 year of the liver transplant, as well as rejection of the kidney within 6 months and 1 year of receiving the kidney, as well as patient and graft loss. Sixty-six thousand seventy-nine patients were transplanted; 60 168 with liver transplant alone, 5627 with SLK, and 284 with KALT. Acute or chronic liver rejection rates within 6 or 12 months were statistically higher in the KALT group (10.0% and 10.9%) compared to the SLK group (6.1% and 7.5%), but comparable to the LTA group (9.3% and 11.1%). Kidney rejection and graft survival rates were not different. Liver graft survival was worse in KALT than SLK or LTA (Kaplan-Meier estimates.61vs..89 and.90), but these patients were more ill at the time of transplantation. KDPI and LDRI scores were notably lower in the SLK than KALT group. Patient survival was not clinically different between the groups. KALT does not increase the risk of acute or chronic kidney rejection. SLK has a lower risk of early liver rejection, but this effect diminishes by one year to being not clinically different compared to KALT. Given that KALT is immunologically safe, and potentially avoids unnecessary renal graft use, it should be preferred over SLK. Patients undergoing sequential kidney after liver transplant do not have an increased risk of liver or kidney rejection when compared to liver transplant alone or simultaneous liver and kidney transplant.

Incidence and Risk Factors Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation: A Review of a 20-Year Experience at a Single Center

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the major complications after liver transplantation (LT), with a significant impact on patient outcomes. This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors of CKD in LT recipients at Siriraj Hospital over the past 20 years. There were 366 adult patients undergoing LT at Siriraj Hospital between January 2002 and December 2021. After excluding patients with pretransplant CKD stages 4 to 5, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation, and patients who died after LT within 90 days, we retrospectively reviewed a total of 288 patients. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of post-transplant CKD. Of the 288 patients, 171 (59.4%) developed CKD after LT. The median time to develop CKD was 5.8 months (IQR, 3.8-15.3). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that age ≥55 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.34-4.42; P = .003), pretransplant kidney dysfunction defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.16-4.27; P = .016), and postoperative acute kidney injury (OR = 3.06; 95% CI, 1.73-5.42; P < .001) were significantly associated with post-transplant CKD. Patients with preexisting kidney dysfunction who received delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction without antibody induction protocol had a significantly lower incidence of post-transplant CKD (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; P = .007). Advanced age, pre-transplant kidney dysfunction, and postoperative acute kidney injury are risk factors for CKD after LT. Importantly, delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction can protect patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction from developing post-transplant CKD. These results may have important clinical implications in reducing the incidence of CKD after LT.

Differential Impact of the UNOS Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplant Policy Change Among Patients With Sustained Acute Kidney Injury.

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLK) allocation policy in the United States was revised in August 2017, reducing access for liver transplant candidates with sustained acute kidney injury (sAKI) and potentially adversely impacting vulnerable populations whose true renal function is overestimated by commonly used estimation equations. We examined national transplant registry data containing information for all liver transplant recipients from June 2013 to December 2021 to assess the impact of this policy change using instrumental variable estimation based on date of listing. Posttransplant survival was compared for propensity-matched patients with sAKI who were only eligible for liver transplant alone (LTA_post; n = 638) after the policy change but would have been SLK-eligible before August 2017, with similar patients who were previously able to receive an SLK (SLK; n = 319). Overall posttransplant patient survival was similar at 3 y (81% versus 80%; P = 0.9). However, receiving an SLK versus LTA increased survival among African Americans (87% versus 61% at 3 y; P = 0.029). A trend toward survival benefit from SLK versus LTA, especially later in the follow-up period, was observed in recipients ≥ age 60 (3-y survival: 84% versus 76%; P = 0.2) and women (86% versus 80%; P = 0.2). The 2017 United Network for Organ Sharing SLK Allocation Policy was associated with reduced survival of African Americans with end-stage liver disease and sAKI and, potentially, older patients and women. Our study suggested the use of race-neutral estimation of renal function would ameliorate racial disparities in the SLK arena; however, further studies are needed to reduce disparity in posttransplant outcomes among patients with liver and kidney failure.

The financial burden after liver transplantation is significant among commercially insured adults: A large US National Cohort.

Liver transplantation (LT) is lifesaving for patients with cirrhosis; however, the resultant financial burden to patients has not been well characterized. We aimed to provide a nationally representative portrayal of patient financial burden after LT. Adult recipients of LT from 2006 to 2021 were identified using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics-a large nationally representative claims database of commercially insured Americans. Patient financial liability (ie, what patients owe) was estimated using the difference between allowed and paid costs for adjudicated medical/pharmacy claims. Descriptive statistics were provided stratified by the financial liability group within 1 year after LT. Multivariable logistic regression modeling identified factors associated with high/extreme liability adjusting for covariates. Potential indirect costs of post-LT care were estimated based on hourly wages lost for care. Among 1412 recipients of LT, financial liability was heterogeneous-~3% had no liability and 21% had extreme liability > $10K for 1-year post-LT care; most (69%) paid between $1 and 10K, with 48% having liability >$5K. Factors associated with >$5K liability included older age, insurance/enrollment type, US region, history of HCC, and simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (for liability >$10K). Medication costs comprised ~30% of outpatient financial liability. Potential indirect costs from wages lost were $2,201-$6,073 per person, depending on an hourly wage. In a large national cohort of commercially insured recipients of LT, financial liability was highly variable across sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; nearly 1 out of 2 recipients of LT owed >$5K for 1 year of post-LT care. Transplant programs should help patients anticipate potential costs and identify vulnerable populations who would benefit from enhanced financial counseling.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation in pediatric patients.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is a surgical procedure that involves transplanting both liver and kidney organs. There are two types of CLKT: simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (smLKT) and sequential LKT (sqLKT). CLKT accounts for a small percentage of liver transplantations (LTs), particularly in pediatric cases. Nevertheless, the procedure has demonstrated excellent outcomes, with high survival rates and lower rejection rates. The main indications for CLKT in pediatric patients differ somewhat from that in adults, in which end-stage kidney disease after LT is the major indication. In children, congenital diseases are common reason for performing CLKT; the examples of such diseases include autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease with congenital hepatic fibrosis which equally affects both organs, and primary hyperoxaluria type 1, a primary liver disease leading kidney failure. The decision between smLKT or sqLKT depends on the dominant organ failure, the specific pathophysiology, and available organ sources. However, there remain significant surgical and societal challenges surrounding CLKT. Innovations in pharmacology and genetic engineering have decreased the necessity for CLKT in early-diagnosed cases without portal hypertension or kidney replacement therapy. Nonetheless, these advancements are not universally accessible. Therefore, decision-making algorithms should be crafted, considering region-specific organ allocation systems and prevailing medical environments.

Differential in Kidney Graft Years on the Basis of Solitary Kidney, Simultaneous Liver-Kidney, and Kidney-after-Liver Transplants.

The number of simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplants has significantly increased in the United States. There has also been an increase in kidney-after-liver transplants associated with 2017 policy revisions aimed to fairly allocate kidneys after livers. SLK and kidney-after-liver candidates are prioritized in allocation policy for kidney offers ahead of kidney-alone candidates. We compared kidney graft outcomes of kidney-alone transplant recipients with SLK and kidney-after-liver transplants using paired kidney models to mitigate differences among donor risk factors. We evaluated recipient characteristics between transplant types and calculated differential graft years using restricted mean survival estimates. We evaluated 3053 paired donors to kidney-alone and SLK recipients and 516 paired donors to kidney-alone and kidney-after-liver recipients from August 2017 to August 2022. Kidney-alone recipients were younger, more likely on dialysis, and Black race. One-year and 3-year post-transplant kidney graft survival for kidney-alone recipients was 94% and 86% versus SLK recipients 89% and 80%, respectively, P < 0.001. One-year and 3-year kidney graft survival for kidney-alone recipients was 94% and 84% versus kidney-after-liver recipients 93% and 87%, respectively, P = 0.53. The additional kidney graft years for kidney-alone versus SLK transplants was 21 graft years/100 transplants (SEM=5.0) within 4 years post-transplantation, with no significant difference between kidney-after-liver and kidney-alone transplants. Over a 5-year period in the United States, SLK transplantation was associated with significantly lower kidney graft survival compared with paired kidney-alone transplants. Most differences in graft survival between SLK and kidney-alone transplants occurred within the first year post-transplantation. By contrast, kidney-after-liver transplants had comparable graft survival with paired kidney-alone transplants.

The Effect of New Acuity Circle Policy on Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in the United States

New deceased donor liver allocation policy using an acuity circle (AC)-based model was implemented on February 4th, 2020. The effect of AC policy on simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of AC policy on SLKT waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant outcomes. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 4908 adult SLKT candidates during two study periods, pre-AC (Aug-2017 to Feb-2020, N=2770) and post-AC (Feb-2020 to Dec-2021, N=2138) were analyzed. Outcomes included 90-day waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant patient and graft survival. Compared to pre-AC period, SLKT recipients during post-AC period had higher median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (24 vs 23, P<0.001), and less percentage of MELD exception (4.6% vs 7.7%, P=0.001). The 90-day waitlist mortality was same, but the probability of SLKT increased in post-AC period (P<0.001). Post-AC period also saw increased utilization of donation after cardiac death organs (11% vs 6.4%, P<0.001) and decreased rates of transplantation among Black candidates (7.9% vs 13%). After risk adjustment, post-AC period was not associated with any significant difference in 90-day waitlist mortality (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.80; 95% CI 0.56-1.16, P=0.24), and a higher 90-day probability of SLKT (sHR 1.68; 95% CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.001). During post-transplant period, one-year patient survival, liver and kidney graft survival were comparable between two study periods. The AC liver allocation policy was associated with increased transplant probability of adult SLKT candidates without decreasing waitlist mortality, post-transplant patient survival, or liver and kidney graft survival.

Outcomes of kidney, liver, and simultaneous liver and kidney transplants from hepatitis c infected donors to hepatitis c naïve recipients: A large single center experience.

With the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAAs), the non-use rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donor organs (D+) has decreased significantly. We present the donor, recipient, and transplant allograft characteristics, along with recipient outcomes, in one of the largest cohorts of HCV-D+ transplants into HCV-naïve recipients (R-). Charts of HCV D+/R- kidney (KT), liver (LT), and simultaneous liver-kidney (SLKT) transplant recipients between January 2019 and July 2022 were reviewed. Primary outcomes of interest included waitlist times and 1-year graft failure. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, post-transplant complications, effectiveness of DAA therapy, and characteristics of patients who relapsed from initial DAA therapy. Fifty-five HCV D+/R- transplants at our center [42 KT (26 nucleic acid testing positive [NAT+], 16 NAT-), 12 LT (eight NAT+, four NAT-), and one SLKT (NAT+)] had a median waitlist time of 69days for KT, 87days for LT, and 15days for SLKT. There were no graft failures at 1year. All viremic recipients were treated with a 12-week course of DAAs, of which 100% achieved end of treatment response (EOTR)-85.7% (n=30) achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) and 14.3% relapsed (n=5; four KT, one LT). All relapsed recipients were retreated and achieved SVR. The most common post-transplantation complications include BK virus infection (n=9) for KT and non-allograft infections (n=4) for LT. Our study has demonstrated no graft failures or recipient deaths at 1year, and despite a 14.3% relapse rate, we achieved 100% SVR. Complications rates of D+/R- appeared comparable to national D-/R- complication rates. Further studies comparing D+/R- to D-/R- outcomes are needed.

Decreased need for RRT in liver transplant recipients after pretransplant treatment of hepatorenal syndrome-type 1 with terlipressin.

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), a serious complication of decompensated cirrhosis, has limited therapeutic options and significant morbidity and mortality. Terlipressin improves renal function in some patients with HRS-1, while liver transplantation (LT) is a curative treatment for advanced chronic liver disease. Renal failure post-LT requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a major risk factor for graft and patient survival. A post hoc analysis with a 12-month follow-up of LT recipients from a placebo-controlled trial of terlipressin (CONFIRM; NCT02770716) was conducted to evaluate the need for RRT and overall survival. Patients with HRS-1 were treated with terlipressin plus albumin or placebo plus albumin for up to 14 days. RRT was defined as any type of procedure that replaced kidney function. Outcomes compared between groups included the incidence of HRS-1 reversal, the need for RRT (pretransplant and posttransplant), and overall survival. Of the 300 patients in CONFIRM (terlipressin n = 199; placebo, n = 101), 70 (23%) underwent LT alone (terlipressin, n = 43; placebo, n = 27) and 5 had simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (terlipressin, n = 3, placebo, n = 2). The rate of HRS reversal was significantly higher in the terlipressin group compared with the placebo group (37%, n = 16 vs. 15%, n = 4; p = 0.033). The pretransplant need for RRT was significantly lower among those who received terlipressin ( p = 0.007). The posttransplant need for RRT, at 12 months, was significantly lower among those patients who received terlipressin and were alive at Day 365, compared to placebo ( p = 0.009). Pretransplant treatment with terlipressin plus albumin in patients with HRS-1 decreased the need for RRT pretransplant and posttransplant.

S3544 A Rare Case of Calciphylaxis in a Patient With Cirrhosis and Chronic Kidney Disease That Resolved After Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation

S3544 A Rare Case of Calciphylaxis in a Patient With Cirrhosis and Chronic Kidney Disease That Resolved After Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation

S1523 Patients Receiving Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Have Improved In-Hospital Outcomes Compared to Patients in the Safety Net Pathway

S1523 Patients Receiving Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Have Improved In-Hospital Outcomes Compared to Patients in the Safety Net Pathway

Hepatorenal syndrome: Updates.

Hepatorenal syndrome: Updates.

COVID-19 Disease in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation from Alpha to Omicron: A High Monocyte Count in the Preceding Three Months Portends a Risk for Severe Disease.

Planning for future resurgences in SARS-CoV-2 infection is necessary for providers who care for immunocompromised patients. to determine factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity in immunosuppressed children. a case series of children with solid organ transplants diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between 15 March 2020 and 31 March 2023. a single pediatric transplant center. all children with a composite transplant (liver, pancreas, intestine), isolated intestine transplant (IT), isolated liver transplant LT), or simultaneous liver kidney transplant (SLK) with a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 infection. We hypothesized that children on the most immunosuppression, defined by the number of immunosuppressive medications and usage of steroids, would have the most severe disease course and that differential white blood cell count in the months preceding infection would be associated with likelihood of having severe disease. The hypothesis being tested was formulated during data collection. The primary study outcome measurement was disease severity defined using WHO criteria. 77 children (50 LT, 24 intestine, 3 SLK) were infected with SARS-CoV-2, 57.4 months from transplant (IQR 19.7-87.2). 17% were ≤1 year post transplant at infection. 55% were male, 58% were symptomatic and ~29% had severe disease. A high absolute lymphocyte count at diagnosis decreased the odds of having severe COVID-19 disease (OR 0.29; CI 0.11-0.60; p = 0.004). Conversely, patients with a high absolute monocyte count in the three months preceding infection had increased odds of having severe disease (OR 30.49; CI 1.68-1027.77; p = 0.033). Steroid use, higher tacrolimus level, and number of immunosuppressive medications at infection did not increase the odds of having severe disease. The significance of a high monocyte count as predictor of severe disease potentially confirms the importance of monocytic inflammasome-driven inflammation in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Our data do not support reducing immunosuppression in the setting of infection. Our observations may have important ramifications in resource management as vaccine- and infection-induced immunity wanes.

Detailed Analysis of Simultaneous Renal and Liver Allografts in the Presence of DSA.

We reevaluated allograft biopsies from simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients who had both allografts biopsied within 60 d of one another and within 30 d of DSA being positive in serum (positive: mean florescence intensity ≥5000). Routine histology, C4d staining, and specialized immunohistochemistry for Kupffer cells (KCs; CD163) and a C4d receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript-4 were carried out in 4 patients with 6 paired biopsies. Overt antibody-mediated rejection was found in 3 of 4 renal and liver allografts. One patient had biopsy-confirmed renal and liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection despite serum clearance of DSA. All biopsies showed KC hypertrophy (minimal: 1; mild: 2; moderate: 1; severe: 2) and cytoplasmic C4d KC staining was easily detected in 2 biopsies from 2 patients; minimal and negative in 2 biopsies each. Implications of which are discussed. Control 1-y protocol liver allograft biopsies from DSA- recipients showed neither KC hypertrophy nor KC C4d staining (n = 6). Partial renal allograft protection by a liver allograft from the same donor may be partially mediated by phagocytosis/elimination of antibody and complement split products by KCs, as shown decades ago in controlled sensitized experimental animal experiments.

First case of simultaneous liver-kidney transplant in a patient with primary hyperoxaluria in the state of Santa Catarina - Brazil

Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a rare disorder, resulting from an excessive production of calcium oxalate mainly by the liver, which can be deposited in different organs. Patients affected by PH can progress to recurrent lithiasis, nephrocalcinosis and end-stage renal disease, requiring a kidney transplant for the recovery of organ function, associated with liver transplantation, to correct the source of this metabolic defect.1 The case of MJB, female, 27 years old, was reported in this paper, which is the first recorded case of simultaneous transplantation of this nature in the transplant service of Hospital Santa Isabel - Blumenau and consequently the first in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. She discovered the disorder through genetic sequencing at the age of 24.2 The patient had already been on renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, for 4 years. Due to the severe complications of the disease, simultaneous kidney and liver transplantation was indicated. Considering the evolution of the patient up to the present moment, the transplant in this case proved to be a very effective therapeutic alternative, and in agreement with the literature.1,3

One size does not fit all: Differential benefits of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation by eligibility criteria.

Standard eligibility criteria for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) are in place in the United States. We hypothesize that the benefit associated with SLK over liver transplant alone differs by patient, depending on the specific SLK criteria met. We analyzed a retrospective US cohort of 5446 adult liver transplant or SLK recipients between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, who are potentially qualified for SLK. Exposure was a receipt of SLK. We tested effect modification by the specific SLK eligibility criteria met (end-stage kidney disease, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, or unknown). The primary outcome was death within 1 year of a liver transplant. We used a modified Cox regression analysis containing an interaction term of SLK * time from transplant. Two hundred ten (9%) SLK recipients and 351 (11%) liver-alone recipients died in 1 year. In the overall population, SLK was associated with a mortality benefit over liver transplant on the day of the transplant, without adjustment [HR: 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76)] and with adjustment [aHR: 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35-0.71)]. However, when SLK eligibility criteria were included, only in patients with end-stage kidney disease was SLK associated with a sustained survival benefit at day 0 [HR: 0.17 (0.08-0.35)] up to 288 (95% CI, 120-649) days post-transplant. Benefit within the first year post-transplant associated with SLK over liver-alone transplantation was only pronounced in patients with end-stage kidney disease but not present in patients meeting other criteria for SLK. A "strict SLK liberal Safety Net" strategy may warrant consideration at the national policy level.

Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant With Planned Delayed Implantation of the Kidney Graft After Ex Vivo Perfusion.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) is an established option for patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Recent studies in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation demonstrate favorable outcomes achieved by delaying implantation of the kidney for over 24 h. This report describes a case series of consecutive patients listed for SHK who had planned delayed implantation of the kidney graft. This case series represents a retrospective analysis of SHK patients extracted from the transplant database at a single center. There were 7 patients who underwent SHK during the study period. In all cases, kidney grafts were maintained on hypothermic ex vivo pulsatile perfusion for delayed implantation (mean cold ischemia 53 h [range, 31-69]). The first 5 patients had 100% 1-y heart and kidney graft survival with good function. Patient 6 was unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-heart transplant. The kidney was implanted at 69 h, and the patient died soon thereafter. Patient 7 was also unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart transplant. The decision was made to implant the kidney into a backup kidney recipient. The heart transplant recipient subsequently died several days later, whereas the kidney was successfully transplanted in the alternate candidate. This case series highlights the potential utility of delayed kidney implantation in SHK patients. SHK with delayed renal transplant may provide an improved physiologic environment for renal transplant, which may result in improved early renal graft function. Delayed kidney transplant also provides the opportunity to transplant the kidney graft into an alternate candidate.

THU-488 - Sex-based differences and comparative predictive value of MELD 3.0 in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation waitlist outcomes after standardization of listing criteria in the United States

THU-488 - Sex-based differences and comparative predictive value of MELD 3.0 in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation waitlist outcomes after standardization of listing criteria in the United States

Non-Renal Factors Associated with Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease and Stage 3-5 Chronic Kidney Disease Not Requiring Dialysis

We aimed to identify the non-renal risk factors for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) vs. liver transplantation alone (LTA) in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt;60 ml/min, not on dialysis. Using organ procurement and transplantation network data, we studied adult ESLD patients who received deceased-donor SLKT or LTA in July 2002-Mar 2016 with a 4-point modification of renal disease (MDRD) equation-estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stratified into chronic kidney disease stage 3 (CKD-3): 30-59 ml/min, CKD stage 4 (CKD-4): 15-29 ml/min, and CKD stage 5 (CKD-5): &lt;15 ml/min) and not on maintenance dialysis (NOD). The outcome of the study was identification of non-renal risk factors predicting likelihood of SLKT vs. LTA. We reported the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for SLKT vs. LTA associated with important clinical variables. Strong non-renal (non-creatinine-associated) risk factors for SLKT were WL-time &gt;2 yrs. and 1-2 yrs. (OR = 3.80, CI = 2.94-4.91; OR = 3.20, CI = 2.58-3.97; respectively), African American or Hispanic recipient race/ethnicity (OR = 2.93, CI = 2.45-3.51; OR = 1.46, CI = 1.24-1.72; respectively), liver repeat transplant (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.39-1.99), and diabetes (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.36-1.72). Factors associated with lower likelihood of SLKT were donor age &gt;60 years (OR = 0.25, CI = 0.19-0.32), female recipient sex (OR = 0.48, CI = 0.43-0.54), hepatocellular carcinoma (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.35-0.81), and transplant center procedure volume tercile ranks 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; (OR = 0.74, CI = 0.62-0.89) and 2&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt; (OR = 0.78, CI = 0.64-0.95). Model for end-stage liver disease scores have varying associations with SLKT vs. LTA, depending on calculation time: at wait listing or transplant. CKD-5 and -4 at wait listing (WL) and transplant were the risk factors with highest point estimates for SLKT vs. LTA. In patients with ESLD and CKD stage 3-5, not on dialysis, strong non-renal risk factors favoring SLKT versus LTA include: prolonged waitlist time, African American or Hispanic race/ethnicity, previous liver transplant, and diabetes. Some novel associations found between risk factors and likelihood of SLKT need further study for confirmation. Lack of uniform criteria for SLK allocation during the period studied is a major limitation of the study.