Simultaneous Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Deceased donor non-composite split liver and intestinal transplantation for children.

Children with intestinal failure suffer liver damage associated with parenteral nutrition: a condition known as intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), which requires transplantation of both liver and intestine. In many countries, simultaneous transplantation of these two organs is performed using grafts from a deceased donor, but there have been no such cases in Japan, and the details of the procedure are not clear. Recently, we performed simultaneous split liver and intestinal transplantation in two premature infants with IFALD, using organs from identical deceased donors and achieved good results. These are the first two cases of this procedure being performed in Japan. We report these cases and discuss the important aspects of the surgical and perioperative management.

Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in Patients Aged 70 y and Older: Proceed With Caution.

The number of elderly patients aged 70 y and older with liver and kidney failure is increasing, mainly because of increasing prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. At present, limited data are available on the outcomes of elderly patients who fit the criteria for dual organ transplantation since the implementation of the simultaneous liver and kidney (SLK) allocation policy. We performed a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database of adults aged 18 y and older undergoing SLK and kidney transplantation only from August 11, 2017, to December 31, 2022. We examined patient and graft survivals and compared the outcomes of the recipients aged 70 y and older undergoing SLK transplantation to those who received kidney transplant alone and kidney after liver transplant. During the study period, there has been a significant rise in the number of patients aged 70 y and older undergoing SLK transplantation, with 6 patients undergoing SLK transplantation in 2017 and 63 in 2021. Patients aged 70 y and older had significantly lower survival with 82.9% at 1 y and 66.5% at 3 y compared with 89.3% and 78.8% in the 50-69 y age group and 93.2% and 88.6% in the 18-49 y age group, respectively. Overall, kidney allograft survival was significantly lower in the 70 y and older group, with 80.9% at 1 y and 66.4% at 3 y compared with 91.1% and 75.5%, respectively, in those undergoing kidney transplant alone. There was no difference in kidney allograft survival in those undergoing SLK and kidney after liver transplantation. Although the outcomes are inferior in recipients of SLK transplant aged 70 y and older, chronologic age should not preclude them from undergoing transplantation. Kidney transplantation after liver transplantation could be considered to avoid futile transplants.

Successful A2 to O Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in the Setting of Pre-operative Positive HLA Crossmatch: A Case Report

Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) is possible for patients with high donor-specific HLA antibodies or with A2 donors to O recipients with high A2 titers. We report the first case of SLKT in a highly sensitized O recipient with organs from an A2 donor. The recipient is a 59-year-old woman with chronic kidney disease and liver failure due to autoimmune hepatitis and drug-induced liver injury. Immune work-up 8 days pre-transplant demonstrated a negative crossmatch and no HLA antibody (calculated panel reactive antibodies = 0%). Anti-A2 IgG levels were 512. The donor was a deceased 24-year-old man. One day before transplantation, serum from the recipient showed a significant increase in antibody reactivity (calculated panel reactive antibodies = 100%) attributable to blood product transfusion and memory response from previous pregnancies. Consequently, a crossmatch was positive for T and B cells with two newly detected HLA antibodies against the donor's antigens. On the day of surgery, the liver was transplanted first. Six hours and 37 minutes later, a repeat flow crossmatch was negative; donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) fell below the positive threshold, and anti-A2 IgG titer fell to 256. Thus, the kidney was transplanted after basiliximab induction therapy. Seven days post-transplant, non-donor-specific HLA antibodies were present but DSAs remain negative. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 57 with no signs of rejection at 4 months. This case illustrates a rapid and prolonged reduction in antibody titers (HLA and ABO) after SLKT. SLKT is feasible in patients with both DSA and high anti-A2 titer.

#2932 Our experience in combined and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: recipient and kidney graft survival

Abstract Background and Aims Simultaneous combined liver-kidney transplantation is a definitive treatment in patients with terminal failure of both organs, but sometimes, assessing the indication for said combined transplantation can be difficult. The liver from the same donor as the kidney graft protects the kidney immunologically and this provides long-term follow-up with a lower risk of rejection. No such protection is observed when both organs come from different cadaveric donors. There are no differences in graft survival in simultaneous or isolated transplants (liver or kidney), being prolonged in both cases. However, patient survival is lower, due to the complexity of this procedure and the clinical characteristics of the patients. The main aim is to analyze the evolution of patients with combined and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in our center in terms of graft survival and overall survival of the recipient. Method It is a retrospective observational study. The computerized clinical history of 50 patients with combined liver-kidney transplantation was reviewed from August 1998 to November 2023. The data were recorded in an Excell-type database. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed for the analysis. Results 50 combined liver-kidney transplants have been performed, of which 28 (56%) died, and 23 of them (82%) with the kidney graft functioning. The main causes of death were neoplasms (11 patients) and infections (7 patients). The survival of the patients at 5 years was approximately 70%. There were 5 cases of kidney graft loss, excluding death. Chronic rejection was the main cause (70-80%) of kidney graft loss. 60% received a kidney transplant again and died with the graft functioning; 20% died while on hemodialysis; and the remaining 20% are awaiting hemodialysis and are being studied for another kidney transplant. Conclusion Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation is a good therapeutic option for patients with terminal disease of both organs. However, it is a complex procedure in patients with multiple comorbidities, which affects overall survival. In contrast, kidney graft survival is prolonged and many recipients die with functioning grafts. It seems to be related to the immunological protective function of the liver. Consequently, there are few rejections and, the vast majority are chronic rejection.

Kidney after liver transplantation does not have an increased risk of rejection compared to liver alone.

Simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplant protects against acute cellular rejection. In 2017, UNOS implemented a "safety net" policy to allow patients with renal recovery to avoid renal transplantation. Whether kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) increases the risk of rejection is unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database of adult patients who received liver transplant, SLK or KALT between 2010 and 2020. We examined rejection of the liver within 6 months and 1 year of the liver transplant, as well as rejection of the kidney within 6 months and 1 year of receiving the kidney, as well as patient and graft loss. Sixty-six thousand seventy-nine patients were transplanted; 60 168 with liver transplant alone, 5627 with SLK, and 284 with KALT. Acute or chronic liver rejection rates within 6 or 12 months were statistically higher in the KALT group (10.0% and 10.9%) compared to the SLK group (6.1% and 7.5%), but comparable to the LTA group (9.3% and 11.1%). Kidney rejection and graft survival rates were not different. Liver graft survival was worse in KALT than SLK or LTA (Kaplan-Meier estimates.61vs..89 and.90), but these patients were more ill at the time of transplantation. KDPI and LDRI scores were notably lower in the SLK than KALT group. Patient survival was not clinically different between the groups. KALT does not increase the risk of acute or chronic kidney rejection. SLK has a lower risk of early liver rejection, but this effect diminishes by one year to being not clinically different compared to KALT. Given that KALT is immunologically safe, and potentially avoids unnecessary renal graft use, it should be preferred over SLK. Patients undergoing sequential kidney after liver transplant do not have an increased risk of liver or kidney rejection when compared to liver transplant alone or simultaneous liver and kidney transplant.

Including the liver in the visceral allograft: Impact on donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and long-term outcomes

Humoral immunity emerges as a risk factor for graft failure after visceral transplantation (VTx) and development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) has been linked with poor outcomes. In most cases, a simultaneous liver transplant can be safely performed in sensitized patients with DSA and appears protective against lymphocytotoxic antibodies. We investigated the incidence of acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) in 32 VTx without any B cell-depleting pre-treatment (6 isolated intestinal transplants (IT) and 26 liver-containing, multivisceral transplants (MVT) and assessed the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) pre- and post-transplantation. Twenty-one patients (65 %) developed AR, 15 (57 %) of the MVT and 6 (100 %) of the IT (p = 0.05). CR occurred in 4 IT (60 %, p < 0.001). At one month, de novo DSA were present in 71 % of VTx (66 % MVT vs 100 % IT, p = 0.09). At the last available follow-up, 69 % of the MVT and 50 % of the IT patients were DSA-free. De novo DSA seemed more persistent (7/19, 37 %) than pre-Tx DSA (1/6, 17 %; p = n.s.), de novo DSA were more frequently specific for HLA class II than class I, 16/19 (84 %) vs. 7/19 (37 %; p = 0.003), and HLA-DQ was their most frequent target HLA. DQ mismatches appeared to be a risk factor for developing de novo DSA. In conclusion, liver-containing visceral allografts have superior short- and long-term outcomes compared with liver-free allografts. De novo DSA develop early and frequently after VTx performed without B cell-depleting induction therapy, but the exact role of DSA in the pathogenesis of rejection remains unclear.

The Effect of New Acuity Circle Policy on Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in the United States

New deceased donor liver allocation policy using an acuity circle (AC)-based model was implemented on February 4th, 2020. The effect of AC policy on simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of AC policy on SLKT waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant outcomes. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 4908 adult SLKT candidates during two study periods, pre-AC (Aug-2017 to Feb-2020, N=2770) and post-AC (Feb-2020 to Dec-2021, N=2138) were analyzed. Outcomes included 90-day waitlist mortality, transplant probability, and post-transplant patient and graft survival. Compared to pre-AC period, SLKT recipients during post-AC period had higher median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (24 vs 23, P<0.001), and less percentage of MELD exception (4.6% vs 7.7%, P=0.001). The 90-day waitlist mortality was same, but the probability of SLKT increased in post-AC period (P<0.001). Post-AC period also saw increased utilization of donation after cardiac death organs (11% vs 6.4%, P<0.001) and decreased rates of transplantation among Black candidates (7.9% vs 13%). After risk adjustment, post-AC period was not associated with any significant difference in 90-day waitlist mortality (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.80; 95% CI 0.56-1.16, P=0.24), and a higher 90-day probability of SLKT (sHR 1.68; 95% CI 1.41-1.99, P<0.001). During post-transplant period, one-year patient survival, liver and kidney graft survival were comparable between two study periods. The AC liver allocation policy was associated with increased transplant probability of adult SLKT candidates without decreasing waitlist mortality, post-transplant patient survival, or liver and kidney graft survival.

Primary hyperoxaluria: a case series

BackgroundPrimary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by the excessive production and accumulation of oxalate. We present five cases of PH, each exhibiting varying manifestations of the disorder including a case presenting as postpartum kidney failure. Notably, three of these cases involve a previously unreported mutation.Case presentationsWe evaluated five Indian patients who presented with varying manifestations of PH. The first case, a 30 year old woman, presented as post-partum kidney failure and was found to be having oxalate nephropathy precipitated by dietary oxalate overload in the setting of previously undiagnosed PH. Genetic analysis revealed a previously unreported mutation in the alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase gene. The patient underwent simultaneous kidney liver transplant. The second and third cases, 26 and 28 year old women respectively, were asymptomatic siblings of the first patient, who were diagnosed through screening. The fourth case is a 12 year boy with PH type 1 presenting as nephrolithiasis and rapidly worsening kidney function requiring combined kidney liver kidney transplant. Case 5 is a 6 year old male child with type 2 PH presenting with nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis and normal kidney function. All the patients were born to consanguineous parents.ConclusionsDue to limited clinical suspicion and inadequate diagnostic resources in certain countries with limited resources, it is possible for PH to go undiagnosed. The manifestations of the disease can range from no noticeable symptoms to severe disease. Interestingly, in some individuals with primary hyperoxaluria, the disease may not exhibit any symptoms until it is triggered by a high intake of dietary oxalate.

Feasible living donor liver transplantation for patients on chronic hemodialysis: a multicenter study in East Asian countries.

End-stage liver and kidney disease is an indication for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. However, in countries where deceased donor transplantation is not well established, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a realistic option for patients on hemodialysis (HD). We investigated the outcomes of LDLT for patients on HD. We conducted a retrospective multicenter survey of patients on chronic HD who underwent LDLT in East Asian countries. The characteristics of donors and recipients and the short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Between 2001 and 2021, 45 patients on HD underwent LDLT and 11 of these patients also underwent kidney transplantation (KT). The overall survival rate at 5years of the 34 patients who underwent only LDLT was 44.5%. Multivariate analysis identified a low graft recipient weight ratio (< 1%) (p = 0.048) and long HD duration (≥ 10years) (p = 0.046) as independent predictors of poor overall survival. The major complication was posttransplant bleeding, which occurred in12 patients (35%). It is important to establish the indications for LDLT, taking into consideration graft size and HD duration in candidate patients on HD.

Domino liver transplantation for maple syrup urine disease in children: A single-center case series.

Domino liver transplant (DLT) represents another type of liver donor to expand the donor pool. Recent reports of successful DLT in children with maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) show promising long-term outcomes. It was a retrospective study. All children with MSUD were paired with either recipients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) or non-MSUD metabolic disease. Each pair underwent simultaneous liver transplant (LT), where the MSUD recipient received the graft from a living-related donor and the liver explanted from the MSUD donor was transplanted to the respective paired domino recipient. We report our experience regarding the techniques and outcomes of DLT at our center. Eleven children with MSUD and 12 respective DLT recipients were enrolled, one of which was domino split-liver transplantation. DLT recipients included seven ESLD, two propionic acidemia (PA), one glycogen storage disease(GSD) type-1, one GSD type-3, and one Citrullinemia. Post-LT ICU and hospital stays were comparable (p > .05). Patient and graft survival was 100% and 66.6% in the MSUD group and DLT recipients at a mean follow-up of 13.5 and 15 months. There was no death in the MSUD group as compared to four in the DLT group. The amino acid levels rapidly normalized after the LT in the children with MSUD and they tolerated the normal unrestricted diet. No vascular, biliary, or graft-related complications were seen in the post-transplant period. No occurrence of MSUD was noted in DLT recipients. DLTs have excellent post-surgical outcomes. DLT should be strongly considered and adopted by transplant programs worldwide to circumvent organ shortage.

Hepatorenal syndrome: Updates.

Hepatorenal syndrome: Updates.

Simultaneous 3-way Paired Exchange Liver Transplantation Without Nondirected Donation: Novel Strategy to Expand the Donor Pool.

Simultaneous 3-way Paired Exchange Liver Transplantation Without Nondirected Donation: Novel Strategy to Expand the Donor Pool.

Primary hyperoxaluria I, II, III types in children (review of literature)

This review presents the latest data on the classification, pathogenesis, clinical and genetic features, and therapy of primary hyperoxaluria types I, II, and III in children with autosomal recessive inheritance. ORPHA portal of orphan diseases presents genes responsible for primary hyperoxaluria type I AGXT (93598); type II and type II GRHPR (93599), type III HOGA1 (93600). Worldwide genetic studies have established the pathogenesis, clinical phenotype and genotype features of primary hyperoxaluria. The pathogenesis of primary hyperoxaluria in children is based on impaired hepatic glyoxylate metabolism. The enzyme AGT catalyzes the conversion of L-alanine and glyoxylate to pyruvate and glycine, with vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) serving as a coenzyme for this reaction. Increased production of endogenous oxalate leads to increased blood oxalate concentrations and urinary oxalate excretion with the formation of renal calcium oxalate crystals and radiopaque concrements (calcium oxalate monohydrate – vevelite, calcium oxalate dihydrate – vedellite). High risk of progression to chronic kidney disease in primary hyperoxaluria in children of types I and II. Systemic oxalosis develops with increasing serum oxalate levels and the formation of calcium oxalate crystals with deposition in many organs and tissues. Therapy for primary hyperoxaluria in children includes: hydration (3l/m2/day) and citrates 100–150 mg/kg/day (potassium citrate 0.3–0.5 mmol/kg/day), pyridoxine at a dose of 5 to 20 mg/kg/day for vitamin B6 sensitive type I primary hyperoxaluria. Administration of oxalobacter formigenes and diet is effective. Combined liver and then kidney transplantation or simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation in patients with type I PH in B6-insensitive and isolated liver transplantation in B6-sensitive variants are performed. Timely molecular genetic testing in children with nephrocalcinosis makes it possible to establish a clinical and genetic diagnosis of type I, II, III PH, to carry out a personalised approach to treatment and to predict future health status.

Transplantation in paediatric patients with MMA requires multidisciplinary approach for achievement of good clinical outcomes

BackgroundAs modern medicine is advancing, younger, small, and more complex children are becoming multi-organ transplant candidates. This brings up new challenges in all aspects of their care.MethodsWe describe the first report of a small child receiving a simultaneous liver and kidney transplant and abdominal rectus sheath fascia transplant on the background of Williams syndrome and methylmalonic acidaemia. At the time of transplantation, the child was 3 years old, weighed 14.0 kg, had chronic kidney disease stage V, and had not yet started any other form of kidney replacement therapy.ResultsThere were many anaesthetic, medical, metabolic, and surgical challenges to consider in this case. A long general anaesthetic time increased the risk of cardiac complications and metabolic decompensation. Additionally, the small size of the patient and the organ size mis-match meant that primary abdominal closure was not possible. The patient’s recovery was further complicated by sepsis, transient CNI toxicity, and de novo DSAs.ConclusionsThrough a multidisciplinary approach between 9 specialties in 4 hospitals across England and Wales, and detailed pre-operative planning, a good outcome was achieved for this child. An hour by hour management protocol was drafted to facilitate transplant and included five domains: 1. management at the time of organ offer; 2. before the admission; 3. at admission and before theatre time; 4. intra-operative management; and 5. post-operative management in the first 24 h. Importantly, gaining a clear and in depth understanding of the metabolic state of the patient pre- and peri-operatively was crucial in avoiding metabolic decompensation. Furthermore, an abdominal rectus sheath fascia transplant was required to achieve abdominal closure, which to our knowledge, had never been done before for this indication. Using our experience of this complex case, as well as our experience in transplanting other children with MMA, and through a literature review, we propose a new perioperative management pathway for this complex cohort of transplant recipients.

Non-Renal Factors Associated with Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease and Stage 3-5 Chronic Kidney Disease Not Requiring Dialysis

We aimed to identify the non-renal risk factors for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) vs. liver transplantation alone (LTA) in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt;60 ml/min, not on dialysis. Using organ procurement and transplantation network data, we studied adult ESLD patients who received deceased-donor SLKT or LTA in July 2002-Mar 2016 with a 4-point modification of renal disease (MDRD) equation-estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stratified into chronic kidney disease stage 3 (CKD-3): 30-59 ml/min, CKD stage 4 (CKD-4): 15-29 ml/min, and CKD stage 5 (CKD-5): &lt;15 ml/min) and not on maintenance dialysis (NOD). The outcome of the study was identification of non-renal risk factors predicting likelihood of SLKT vs. LTA. We reported the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for SLKT vs. LTA associated with important clinical variables. Strong non-renal (non-creatinine-associated) risk factors for SLKT were WL-time &gt;2 yrs. and 1-2 yrs. (OR = 3.80, CI = 2.94-4.91; OR = 3.20, CI = 2.58-3.97; respectively), African American or Hispanic recipient race/ethnicity (OR = 2.93, CI = 2.45-3.51; OR = 1.46, CI = 1.24-1.72; respectively), liver repeat transplant (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.39-1.99), and diabetes (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.36-1.72). Factors associated with lower likelihood of SLKT were donor age &gt;60 years (OR = 0.25, CI = 0.19-0.32), female recipient sex (OR = 0.48, CI = 0.43-0.54), hepatocellular carcinoma (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.35-0.81), and transplant center procedure volume tercile ranks 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; (OR = 0.74, CI = 0.62-0.89) and 2&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt; (OR = 0.78, CI = 0.64-0.95). Model for end-stage liver disease scores have varying associations with SLKT vs. LTA, depending on calculation time: at wait listing or transplant. CKD-5 and -4 at wait listing (WL) and transplant were the risk factors with highest point estimates for SLKT vs. LTA. In patients with ESLD and CKD stage 3-5, not on dialysis, strong non-renal risk factors favoring SLKT versus LTA include: prolonged waitlist time, African American or Hispanic race/ethnicity, previous liver transplant, and diabetes. Some novel associations found between risk factors and likelihood of SLKT need further study for confirmation. Lack of uniform criteria for SLK allocation during the period studied is a major limitation of the study.

Is bariatric surgery safer before, during, or after liver transplantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe incidence of morbid obesity is increasing constantly. One of the most common complications related to obesity is represented by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease that can range from fatty liver to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which is progressively becoming the first cause of end-stage liver disease and need for liver transplantation with alcohol hepatitis. Moreover, many factors contribute to an elevated incidence of morbid obesity in the post-transplant setting and individuals with obesity undergoing liver transplantation rarely succeed in losing weight postoperatively. Individuals with obesity in the pre- and post-transplant setting benefit from weight loss with reduced morbidity and mortality. Bariatric surgery is effective in inducing weight loss and obesity-related medical problems resolution but its application in the liver transplant setting is limited.The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore postoperative morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgery performed before, during, or after liver transplantation. MethodThis is a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis of 24 studies based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. ResultsBariatric surgery performed in patients with obesity and end-stage liver disease waiting for liver transplantation is associated with a 5% major post-bariatric surgery complications rate and a 7% 1-year post-liver transplantation mortality. Patients who had bariatric surgery for morbid obesity after liver transplantation had a 16% post-bariatric surgery major complication rate. For patients undergoing simultaneous bariatric surgery and liver transplantation, meta-analysis was not applicable but the review of the literature found 1/10 patients experiencing major postoperative bariatric-related complications and 31/32 patients were alive 1 year after operation. ConclusionBariatric surgery must be performed in selected cases in the setting of liver transplantation. Simultaneous bariatric surgery and liver transplantation are associated with low morbidity and mortality while bariatric surgery after liver transplantation showed increased morbidity. Bariatric surgery before LT is feasible and can improve liver function for patients in transplant waiting list.

Combined Sleeve Gastrectomy with Simultaneous Liver Transplantation

Combined Sleeve Gastrectomy with Simultaneous Liver Transplantation

Simultaneous Sleeve Gastrectomy and Liver Transplantation: Our Preliminary Experience

Simultaneous Sleeve Gastrectomy and Liver Transplantation: Our Preliminary Experience

Hypercrystalluria as a Factor in the Development of Urine Stone Disease, Diagnosis and Directions of Treatment

Under the action of exogenous, androgenic, genetically determined factors, the metabolism of stone-forming salts of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, oxalates, uric acid in the blood serum and their active excretion by the kidneys to the state of hypersaturation (oversaturation) is disturbed) urine is formed. When the level of crystallization inhibitors is disturbed, a saturated salt solution crystallizes with the formation of microliths. The formation of stones in the kidneys is possible only in the presence of «building material» – supersaturated saturated urine, therefore, hyperoxaluria is a pre-stone condition. Treatment measures should be aimed at correcting mineral metabolism in the body after establishing the type of hyperoxaluria using laboratory tests: salt transport, calcium load, dietary test – low-calcium diet, thiazide test and determination of the mineral composition of the removed (removed) stone. Genetically consequential conditions (10–15%) count about 30 varieties in which the main sign or symptom in the manifestation of the disease is urolithiasis. Unfortunately, congenital tubulopathies are not sufficiently studied, so the treatment is symptomatic, in some cases simultaneous kidney and liver transplantation options are possible. Clinically, 4 main forms of hypercrystalluria are distinguished: hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, hyperuricuria, phosphaturia and mixed forms of crystalluria. Acquired forms of hypercrystalluria, of which they are absorptive (type II intestinal hyperabsorption – absorptive hypercalciuria and absorptive hyperoxaluria), are of main clinical interest, which is characteristic of the course of calcium-oxalate urolithiasis. Metaphylaxis of calcium-oxalate urolithiasis is formed on the basis of these data.

Reverse Takotsubo Stress Cardiomyopathy During Liver Transplantation

Reverse Takotsubo Stress Cardiomyopathy During Liver Transplantation