Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss Research Articles

Contralateral Routing of Signal Disrupts Monaural Sound Localization.

In the absence of binaural hearing, individuals with single-sided deafness can adapt to use monaural level and spectral cues to improve their spatial hearing abilities. Contralateral routing of signal is the most common form of rehabilitation for individuals with single-sided deafness. However, little is known about how these devices affect monaural localization cues, which single-sided deafness listeners may become reliant on. This study aimed to investigate the effects of contralateral routing of signal hearing aids on localization performance in azimuth and elevation under monaural listening conditions. Localization was assessed in 10 normal hearing adults under three listening conditions: (1) normal hearing (NH), (2) unilateral plug (NH-plug), and (3) unilateral plug and CROS aided (NH-plug + CROS). Monaural hearing simulation was achieved by plugging the ear with E-A-Rsoft™ FX™ foam earplugs. Stimuli consisted of 150 ms high-pass noise bursts (3-20 kHz), presented in a random order from fifty locations spanning ±70° in the horizontal and ±30° in the vertical plane at 45, 55, and 65 dBA. In the unilateral plugged listening condition, participants demonstrated good localization in elevation and a response bias in azimuth for signals directed at the open ear. A significant decrease in performance in elevation occurs with the contralateral routing of signal hearing device on, evidenced by significant reductions in response gain and low r2 value. Additionally, performance in azimuth is further reduced for contralateral routing of signal aided localization compared to the simulated unilateral hearing loss condition. Use of the contralateral routing of signal device also results in a reduction in promptness of the listener response and an increase in response variability. Results suggest contralateral routing of signal hearing aids disrupt monaural spectral and level cues, which leads to detriments in localization performance in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. Increased reaction time and increasing variability in responses suggests localization is more effortful when wearing the contralateral rerouting of signal device.

Adults with unilateral congenital ear canal atresia – sound localization ability and recognition of speech in competing speech in unaided condition

Background Individuals with unilateral hearing loss show poor spatial hearing, but individual variability is high. Aims/objectives To investigate if the degree of hearing loss in unilateral ear canal atresia affects horizontal sound localization and speech recognition. Materials and methods Twelve subjects with unilateral ear canal atresia without childhood hearing intervention. Previously published data from eight normal-hearing subjects in normal binaural as well as experimentally induced unilateral hearing loss served as a reference. Horizontal sound localization and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech were assessed. Results Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between sound localization accuracy (SLA) and the air conduction pure tone average of the atretic ear (r = 0.85, p=.007). The large proportion of variability in SLA (72%) explained by the degree of hearing loss of the atretic ear indicates that binaural processing is possible. SLA was worse than for normal hearing individuals (p<.0001), and comparable to moderate simulated unilateral hearing loss (p=.13). Speech discrimination was significantly worse than normal (p<.0001) and not dependent on degree of hearing loss of the atretic ear. Conclusions and significance Individuals with congenital unilateral ear canal atresia show impaired horizontal SLA and recognition of speech in competing speech.

Contribution of a method of assessing minimum audible angle in headphones

ObjectivesThe main objective of this study was to test the feasibility of measuring minimum audible angle in headphones with different reference positions in the horizontal plane, and comparing different types of pre-recorded head-related transfer functions. The secondary objective was to assess spatial discrimination performance in simulated unilateral hearing loss by measuring the minimum audible angle under monaural conditions using headphones. Materials and methodsMinimum audible angle was assessed in 27 normal-hearing subjects, to test their spatial discrimination abilities, using 4 datasets of pre-recorded head-related transfer functions: 2 recorded on mannequins (KU100, KEMAR), and 2 individualized head-related transfer function datasets (TBM, PBM). Performance was evaluated at 3 reference positions (0°, 50° and 180°) in 1 binaural and 2 monaural conditions. ResultsKU100 generated minimum audible angle values smaller than KEMAR in frontal and lateral position P<0.005), with a suggestive difference (P<0.05) compared to TBM and PBM in the frontal and lateral planes. Comparison between binaural and monaural conditions showed significant differences in frontal position for MON-c (contralateral) and MON-i (ipsilateral) (P<0.001), in lateral position for MON-c only (P<0.001) and in posterior position for MON-c and MON-i (P<0.001). ConclusionThis study suggests that evaluation of spatial discrimination capacity using minimum audible angle with the KU100 head-related transfer dataset was reliable and robust.

Sound localization latency in normal hearing and simulated unilateral hearing loss

Directing gaze towards auditory events is a natural behavior. In addition to the well-known accuracy of auditory elicited gaze responses for normal binaural listening, their latency is a measure of possible clinical interest and methodological importance. The aim was to develop a clinically feasible method to assess sound localization latency (SLL), and to study SLL as a function of simulated unilateral hearing loss (SUHL) and the relationship with accuracy. Eight healthy and normal-hearing adults (18–40 years) participated in this study. Horizontal gaze responses, recorded by non-invasive corneal reflection eye-tracking, were obtained during azimuthal shifts (24 trials) of a 3-min continuous auditory stimulus. In each trial, a sigmoid function was fitted to gaze samples. Latency was estimated by the abscissa corresponding to 50% of the arctangent amplitude. SLL was defined as the mean latency across trials. SLL was measured in normal-hearing and simulated SUHL conditions (SUHL30 and SUHL43: mean threshold of 30 dB HL and 43 dB HL across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz). In the normal-hearing condition, the mean ± SD SLL was 280 ± 40 ms (n = 8) with a test-retest SD = 20 ms. A linear mixed model showed a statistically significant effect of listening condition on SLL. The SUHL30 and SUHL43 conditions revealed a mean SLL of 370 ± 49 ms and 540 ± 120 ms, respectively. Repeated measures correlation analysis showed a clear relationship between SLL and the average sound localization accuracy (R2 = 0.94). The rapid and reliable method to obtain SLL may be an important clinical tool for evaluation of binaural processing. Future studies in clinical cohorts are needed to assess whether SLL may reveal information about binaural processing abilities beyond that afforded by sound localization accuracy.

Horizontal Localization in Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Background and ObjectivesThe ability to localize a sound source is one of the binaural hearing benefits in a horizontal plane based on interaural time difference and interaural intensity difference. Unilateral or bilateral asymmetric hearing loss will affect binaural hearing and lead to sound locating errors. In this cross sectional analytical descriptive study, the localization error was investigated when participants turned their heads to the sound source with closed eyes and after simulating unilateral hearing loss by placing earplugs inside the right ear canal. Subjects and MethodsThis cross sectional analytical descriptive study was carried out on 30 right-handed adults, 22 female and 8 male (average: 25 years, standard deviation: 3.16). They were selected with the available random access method. Horizontal localization was evaluated with five speakers located at 0, ±30, and ±60 degree azimuths at a 1-meter distance from the examinee. Narrow-band noise signals were delivered at 35 dB SL in two “without earplug” and “with earplug” situations and the results were compared. The study was performed between September and December 2016 in Tehran, Iran. ResultsSignificant differences were observed in localization errors between the “with earplug” and “without earplug” situations. The localization differences were greater for left-side speakers (-30 and -60 degrees) compared with right-side speakers (+30 and +60 degrees). The differences were more apparent at 4,000 and 6,000 Hz, which confirmed the effect of unilateral simulated hearing loss on interaural latency differences. ConclusionsSimulating hearing loss by using an earplug in one ear (right) increased localization errors at all frequencies. The errors increased at higher frequencies.

The effect of simulated unilateral hearing loss on horizontal sound localization accuracy and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech

Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) occurs in 25% of cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Due to the unilaterally reduced audibility associated with UHL, everyday demanding listening situations may be disrupted despite normal hearing in one ear. The aim of this study was to quantify acute changes in recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech and sound localization accuracy, and relate those changes to two levels of temporary induced UHL (UHL30 and UHL43; suffixes denote the average hearing threshold across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) for 8 normal-hearing adults. A within-subject repeated-measures design was used (normal binaural conditions, UHL30 and UHL43). The main outcome measures were the threshold for 40% correct speech recognition and the overall variance in sound localization accuracy quantified by an Error Index (0 = perfect performance, 1.0 = random performance). Distinct and statistically significant deterioration in speech recognition (2.0 dB increase in threshold, p < 0.01) and sound localization (Error Index increase of 0.16, p < 0.001) occurred in the UHL30 condition. Speech recognition did not significantly deteriorate further in the UHL43 condition (1.0 dB increase in speech recognition threshold, p > 0.05), while sound localization was additionally impaired (Error Index increase of 0.33, p < 0.01) with an associated large increase in individual variability. Qualitative analyses on a subject-by-subject basis showed that high-frequency audibility was important for speech recognition, while low-frequency audibility was important for horizontal sound localization accuracy. While the data might not be entirely applicable to individuals with long-standing UHL, the results suggest a need for intervention for mild-to-moderate UHL.

Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the effect of an acute simulated unilateral hearing loss on children's spatial release from masking in two-talker speech and speech-shaped noise, and (2) to develop a procedure to be used in future studies that will assess spatial release from masking in children who have permanent unilateral hearing loss. There were three main predictions. First, spatial release from masking was expected to be larger in two-talker speech than in speech-shaped noise. Second, simulated unilateral hearing loss was expected to worsen performance in all listening conditions, but particularly in the spatially separated two-talker speech masker. Third, spatial release from masking was expected to be smaller for children than for adults in the two-talker masker. Participants were 12 children (8.7 to 10.9 years) and 11 adults (18.5 to 30.4 years) with normal bilateral hearing. Thresholds for 50%-correct recognition of Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences were measured adaptively in continuous two-talker speech or speech-shaped noise. Target sentences were always presented from a loudspeaker at 0° azimuth. The masker stimulus was either co-located with the target or spatially separated to +90° or -90° azimuth. Spatial release from masking was quantified as the difference between thresholds obtained when the target and masker were co-located and thresholds obtained when the masker was presented from +90° or -90° azimuth. Testing was completed both with and without a moderate simulated unilateral hearing loss, created with a foam earplug and supra-aural earmuff. A repeated-measures design was used to compare performance between children and adults, and performance in the no-plug and simulated-unilateral-hearing-loss conditions. All listeners benefited from spatial separation of target and masker stimuli on the azimuth plane in the no-plug listening conditions; this benefit was larger in two-talker speech than in speech-shaped noise. In the simulated-unilateral-hearing-loss conditions, a positive spatial release from masking was observed only when the masker was presented ipsilateral to the simulated unilateral hearing loss. In the speech-shaped noise masker, spatial release from masking in the no-plug condition was similar to that obtained when the masker was presented ipsilateral to the simulated unilateral hearing loss. In contrast, in the two-talker speech masker, spatial release from masking in the no-plug condition was much larger than that obtained when the masker was presented ipsilateral to the simulated unilateral hearing loss. When either masker was presented contralateral to the simulated unilateral hearing loss, spatial release from masking was negative. This pattern of results was observed for both children and adults, although children performed more poorly overall. Children and adults with normal bilateral hearing experience greater spatial release from masking for a two-talker speech than a speech-shaped noise masker. Testing in a two-talker speech masker revealed listening difficulties in the presence of disrupted binaural input that were not observed in a speech-shaped noise masker. This procedure offers promise for the assessment of spatial release from masking in children with permanent unilateral hearing loss.

Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss

Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss

Reversible Induction of Phantom Auditory Sensations through Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss

Tinnitus, a phantom auditory sensation, is associated with hearing loss in most cases, but it is unclear if hearing loss causes tinnitus. Phantom auditory sensations can be induced in normal hearing listeners when they experience severe auditory deprivation such as confinement in an anechoic chamber, which can be regarded as somewhat analogous to a profound bilateral hearing loss. As this condition is relatively uncommon among tinnitus patients, induction of phantom sounds by a lesser degree of auditory deprivation could advance our understanding of the mechanisms of tinnitus. In this study, we therefore investigated the reporting of phantom sounds after continuous use of an earplug. 18 healthy volunteers with normal hearing wore a silicone earplug continuously in one ear for 7 days. The attenuation provided by the earplugs simulated a mild high-frequency hearing loss, mean attenuation increased from <10 dB at 0.25 kHz to >30 dB at 3 and 4 kHz. 14 out of 18 participants reported phantom sounds during earplug use. 11 participants presented with stable phantom sounds on day 7 and underwent tinnitus spectrum characterization with the earplug still in place. The spectra showed that the phantom sounds were perceived predominantly as high-pitched, corresponding to the frequency range most affected by the earplug. In all cases, the auditory phantom disappeared when the earplug was removed, indicating a causal relation between auditory deprivation and phantom sounds. This relation matches the predictions of our computational model of tinnitus development, which proposes a possible mechanism by which a stabilization of neuronal activity through homeostatic plasticity in the central auditory system could lead to the development of a neuronal correlate of tinnitus when auditory nerve activity is reduced due to the earplug.

Localization Ability in Infants with Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss

This study investigated the feasibility of using a localization task to rule out unilateral hearing loss in infants. Fourcorner localization ability was assessed in 29 normal-hearing infants (9-20 mo) using four different test stimuli. In these same infants, a mild unilateral hearing loss was simulated by occlusion of the external auditory canal and the test sequence was repeated. Analysis of front-back, right-left, and combined errors for each of the test stimuli revealed that this type of task may allow detection of unilateral hearing loss as slight as 25 dB HL.