Simplified Disease Activity Index Remission Research Articles

THU0161 Near Misses of ACR/EULAR Criteria Reflects Patient’s Disease Activity Level in Proportion to Patient Global Assessment Level

BackgroundThe American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) remission criteria (Boolean criteria) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of popular index for remission. This index is well known, but...

THU0109 Treating to target ultrasound with clinical remission better effects than clinical remission in RRP

BackgroundTreatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should aim at full remission. However,recent publications described rapid radiographic progression (RRP) existed despite initial biologics and methotrexate combination therapy in early RA. In RRP,...

FRI0076 The effects of tight disease control of rheumatoid arthritis on HAQ

BackgroundTreat to Target (T2T) is the main strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We need to control disease activity in order to sustain ADL in optimal status and...

AB0328 Factors associated with normalized physical function and clinical remission defined with simplified disease activity index by 1-yaear infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BackgroundWe previously reported that the presence of anti-Ro/SS-A antibody (anti-Ro) was an independent factor for poor clinical response to TNF-alpha inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).ObjectivesTo investigate factors associated...

Comparison of long‐term clinical outcome with etanercept treatment and adalimumab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with respect to immunogenicity

To compare rates of sustained low and minimal disease activity and remission according to the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria during 3-year followup in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with etanercept and adalimumab in routine care. Four hundred seven RA patients previously unexposed to tumor necrosis factor antagonists were treated with etanercept (n = 203) or adalimumab (n = 204) and assessed at 3- and later 6-month intervals. Treatment allocation was at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. Clinical parameters were measured at each time point, as were anti-adalimumab antibodies in adalimumab-treated patients. Achievement of clinical outcome was defined as the occurrence of sustained (at least 12 consecutive months) low disease activity (28-joint Disease Activity Score [DAS28] <3.2), minimal disease activity (DAS28 <2.6), or ACR/EULAR remission based on the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI). Non-overlapping response rates were calculated. Among the adalimumab group, 13% reached sustained low disease activity but not sustained minimal disease activity, 15% reached sustained minimal disease activity but not sustained remission according to the SDAI, and 16% reached sustained ACR/EULAR remission. In the etanercept group the corresponding rates were 16%, 11%, and 12%, respectively (P = 0.42, overall test for linear trend). Adalimumab-treated patients without anti-adalimumab antibodies (n = 150 [74%]) had the best outcomes, and adalimumab-treated patients with anti-adalimumab antibodies the worst, with outcomes in etanercept-treated patients in between (P < 0.0001). Differences were most apparent in the sustained SDAI remission and sustained minimal disease activity categories. For example, 40% of anti-adalimumab antibody-negative patients, 23% of etanercept-treated patients, and 4% of anti-adalimumab antibody-positive patients achieved at least sustained minimal disease activity. Overall, etanercept and adalimumab treatment appear similar in inducing a good long-term clinical outcome. However, in the case of adalimumab this is strongly dependent on the presence or absence of anti-adalimumab antibodies.

Performance of the 2011 ACR/EULAR preliminary remission criteria compared with DAS28 remission in unselected patients with rheumatoid arthritis

ObjectiveTo compare the performance of the preliminary American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) remission criteria with the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission in unselected ‘real-life’ patients.MethodsRemission...

Treatment discontinuation in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis in sustained simplified disease activity index remission after synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug administration

We aimed to identify whether drug-free remission could be achieved in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognosis factors by treatment with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Thirteen patients with very early RA, whose disease was considered to have highly erosive potential, were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proven bone edema and autoantibodies were determined in these patients. A treat-to-target strategy initiated with synthetic DMARDs was employed for 12 months. If the patients achieved simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission along with a reduction of the RA MRI scoring bone edema score to <33% as compared with baseline at 12 months, DMARD treatment was stopped and the clinical status was further observed for the following 12 months. Synthetic DMARDs were stopped at 12 months in 5 patients. One of the 5 was lost to follow-up because of sustaining an injury that required orthopedic surgery. Three of the remaining 4 patients showed continued SDAI remission that was DMARD-free without any evidence of radiographic progression for the following 12 months. Although this was a small clinical trial, we have shown–for the first time–that true remission of very early RA with poor prognosis factors can be achieved by treatment with synthetic DMARDs.

Delayed treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in incomplete responders to synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs shows an excellent effect in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognosis factors

We aimed to investigate whether delayed treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in incomplete responders to synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was effective among patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognosis factors. We examined 22 patients with very early RA who were positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies or IgM-rheumatoid factor. The mean disease duration at entry was 14.1 weeks. A treat-to-target strategy, aiming at simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission, was initiated with synthetic DMARDs. SDAI remission was not achieved in 9 of the 22 patients with synthetic DMARDs alone, and TNF inhibitors were added in these patients. SDAI values in these 9 patients were further examined for the following 6 months. The TNF inhibitors (infliximab 8, etanercept 1) were added at a mean interval of 34.1 weeks after the initiation of synthetic DMARDs. SDAI remission was achieved in 4 of the 9 patients (44.4%) at 3 months and in 8 of the 9 patients (88.9%) at 6 months after the introduction of the TNF inhibitors. Radiographic damage had not progressed in these patients. Delayed treatment with TNF inhibitors is effective and tolerable for patients with very early RA with poor prognosis factors.

Remission and radiographic outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: application of the 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria in an observational cohort

ObjectivesOne goal of remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is to halt joint damage. The authors assessed the progression of radiographic joint damage among RA patients in remission by the new...

Treatment discontinuation in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis in sustained simplified disease activity index remission after synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug administration

We aimed to identify whether drug-free remission could be achieved in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognosis factors by treatment with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Thirteen patients with very early RA, whose disease was considered to have highly erosive potential, were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proven bone edema and autoantibodies were determined in these patients. A treat-to-target strategy initiated with synthetic DMARDs was employed for 12 months. If the patients achieved simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission along with a reduction of the RA MRI scoring bone edema score to <33% as compared with baseline at 12 months, DMARD treatment was stopped and the clinical status was further observed for the following 12 months. Synthetic DMARDs were stopped at 12 months in 5 patients. One of the 5 was lost to follow-up because of sustaining an injury that required orthopedic surgery. Three of the remaining 4 patients showed continued SDAI remission that was DMARD-free without any evidence of radiographic progression for the following 12 months. Although this was a small clinical trial, we have shown-for the first time-that true remission of very early RA with poor prognosis factors can be achieved by treatment with synthetic DMARDs.

Delayed treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in incomplete responders to synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs shows an excellent effect in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognosis factors

We aimed to investigate whether delayed treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in incomplete responders to synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was effective among patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognosis factors. We examined 22 patients with very early RA who were positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies or IgM-rheumatoid factor. The mean disease duration at entry was 14.1 weeks. A treat-to-target strategy, aiming at simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission, was initiated with synthetic DMARDs. SDAI remission was not achieved in 9 of the 22 patients with synthetic DMARDs alone, and TNF inhibitors were added in these patients. SDAI values in these 9 patients were further examined for the following 6 months. The TNF inhibitors (infliximab 8, etanercept 1) were added at a mean interval of 34.1 weeks after the initiation of synthetic DMARDs. SDAI remission was achieved in 4 of the 9 patients (44.4%) at 3 months and in 8 of the 9 patients (88.9%) at 6 months after the introduction of the TNF inhibitors. Radiographic damage had not progressed in these patients. Delayed treatment with TNF inhibitors is effective and tolerable for patients with very early RA with poor prognosis factors.

Performance of the new 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria with tocilizumab using the phase IIIb study TAMARA as an example and their comparison with traditional remission criteria

BackgroundRemission is the established goal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Although originally defined by a disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) <2.6, more stringent criteria may imply the absence...

Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments

ObjectivesPatients can fulfil clinical criteria for remission, yet still have evidence of synovitis detectable clinically and by ultrasound, and this is associated with structural damage. Stricter remission criteria may more...

Interleukin‐6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab and attainment of disease remission in rheumatoid arthritis: The role of acute‐phase reactants

To determine the effects of tocilizumab on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and remission assessment, using measures that do or do not comprise acute-phase reactants. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) scores, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores, and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were calculated using data from tocilizumab trials in patients with RA in whom disease had remained active despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The CDAI does not contain an acute-phase reactant component. Disease activity states, including remission, were defined using established cut points; for the DAS28, an alternative cut point of <2.4 was also used. Changes in the DAS28, the SDAI score, and the CDAI score among patients receiving tocilizumab were significantly higher than those among patients receiving placebo, and the magnitude of these changes was similar for the SDAI and the CDAI. Among patients who achieved 50% improvement in disease activity according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, only ∼20% required a reduction in acute-phase reactant values in order to fulfill the criteria. However, DAS28 remission rates were higher (even when using the lower cut point) than the SDAI and CDAI remission rates. Only a minority of tocilizumab-treated patients with DAS28 remission also had disease remission according to the SDAI (26%) or CDAI (∼21%). With infliximab treatment, SDAI and CDAI remission rates were of the same magnitude as those observed with tocilizumab treatment, and DAS28 remission rates were lower. Tocilizumab-treated patients with DAS28 remission but without CDAI remission had significantly higher swollen joint counts but lower erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs) compared with patients with SDAI or CDAI remission. Disease activity in RA is reduced by tocilizumab treatment, irrespective of the type of composite measure used to evaluate disease activity. Remission rates were much higher using the DAS28 compared with the SDAI and CDAI, due to the high weight of the ESR in the DAS28 and the effect of tocilizumab on the ESR. Using the stringent SDAI and CDAI criteria, however, remission rates in patients treated with tocilizumab were in the same range as those seen in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Assessing remission in clinical practice

Remission constitutes the best achievable state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed at evaluating sustained remission in a large cohort of patients followed prospectively in clinical practice and to evaluate available instruments to define remission for their stringency in defining this state. We analysed remission and sustained remission in 621 patients who had two consecutive and complete clinical observations; the average period between the two visits was 92 days (median; quartiles: 82; 105). Remission was evaluated according to modified ACR (mACR), 28 Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria. Sustained remission was defined as remission at both consecutive visits. Patients were treated with traditional disease- modifying antirheumatic drugs, mainly methotrexate, and partly with biological agents (approximately 11%). Remissions at any one of the two visits were seen in 33.5% of patients by SDAI or CDAI, 42.7% by DAS28, and 38.6% by mACR criteria (P < 0.01). Sustained remission was observed in much lower proportions of patients (between 16.7 and 19.6%, dependent on the instrument). Agreement between classifications of remission by kappa-statistics was very good for SDAI vs CDAI, good for DAS28 vs SDAI or CDAI, and only moderate for mACR vs the three other scores. Residual swollen joints were observed in 15% of patients in DAS28 remission (range 1-9), 6% of patients in mACR remission (range 1-8), but only approximately 5% of patients in CDAI or SDAI remission (range 1-2) (P < 0.01). Sustained remission can be observed in 17-20% of patients in clinical practice. CDAI and SDAI remission criteria are more stringent than DAS28 and mACR criteria, since they allow for lesser residual disease activity. Consequently, smaller proportions of patients are classified as in remission by SDAI and CDAI than by DAS28 and mACR criteria. Sustained remission is an achievable goal in clinical practice even with the most stringent of the definitions studied.