A search of the literature reveals numerous studies dating from the 1920s which have investigated the relationship between the quality of handwriting and scores given to essays. These studies have consistently found that essays get higher grades when written in good handwriting (e.g., James, 1927; Sheppard, 1929; Chase, 1968; Marshall and Powers, 1969; Briggs, 1970; Markham, 1976; Bull and Stevens, 1979). A few studies have investigated the influence on essay grades of marker expectations based on information regarding the writers' achievement or intelligence. These have consistently reported significant expectation effects (Bonniol, Caverni and Noizet, 1972; Dash, 1975; Petrilla, 1978; Chase, 1979). The study by Chase (1979) investigated the joint effect of marker expectation and handwriting quality on essay grades. Fabricated essay responses to questions on test theory were copied out in both very poor and very good handwriting. These responses were given to graduate students for scoring with cover sheets providing fictitious information on the supposed writer's undergraduate courses and grades for the last semester. While identical courses were listed for each writer, half the writers had uniformly high grades and half uniformly low grades to establish scorer expectations. Chase found a main effect for expectation (p < .01) but no main effect for handwriting quality. While the interaction between quality of handwriting and expectation was not significant, an analysis of simple main effects suggested the possibility that where handwriting is very poor, the effects of high expectation are accentuated. The present study has as its focus Chase's suggestion that, in essay scoring, an interaction exists between writer handwriting quality and scorer achievement expectations.
Read full abstract