Today, greater emphasis is placed on conserving teeth by means of endodontic treatm ent than was previously, and the need for research in this field has also increased. O ne of the phases of study tha t has been neglected until recently is the accurate determ ination of root canal size and taper. The minuteness and ir regularity of canals have caused most in vestigators to abandon any attem pt at actually making measurements through a microscope, although the volumes of root canals have been determined by other methods.1,2 Nevertheless, information on sizes and tapers can be of great value to the endodontist by aiding him in visual izing the dimensions of root canals before and during the procedures of preparing and filling them. The success of endo dontic treatm ent, as with any other operation, depends to a large degree on the dentist’s knowledge of the anatomy of the region involved. Furtherm ore, such da ta are needed for correlation with the sizes of files, reamers, silver cones, gutta percha cones, pluggers and broaches and may provide the m anufacturer of these instruments and materials with a basis m ore precise than trial and error for the determ ination of the necessary diameters. Scant mention of root canal sizes is made in the literature. In 1867 Latimer observed the sizes of the foramens of m andibular m olar roots, not the canals, which he said were impossible to classify on paper. In 1925, Barrett4 reported a study of 512 sectioned perm anent teeth and stated, w ithout further elucidation, th a t “the canals vary greatly in size, ranging from about 20 to 35 microns to 250 microns for the larger examples.” In 1933, M ueller5 tabulated root canal sizes under the heading, “Range in M illi meters of Canal Size in Gingival T h ird .” T he table provides figures for incisors, cuspids and bicuspids only, and there is no m ention of the sizes of the canals in the middle third or apical third of the roots. Meyer and Scheele6 examined root canals by making serial cross sections of the roots, the canals of which were then reproduced in wax. According to their observations, histological preparations show tha t the m ajor canal may be m oder ately narrow and its ramifications may
Read full abstract