Development projects in a number of deepwater provinces face the risk of shallow-water flow (SWF) from overpressured water-bearing sands. Typically found 1,000 to 3,000 ft below the mudline, these sands are often drilled before riser installation and can flow against a saltwater gradient. In extreme cases, vigorous flow will cause borehole rugosity or cavities from sand mining. After casing installation, poorly isolated SWF sands can flow, causing subsidence and casing buckling in both the afflicted well and its offsets. This article describes the evolution of SWF discovery, analysis, and mitigation on BP’s Atlantis project, located in 6,900 ft of water in southern Green Canyon. The earliest seismic images of Atlantis had shown a possible SWF sand at 9,200 ft, some 2,300 ft below the mudline, that generally covered the entire prospect. Drilling revealed a pore pressure of 9.2 ppge for this zone, which was successfully cased by the first four wells on the prospect. The fifth well, GC 743 #4, was spudded in July 2002. Drilling progressed below the 36-in. jet string at 7,100 ft toward the next planned casing point at 10,250 ft. At 8,400 ft, a 100-ft sand was drilled that had not been seen on seismic or in previous wells. The sand flowed against salt water during drilling, and at least some degree of sand mining occurred. After “pumping and dumping” to casing point at 10,250 ft, pad mud was spotted and the drillstring was retrieved to run 20-in. casing. The 20-in. shoe hit a ledge or bridge at the 8,400-ft sand, buckled above the wellhead, and parted. GC 743 #4 was cemented and abandoned after unsuccessful fishing attempts. A replacement well, GC 743 #6, was drilled 195 ft away with an additional string of 26-in. casing set above the newly identified 8,400-ft sand. Surprisingly, the sand was absent in this well, as shown in Fig. 1. With the data from these two wells, recently acquired high-resolution seismic revealed vague images of a steeply banked sand-filled river channel meandering through DC-1, the primary Atlantis drill center. But seismic resolution was inadequate to map the exact boundaries of the sand. Bathymetry and proximity to the Sigsbee Escarpment prevented relocation of the drill center. With sanction approaching, an additional string of 26-in. casing, top set above the newly problematic 8,400-ft sand, was included for each of the 15 remaining wells. Atlantis was sanctioned in November 2002 with the casing design shown in Fig. 2. A slimmer version, shown in Fig. 3, was under consideration at the time to reduce high “pump and dump” mud volumes experienced in GC 743 #4. The sanction work scope provided for a continuous batch-setting program for the remaining wells.