You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy V1 Apr 2018PD38-05 PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF EFFECT ON INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE AND VISUAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITHOUT AND WITH OPHTHALMIC DISEASES AFTER ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY SHIGENORI KAKUTANI, HIROSHI FUKUHARA, FUMIYUKI ARAKI, MASAAKI ASAMOTO, NOBUKO ITO, MAKOTO AIHARA, and HARUKI KUME SHIGENORI KAKUTANISHIGENORI KAKUTANI More articles by this author , HIROSHI FUKUHARAHIROSHI FUKUHARA More articles by this author , FUMIYUKI ARAKIFUMIYUKI ARAKI More articles by this author , MASAAKI ASAMOTOMASAAKI ASAMOTO More articles by this author , NOBUKO ITONOBUKO ITO More articles by this author , MAKOTO AIHARAMAKOTO AIHARA More articles by this author , and HARUKI KUMEHARUKI KUME More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1752AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Although the fact is well-known that Trendelenburg position increases intraocular pressure (IOP) during robotic surgery and might cause postoperative visual loss (POVL), very few papers have reported on effect in patients with ophthalmic diseases after robotic surgery. Taketani Y et al reported that transient but significant unilateral visual field defects were found in 28% subjects after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). We prospectively evaluated the effect on IOP and visual function in patients undergoing RALP. METHODS In this clinical study, the enrolled patients were performed RALP uneventfully under general anesthesia from December in 2015 to March in 2017 in our single institution, The University of Tokyo Hospital. We measured IOP of both eyes before, during and 7days after RALP and performed visual field tests using Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) before, 7days after, and 1-3 months after RALP. RESULTS A total of 99 patients were analyzed; mean IOP before and during RALP were 11.5±4.2 mmHg and 22.4±3.6 mmHg, respectively. IOP was significantly increased during RALP with P value < 0.01 as previously reported. POVL in 7 days after RALP was detected in 21 eyes of 16 subjects but all of them recovered to normal in 1 month after RALP. Among of them, 4 eyes of 3 subjects were diagnosed as ophthalmic diseases before RALP; 2 eyes of 1 subject as normal tension glaucoma, 1 eye of 1 subject as epiretinal membrane and 1 eye of 1 subject as scleritis. Before RALP, 24 eyes of 15 subjects were diagnosed as glaucoma; 22 eyes of 14 subjects as normal tension glaucoma and 2 eyes of 1 subject as closed angle glaucoma, in whom laser iridectomy was performed before RALP and no POVL was detected after RALP. CONCLUSIONS In our study, although transient POVL was detected in 16% of subjects after RALP, no severe visual defects were detected in 1-3 months after RALP both in patients without and in patients with ophthalmic diseases. Our data suggests that RALP does not affect visual function in the long term after surgery even in patients with normal tension glaucoma. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e737-e738 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information SHIGENORI KAKUTANI More articles by this author HIROSHI FUKUHARA More articles by this author FUMIYUKI ARAKI More articles by this author MASAAKI ASAMOTO More articles by this author NOBUKO ITO More articles by this author MAKOTO AIHARA More articles by this author HARUKI KUME More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...