Significant Prolongation Of Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Results of biomarker analysis from phase II trial of nivolumab in refractory biliary tract cancer.

338 Background: Our previous phase II study demonstrated that nivolumab provides modest but durable clinical efficacy in patients (pts) with refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC), suggesting the significant clinical benefit of nivolumab in selected pts and identification of potential predictive biomarkers. Here, we report outcomes from the biomarker analysis. Methods: Pre-treatment tumor samples were obtained and assessed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) with PD-1 and PDL-1 antibodies, mRNA sequencing (RNAseq), and whole exome sequencing (WES). Clinical efficacy was correlated with the molecular analysis. Prior cisplatin exposure was reviewed to evaluate the impact of cisplatin on the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and clinical outcome. Results: Among 46 pts who had tumor response evaluation, 31 pts received cisplatin prior to nivolumab, and 15 were cisplatin-naive. Pre-treatment tumor samples were assessed for IHC (n = 42), RNAseq (n = 11), and WES (n = 11) based on tissue availability. There was no statistically significant correlation between prior cisplatin exposure and clinical outcome. Among 42 available tumor samples, 18 (43%) expressed PD-L1 positivity ( > 1%), which was associated with a statistically significant prolonged progression free survival (PFS). Median PFS was 10.4 months for PD-L1 positive vs 2.4 months for PD-L1 negative (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.51; P < 0.001), while there was no statistically significant correlation between PD-1 expressing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and clinical outcome. There was also no statistically significant difference in TMB of cisplatin-exposed (n = 8) vs. cisplatin-naïve tumor samples (n = 3) (9162, SD = 150 vs. 8898, SD = 806, p = 0.62). In comparing the group with prolonged disease control of at least 16 weeks (n = 4) to those with rapid disease progression (n = 7) who had mRNA sequencing performed, levels of AC005609.1, FAT3, TMEM151A, ADARB2, FAM153A were all significantly upregulated (p < 0.01), while levels of CLCA1, MUC2, IGHV3-43, SWORA6, and CRISP3 were all significantly downregulated (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Prior cisplatin exposure did not lead to statistically significant differences in clinical outcome or TMB in advanced BTC pts treated with nivolumab. However, PD-L1 expression > 1% correlated with improved PFS, and variations in level of certain mRNA sequences were noted when comparing pts who had rapid disease progression vs. prolonged disease control with nivolumab. This suggests that BTC pts with positive PD-L1 expression and a particular mRNA profile may have a favorable response to nivolumab. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical trial information: NCT02829918.

Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from SOLAR-1

Activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway via PIK3CA mutations occurs in 28%-46% of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancers (ABCs) and is associated with poor prognosis. The SOLAR-1 trial showed that the addition of alpelisib to fulvestrant treatment provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2- ABC. Men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC whose disease progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor (AI) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive alpelisib (300 mg/day) plus fulvestrant (500 mg every 28 days and once on day 15) or placebo plus fulvestrant. Overall survival (OS) in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and a one-sided stratified log-rank test was carried out with an O'Brien-Fleming efficacy boundary of P ≤ 0.0161. In the PIK3CA-mutated cohort (n= 341), median OS [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 39.3 months (34.1-44.9) for alpelisib-fulvestrant and 31.4 months (26.8-41.3) for placebo-fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR)= 0.86 (95% CI, 0.64-1.15; P= 0.15)]. OS results did not cross the prespecified efficacy boundary. Median OS (95% CI) in patients with lung and/or liver metastases was 37.2 months (28.7-43.6) and 22.8 months (19.0-26.8) in the alpelisib-fulvestrant and placebo-fulvestrant arms, respectively [HR= 0.68 (0.46-1.00)]. Median times to chemotherapy (95% CI) for the alpelisib-fulvestrant and placebo-fulvestrant arms were 23.3 months (15.2-28.4) and 14.8 months (10.5-22.6), respectively [HR= 0.72 (0.54-0.95)]. No new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. Although the analysis did not cross the prespecified boundary for statistical significance, there was a 7.9-month numeric improvement in median OS when alpelisib was added to fulvestrant treatment of patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2- ABC. Overall, these results further support the statistically significant prolongation of PFS observed with alpelisib plus fulvestrant in this population, which has a poor prognosis due to a PIK3CA mutation. CLINICALTRIALS. NCT02437318.

Efficacy of Isatuximab on Surrogate Endpoints in Multiple Myeloma; A Systematic Review

Introduction: Isatuximab (ISA) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has shown benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination regimens. This study focuses on the clinical utility and tolerability of ISA based therapies in patients with ISS stage III disease. Methods: Literature search on PubMed, EmCare, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was performed from inception to July 1, 2020, for the use of ISA in MM patients. A total of five clinical trials, including phase Ib/II and phase III trials, were selected for a systematic review out of 109 studies (n=556 patients). Results: The median age was 61-71 years. The addition of ISA to pomalidomide-dexamethasone (PD) in previously treated patients was evaluated by Attal et al. (2019). International Staging System (ISS) stage III disease was present in 28% of the study population at baseline. Patients treated with ISA-PD had a meaningful increase in progression-free survival (PFS) (11.53 versus 6.47 months, P = 0.001, Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.596; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.436-0.814. PFS benefit was maintained in subgroup analysis based on renal involvement, refractoriness to lenalidomide, and proteasome inhibitors. However, PFS benefit was not statistically significant in ISS stage III disease (HR: 0.64; CI: 0·36-1·11). Martin et al. (2017) evaluated the addition of ISA to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in 57 patients. 22% of the patients had ISS stage III disease. Mikeal et al. also included 9% and 37.1% of patients with ISS stage III MM in their phase Ib and II trials, respectively. All studies demonstrated a significant prolongation of PFS in patients refractory to lenalidomide with ISA administered at 10 mg/kg weekly/every two weeks. Iida et al. (2019) also reported statistically significant improvement in PFS with ISA monotherapy in heavily pretreated Japanese patients (PFS 4.7 months; 95% CI 3.75-NC). In patients with newly diagnosed MM, Ocio et al. (2017) showed encouraging results with an ISA based regimen in 17 patients. ISS stage III disease was present in 88% of the population. At the time of data cut-off, the overall response to treatment was 87%, and 82.4% continued to remain on treatment (see Table 1). Conclusion: ISA as monotherapy and in combination therapy improved surrogate endpoints without increased toxicity in patients refractory to previous lines of treatment. Limited data suggest an improvement in PFS for ISS stage III disease. Long-term results on efficacy in MM with high-risk cytogenetics are awaited. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Progress in individualized treatment for <i>EGFR</i>-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The identification of mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene has revolutionized the treatment strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effectiveness of individualized treatment using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR-mutated NSCLC has mainly been clarified in clinical trials within Japan, and EGFR-TKI monotherapy has been established as the standard first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Since then, combination regimens involving EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic agents have been developed. Regarding combinations, the NEJ009 study conducted in Japan showed a significant prolongation of progression-free survival and overall survival compared with gefitinib alone. The NEJ009 regimen may be a reasonable option for patients with good performance status in terms of risk–benefit balance. However, further investigation is warranted to improve clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Three Drug Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Transplant-Ineligible Elderly Patients - a Systematic Review

Introduction: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) tend to have comorbidities and/or advanced age that make this subset of patients difficult to manage with current drug regimens. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science was performed from inception and completed on 07/17/2019. Studies focusing on efficacy and tolerability of 3-drug regimens in patients with NDMM were included for the review. Results: Out of 3579 studies, a total of 10 (08 phase II and 03 phase III) clinical trials in last ten years (2010-2019) using 3-drug regimens in NDMM elderly pts (893M/807F) ineligible for ASCT (determined by investigators) were selected. A total of 1703/1740 NDMM pts were evaluated. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) such as carfilzomib (C), bortezomib (V) and ixazomib (I) showed promising results in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. CLARION trial (phase III, n=955) compared two PIs (C and V) with melphalan (M) and prednisone. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between two groups (median: 22.3 vs 22.1 months; HR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10, p = 0.159) as well as overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.82-1.43). Difference in the least square means of the HR-QoL (Health related- quality of life) was 4.99 (p<.0001) favoring C-group. M may not be an ideal drug to combine with carfilzomib in this setting given more AEs.(Facon et al 2019). V as 3-drug regimen in combination with lenalidomide (L) in 242 pts achieved statistically significant prolonged PFS (median 43 mo) and OS (median 75 mo) with great efficacy and acceptable risk-benefit profile. (Durie et al 2017; phase III). Multinational phase II trial (n=70) by Dimopoulos et al (2019) evaluated I, with different fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy). Median duration was 19 cycles, indicating the long-term tolerability of regimen. With favorable toxicity profile and maintained QoL scores, trial concluded that this therapy is tolerable in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. Tuchman et al (2017) in phase II trial (n=14) investigated (V-Cy-d) and achieved ORR of 64%, with ≥VGPR of 57%. Low dose V showed great efficacy with M yielding ORR of 86% and VGPR or better of 49% in phase II trial (n=101) that also evaluated Cy as 3-drug combination but results were more productive with M with longer PFS and OS which reduced when impact of frailty was examined on outcomes. Since toxicity was higher with M, trial suggested that 2-drug combination should be preferred in elderly frail patients. (Larocca et al 2015). Efficacy was quite promising when Bringhen et al (2014) trialed C with Cy-d; 87% OS and 76% PFS at 1 y in phase II trial (n=58) with much favorable safety profile. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as elotuzumab (E) and pembrolizumab (Pe) are also tested in elderly. First study conducted on NDMM pts using humanized mAb; E, in phase II trial (n=40) by Takezako et al (2017) attained primary endpoint of the study (ORR) of (88%) and VGPR or better of 45% in Japanese pts with tolerable toxicities in elderly. No subjects on this study experienced severe peripheral neuropathy. KEYNOTE-185; a phase III multinational trial by Usmani et al (2019) evaluated Pe with Ld in 151 pts. FDA halted this study due to unfavorable benefit-risk profile; 19 deaths, 6 due to disease progression (PD), and 13 due to treatment-related AEs. Median PFS and median OS were not reached in either group. Immunomodulators such as L achieved one of the longest PFS reported in a trial of transplant ineligible patients (35 mo) by using LVd regimen in phase II multicenter trial (n=50). (O'Donnell et al 2018) Alkylating agents like bendamustine (ben) and M have been tested in different novel regimens. Decreasing intensity and increasing duration of ben resulted in better outcomes in phase II trial (n=59) by Berdeja et al (2016) and can be given as first line treatment. Ben yielded great results with low dose dexa as compared to high dose achieving 92% ORR. Original regimen was effective but relatively more toxic. Incidence of herpes and neuropathy decreased dramatically with the treatment modifications. Conclusion: Three-drug regimens having PIs, mABs, immunomodulators and alkylating agents have shown desirable results in NDMM transplant (ASCT)-ineligible elderly patients and are likely the emerging standard of care for NDMM. Disclosures Anwer: In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Four-Year Follow-up of the Phase 3 Pollux Study of Daratumumab Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (D-Rd) Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Alone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Four-Year Follow-up of the Phase 3 Pollux Study of Daratumumab Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (D-Rd) Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Alone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

480P - Safety and efficacy of dacomitinib for EGFR+ NSCLC in the subgroup of Asian patients from ARCHER 1050

480P - Safety and efficacy of dacomitinib for EGFR+ NSCLC in the subgroup of Asian patients from ARCHER 1050

1862PD - Impact of lung metastasis on overall survival (OS) in the phase III SELECT study with lenvatinib (LEN) in patients (pts) with radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC)

BackgroundIn the randomized phase III SELECT study, LEN demonstrated a significant prolongation of progression-free survival compared with placebo (PBO) in pts with RR-DTC. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between LEN and PBO arms which was likely due to>80% of pts on the PBO arm crossing over to open-label LEN treatment. This exploratory post hoc analysis investigated the impact of measurable lung metastasis on OS from the SELECT study. MethodsThe hazard ratio (HR) for OS (data cutoff, September 1, 2016) and the 95% CIs were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. The influence of various baseline characteristics on OS was analyzed using a multivariate analysis based on a Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analysis of OS was conducted based on maximum size of measurable lung metastasis (≥ 1cm per RECIST 1.1) at baseline. ResultsIn the overall population (392 pts), median OS of LEN (261 pts) and PBO (131 pts, with 115 pts crossed over to LEN) arms, were 40.3 months (M) and 34.5 M, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.66 –1.15, P=0.3170). In 306 pts with lung metastasis of≥1.0cm, significant prolongation of OS was observed with LEN (199 pts) compared with PBO (107 pts, with 95 pts crossed over to LEN) (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47–0.85, P=0.0025). This was maintained after adjustment for baseline characteristics in the multivariate model. Similar trends of OS prolongation by LEN were observed in pts with lung metastasis of≥1.5cm, ≥ 2.0cm, and 1.0–2.0cm (Table). ConclusionsIn pts with lung metastasis of≥1.0cm, LEN significantly prolonged OS compared to pts treated by PBO including those crossed over to LEN. This post-hoc analysis suggests that RR-DTC pts with lung metastasis could be candidates for targeted therapy. Table1862PD Overall survival by size of measurable lung metastasis at baselineTableLung LesionNumber of PtsMedian OS (M)HR95% CIP ValueLENPBOLENPBO≥1.0cm19910744.733.10.630.47 – 0.850.0025≥1.5cm1508444.122.30.630.45 – 0.890.0082≥2.0cm945834.719.30.650.44 – 0.980.03831.0–2.0cm1054949.238.60.630.40 – 0.990.0438*≥ 1cm per RECIST 1.1 Clinical trial identificationNCT01321554; Release date: December 30, 2016. Editorial acknowledgementOxford PharmaGenesis, Newtown, PA, USA; Funded by Eisai Inc. Legal entity responsible for the studyEisai Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. FundingEisai Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. DisclosureM. Tahara: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer-Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. N. Kiyota: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Merck Serono; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Astra-Zeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai Pharmaceutical. A..O. Hoff: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astra-Zeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Genzyme. T.K. Owonikoko: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis, Celgene, Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Abbvie; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): G1 Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen, Loxo/Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas, Stemcentrx, Regeneron, Corvus Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): United Therapeutics, Fujifilm, Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Aeglea Biotherapeutics, Incyte, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Sandoz, Eisai, Takeda, Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: BerGenBio, PharmaMar, Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono, Xcovery; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron Pharmaceuticals, Armo BioSciences; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Cambium Oncology. C.E. Dutcus: Full / Part-time employment: Eisai Inc.. T. Suzuki: Full / Part-time employment: Eisai Co., Ltd. M. Ren: Full / Part-time employment: Eisai Inc.. S. Misir: Full / Part-time employment: Eisai Inc. L.J. Wirth: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Loxo; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

P2.01-102 Outcome of Patients with EGFR Exon 19 Mutation in a Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Gefitinib to Gefitinib with Chemotherapy

In patients with EGFR sensitizing mutations, the subtype of the EGFR mutation impacts the clinical outcome and carries both prognostic and predictive value. We had conducted a Phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR sensitizing mutation, ECOG PS 0 to 2 planned for first-line palliative therapy. The type of sensitizing EGFR mutation (exon 19 versus others) was a stratification factor. Randomization was 1:1 to gefitinib 250 mg orally daily (gef) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 IV 3-weekly for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed with gefitinib from day 1 (gef+C). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), response rate and toxicity. We present the subset analysis of the patients with exon 19 in-frame deletion. Between 2016 and 2018, 216 patients with EGFR exon 19 mutation were randomly assigned to gef (n=109) and gef+C (n=107). The median age was 54 years, 51% were males, 20% were PS 2 and 21% had brain metastases. Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 7 to 30). Radiologic response rates were 81% and 75% in gef+C and gef arms respectively, P=0.29. Estimated median PFS was significantly longer with gef+C than gef [17 months, (95% CI, 12.4 to 21.6) versus 8 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 9.3); hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.69; P<0.001]. Data for OS are immature. Clinically relevant ≥ grade 3 toxicities occurred in 55% and 23% of patients in gef+C and gef arms respectively, P<0.001. In patients with exon 19 in-frame deletion, combining pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy with gefitinib led to a significant PFS prolongation, with an increase in clinically relevant severe toxicities.

Phenotypic landscape of granulocytes and monocytes by multiparametric flow cytometry: A prospective study of a 1-tube panel strategy for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with MDS.

Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) was recently reported to be a helpful additional tool in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, numerous aberrancies have been reported that makes their evaluation difficult as part of a routine diagnosis. Here, we validated a 1-tube panel for the evaluation of granulocytic and monocytic maturation by MFC and correlated our findings with diagnosis and prognosis of MDS. A total of 251 samples with MDS suspicion were prospectively analyzed and compared to an internal reference database leading to the calculation of the Diff score. The associated specificity and sensitivity values of this scoring system were 92.1% and 60.4% in a first learning cohort and 96.7% and 65.2% in a second independent validation cohort. The combination of the Diff score with the concomitantly calculated Ogata score increased the sensitivity to 74.2% and 78.3% in the learning and validation cohorts, respectively. Finally, a normal Diff score in MDS patients was associated with a significant prolonged progression-free survival. Taken together, the present data indicate that our strategy is a sensitive and specific MFC tool for the diagnosis of MDS-related cytopenia(s) which could be also useful for predicting evolution of these diseases.

Previous Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment to Increase the Efficacy of Docetaxel and Ramucirumab Combination Chemotherapy.

For immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-pretreated patients, docetaxel and ramucirumab (DOC+RAM) combination therapy may be more effective compared to patients not receiving ICI treatment. From June 2013 to July 2018, 39 patients with advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer underwent DOC+RAM therapy. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of DOC+RAM therapy based on the presence (pre-ICI+) or absence (pre-ICI-) of ICI pretreatment history. Of the 39 patients treated with DOC+RAM, we identified 18 (46%) pre-ICI+ patients. Overall response rates for DOC+RAM concerning pre-ICI+ and pre-ICI- patients were 38.9% vs. 19.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 vs. 2.3 months [hazard ratio(HR)=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.16-0.80]. Adverse events such as fever, myalgia, arthritis, pleural effusion, and pneumonitis tended to be increased in pre-ICI+ patients. Despite increased toxicity concerns, DOC+RAM therapy in pre-ICI+ patients showed a trend for tumor regression improvement and statistically significant prolongation of PFS.

Abstract 477: Targeted deep sequencing contributes to guiding personalized targeted therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer

Abstract Purpose: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a devastating disease of the digestive system with poor prognosis. Targeted therapy based on specific genetic alterations has been proven to be an effective treatment for some cancer subtypes. However, the effect of this targeted therapy is unclear in BTC. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of personalized targeted therapy guided by targeted deep sequencing for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, targeted deep sequencing was employed for 49 patients with BTC and the recommendation of biologic agent was offered. Among 32 patients with stage IV and R2 resection, 21 patients underwent conventional chemotherapy (mGEMOX) (chemotherapy group), while the remaining 11 patients received a personalized targeted agent (targeted therapy group). The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) were used to assess the efficacy of treatments, while the grade of treatment-related toxicities was evaluated for safety. Results: The genomic landscape of 49 patients with BTC was depicted by targeted deep sequencing. Further analysis of all alterations demonstrated that these altered genes were highly enriched in the ERBB family or cell cycle pathway. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the targeted therapy group had a significant prolonged PFS (4.5 months vs. 1.5 months, P = 0.014) and a trend of prolonged OS (12.9 months vs. 4.1 months, P = 0.104) in comparison to the chemotherapy group. The DCR in the targeted therapy group was marginally higher but without statistical significance (63.6% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.142). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients that experienced Grade &amp;gt;2 treatment-related toxicities in either treatment group (36.4% vs 19.0%, P = 0.397). Conclusions: This real-world clinical study suggests that targeted deep sequencing contributes to guiding personalized targeted therapy based on individual actionable mutations, which may benefit advanced BTC patients. Large umbrella trials of personalized precision therapy are needed to further confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of this therapeutic strategy in BTC. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Feiling Feng, Qingbao Cheng, Dadong Zhang, Bin Li, Hao Qin, Chang Xu, Miao Han, Yong Yu, Zhizhen Li, Jing-Yu Li, Zhiquan Qiu, Lei Xiong, Chen Liu, Fugen Li, Bin Yi, Xiaoqing Jiang. Targeted deep sequencing contributes to guiding personalized targeted therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 477.

Sustained effect of continuous treatment with bevacizumab following bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in a human ovarian clear cell carcinoma xenograft model.

Although bevacizumab maintenance following bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy has demonstrated significant prolongation of progression-free survival in clinical studies in patients with ovarian cancer, the majority of the cancer cases in the study were of the serous histotype; therefore, data regarding clear cell carcinoma is limited. Furthermore, the efficacy of bevacizumab beyond progression has not yet been demonstrated in ovarian cancer. A xenograft model using the human ovarian clear cell carcinoma cell line RMG-I was used to investigate the antitumor effects and the mechanisms of bevacizumab in maintenance treatment and bevacizumab when administered beyond disease progression. In the RMG-I model, bevacizumab maintenance following bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel exhibited increased tumor suppression, compared with its absence, and inhibited the increase of microvessel density (MVD) in tumors. Following disease progression during bevacizumab maintenance, continued bevacizumab treatment in combination with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin as a secondary chemotherapeutic agent had increased efficacy, compared with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin alone, and resulted in lower MVD accompanied with lower levels of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, which is reported to have angiogenic activity. Continuous suppression of angiogenesis by bevacizumab may contribute to the superior efficacy of bevacizumab maintenance and bevacizumab beyond progression in ovarian cancer.

Clinical and Immunological Implications of Frameshift Mutations in Lung Cancer

IntroductionPresently, programmed death ligand 1 is the most commonly used biomarker to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC. Owing to its several limitations, there is continuous search for more precise and reliable markers. Frameshift mutations by insertion or deletion (fsindels) are suggested to induce more immunogenic tumor-specific neoantigens, conferring better response to ICIs. Positive correlation of fsindels with ICI response has been studied in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. We investigated the implication of fsindels in the clinical outcomes and immune landscape of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs. MethodsWe utilized The Cancer Genome Atlas data set to analyze tumor mutational burden, neoantigen burden, and immune landscape in relation to fsindel status. In addition, utilizing the clinical data from 122 patients treated with ICIs, we evaluated the influence of fsindels on disease response rates and survival outcomes. ResultsA positive correlation between fsindel burden and tumor mutational burden and activated CD4/CD8 T-cell infiltration was shown. Presence of fsindels was also associated with significant prolongation of progression-free survival in patients treated with ICIs (median 6.2 versus 2.7 months [p = 0.01]). In addition, significant differences in the overall response rates (26% versus 12% [p = 0.04]) and disease control rates (68% versus 48% [p = 0.02]) were observed in patients with fsindels. ConclusionOur findings suggest that fsindels may have a predictive role for ICI response in NSCLC.

Results of a phase 2 trial of ribociclib and letrozole in patients with either relapsed estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ovarian cancers or relapsed ER-positive endometrial cancers.

5510 Background: Single agent aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with limited clinical activity in ovarian cancer (OC) and endometrial cancers (EC). AI therapy was associated with a progression free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks of only 20% in relapsed OC (Bowman et al, 2002) and a median PFS of 1 month in relapsed EC (Rose et al, 2000). In Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer, clinical studies had shown a significant prolongation of PFS with the addition of the cyclin kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib to AI (Hortobagyi et al, 2016). Here, we report the results of a phase 2 clinical trial of the combination of ribociclib and letrozole in patients with relapsed ER positive OC or EC. Objectives: Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with relapsed ER positive OC or EC alive and progression-free after 12 weeks of therapy (PFS12) with the combination of ribociclib given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily and letrozole 2.5 mg orally daily. A PFS of 45% was considered a favorable result based on the data referenced above from Bowman et al. Methods: Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed ER positive OC or EC, with measurable disease, not previously treated with ribociclib or AIs. Xenografts were created from CT guided tumor biopsies at baseline to assess feasibility. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled (20 with OC and 20 with EC) ) with a median age of 61 years (range: 30-82) and 64.5 (range: 52-75) in the OC and EC groups respectively. Among the OC patients, 17 had high grade serous carcinomas and 3 had low grade serous carcinomas. 11 EC patients had endometrioid cancers (3 with grade 1 tumors) and 9 had high grade serous tumors. Ten out of 20 OC patients and 11/20 EC patients were alive and progression-free at 12 weeks (PFS12 of 50 and 55%, respectively). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (occurring in at least 5 pts) were leukopenia (18%), lymphopenia (18%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (13%). 34 tumor biopsies were suitable for injection into mice and 44% engrafted. ER expression persisted through multiple passages in mice. Two of three EC PDX models exhibited improved PFS with letrozole/ribociclib compared to letrozole alone. Conclusions: The combination of ribociclib and letrozole is associated with a promising 50% and 55% PFS12 in patients with ER positive relapsed OC or EC respectively. Creation of xenograft tumor models from CT guided biopsies of OC and EC tumors was feasible. Clinical trial information: NCT02657928.

Clinical impact of gemcitabine mono-maintenance versus best supportive care after first-line gemcitabine with platinum in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

404 Background: To evaluate the clinical impact of gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy after 1st line GEM with platinum in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 113 patients who showed with radiological response or stabilization after 4-6 cycles of GEM with platinum.61 patients received maintenance of GEM-mono (GEM group) as 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 every three weeks until progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. And 52 patients received best supportive care (BSC) with regular radiologic evaluation (BSC group). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start date of GEM-mono or BSC was examined. Results: After a median follow-up of all population of 8.21 months, 43 (70%) patients had progressed and 32 (52%) died in the GEM-mono arm, compared to 45 (86%) and 39 (76%) in the BSC arm, respectively. Maintenance of GEM-mono was for a median 6 cycles (2-19). Median PFS was 7–12 months (range 1.5-13.0) in the GEM-mono arm and 4–8 months (range 1.4-8.6) in the BSC arm (Hazard Ratio 0.580, 95%CI 0.38-0.95, p=0.032). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events in the GEM arm were neutropenia (n=11; 18%) and fatigue (n=13; 21%). After progression, 42 (68%) patients received treatment at the GEM and 30 (58%) at the BSC arm. Conclusions: Our data suggest that maintenance of GEM-mono therapy in patients who responded to 1st line GEM with platinum provides a significant prolongation of PFS, and with a manageable toxicity profile.

Randomized phase II study of the PDGFR\u03b1 antibody olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin versus liposomal doxorubicin alone in patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer

BackgroundOlaratumab is a platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα)-targeting monoclonal antibody blocking PDGFRα signaling. PDGFRα expression is associated with a more aggressive phenotype and poor ovarian cancer outcomes. This randomized, open label phase II study evaluated olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin compared with liposomal doxorubicin alone in advanced ovarian cancer patients.MethodsPatients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2, intravenous infusion) administered every 4 weeks with or without olaratumab (20 mg/kg, IV infusion) every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified based on prior response to platinum therapy (refractory vs resistant). The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety.ResultsA total of 123 patients were treated (62 olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin; 61 liposomal doxorubicin). Median PFS was 4.2 months for olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and 4.0 months for liposomal doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 1.043; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.698–1.558; p = 0.837). Median OS was 16.6 months and 16.2 months in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin arms, respectively (HR = 1.098; 95% CI 0.71–1.71). In the platinum-refractory subgroup, median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.6–9.2) and 3.7 months (95% CI 1.9–9.2) in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin (n = 15) and liposomal doxorubicin arms (n = 16), respectively (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.38–1.91). Overall, 59.7% (olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin) and 65.6% (liposomal doxorubicin) of patients reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events regardless of causality. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades) regardless of causality were fatigue related (61%), nausea (57%), and constipation (52%) with olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and nausea (64%), fatigue related (62%), and mucositis (46%) with liposomal doxorubicin.ConclusionsThe addition of olaratumab to liposomal doxorubicin did not result in significant prolongation of PFS or OS in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00913835; registered June 2, 2009.

Three-Year Follow up of the Phase 3 Pollux Study of Daratumumab Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (D-Rd) Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Alone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Introduction: Daratumumab is a human, CD38-targeted, IgGκ monoclonal antibody with both direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action. In the phase 3 POLLUX study, D-Rd reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 63% and significantly increased the overall response rate (ORR) versus Rd alone (93% vs 76%; P 3 years of median follow-up. Methods: Pts with ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomized (1:1) to receive Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg PO on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone 40 mg per week) ± daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV QW for Cycles 1-2, Q2W for Cycles 3-6, then Q4W until disease progression). High risk cytogenetic abnormalities included t(4;14), t(14;16), and del17p. At the time of suspected CR and at 3 and 6 months after confirmed CR (and every 12 months thereafter if CR was maintained), bone marrow aspirates were assessed for MRD using clonoSEQ® V2.0 (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA). Sustained MRD negativity was defined as maintenance of MRD negativity at the 10-5 threshold for ≥6 or ≥12 months. PFS on subsequent line of therapy (PFS2), an exploratory endpoint, was defined as time from randomization to progression after next line of subsequent therapy or death. Results: A total of 569 pts were randomized (D-Rd, n = 286; Rd, n = 283). At a median follow-up of 39.5 months, D-Rd significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus Rd (median, not reached [NR] vs 17.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.55; P The median duration of treatment was 34.3 months in the D-Rd arm versus 16.0 months in the Rd arm. The most common (≥10%) grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) observed with D-Rd versus Rd are described in Table 2. No differences were observed for D-Rd versus Rd in discontinuations due to TEAEs (14% of pts in each treatment group) or incidences of second primary malignancies (7% of pts in each treatment group). Updated data including PFS2 will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: After >3 years of median follow-up, D-Rd continued to demonstrate a significant PFS benefit and higher rates of deeper responses versus Rd alone in RRMM pts. The higher rate of sustained MRD negativity with D-Rd compared with Rd suggests that continued D-Rd treatment drives these deep responses and delays progression. No new safety signals were observed following a median of 34 months of D-Rd exposure. Disclosures Bahlis:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. White:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cook:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlycoMimetics, Celgene, Janssen and Takeda and Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Research Funding. Ho:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel to meeting; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel to meeting. Moreau:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krevvata:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Chiu:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Qin:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Okonkwo:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Trivedi:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Qi:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. San-Miguel:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Efficacy of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the additive effect of bevacizumab when combined with first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MethodsWe searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library in April 2018. When possible, data were pooled to estimate summary effects. The present analysis evaluated treatment related efficacy based on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The analysis was performed to define the overall effect and the effect observed in currently used chemotherapy regimens. ResultsSeven randomised studies were included. In the analysis of the overall effect, PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, p < 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.85, p = 0.0008) clearly favoured bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. When the analysis was focused on currently used chemotherapy excluding 5-FU bolus regimens and including only infusional 5-FU plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin, the addition of bevacizumab prolonged PFS (HR 0.79, p < 0.0001) but not OS (HR 0.92, p = 0.18). However, addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidine monotherapy lead to a significant prolongation of PFS (HR 0.57, p < 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.83, p = 0.03). ConclusionThe present meta-analysis demonstrates that the effect of bevacizumab on survival is not consistent throughout the included regimens. Considering only presently used regimens, a significant effect on PFS and OS was only observed when bevacizumab was added to fluoropyrimidine monotherapy.

Clinical Significance of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Endocrine Therapy for Stage IV Breast Cancer.

Studies have found that patients with cancer exhibit abnormal leukocyte fractions, such as elevated neutrophil count and diminished lymphocyte count, and that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) provides a surrogate marker for prognosis and response to treatment of patients after radical surgery for several different types of cancer. However, few reports have addressed the association between the NLR and response to endocrine therapy. In this study, we carried out a clinical investigation to confirm whether or not the NLR predicted the response to endocrine therapy of stage IV breast cancer. The study subjects were 34 patients who underwent endocrine therapy as initial drug therapy for stage IV breast cancer. The correlation between NLR and prognosis, including the efficacy of endocrine therapy, was evaluated retrospectively. Among the 34 patients, the NLR was high in 10 (29.4%) and low in 24 (70.6%). In analysis of outcomes, the group with low NLR had a significant prolongation of progression-free survival (p=0.003), time to treatment failure (p=0.031), and overall survival (p=0.013) compared to the group with high NLR. Univariate analysis of progression-free survival found that responding to treatment [hazard ratio (HR)=4.310, p=0.004] and low NLR (HR=3.940, p=0.016) were factors associated with a favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis also showed that responding to treatment (HR=4.329, p=0.006) and low NLR (HR=3.930, p=0.008) were independent factors associated with a favorable prognosis. Our results suggested that the NLR may represent a predictive marker for response to endocrine therapy in stage IV breast cancer.