Abstract Background East Asians have smaller aortic valve complexes than individuals from Western countries, and few studies have reported transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in Asian patients with a large annulus. Purpose We aimed to compare the acute and long-term outcomes of TAVR using balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expandable valves (SEVs) in Asian patients with a large annulus. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interveNtion Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry. A large annulus was defined by annular area ≥ 500 mm2 and average diameter ≥ 25 mm in computed tomography scans. The primary endpoint was the 3-year all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were 3-year heart-failure rehospitalization (HFR) after TAVR, acute outcomes of TAVR, and changes in valve function on echocardiography 2 years after TAVR. Results Among 773 patients, 671 (86.8%) underwent BEV-TAVR. The SEV-TAVR group showed a significantly higher incidence of above-moderate perivalvular leakage (2.1% vs. 7.8%; P < 0.001), and included a significantly greater percentage of patients who required postoperative pacemaker implantation (6.1% vs. 11.8%; P = 0.035). The incidence of moderate-to-severe prosthesis–patient mismatch did not differ between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed no significant intergroup differences in the 3-year all-cause mortality and HFR rates (log-rank P = 0.900), and the echocardiography-indexed effective orifice area and mean transaortic valve pressure gradient at 2 years post-TAVR did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions The benefits of BEV-TAVR may outweigh those of SEV-TAVR in patients with a large annulus.