Significant Improvement In Survival Research Articles

Bevacizumab-Induced Hypertension in Glioblastoma Patients and Its Potential as a Modulator of Treatment Response.

Glioblastoma invasion is the primary mechanism responsible for its dismal prognosis and is the direct result of interactions between glioblastoma cells and the tumor vasculature. The dysregulated microvasculature in glioblastoma tumors and vessels co-opted from surrounding brain tissue support rapid tumor growth and are utilized as pathways for invasive cancer cells. Attempts to target the glioblastoma vasculature with antiangiogenic agents (eg, bevacizumab) have nonetheless shown limited and inconsistent efficacy, and the underlying causes of such heterogeneous responses remain unknown. Several studies have identified that patients with glioblastoma who develop hypertension following treatment with bevacizumab show significant improvement in overall survival compared with normotensive nonresponders. Here we review these findings and discuss the potential of hypertension as a biomarker for glioblastoma treatment response in individual patients and the role of hypertension as a modulator of interactions between tumor cells and cells in the perivascular niche. We suggest that a better understanding of the actions of bevacizumab and hypertension at the cellular level will contribute to developing more effective personalized therapies that address glioblastoma tumor cell invasion.

Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with locally advanced vulvar or vaginal cancer in British Columbia

ObjectiveAs vulvar and vaginal cancers are rare malignancies, treatment is extrapolated from the cervical cancer field. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or combined chemoRT is most beneficial. MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with vulvar or vaginal cancer in 2000–2017. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize demographic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, multivariate analysis with hazard ratios (HR) were conducted to compare survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival, between surgery, RT, and chemoRT. ResultsThis study included 688 patients with either vulvar (n = 560, 81%) or vaginal cancer (n = 128, 19%). Median age of diagnosis was 68 (27–98) years. In multivariate survival analysis, vulvar cancer was associated with more likelihood of death (HR: 1.50, p = 0.042) compared to vaginal cancer. For patients who received definitive RT, median OS was 63.8 months with concurrent chemotherapy vs. 46.3 months without for vulvar cancer (p = 0.75); for vaginal, median OS 100.4 with chemotherapy vs. 66.6 months without (p = 0.31). For vulvar cancer patients who received RT (n = 224), adding chemotherapy (n = 100) was not associated with statistically significant OS improvement (HR: 0.989, p = 0.957). Similarly, vaginal cancer patients who received chemoRT (n = 51) did not have significant OS benefit (HR: 0.720, p = 0.331) over patients who received RT (n = 49). ConclusionsIn this retrospective study, chemoRT was not associated with significant improvements in survival compared to RT in vulvar or vaginal cancer. Future studies investigating novel therapies to treat these cancers are needed to improve patient outcomes.

HTA and Reimbursement Status of Metastatic Hormone‑Sensitive Prostate Cancer, Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treatments in Europe: A Patient Access Landscape Review

Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men, with up to one-third of men being diagnosed in their lifetime. Recently, novel therapies have received regulatory approval with significant improvement in overall survival for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. To improve decision-making regarding the value of anticancer therapies and support standardized assessment for use by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed a Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS). Objective: This review aimed to map HTA status, reimbursement restrictions, and patient access for 3 advanced prostate cancer indications across 23 European countries during 2011-2021. Methods: HTA, country reimbursement lists, and ESMO-MCBS scorecards were reviewed for evidence and data across 26 European countries. Results: The analysis demonstrated that only in Greece, Germany, and Sweden was there full access across all included prostate cancer treatments. Treatments available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were widely reimbursed, with both abiraterone and enzalutamide accessible in all countries. In 3 countries (Hungary, the Netherlands, and Switzerland), there was a statistically significant difference (P<.05) between status of reimbursement and ESMO-MCBS “substantial benefit” (score of 4 or 5) vs “no substantial benefit” (score <4). Conclusion: Overall, the impact of the ESMO-MCBS on reimbursement decisions in Europe is unclear, with significant variation across the countries included in this review.

HTA and Reimbursement Status of Metastatic Hormone‑Sensitive Prostate Cancer, Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treatments in Europe: A Patient Access Landscape Review.

Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men, with up to one-third of men being diagnosed in their lifetime. Recently, novel therapies have received regulatory approval with significant improvement in overall survival for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. To improve decision-making regarding the value of anticancer therapies and support standardized assessment for use by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed a Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS). Objective: This review aimed to map HTA status, reimbursement restrictions, and patient access for 3 advanced prostate cancer indications across 23 European countries during 2011-2021. Methods: HTA, country reimbursement lists, and ESMO-MCBS scorecards were reviewed for evidence and data across 26 European countries. Results: The analysis demonstrated that only in Greece, Germany, and Sweden was there full access across all included prostate cancer treatments. Treatments available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were widely reimbursed, with both abiraterone and enzalutamide accessible in all countries. In 3 countries (Hungary, the Netherlands, and Switzerland), there was a statistically significant difference (P<.05) between status of reimbursement and ESMO-MCBS "substantial benefit" (score of 4 or 5) vs "no substantial benefit" (score <4). Conclusion: Overall, the impact of the ESMO-MCBS on reimbursement decisions in Europe is unclear, with significant variation across the countries included in this review.

Cemiplimab + Chemo Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced NSCLC

Cemiplimab + Chemo Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced NSCLC

A negative trial for vasoactive intestinal peptide in COVID-19-associated acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure

A negative trial for vasoactive intestinal peptide in COVID-19-associated acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure

#3670 THE ROLE OF CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS IN MONOGENIC PEDIATRIC STEROID RESISTANT NEPHROTIC SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER STUDY

Abstract Background and Aims Response to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) is associated with a significant improvement in long-term kidney survival of children with non-genetic steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). On the contrary, these agents are considered non-efficacious in monogenic SRNS and are contraindicated according to the latest International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) Clinical Practice Recommendations for SRNS. However, there is evidence suggesting that remission with CNI therapy in this subgroup of children with SRNS is possible, but no studies to date have assessed this question in a systematic way. We aimed to study the incidence of response to CNI in children with monogenic SRNS, factors predictive of remission and the effect of treatment on kidney survival. Method Retrospective cohort study of children 0–18 years with genetically confirmed SRNS treated with a CNI for at least 3 months. Demographic, clinical, genetic, biochemical, histopathologic and treatment data were collected at various time points; at clinical diagnosis, 6, 12, 24 months from CNI onset, and last available follow-up. Pathogenicity of all reported variants was assessed by a dedicated geneticist according to the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines and only patients with a pathogenic genotype were included in the analysis[1]. Patients were classified according to their response to CNI as complete, partial or non-responders based on the IPNA Clinical Practice Recommendations for SRNS[2]. Results 141 patients from 37 international paediatric nephrology centers were included in the study. At 6 months from CNI initiation and at last visit, 27.6% and 22.5%, respectively, demonstrated either complete or partial response (“at least partial response”). Median observation time between CNI initiation and last visit was 42.1 months (IQR 20.1–65.6) and was comparable between patients with no response and at least partial response (42.3 vs 41.6 months; P&amp;gt;0.05). No serious adverse effects mandating treatment discontinuation were reported. Children demonstrating at least partial response at 6 months had a lower risk of progression to kidney failure at last visit versus non-responders (hazard ratio [95%CI] 0.25, [0.10–0.62]; P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years revealed similar results with a hazard ratio of 0.35 (95%CI 0.14–0.91; P = 0.03). Of the various clinical, biochemical, genetic, histopathologic and treatment parameters tested in a multivariable logistic regression model only higher serum albumin at CNI onset was associated with higher likelihood of response at 6 months (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.16, [1.08–1.24]; P &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusion Our findings suggest that CNI use could be considered in monogenic SRNS and that achievement of response in this setting can alter an otherwise dismal long-term kidney outcome.

Molecular pharmacology in complement-mediated hemolytic disorders.

In the last decade, a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of complement mediated hemolytic disorders, such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), cold agglutinin disease (CAD), warm type autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) with complement activation (wAIHA), and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), paved the way to the therapeutic shift from purely supportive approaches to complement-targeted therapies. This resulted in a significant improvement in disease management, survival, and quality of life. In this review, we will provide a snapshot of novel therapies for complement-mediated hemolytic anemias with a focus on those ready to use in clinical practice. C5 inhibitors eculizumab and the long-acting ravulizumab, are the established gold standard for untreated PNH patients, whilst the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan should be considered for suboptimal responders to anti-C5 drugs. Several additional compounds targeting the complement cascade at different levels (other C5 inhibitors, factor B and D inhibitors) are under active investigation with promising results. In CAD, immunosuppression with rituximab remains the first-line. However, recently FDA and EMA approved the anti-C1s monoclonal antibody, sutimlimab, that showed dramatic responses and whose regulatory approval is soon awaited in many countries. Other drugs under investigation in AIHA include the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan, and the anti-C1q ANX005 for warm AIHA with complement activation. Finally, aHUS is an indication for complement inhibitors. Eculizumab and ravulizumab have been approved, whilst other C5 inhibitors, and novel lectin pathway inhibitors are under active investigation in this disease.

DIPG-15. CONCURRENT GB-13 (IL13.E13K-PE4E) IMPROVES THE EFFICACY OF RADIATION THERAPY IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA

Abstract Diffuse midline glioma with H3 K27 alterations (DMG) is the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in the pediatric population. Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard-of-care; however, it has not demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival or stalled disease progression, and children usually succumb to disease within 12-15 months of diagnosis. Consequently, finding efficient treatments for DMG remains one of the most critical unmet needs in modern neuro-oncology. Interleukin 13 receptor subunit alpha 2 (IL-13Rα2) is a cell-surface receptor upregulated in ~80% of DMG versus normal brain, posing a potentially promising therapeutic target. Immunotherapies harnessing IL-13Rα2 to selectively delivery cytotoxic payloads, such as pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE), to tumor cells have been previously demonstrated to be safe in DMG patients and efficacious in preclinical models of DMG with high IL-13Rα2 expression using convection-enhanced delivery (CED). Furthermore, there is evidence that PE-based therapies can sensitize cells to RT. In this study, we utilized in vitro and in vivo models of DMG to evaluate clinically-relevant combination treatments of RT and the IL-13/PE immunotoxin GB-13 (IL13.E13K-PE4E). GB-13 improved the effectiveness of low-dose RT in multiple DMG cell lines by promoting caspase activation, which boosted apoptotic cell death. Intratumoral administration of GB-13 via chronic CED decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival in both DMG patient-derived orthotopic xenograft and genetically engineered mouse models. When GB-13 and RT were administered concurrently, this impact became even more prominent, informing future preclinical and clinical investigation of a potentially efficacious therapeutic approach in a subset of DMG.

Translational Models in Glioma Immunotherapy Research.

Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic domain for the treatment of gliomas. However, clinical trials of various immunotherapeutic modalities have not yielded significant improvements in patient survival. Preclinical models for glioma research should faithfully represent clinically observed features regarding glioma behavior, mutational load, tumor interactions with stromal cells, and immunosuppressive mechanisms. In this review, we dive into the common preclinical models used in glioma immunology, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and highlight examples of their utilization in translational research.

Primary overall survival analysis of the phase 3 randomized ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard-of-care therapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

LBA107 Background: In ZUMA-7 (NCT03391466), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was superior to standard of care (SOC; hazard ratio [HR], 0.398; P&lt;.0001) in the primary analysis of event-free survival as second-line therapy in patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL; Locke et al. NEJM. 2022). In a preplanned interim analysis, median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the axi-cel arm and was 25.7 mo in the SOC arm (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97; Locke et al. TCT 2022. Abstract 1). We now report the primary OS analysis of ZUMA-7. Methods: Study procedures and eligibility were previously reported. The intention-to-treat (ITT) primary OS analysis occurred 5 years after the first patient was randomized (01/25/2018) per protocol. A log-rank test stratified by randomization stratification factors compared OS between the 2 arms. In addition to the ITT analysis and to account for subsequent treatment with cellular immunotherapy off protocol in the SOC arm, prespecified sensitivity analyses of OS were conducted using the Rank-Preserving Structural Failure Time (RPSFT) and Inverse Probability of Censoring Weights (IPCW) models. Other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment, OS in key subgroups, and safety. Results: In total, 359 patients were randomly assigned, 180 to axi-cel and 179 to SOC. As of 01/25/2023, at a median follow-up of 47.2 mo, axi-cel demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS over SOC (HR [95% CI], 0.726 [0.540-0.977]; stratified log-rank 1-sided P=0.0168 [efficacy boundary, 0.0249]). Median OS was longer with axi-cel vs SOC (not reached vs 31.1 mo, respectively); 48-mo OS estimates were higher with axi-cel (54.6% vs 46.0%, respectively). OS benefit with axi-cel vs SOC was consistent in prespecified key subgroups, including age ≥65 years, primary refractory, early relapse, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, and high second-line age-adjusted IPI. In the SOC arm, 102 (57%) patients received subsequent cellular immunotherapy off protocol. Prespecified OS sensitivity analyses, conducted to address the confounding effects of treatment-switching in the SOC arm, showed an even greater OS benefit with axi-cel vs SOC, with stratified HR (95% CI) of 0.608 (0.449-0.824) by RPSFT and 0.633 (0.409-0.981) by IPCW. PFS by investigator confirmed benefit of axi-cel over SOC (HR [95% CI], 0.506 [0.383-0.669]), with 48-mo PFS estimates of 41.8% vs 24.4%, respectively. No new cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events and no new treatment-related deaths occurred since the primary EFS analysis. The safety profile of axi-cel remained consistent with prior studies. Conclusions: Axi-cel as second-line therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival over historical standard of care in patients with early relapsed/refractory LBCL. Clinical trial information: NCT03391466 .

Chemotherapy for the initial treatment of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma at diagnosis: real world application and impact in the SEER database (2004 -2018).

Randomized controlled phase III trials have reported significant improvements in disease response and survival with the addition of chemotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for men presenting with metastatic prostate cancer. We examined the implementation of such knowledge and its impact within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The administration of chemotherapy for men with an initial presentation of metastatic prostate cancer from 2004 to 2018 in the SEER database and its association with survival outcomes was examined. Kaplan-Meier estimates were applied to compare survival curves. Cox proportion hazard survival models were used to analyze the association of chemotherapy and other variables with both cancer- specific and overall survival. A total of 727,804 patients were identified with 99.9% presenting with adenocarcinoma and 0.1% with neuroendocrine histopathology. Chemotherapy as initial treatment for men with de novo distant metastatic adenocarcinoma increased from 5.8% during 2004-2013 to 21.4% during 2014-2018. Chemotherapy was associated with a poorer prognosis during 2004-2013 but was associated with improved cancer-specific (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.93, p=0.0004) and overall survival (HR= 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85, p < 0.0001) during 2014-2018. The improved prognosis during 2014-2018 was observed in patients with visceral or bone metastasis and most impactful for patients aged 71-80 years. These findings were confirmed by subsequent propensity score matching analyses. Furthermore, chemotherapy was consistently provided to 54% of patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma at diagnosis from 2004 to 2018. Treatment was associated with improved cancer-specific survival (HR= 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.87, p=0.0055) and overall survival (HR= 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0. 94, p=0.0176) during 2014-2018 but not significant in earlier years. Chemotherapy at initial diagnosis was increasingly employed in men with metastatic adenocarcinoma after 2014 and consistent with the evolution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Benefits for chemotherapy are suggested after 2014 in the treatment of men with metastatic adenocarcinoma. The use of chemotherapy for neuroendocrine carcinoma at diagnosis has remained stable, and outcomes have improved in more recent years. Further development and optimization of chemotherapy continues to evolve for men with de novo diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer.

Molecular Profile of Canine Hemangiosarcoma and Potential Novel Therapeutic Targets

Canine hemangiosarcoma (HSA) is a relatively common neoplasia, occurring mainly in the skin, spleen, liver and right atrium. Despite the numerous studies investigating the treatment of canine HSA, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved in the last 20 years. Advancements in genetic and molecular profiling presented molecular similarities between canine HSA and human angiosarcoma. It could therefore serve as a valuable model for investigating new and more effective treatments in people and dogs. The most common genetic abnormalities in canine HSA have been found in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) pathways. Mutations are also found in tumor protein p53 (TP53), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). Known abnormal protein expression could be exploited to trial new target treatments that could be beneficial for both canine and human patients. Despite the high expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR), no correlation with overall survival time has ever been found. In this review, we explore the most recent developments in molecular profiling in canine HSA and discuss their possible applications in the prognosis and treatment of this fatal disease.

Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice. In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes. The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) (p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T (p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) (p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) (p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies. The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.

HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment in the First-Line Setting: Expert Review.

The approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors has dramatically improved care for the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, but navigating the rapidly-expanding treatment evidence base is challenging. In this narrative review, we provide best-practice recommendations for the first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer in Canada based on relevant literature, clinical guidelines, and our own clinical experience. Due to statistically significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor is our preferred first-line treatment for de novo advanced disease or relapse ≥12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ribociclib or abemaciclib + fulvestrant is our preferred first-line treatment for patients experiencing early relapse. Abemaciclib or palbociclib may be used when alternatives to ribociclib are needed, and endocrine therapy can be used alone in the case of contraindication to CDK4/6 inhibitors or limited life expectancy. Considerations for special populations-including frail and fit elderly patients, as well as those with visceral disease, brain metastases, and oligometastatic disease-are also explored. For monitoring, we recommend an approach across CDK4/6 inhibitors. For mutational testing, we recommend routinely performing ER/PR/HER2 testing to confirm the subtype of advanced disease at the time of progression and to consider ESR1 and PIK3CA testing for select patients. Where possible, engage a multidisciplinary care team to apply evidence in a patient-centric manner.

Patient-derived skin MicroOrganoSpheres and clinical response to immunotherapy.

2588 Background: Immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), have revolutionized the treatment of many cancers, producing significant improvements in survival in patients with many different cancers. However, the intended anti-tumor effects also result in a unique form of autoimmunity, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which have emerged as a limiting factor for many immunotherapies. Cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs), the most frequently occurring ICI–related toxicities, have been associated with improved efficacy and survival but, in their severe forms, require systemic steroids and have in cases led to premature ICI discontinuation and fatality. There is a need for both robust biomarkers and adequate models that effectively predict which patients who develop irAEs may have improved outcomes. Methods: Using a microfluidic droplet technology that generates "mini" patient-derived organoids called MicroOrganoSpheres (MOS), we successfully generated skin MOS from skin biopsy samples in both healthy skin and tumor-involved skin that sustain the original patient skin immune microenvironment over three weeks. Using this model, we assessed skin cell toxicity and cytokine release in response to ICI and targeted therapies. Results: Clinical responses were largely consistent with the skin and tumor MOS assay readouts, indicating that MOS recapitulates the potential association between skin irAEs and efficacy. Matched pairs of patient melanoma and skin MOS showed good concordance with patient outcome indicating that MOS recapitulates the potential association between skin irAEs and efficacy. Enrichment of genes associated with atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, and psoriatic dermatitis were observed in MOS generated from skin of an ICI-sensitive patient compared to the MOS generated from skin of an ICI-resistant patient. These results indicated that the skin MOS platform can potentially predict the dermatological toxicity of ICI. As the MOS assay can be completed within 12 days after biopsy acquisition, this novel technology may enable personalized medicine approaches by prediction of cirAEs and efficacy for individual patients. Conclusions: This is the first study to date demonstrating the application of a patient-derived immune competent skin model deployable for assessing ICI efficacy and toxicity response. Matched tumor skin MOS from the same patients recapitulated the clinically observed association between ICI efficacy and toxicity and may provide key indicators for prospective irAE-predicting clinical trials.

Survival outcomes of metastasectomy and primary site resection in melanoma patients with isolated brain metastasis: A SEER analysis.

e21541 Background: Approximately 40–50% of Stage IV melanoma patients eventually develop brain metastases which is associated with poor prognosis. Breakthroughs in targeted and immunotherapies have improved long-term survival in advanced melanoma patients. In this new era, there is a paucity of evidence for the role of metastatectomy for melanoma patients with brain metastasis. Here, we investigate the survival benefit of metastasectomy and primary site resection in melanoma patients with isolated brain metastasis. Methods: A total of 636 patients with melanoma with isolated brain metastasis at diagnosis were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2019. Patients younger than 18 years, cases with missing information including age, gender, race, unknown stage, unknown primary site resection status, unknown metastasis site, or known metastasis to the lung, liver, or bones were excluded. Cox regression analysis estimated the prognostic value of metastasectomy and primary site resection, presented by hazard ratios (HR), among melanoma patients. Survival ratios were controlled for age, race, gender, and type of melanoma. All analyses were performed on STATA v17. Results: About 49.37% of melanoma patients with isolated brain metastasis underwent metastasectomy. Of the included sample, 25% (n = 159) underwent primary site resection. Cox regression demonstrated that metastasectomy was associated with improved survival outcomes in melanoma patients with isolated brain metastasis (HR 0.51, CI 0.42 – 0.63, p &lt; 0.001). Pooled primary site resection procedures were associated with improved survival (HR 0.64, CI 0.49 – 0.83, p = 0.001) compared to not having a primary site resection. When stratified per procedure type, “wide excision or re-excision of lesions with margins &gt; 1 cm and microscopically negative margins” was associated with improved survival (HR 0.27, CI 0.133 – 0.56, p &lt; 0.001) compared to not having surgical resection, all other primary site resection procedures had no significant improvement in survival with p &gt; 0.05. Conclusions: Metastasectomy and primary site resection significantly improved survival in melanoma patients with isolated brain metastasis. Wide excision with &gt; 1cm negative margins presents itself as the most effective surgical treatment modality in terms of improving survival for these patients. Thus, it should be attempted whenever feasible.

National trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization for cT1-2 N0 triple negative breast cancer: Did the CREATE-X trial impact treatment patterns?

e12599 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for operable breast cancer allows for in-vivo assessment of chemotherapy response with survival and therapeutic implications. In 2017, the Capecitabine for Residual Cancer as Adjuvant Therapy (CREATE-X) trial demonstrated significant improvement in survival with the addition of adjuvant capecitabine in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual disease after NAC. These results provided the rationale for NAC even in early stage TNBC. The aim of this study was to assess U.S. national rates of NAC utilization in early-stage node-negative TNBC patients before and after the release of CREATE-X and to assess factors associated with receiving NAC vs adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-2N0M0 TNBC from 2014–19. NAC utilization was collected and categorized as 2014-15 (pre-CREATE-X), 2016-17 (transition yrs), and 2018-19 (post-CREATE-X). Those who did not receive chemotherapy were excluded. NAC use over time was analyzed via multivariable logistic regression (MLR). Clinical and demographic factors associated with NAC vs AC utilization were assessed using ANOVA, Chi-squared, and Fisher Exact tests. A MLR model was used to determine predictors of receipt of NAC vs AC. Results: 55,633 women were treated from 2014-19: 26.9% with NAC, 52.4% with AC, and 20.7% received no chemotherapy (median ages 53, 59, and 71yrs, respectively, p &lt; 0.01). Most had cT1c (32.7%, n = 18,190) or cT2 (41.95%, n = 23,331) tumors and 99% had invasive ductal pathology. NAC utilization significantly increased over time, 19.5% (n = 3,465 of 17,777) in 2014-15, 27.1% (n = 5,140 of 18,985) in 2016-17, and 33.6% (n = 6,337 of 18,871) in 2018-19 (p &lt; 0.01). On MLR analysis, increased use of NAC was associated with younger age ( &lt; 50yrs), non-Hispanic white patients, having no comorbidities, having a cT2 tumor, grade 2 disease, and care at an academic or integrated network cancer program (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Patients with Medicare and Medicaid insurance were less likely to receive NAC (p &lt; 0.01). Patients who traveled &gt; 60 miles to their treating facility were more likely to receive NAC (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: From 2014–19, NAC utilization increased for patients with cT1-2N0M0 TNBC coinciding with the release of the CREATE-X results. Findings demonstrate the significance of the multidisciplinary oncology team in developing individualized treatment plans based on emerging clinical trial evidence. Racial, socioeconomic, and access disparities were observed in NAC utilization and warrants further investigation and interventions to ensure equitable care. [Table: see text]

Impact of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid Expansion on Insurance Coverage and Outcomes in Patients with HIV‐associated Aggressive B‐cell Non‐Hodgkin Lymphomas

Introduction: HIV-associated lymphomas affect a uniquely disadvantaged group of patients, who were often denied insurance based on preexisting conditions until the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed in 2010. We investigated the impact of ACA and its Medicaid expansion in 2014 which covered the low-income strata, on outcomes among patients with HIV-associated aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (HIV-aB-NHL). Methods: We used the National cancer database (NCDB) to identify HIV-associated aB-NHL patients aged 18–64 years from 2004 to 2017. We defined the pre-ACA period up to 2013 and the post-ACA period after 2014. States were grouped as Medicaid expansion adopted or not adopted. To reduce bias from advancements in anti-retroviral and chemo-immuno-therapies, we compared survival outcomes between 2010 to 2013 and 2014 to 2017. Kaplan-Meier method and a parametric Weibull model were used for survival analysis. Results: We identified 10,795 eligible patients with HIV-associated aB-NHL, comprised of 1802 Hispanics (16.7%), 3915 non-Hispanic blacks [NHB (36.3%)], 4727 Non-Hispanic Whites [NHW (43.8%)] and 351 other minorities (3.2%). The predominant diagnoses were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (63.3%) and Burkitt lymphoma (20.1%). The figure shows the distribution of insurance status at diagnosis in Medicaid expansion (n = 4611) and non-expansion (n = 3091) states before and after the implementation of ACA stratified by race. Hispanics were more likely to be from residential zip codes in the lower educational quartile. A higher proportion of patients were seen at academic medical centers in expansion states across all races, and this further improved post-ACA. There was a significant improvement in survival seen among NHB (p < 0.01) post-ACA though the trend in Hispanics was not significant (P = 0.36). A multivariable survival analysis using the Weibull model adjusting for age, sex, insurance status, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, income, race, and Medicaid expansion status found statistically significant improvement in the states that adopted Medicaid expansion (HR 0.88, p < 0.01) though NHB race predicted poor survival (HR 1.49, p < 0.01). Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Cancer Health Disparities Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. L. D. Anderson Consultant or advisory role: Celgene, BMS, Amgen, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Beigene, AbbVie, Cellectar, and Sanofi Y. F. Madanat Consultant or advisory role: BluePrint Medicines, GERON, OncLive, Sierra Oncology, Stemline Therapeutics and Novartis G. Kaur Honoraria: BMS and Cellectar F. T. Awan Consultant or advisory role: Genentech, Astrazeneca, Abbvie, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead sciences, Kite pharma, Celgene, Karyopharm, MEI Pharma, Verastem, Incyte, Beigene, Johnson and Johnson, Dava Oncology, BMS, Merck, Cardinal Health, ADCT therapeutics, Epizyme, Caribou Biosciences, Cellecter Bisosciences Research funding: Pharmacyclics P. Ramakrishnan Geethakumari Consultant or advisory role: Kite Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Rafael Pharma, Pharmacyclics LLC, ADC Therapeutics and Cellectar Biosciences

Epidemiology and outcomes of anorectal melanomas: A national database analysis.

e21572 Background: Anorectal melanoma is a rare but aggressive type of melanoma, arising primarily from the mucosal epithelium from the anorectal tract. Knowledge of this rare etiology has been limited given its low incidence. This study aims to characterize the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of anorectal melanoma using a national database. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database was queried to identify patients with biopsy-proven anorectal melanoma. The following information was retrieved: tumor site, grade, stage, intervention, lymph node histology, and survival information for oncology codes as per the international classification of diseases. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 15.1 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Results: The age-adjusted anorectal melanoma annual incidence rates have been stable approximately 0.4-0.5 per 1 million from 2000 to 2019. Of the 823 biopsy-proven confirmed cases of anorectal melanoma from 2000 to 2018, 150 (18.2%) received chemotherapy, 182 (22.1%) received radiotherapy, 55 (6.7%) received chemoradiation, while 619 (75.2%) of the population received surgery alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Statistically significant improvement in survival was noted in treatment strategies that utilized surgery with and without chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (median survival time 22 vs 9 months, p &lt; 0.0001). Patients with positive regional lymph nodes on pathology were associated with worse prognosis (median survival time 15 vs 37 months, p &lt; 0.0001). Outcomes did not differ based on sex (p = 0.810) and race (p = 0.372). Conclusions: Incidence of anorectal melanoma in the United States has been stable in the last twenty years. Treatment strategies including surgical resection should be adopted if possible to achieve improved survival outcomes.