Abstract Background Despite the widespread use of Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), definite data on cardiac remodeling under treatment are still lacking. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis on a large cohort of 201 consecutive HFrEF ambulatory patients who started Sac/Val in our HF unit between Sept. 2016 and Dec. 2018 on top of optimal medical treatment. Patients with both basal and follow up (at least 3 months) echocardiographic assessment (TTE) were included. Results A follow up TTE was performed in 100 patients (male 76%; mean age 67.4 ± 11.1 years; medium follow-up 309 ± 182 days). Baseline characteristics are shown in Tab.1. 34% of the patients reached the maximal dose (97/103 b.i.d.) while 18 interrupted the treatment. We observed an overall significant improvement in ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic and end-systolic ventricular volumes (EDV/ESV), while just a trend in pulmonary pressures (PAPs) and mitral regurgitation (MR) reduction was noted (p = 0.06 and 0.09 respectively). Non ischemic etiology and high dose of Sac/Val were predictors of better remodeling (Fig.1). Conclusion In our study Sac/Val led to an early favorable ventricular remodeling assessed by echocardiography. The observed benefit was greater in patients on higher dose of the drug and non ischemic etiology. Table 1 n = 100 Clinical characteristics Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 116 ± 11 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 70 ± 9 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 13 ± 2.0 MDRD (ml/min/1.73 m2) 63 ± 21.4 Potassium (mmol/L) 4.26 ± 0.50 NYHA class II (n;%) 59 (59%) NYHA class III (n;%) 41 (41%) Ischemic etiology (n;%) 58 (58%) ICD (n;%) 41 (41%) CRT (n;%) 32 (32%) Beta-blockers (n;%) 94 (94%) ACEi or ARBs (n;%) 92 (92%) MRA (n;%) 77 (77%) Baseline clinical characteristics Abstract 410 Figure. Fig. 1
Read full abstract