The burden of diabetes and heart disease falls disproportionately on racial and ethnic minority groups in many developed nations. African Americans and Hispanics in the United States develop diabetes or die of heart disease at rates 50– 100% greater than Caucasians (1,2). Significant differences in socioeconomic status and conventional heart disease risk factors exist among racial/ethnic groups in the United States, Canada and the UK (3–6). However, these differences do not fully account for the observed disparities in disease prevalence (3–6), suggesting the presence of other biological factors. In recent years, attention has been focused on the importance of the insulin resistance syndrome (IRS, also called Syndrome X) as an underlying cause of both diabetes and heart disease (7,8). In this syndrome, insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia place the pancreatic B-cell under chronic stress, and give rise to a variety of well known and novel heart disease risk factors, including glucose intolerance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability and chronic inflammation. In the United States, the prevalence of IRS differs among racial/ethnic groups and increases with age, exceeding 40% in older adults (9,10). IRS has been noted in African-American children as young as 5 y of age (11). Obesity is a major cause of insulin resistance and, as a consequence, of IRS, although many genetic and lifestyle factors also affect insulin resistance (10,12–15). Thus, a fundamental issue in understanding disparities in diabetes and heart disease risk is how the natural history of IRS might differ among racial/ethnic groups. Data from the laboratories of Silva Arslanian (16) and Michael Goran (17) address this point. Firstand second-phase insulin responses were higher in African-American than in Caucasian children after adjusting for body mass index (BMI). Moreover, differences in insulin sensitivity and secretion between African-American and Caucasian children remained, after taking body composition, fat distribution, dietary patterns and physical activity level into account (17,18). In this context, the study by Dickinson et al. (19) in this issue of The Journal of Nutrition is of particular interest. The investigators fed 60 lean, healthy young adults from five racial/ ethnic groups white bread providing 75 g available carbohydrate, and measured changes in plasma glucose and insulin concentrations for a 2-h period. Mean fasting glucose concentrations were very similar among the groups. However, Southeast Asian and Chinese subjects showed markedly higher postprandial glycemia than European Caucasians, with 1.5to 2.0-fold higher mean incremental areas under the glucose curve. In fact, several Southeast Asian subjects had postprandial responses that would have met criteria for the diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance. Mean incremental area under the insulin curve was 1.9to 2.7-fold higher among Southeast Asians, Chinese and Asian Indians compared with European Caucasians. The groups also differed significantly in insulin sensitivity, as assessed by homeostasis model assessment or the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp technique; European Caucasians were most sensitive, whereas Southeast Asians were most resistant. The results do not appear to be attributable to the effects of sex, age, BMI or birth weight because these potentially confounding variables were either controlled for or matched among groups. These findings have three major implications. Abnormalities in glucose homeostasis are prevalent among individuals of certain racial/ethnic groups in the absence of obesity and advanced age, demonstrating an apparent predisposition to development of IRS. Pathophysiological abnormalities related to diabetes and heart disease risk may occur in apparently healthy individuals earlier than previously recognized. Also, measurements taken in fasting subjects may not reveal important abnormalities in glucose homeostasis, consistent with findings from a recent study of obese children (20). It is tempting to ascribe these racial/ethnic differences to genetic influences (21). Indeed, several genes or genetic loci have been identified that appear to increase risk for IRS in certain populations (22). However, other factors may also explain, at least in part, the present observations. Underor overnutrition at critical stages of fetal development appears to induce permanent changes in metabolism, neuroendocrine function or body composition that result in insulin resistance and B-cell dysfunction (23–25). It is especially noteworthy that intrauterine influences may be racial/ethnic group specific, in that low birth weight appears to increase risk for IRS in African Americans to a greater extent than in Caucasians (26). Duration of breast-feeding during infancy has been related to body composition later in life (27). A number of lifestyle factors may also affect risk for insulin resistance, independent of BMI, including diet (e.g., macronutrient composition, fiber, glycemic index, fatty acid profile and dairy consumption) (10,14,15,28–30), physical activity level and fitness (12) and perhaps psychosocial stress. As recognized by 1 Supported by grants from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R01DK59240) and the Charles H. Hood Foundation. 2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.ludwig@tch.harvard.edu.
Read full abstract
Mar 30, 2011
Agnieszka Butwicka + 5
Open Access
