Significant Difference In Lysholm Score Research Articles

Bone marrow lesion and medial meniscus extrusion width changes following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for medial meniscal flap tears

BackgroundThe current literature evaluating meniscectomy outcomes often mixes various tear patterns, failing to elucidate the impact of specific tear types on procedure results. Flap tears, which are prone to causing mechanical symptoms, require targeted research. This study aims to examine Lysholm scores following a meniscectomy for medial meniscus flap tears, to determine if extensive resections lead to poorer one-year outcomes, and to assess their impact on postoperative bone marrow lesion (BML) risk and medial meniscus extrusion (MME) width.MethodsPatients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy for medial meniscal flap tears were classified into three groups: minimum resection, single leaf resection, and subtotal resection. Lysholm scores and medial joint space (MJS) width on Rosenberg view radiographs were measured preoperatively and one year postoperatively. BMLs and MMEs were assessed via MRI preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.ResultsFifty patients (mean age 60 ± 13 years) underwent meniscectomy: minimum resection in 21 (42%), single leaf in 23 (46%), and subtotal in 6 (12%). The Lysholm scores improved significantly, from 65.5 ± 17.6 to 93.4 ± 16.5 (n = 50) at 12 months in patients overall (p < 0.001), while MJS width decreased from 3.9 ± 0.7 mm to 3.5 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in Lysholm scores or MJS widths among the three resection patterns. The occurrence rate of BMLs in the medial femoral condyle and tibial plateau increased post-surgery, peaking at 1 month, but then improved to near-baseline by 12 months. The occurrence rate of BMLs was higher in the single leaf and subtotal meniscectomy groups post-surgery, but declined across all groups by 12 months. Among the three groups with different resection patterns, MME width at 12 months was 2.7 ± 1.8 mm in the subtotal resection group, which was significantly larger than in the other groups.ConclusionsArthroscopic partial meniscectomy for flap tears yielded favorable 12-month outcomes. Larger resections were associated with greater BML incidence and greater MME width.

A Retrospective Study on Arthroscopic Debridement Alone Versus Combined with Microfracture in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes between arthroscopic debridement alone and arthroscopic debridement combined with microfracture in treating knee osteoarthritis, providing evidence for clinical treatment selection. MethodsClinical data of 103 knee osteoarthritis patients treated at our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into observation group (arthroscopic debridement combined with microfracture, n=51) and control group (arthroscopic debridement alone, n=52) based on surgical approach. Lysholm scores, VAS scores, ROM, SF-36 scores, and complications were compared between groups before surgery and 6 months postoperatively. ResultsBoth groups showed significant improvement in Lysholm scores, VAS scores, ROM, and SF-36 scores at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperative values (P<0.001). Compared with the control group, the observation group showed statistically significant differences in Lysholm scores [(76.12±2.45) vs (68.19±2.77)], VAS scores [(2.61±0.49) vs (3.13±0.77)], ROM [(126.20±2.42)° vs (115.02±2.08)°], and SF-36 scores [(77.47±2.08) vs (64.15±1.71)] at 6 months postoperatively (all P<0.001). The total complication rate in the observation group (11.76%) was significantly lower than in the control group (30.77%) (P<0.05). ConclusionArthroscopic debridement combined with microfracture shows significant advantages over arthroscopic debridement alone in improving clinical symptoms, joint function, and quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients, with a lower complication rate, representing a safe and effective treatment option.

Comparative study of I.D.E.A.L. technique and transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

To compare the effectiveness of I.D.E.A.L technique and transtibial (TT) technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A clinical data of 60 patients with ACL injury, who were admitted and met the selection criteria between January 2020 and September 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon. During operation, the femoral tunnel was prepared by using I.D.E.A.L technique in 30 cases (I.D.E.A.L group) and using TT technique in 30 cases (TT group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, cause of injury, injured side, interval from injury to operation, constituent ratio of combined cartilage and meniscus injury, and preoperative Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior tibial translation difference, and Blumensaat angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). The length of hospital stay and the occurrence of early and late complications were recorded. During follow-up, the Lysholm score, IKDC score, and VAS score were used to evaluate knee joint function and pain degree, and the anterior tibial translation difference was measured. MRI reexamination was performed to observe the healing of the graft, and the signal to noise quotient (SNQ) values of the femoral end, middle section, and tibial end of the graft, as well as the Blumensaat angle of the knee joint were measured. The differences in tibial anterior translation difference and Blumensaat angle before and after operation (change values) were calculated and compared between the two groups. The incisions in both groups healed by first intention after operation, and there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 14.9 months. The Lysholm score and IKDC score of the knee joint in both groups after operation increased when compared with those before operation, and the VAS score decreased. Compared to preoperative scores, except for the VAS score of the TT group at 1 week after operation ( P>0.05), there were significant differences in all scores at different time points postoperatively in the two groups ( P<0.05). The above scores in both groups showed a further improvement trend with the prolongation of time after operation. There were significant differences in Lysholm score and VAS score among 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation in the two groups ( P<0.05). The IKDC score of both groups at 1 month after operation was significantly different from that at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05). At 1 week after operation, the Lysholm score and IKDC score in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly higher than those in the TT group ( P<0.05), and the VAS score was significantly lower ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the anterior tibial translation differences in both groups were significantly lower than those before operation ( P<0.05); and the change value in the I.D.E.A.L group was significantly higher than that in the TT group ( P<0.05). The incidences of early and late complications in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly lower than those in the TT group ( P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, MRI examination showed that the grafts of the knee joint in both groups survived well, and the Blumensaat angles of both groups were significantly smaller than those before operation ( P<0.05). The change value of the Blumensaat angle in the I.D.E.A.L group was significantly higher than that in the TT group ( P<0.05). The SNQ values of the femoral end, middle section, and tibial end of the graft in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly higher than those in the TT group ( P<0.05). The early effectiveness of ACL reconstruction by using the I.D.E.A.L technique is better, the knee joint is more stable, and the incidence of postoperative complication is lower. However, the maturity of the graft after reconstruction using the TT technique is higher.

Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy in patellar instability: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

PurposeTo confirm which method provides lower rate of recurrent instability and superior clinical outcomes.MethodWe searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for the trials involving one intervention or both for patellar instability: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). The postoperative Kujala score, Lysholm score, Tegner scores and the rate of recurrent instability (dislocation or subluxation) were analyzed as the primary clinical outcome parameters in a random or fixed effects meta-analysis.ResultsIn total, 43 articles met inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 2046 patients were analyzed. The overall mean age was 20.3 years (range, 9.5–60.0 years), with a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years (range, 1–8 years). The mean Kujala scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 89.04 and 84.44, respectively. There was significant difference in Kujala scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 4.60, 95%CI: 1.07–8.13; P = 0.01). The mean Lysholm scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 90.59 and 88.14, respectively. There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 2.45, 95%CI: -3.20-8.10; P = 0.40). The mean Tegner scores in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 5.30 and 4.88, respectively. There was no significant difference in Tegner scores between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (MD = 0.42, 95%CI: -0.39-1.23; P = 0.31). At final follow-up, the rates of recurrent instability in MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO were 3% and 4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rates between MPFLR and MPFLR + TTO (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.96–1.02; P = 0.4848).ConclusionMPFLR and MPFLR + TTO are effective and reliable treatments in the setting of patellofemoral instability. MPFLR seems to show a better performance in functional outcomes than MPFLR + TTO. Moreover, their rates of recurrent instability are very low, and no significant difference exists.

Clinical outcomes following transtibial medial meniscal root repair are maintained at long-term follow-up.

To evaluate long-term outcomes of patients treated with posterior medial meniscal root tear (PMMRT) repair through assessment of functional outcome scores and to identify patient surgical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics associated with improved outcomes. This was a single-centre, retrospective study evaluating patients who had undergone a PMMR repair using a transtibial suture pullout technique with two locking cinch sutures. This was performed as a follow-up to previously published 2-year and 5-year outcome studies, using the same cohort. All patients from the prior short-term and midterm studies were invited to participate. Patient-reported outcome (PROs) scores, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, were collected. Previously collected demographic data were updated based on review of the electronic medical record. Patient outcomes were assessed preoperatively, as well as at 2-year, 5-yearand 8-yearpostoperatively. MRI outcome measurements were assessed at 2-year and 5-year follow-ups. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. Seventeen patients of the original 18 patients (94.4%) were included in the final analysis. Additionally, three patients who had additional ipsilateral surgery were excluded from the analysis of PROs. The IKDC score significantly increased from 44.7 ± 11.6 at preoperative baseline to 71.2 ± 21.3 at 8-yearpost-operation (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in IKDC score between 2-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.) or 5-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.). The Lysholm score significantly increased from 49.6 ± 7.3 at preoperative baseline to 76.4 ± 17.2 at 8-year follow-up (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between 2-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.) or 5-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.). A linear regression analysis found that 5-year IKDC scores were significantly correlated with 8-year IKDC scores (β = 0.681, p = 0.038). At 8-year follow-up, four (23.5%) patients required additional procedures on their operative knee (one total knee arthroplasty conversion). Patients treated with repair of PMMRT had maintenance of clinical outcome improvements at long-term follow-up despite worsening MRI outcomes at short-term and medium-term follow-ups. While a high proportion of patients required additional procedures on their operative knee at 8-yearfollow-up, few of these patient's additional procedures were related to failure of their primary surgery. Providers and patients may expect durable clinical outcomes following the repair of PMMRT, irrespective of radiographic appearance. Level IV.

Early-term effectiveness comparison of suture hook suture via double posteromedial approaches and Fast-Fix total internal suture in treatment of Ramp lesions

To compare the short-term effectiveness of suture hook suture via double posteromedial approaches and Fast-Fix total internal suture in treatment of Ramp lesions. A clinical data of 56 patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture combined with Ramp lesions, who met the selection criteria and admitted between December 2021 and February 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. The Ramp lesions were sutured using suture hook via double posteromedial approaches under arthroscopy in 28 cases (group A) and treated with Fast-Fix total internal suture under arthroscopy in 28 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, cause of injury, type of injury, time from injury to operation, side of injury, body mass index, and preoperative Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Tegner score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The patients were followed up regularly after operation, and the clinical and imaging healing of the Ramp lesion was evaluated according to the Barrett clinical healing standard and the MRI evaluation standard. Lysholm score, VAS score, and Tegner score were used to evaluate the function and pain degree of knee joint, and the results were compared with those before operation. The incisions of the two groups healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.9 months). Postoperative McMurray tests were negative in both groups. The clinical healing rates of group A and group B were 71.4% (20/28) and 64.3% (18/28) at 6 months after operation, and 92.9% (26/28) and 82.1% (23/28) at 12 months after operation, respectively. The differences between the two groups was not significant ( χ 2=0.327, P=0.567; χ 2=0.469, P=0.225). There was no significant difference in Lysholm score, VAS score, and Tegner score between the two groups at each time point after operation ( P>0.05). The postoperative scores in the two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and the scores at 12 months after operation further improved when compared with those at 6 months after operation, showing significant differences between the different time points in the two groups ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, MRI examination of the knee joint showed that there were 26 (92.9%), 2 (7.1%), and 0 (0) cases of complete healing, partial healing, and nonunion in the Ramp lesion of group A, and 25 (89.3%), 1 (3.6%), and 2 (7.1%) cases in group B, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( Z=-0.530, P=0.596). Suture hook suture via double posteromedial approaches and Fast-Fix total internal suture under arthroscopy are safe and reliable in the treatment of Ramp lesion, and the knee joint function significantly improves after operation.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma After Meniscal Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Meniscal injuries frequently require surgical intervention to restore knee joint function and stability. Intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy to enhance tissue healing post-meniscal repair. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PRP in terms of pain relief, functional recovery, and overall success rates in patients undergoing meniscal repair procedures. A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies across Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohorts, and case-control studies, focusing on intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) use post-meniscal repair and reporting outcomes related to pain, functionality, and cure rates. Exclusion criteria comprised animal studies, non-English publications, studies lacking relevant outcome measures, and those with insufficient data. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, resolving disagreements through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer, followed by a full-text assessment for potentially eligible studies. Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers using a standardized form. The reliability of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses and pooled effect estimates for main outcomes were computed using RevMan 5.3, a meta-analysis tool. The demographic analysis revealed that the PRP group had an average age of 41.39years, while the control group had an average age of 42.1years. In terms of gender distribution, the PRP group consisted of 61 men and 29 women, while the control group had 62 men and 34 women. Pain ratings showed a preference for PRP with a mean difference of 4.83 (p = 0.13). However, there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores (mean difference: - 0.44, p = 0.91) or IKDC scores (mean difference: 2.80, p = 0.14) between the PRP and control groups. Similarly, ROM measures did not show a statistically significant difference, with a mean difference of 2.80 (p = 0.18). Additionally, there was no significant distinction in failure rates between the PRP and control groups, as indicated by a weighted mean difference of 0.71 (p = 0.52). These findings suggest that while PRP may offer some benefits in pain relief, its impact on functional recovery, range of motion, and failure rates following meniscal repair procedures is inconclusive. The current evidence regarding the effect of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on patients undergoing meniscal repair remains inconclusive. While some studies suggest potential benefits in terms of pain relief and functional recovery, others show no significant differences compared to control groups. The impact of PRP therapy on overall success rates, including rates of re-tear and revision surgery, is also uncertain. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to provide more robust evidence and guide clinical practice in orthopedic surgery.

Effects of preoperative anxiety level on pain level and joint functions after total knee arthroplasty

This study examined the effect of preoperative anxiety level on postoperative pain, opioid and nonopioid analgesic use requirements and joint function in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. 106 patients were included in the study. Situational anxiety score (STAI-S) and trait anxiety score (STAI-T) were divided into two groups as below and above 40. Visual analog scale (VAS), Lysholm scores, and anxiety levels were assessed preoperatively, at the third and sixth month postoperatively to investigate their effects on the use of opioid and non-opioid drugs during the postoperative period. For those with low situational and trait anxiety scores, the median duration of hospital stays was significantly shorter compared to those with high anxiety scores. In groups where anxiety levels were initially low, the median anxiety levels at the postoperative 3rd month were also observed to be lower compared to the other group. In the same groups, the median VAS values and the median Lysholm knee scores were significantly better both preoperatively and at the postoperative 3rd month compared to the other group. There was no significant difference in Lysholm score between the two groups at the 6th postoperative month. Similarly, in the preoperative period, groups with low anxiety levels had a significantly lower median usage of both opioids and non-opioids compared to the other group. These findings suggest that high preoperative anxiety may have a negative effect on functional outcomes in the early postoperative period, but this effect disappeared at 6 months. It can be concluded that reducing preoperative anxiety may have a positive effect on early outcomes. We believe that preoperative psychological evaluation and treatment can increase the satisfaction level in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

The degree of fracture reduction does not compromise the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic reduction and fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to explore the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic internal fixation with repositioning sutures for the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures with poorly reduced fracture fragments. It was hypothesized that improperly repositioned fracture fragments might not influence the postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with PCL avulsion fractures treated by arthroscopic sutures. From January 2020 to December 2021, patients admitted to our hospital with PCL avulsion fractures were evaluated. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: diagnosis of PCL avulsion fracture as Meyers & McKeever Type II or Type III; underwent arthroscopic double tunnel suture fixation; and age below 70. Of the patients meeting these criteria, data from 34 individuals were collected by a designated follow-up officer. Based on postoperative imaging, the patients were divided into 2 groups: well fracture reduction and poor fracture reduction groups. Prior to the surgery, the Lysholm score, knee mobility, and international knee documentation committee (IKDC score) were recorded for both groups. At the 3-month post-surgery mark, CT-3D reconstruction was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted on the collected data. For data that conformed to a normal distribution, the t test was applied. For data that didn't conform, we used a non-parametric test. Both groups achieved successful wound healing without encountering any adverse events, such as fracture nonunion infection. Fracture healing was observed in both groups at the 3-month postoperative mark. The average follow-up duration was 13.24 ± 6.18 months. There were no significant differences in Lysholm score, IKDC score, or knee mobility between the well- and poorly-reduced groups at the final follow-up (P > .05). Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee function compared to the preoperative scores, with statistically significant differences observed in Lysholm score, IKDC score, and knee mobility (P < .05). Arthroscopic fixation with double-tunnel sutures proved to be a highly effective treatment approach for PCL avulsion fractures, even in cases where the fractures were poorly reduced. Remarkably, there were no significant differences observed in postoperative knee function between the well- and poorly-reduced groups, indicating that both groups achieved favorable outcomes.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) and Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis Using Modified Lemaire Technique versus ACLR alone : A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture was the most common injury that occurred in the knee. Reconstruction was the most common operative management used. After primary ACL reconstruction, a rerupture can be devastating. Several extraarticular procedures have been proposed to resolve rotatory instability, such as tenodesis. We determined to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) using the modified Lemaire technique and evaluated the risk of failure or re-rupture rate and the outcome. Method: We conducted a meta-analysis based on The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The search was conducted in June 2022 on several databases: PubMed, EBSCOHost, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and WileyOnline using Boolean operators focusing on PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome). Included studies will be extracted for characteristics such as author and study year, location, design, sample characteristics, failure (graft or clinical failure), and outcome (KOOS score, functional outcome, clinical outcome). Studies will be qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated using Review Manager 5.4 or equivalent. Result: Search was conducted and resulted in the five final studies with 797 patients. ACLR + LET has a lower risk of failure or re-rupture ratio than ACLR alone (RR= 0.44; 95% CI 0.26 – 0.75; I2=9%; p= 0.003). There were differences in the KOOS pain score, ADL score, sports score and QOL score with mean difference of 0.20 (95% CI 0.10, 0.30; I2=0%; p &lt;0.0001), -0.20 (95% CI -0.26, -0.13; I2=0%; p &lt;0.00001), 0.20 (95% CI 0.02, 0.38; I2=0%; p= 0.03), and 0.50 (95% CI 0.29, 0.71; I2=0%; p&lt; 0.00001) respectively. Furthermore, there was a significant mean difference in the International Knee Documentation Committee score of 0.70 (95% CI 0.57, 0.83; I2=0%; p &lt;0.000001). However, there were no significant differences in Lysholm score, and Tegner score between groups. Conclusion: LET was considered adequate in adjunction to ACLR, to minimize rerupture rate, and to improve stability and laxity of the knee to improve clinical outcome

A comparison of functional knee outcomes post-arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring and peroneus longus (PL) autograft

Background: Hamstring autograft (HA) is the most common graft used in ACL reconstruction procedures. However, harvesting HA could weaken the secondary stabilizer of the knee joint. Peroneus longus grafts (PL) is a novel option secondary to hamstring graft with less morbidity at the knee joint. We intended to determine whether peroneus longus autograft (PL) is a comparable alternative to hamstring autograft for ACL Reconstruction. Methods: 84 patients were grouped into "hamstring" (n = 51) and "peroneus longus" (n = 33) groups, with a mean age of 26.2 ± 5.9 in the Hamstring group and a mean age of 26.4 ± 6.6 in peroneus group. We obtain secondary data from the medical records of several hospitals in Makassar. Results: There was a significant difference in Lysholm score (p&lt;0.05) in the hamstring group with peroneus at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively for IKDC score, anterior translation, Power Grading Flexi-Extension, ROM on flexion, and extension. In addition, in muscle atrophy, the Hamstring group compared to the peroneus group also showed a significant difference (p=0.001). Conclusion: The study's results did not show significant differences between the hamstring and peroneus groups other than atrophy of thigh muscles in the hamstring group. Based on the results of this study, we conclude peroneus longus graft is one of the graft options in ACL reconstruction surgery.

Functional Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Tibial Attachment Preserving versus Sacrificing Hamstring Graft Technique- A Prospective Interventional Study

Introduction: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is a stout, short intra-articular, extra synovial structure. For a knee with the deficiency of ACL, the ligament reconstruction using an autograft, either a free bone patellar tendon bone graft or a Semi Tendinosus and Gracilis (STG) tendon free hamstring graft, is the most common surgical treatment. Tibial fixation region of the graft is presumed to be a delicate point in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. There, can be a chance of graft pull out from the tibial tunnel before actual healing of the graft– tunnel can occur. To avoid this problem, the technique of tibial attachment preserved hamstring graft can be used instead of free hamstring graft. Aim: To evaluate and compare the functional outcome of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with either a free hamstring graft or by tibial attachment preserving hamstring graft. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Swami Rama Himalayan University Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, over a period of one year (July 2019-July 2020). A total 52 patients were included and they were divided into two groups. Group A (tibial attachment preserving hamstring graft) and Group B (tibial attachment sacrificing hamstring graft) with each group comprised 26 patients. Patients were assessed with Lysholm score at 6, 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up. For determining the statistical difference between the two groups Independent Student’s t-test was used, whereas for more than two groups Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used and a p-value &lt;0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 30.73±10.02 years whereas in group B it was 29.54±9.84 years. For group A, mean Lysholm score at 6 weeks was 73.23±8.37, at 12 week score was 86.85±5.93 and at 24 week score was 95.58±4.91. For group B, mean Lysholm score at 6 weeks was 74.15±5.82, at 12 weeks score was 87.46±5.95 and at 24 weeks score was 96.92±3.61. Post-hoc analysis showed that there was a significant difference in mean Lysholm score {between preoperative and other time points (p&lt;0.001, respectively)} for both the groups but there was no significant difference in Lysholm score at 6 weeks (p=0.646), 12 weeks (p=0.710) and 24 weeks (p=0.265) when compared between the two groups. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft with preserved tibial insertion resulted in no statistically significant difference in functional outcome as compared with free autograft.

Outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors: A systematic review

IntroductionTwo major techniques are used to repair complete quadriceps tendon ruptures, transosseous tunnel (TT) and the suture anchor (SA). There are multiple studies comparing the biomechanical outcomes of repairs performed with TT or SA. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using SA and TT fixation techniques. MethodsThree major search engines were used with predetermined keyword searches to perform a systematic review of literature. These studies were independently scanned by two reviewers using PRISMA criterion. All included studies had to include at least one of the following outcome measures: range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, complications, and/or re-ruptures. ResultsUsing three major search engines, 1039 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for inclusion, 49 articles were reviewed. Two independent reviewers searched the studies to meet the inclusion criteria, and eight studies were selected. These eight studies included 156 knees in the TT group and 54 knees in the SA group. The TT group had a significantly better ROM after QT repair (132.5° versus 127.0°, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the TT group (92.6) and SA group (91.0, p = 0.11). There were significantly more complications in SA groups (9.3% versus 1.3%, p = 0.013), but not a significant difference in re-rupture rate between those undergoing SA vs. TT repair (3.7% versus 0%, p = 0.065). The SA group had a significantly higher age at time of surgery (63.62 vs. 54.32) ConclusionThe current study suggests that, following quadriceps tendon rupture, there are no significant differences in functional outcome between TT and SA techniques. Those undergoing TT repair attained a statistically significantly greater final ROM but this difference may not be clinically relevant. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of post-operative complications using SA technique.

The comparison of clinical outcomes of popliteal tendon recess and reconstruction technique

Objective To compare the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of recess procedure versus popliteal tendon reconstruction in patients with posterolateral corner injury. Methods From January 2012 to January 2017, patients who were eligible for inclusion in this study if they 1) had acute posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI) and were treated surgically in our institution, 2) were followed for a minimum of 2 years with examination under anesthesia results. The mean age was 34.5±7.4 years (range 20-45 years). According to Fanelli's classification, there were 31 type A, 17 type B and 6 type C cases. There were 26 patients in reconstruction group and 28 patients in recess group. Outcomes included subjective scoring systems (Lysholm score, Tegner score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score), knee stability examinations (the side-to-side difference (SSD) of tibial external rotation angle by dial test, posterior and varus stress radiograph) and second-look arthroscopic lateral gutter drive-through test during hardware removal operation. Results The mean follow-up duration was 30.2±4.9 months in reconstruction group and 32.2±9.9 months in recess group. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in Lysholm scores (reconstruction group: 70.1±15.5, recess group: 70.0±10.2; t=0.089, P=0.926), Tegner scores (reconstruction group: 3(2, 5), recess group: 2(1, 4); U=395.522, P=0.156), or IKDC subjective scores (reconstruction group: 74.8±19.3, recess group: 71.2±17.6; t=0.381, P=0.722) between the groups. No significant difference in SSD on posterior stress radiography (reconstruction group: 4.1±3.4 mm, recess group: 4.7±2.6 mm; t=0.918, P=0.345) or medial stress radiography (reconstruction group: 4.0±1.7 mm, recess group: 3.8±1.9 mm; t=0.208, P=0.820) was observed. There was no significant difference on SSD of dial test (reconstruction group: 1.5°±4.2°, recess group: 1.1°±4.0°, t=0.586, P=0.565). No positive lateral gutter drive-through test was observed in all groups. Conclusion Both recess procedure and popliteal tendon reconstructions significantly improve the knee stability and subjective outcomes of patients with PLRI. In a comparison with popliteal tendon reconstruction, the recess procedure has similar subjective and objective clinical outcomes. Key words: Collateral ligaments; Tendon injuries; Arthroscopy; Reconstructive surgical procedures

Platelet rich plasma intra-articular and extra-articular injection for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

To observe clinical effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular and extra-articular injection for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and analyze its safety and clinical efficacy. From January to December 2017, 48 patients with KOA were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 24 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with intra-articular injection of PRP (2 ml) and extra-articular injection of PRP (2 ml), once a week, for three times, including 8 males and 16 females with an average of (58.04±7.87) years old ranging from 43 to 68 years old, the courses of disease ranged from 1 to 8 years with an average of (4.69±1.96) years, the body mass index (BMI) was (24.53±5.26) kg/m 2 . The control group was treated with intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate (20 mg), extra-articular injection of analgesic drug (2 ml for one point), once a week, for three times, including 7 males and 17 females with an average of (60.54±8.93) years old ranging from 47 to 72 years old, the courses of disease ranged from 1.5 to 9 years with an average of (5.27±1.68) years, BMI was (23.47±4.62) kg/m 2 . VAS score and Lysholm score before operation and the 1st, 6th month after treatment were compared between two groups. All patients were followed up at least 6 months without occurrence serious adverse reactions or complications. VAS score in observation group and control group before treatment and 1st, 6th month after treatment were 7.35±1.47, 4.15±1.52, 2.26±1.02 and 7.51±1.39, 3.84±1.76, 3.66±1.18, respectively; VAS score in obsevation group was lower than that of control group at 6 months after treatment. Lysholm score in observation group and control group before treatment and 1st, 6th month after treatment were 55.21±5.78, 79.16±7.25, 85.45±6.87 and 54.65± 6.40, 77.58±6.94, 82.34±7.12. There were significant differences in Lysholm score before and after injection between two groups (P<0.05) . There was no significant difference in Lysholm score between two groups at 1 month after treatment (P>0.05), while Lysholm score in observation group was better than that of control group at 6 months after treatment (P<0.05) . Intra-articular and extra-articular injection of PRP could relieve pain symptoms and improve function of knee joint with higher safety, although the short-term effect is not significantly different from traditional treatment, its medium-long-term effect is stable. It is a safe and effective method for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Arthroscopic repair of horizontal cleavage meniscus tears provides good clinical outcomes in spite of poor meniscus healing.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and meniscus healing after arthroscopic repair of horizontal-cleavage meniscus tears, compared with vertical-longitudinal meniscus tears. This was a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 52 meniscal repairs for horizontal-cleavage tears (n = 27) or vertical-longitudinal tears (n = 25); the groups were compared with respect to clinical symptoms and meniscal healing. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using the inside-out technique with a marrow-stimulating technique. Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Lysholm score and Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Meniscus healing was evaluated by MRI. The mean follow-up periods were 35.4 ± 8.9months in the horizontal-cleavage tear group and 39.8 ± 8.3months in the vertical-longitudinal tear group. There were no significant differences in Lysholm score and KOOS, including each subscale, between the horizontal-cleavage tear- and vertical-longitudinal tear-groups at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, MRI meniscus grades 0 and 1 were significantly more frequent in the vertical-longitudinal tear-group than in the horizontal-cleavage tear-group, while grade 3 was significantly more frequent in the horizontal-cleavage tear group than in the vertical-longitudinal tear group (p < 0.0001). Although meniscus healing of horizontal-cleavage tears may be poor, arthroscopic repair should be considered for horizontal-cleavage tears because it does provide good clinical outcomes. IV.

Arthroscopic cyst removal and wire-guided suture for the treatment of lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint

To explore clinical effect of arthroscopic cyst removal and wire-guided suture for the treatment of lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint. From July 2014 to December 2017, 33 patients with lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint were treated by arthroscopic cysts removal and wire-guided suture, including 13 males and 20 females, aged from 20 to 55 years old with an average age of(36.23 ±2.30) years old, the courses of disease ranged from 3 to 14 months with an average of(4.60±0.83) months; Preoperative MRI examination was clear diagnosed. There were 14 cysts on anterior horn, 18 cysts on meniscal body and 1 cyst on posterior horn;all cysts were solitary, and 3 of them were multilocular. Lysholm score and GLASOW score of knee joint function and clinical efficacy were observed before and after operation at 6 months. All patients were followed up form 6 to 24 months with an average of (7.5±1.2) months. Preoperative symptoms disappeared or significantly alleviated, and all incisions were healed by intention without complication and neurovascular injury. MRI showed meniscal tear areas and cystic defective areas healed, cyst was not recurrenced, healing time ranged form 8 to 12 weeks with an average of (9.6±1.6) weeks, and patients recovered their daily life and exercise. There was significant difference in Lysholm score before operation (61.12±4.35) and after operation at 6 momths(91.32±3.36)(t=46.11, P<0.01);according to GLASOW assessment, 31 patients with excellent recovery, and 2 good. Arthroscopic cyst removal and wire-guided suture for the treatment of lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint could reserve meniscus, repair injury of meniscus, recover knee joint function after operation, and is worth popularizing.

Does Donor Age of Nonirradiated Achilles Tendon Allograft Influence Mid-Term Results of Revision ACL Reconstruction?

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to investigate if the donor age of nonirradiated Achilles tendon allograft could influence the clinical results of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods All patients that underwent ACL revision between 2004 and 2008 with at least 4 years of follow-up were included. For all the patients that met the inclusion criteria, the age of the graft donor was obtained from the tissue bank. Lysholm score was administered to patients that met inclusion criteria. In addition, patients were divided in two groups based on the donor age (<45 years vs. ≥45 years), and the baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results Fifty-two patients were evaluated at a mean 4.8 ± 0.8 years follow-up with Lysholm score. The Lysholm significantly improved from 62.3 ± 6.6 at preoperative status to 84.4 ± 12.3 at final follow-up. The mean donor age was 48.7 ± 8.4 years; a significant difference in Lysholm score was noted between patients that received an allograft with a donor age <45 years (14 patients; 27%) and those receiving an allograft with a donor age ≥45 years (38; 73%) (89.5 ± 3.2 vs. 80.1 ± 11.1, respectively; p = 0.0469). The multiple regression model showed the donor age, the final follow-up, and the preoperative Lysholm score as significant predictors of postoperative Lysholm score ( p < 0.0002). Conclusion Donor age of nonirradiated Achilles tendon allograft influenced the mid-term results of revision ACL reconstruction, thus advising the use of grafts from young donors. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for discoid lateral meniscus injury in knee joint: a self-control study

Background and objectives: Discoid meniscus injury is a rare form of abnormal meniscus morphology with unknown pathogenesis. The complete disc-shaped meniscus is more prone than incomplete disc-shaped meniscus to tearing and adverse reactions such as joint degeneration and osteochondritis. Moreover, its clinical efficacy is not satisfactory. Arthroscopic meniscus surgery can enhance the stability of the meniscus and provide sufficient cushioning pressure to prevent recurrent meniscal tears. Therefore, this study will investigate the efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for discoid meniscus injury in knee joint and analyze risk factors that influence the efficacy of arthroscopic surgery. Methods: This single-center, self-control study will include 196 patients with discoid meniscus injury who will receive arthroscopic meniscus repair (Stryker) from December 2018 to December 2019 at the Department of Sports Trauma and Arthroscopy, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University of China. This surgical procedure will include meniscus plasty and subtotal meniscectomy. After surgery, all included patients will be followed up for 6–18 months. Surgical efficacy will be evaluated by Lysholm score. Patients will be divided into an excellent-and-good group (Lysholm score ≥ 85) and a poor group (Lysholm score Results: The primary outcome measure of this study is the change in excellent-and-good rate of Lysholm score that reflects knee joint function measured at the last follow-up in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery. Secondary outcome measures are Lysholm score; Outerbridge grade of chondral lesion; knee joint morphology by magnetic resonance images before surgery and at the last follow-up; age, sex, lesion region, and course of disease before surgery; and incidence of adverse reactions at the last follow-up. Clinical data from 115 patients with discoid meniscus injury (150 knees) who received treatment from April 2015 to September 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Six to eighteen months of follow-up of 115 patients revealed a significant difference in Lysholm scores before surgery (65.80 ± 9.39) and at the last follow-up (89.15 ± 7.45; P Conclusion: Results from this study hope to confirm that arthroscopic surgery for discoid meniscus injury is a definitive treatment technique. Patient age and the degree of chondral lesion are closely related with efficacy, so it is recommended that patients with symptomatic discoid meniscus injury undergo surgery as soon as possible. Ethics and trial registration: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (approval No. PJ2018-02-03) on February 5, 2018. The version of the study protocol is 1.0. Patients and their family members will volunteer to participate in this study. Written informed consent will be obtained from each patient. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR1800019182) on October 30, 2018.

Clinical Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With or Without Other Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: While additional procedures correcting accompanying pathological conditions can improve the clinical outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), whether those outcomes are comparable or poorer than those of isolated MAT has yet to be clarified. Purpose: To evaluate whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between isolated MAT and MAT combined with other procedures (combined MAT). Study Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Methods: For the comparison of clinical outcomes between isolated MAT and combined MAT, the authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that separately reported the clinical outcomes of isolated MAT and combined MAT were included. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication, reoperation, survivorship, and failure rates. We conducted a meta-analysis of the PROs that were used in more than 3 studies. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in this study. In the meta-analysis, no significant differences in Lysholm scores (95% CI, –5.92 to 1.55; P = .25), Tegner activity scores (95% CI, –0.54 to 0.22; P = .41), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores (95% CI, –5.67 to 3.37; P = .62), and visual analog scale scores (95% CI, –0.15 to 0.94; P = .16) were observed between isolated MAT and combined MAT. For PROs that were not included in the meta-analysis, most studies reported no significant difference between the 2 groups. As for the survivorship and failure rates, studies showed varying outcomes. Four studies reported that additional procedures did not affect MAT failure or survivorship. However, 3 studies reported that ligament surgery, realignment osteotomy, and osteochondral autograft transfer were risk factors of failure. One study reported that the medial MAT group in which high tibial osteotomy was performed showed a higher survival rate than the isolated medial MAT group. Conclusion: Overall, there seems to be no significant difference between the postoperative PROs in terms of isolated MAT and combined MAT. However, more data are required to verify the effects of osteotomy and cartilage procedures on the clinical outcomes of MAT. We could not draw conclusions about the differences in complication, reoperation, survivorship, and failure rates between the 2 groups because we did not obtain sufficient data.