Significant Difference In Event-free Survival Research Articles

The prognostic value of baseline EARL standardized FDG PET indices in pediatric and adolescent high-grade osteosarcoma.

To investigate the prognostic value of baseline European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd. (EARL) standardized [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET-CT) quantitative values for survival and to evaluate cutoff values identified in other studies. Pediatric and adolescent patients with high-grade osteosarcoma were included. Baseline [18F]FDG PET-CT, with EARL-accredited reconstructions, was the standard diagnostic staging procedure. Cox proportional hazard analysis for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed with clinical prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were applied to investigate the prognostic performance of the [18F]FDG PET indices. In total, 66 patients were included in this study. In the univariable Cox regression analysis, peak lean-body mass corrected SUV (SULpeak) (hazard ratio (HR): 1.04), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) (HR: 1.0), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (HR: 1.0) were not associated with EFS or OS. Log-rank analysis showed a significant difference in EFS for all SULmax and SULpeak cutoffs. For MTVtotal the maximum Youden, and for TLGtotal, the maximum Youden and maximally selected rank cutoff resulted in a significant EFS difference. No cutoff for any measure showed a significant difference in OS between the groups. ROC curves for event status had an AUC of 0.67, 0.66, 0.64, and 0.64 for SULmax, SULpeak, MTVtotal, and TLGtotal, respectively. In this study, the baseline EARL-standardized [18F]FDG PET indices of children and adolescents with osteosarcoma were not prognostic of EFS or OS. The proposed prognostic cutoffs from earlier studies suffer from important technical and statistical issues. Question Prognostic value of baseline [18F]FDG PET-CT imaging markers have been reported for histologic response and survival in high-grade osteosarcoma but have not been validated for clinical practice. Findings Baseline SUVpeak, TLGtotal, and MTVtotal measured on EARL-accredited reconstructions were not prognostic factors for survival in pediatric and adolescent patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Clinical relevance A wide range of values for SUVpeak and SUVmax cutoffs with similar prognostic value were identified, questioning the value of a single proposed cutoff. Lack of validation, with important technical and statistical issues of proposed prognostic cutoffs, limits clinical implementation.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) is a new treatment method for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Network meta-analysis assessed efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NICT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and international conferences. Outcomes were surgical resection rate, pathological complete response(pCR),event-free survival (EFS), and Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RCTs of 3,387 patients, six treatment combinations, and two modalities were included. Meta-analysis showed that NICT yielded higher pCR and EFS rates than NCT. The toripalimab-chemotherapy combination had the highest surgical resection rate (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05-2.73), pCR (OR = 38.84, 95% CI: 11.05-268.19) and EFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.58).This regimen worked well for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or squamous cell pathology. For high PD-L1 expression and patients with NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy had the most efficacy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events increased with longer treatment cycles, with perioperative nivolumab combined with chemotherapy showing the worst safety profile (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00-1.76), while neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy alone had the best safety profile (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68-1.21). Indirect comparison showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.65-1.35). In the indirect comparison between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), although there was no significant difference in EFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.08), PD-1 inhibitors may still be the most effective treatment option. NICT effectively and safely treats resectable NSCLC. The optimal treatment combination is typically toripalimab and chemotherapy. Treatment based on PD-L1 expression and pathological type is recommended.

Clipping the Positive Lymph Node in Patients with Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on Axillary Surgery in the ISPY-2 Clinical Trial

BackgroundFor patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), retrieving previously clipped, biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy [i.e., targeted axillary dissection (TAD)] may reduce false negative rates. However, the overall utilization and impact of clipping positive nodes remains uncertain.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed cN+ ISPY-2 patients (2011–2022) undergoing axillary surgery after NAC. We evaluated trends in node clipping and associations with type of axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node (SLN) only, SLN and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or ALND only] and event-free survival (EFS) in patients that were cN+ on a NAC trial.ResultsAmong 801 cN+ patients, 161 (20.1%) had pre-NAC clip placement in the positive node. The proportion of patients that were cN+ undergoing clip placement increased from 2.4 to 36.2% between 2011 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression showed nodal clipping was independently associated with higher odds of SLN-only surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8–6.8, p < 0.001]. This was also true among patients with residual pathologically node-positive (pN+) disease. Completion ALND rate did not differ based on clip retrieval success. No significant differences in EFS were observed in those with or without clip placement, both with or without successful clip retrieval [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.4–1.7, p = 0.7; HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5–6.0, p = 0.3, respectively].ConclusionClip placement in the positive lymph node before NAC is increasingly common. The significant association between clip placement and omission of axillary dissection, even among patients with pN+ disease, suggests a paradigm shift toward TAD as a definitive surgical management strategy in patients with pN+ disease after NAC.

Taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline for neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized, controlled, phase II study

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that the addition of platinum to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improved outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, no studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of taxane and lobaplatin. In this study, we conducted a randomized controlled phase II clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline.MethodsWe randomly allocated patients with stage I–III TNBC into Arm A and Arm B. Arm A received six cycles of taxane combined with lobaplatin (TL). Arm B received six cycles of taxane combined with anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (TEC) or eight cycles of anthracycline combined with cyclophosphamide and sequential use of taxane (EC-T). Both Arms underwent surgery after NAC. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsA total of 103 patients (51 in Arm A and 52 in Arm B) were assessed. The pCR rate of Arm A was significantly higher than that of Arm B (41.2% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.028). Patients with positive lymph nodes and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) benefited significantly more from Arm A than those with negative lymph nodes and high NLR (Pinteraction = 0.001, Pinteraction = 0.012, respectively). There was no significant difference in EFS (P = 0.895) or OS (P = 0.633) between the two arms. The prevalence of grade-3/4 anemia was higher in Arm A (P = 0.015), and the prevalence of grade-3/4 neutropenia was higher in Arm B (P = 0.044).ConclusionsNeoadjuvant taxane plus lobaplatin has shown better efficacy than taxane plus anthracycline, and both regimens have similar toxicity profiles. This trial may provide a reference for a better combination strategy of immunotherapy in NAC for TNBC in the future.

Comparable outcomes of allogeneic peripheral blood versus bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a sibling donor for pediatric patients.

Traditionally, bone marrow (BM) has been preferred as a source of stem cells (SCs) in pediatric hematopoietic SC transplantation (HSCT); however, the use of peripheral blood SCs (PBSC) has recently increased. With advancing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, whether the BM is still a better SC source than PB in sibling donor HSCT remains controversial. Here, we compared the results of BM transplantation (BMT) and PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) in pediatric patients with malignant or non-malignant diseases receiving sibling HSCT using a total of 7.5mg/kg of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). We retrospectively reviewed children who received HSCT from a sibling donor between 2005 and 2020 at Seoul National University Children's Hospital. Of the 86 patients, 40 underwent BMT, and 46 underwent PBSCT. Fifty- six patients had malignant diseases, whereas thirty patients had non-malignant diseases. All conditioning regimens comprised ATG. Busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimens were administered to patients with malignant diseases and approximately half of those with non-malignant diseases. The remaining half of the patients with non-malignant diseases were administered cyclophosphamide-based reduced- intensity conditioning regimens. According to studies conducted at our center, all BM donors received G-CSF before harvest to achieve early engraftment. In all 86 patients (47 males and 39 females), the median age at the time of HSCT was 11.4 (range, 0.7 - 24.6) years. The median follow-up period was 57.9 (range, 0.9-228.6) months, and the corresponding values for those with BM and PBSC were 77 (range, 2.4-228.6) months and 48.7 (range, 0.9-213.2) months, respectively. Engraftment failure occurred in one patient with BM and no patient with PBSC. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD with grades II-IV was higher in PBSC (BM 2.5%, PBSC 26.1%, p = 0.002), but there was no significant difference in those with grades III-IV acute GVHD (BM 0%, PBSC 6.5%, p = 0.3703) and extensive chronic GVHD (BM 2.5%, PBSC 11.6%, p = 0.1004). There were no significant differences in treatment-related mortality (TRM) (BM 14.2%, PBSC 6.8%, p = 0.453), 5-year event-free survival (EFS) (BM 71.5%, PBSC 76.2%, p = 0.874), and overall survival (OS) rates (BM 80.8%, PBSC 80.3%, p = 0.867) between BM and PBSC in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, which included all factors with p < 0.50 in the univariate analysis, there was no significant prognostic factor for EFS or OS. There was no significant difference in the relapse incidence between BM and PBSC among patients with malignant diseases (BM 14.2%, PBSC 6.8%, p = 0.453). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the TRM, 5-year EFS, and OS rates between malignant and non-malignant diseases nor between the busulfan-based myeloablative regimen and reduced-intensity chemotherapy using cyclophosphamide. In this study, we showed no significant differences in EFS, OS, TRM, and GVHD, except for acute GVHD grades II-IV, between BMT and PBSCT from sibling donors, using ATG (a total of 7.5mg/kg). Therefore, PB collection, which is less invasive for donors and less labor-intensive for doctors, could also be considered an acceptable SC source for sibling donor HSCT in children.

Early failure is still a poor prognostic factor in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the era of CAR T-cell therapy

Patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) refractory to first-line chemotherapy or with early relapse have poor outcomes. While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has impressive efficacy after two or more lines of chemotherapy, it's still uncertain if these outcomes remain consistent in the context of third-line CAR T-cell therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of 107 R/R LBCL patients. Patients with relapse 12 months or more after their first-line chemoimmunotherapy (late failure: n = 25) had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with refractory disease or relapse within 12 months (early failure: n = 82) (median OS: not achieved vs. 18.4 months; P < 0.001). Among patients who proceeded to autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), those with late failure had significantly longer event-free survival (EFS) than those with early failure (median EFS: 26.9 vs. 3.1 months; P = 0.012). However, no significant difference in EFS was detected among patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy (median EFS: not reached vs. 11.8; P = 0.091). Cox regression with restricted cubic spline demonstrated that timing of relapse had significant impact on EFS in patients with auto-HSCT but not in patients with CAR T-cell therapy. Of patients who were scheduled for CAR T-cell therapy, those with late failure were significantly more likely to receive CAR T-cell therapy than those with early failure (90% vs. 57%; P = 0.008). In conclusion, patients with early failure still experienced poor outcomes after the approval of third-line CAR T-cell therapy.

Survival Disparities By Frontline Clinical Trial Enrollment Status for Treatment of Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction: Studies have suggested superior outcomes for patients enrolled on clinical trials for their cancer treatment. While sociodemographic disparities in trial enrollment are well established in adults, the literature in children is mixed and limited. A deeper understanding of disparities in pediatric clinical trial enrollment and potential survival differences is critical to ensure the generalizability of trial results and equitable outcomes. In a cohort of children with AML, we sought to examine (1) differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by trial enrollment status, (2) the impact of trial enrollment on survival, and (3) the potential drivers of survival differences. Methods: A retrospective cohort including all pediatric (age &amp;lt;19 years) patients with AML treated at 10 institutions in the United States from 2011-2018 was established and is being actively expanded to include diagnoses through 2023. Chart abstraction by trained study personnel collected detailed demographic and clinical information. Resource utilization data from the Pediatric Health Information System was merged to ascertain patient acuity. Higher acuity was defined as requiring ICU-level resources for 2 or more organ systems within 72 hours of diagnosis. Only patients who had a frontline therapeutic trial option available at their treating institution were included. This was operationalized as a center-level restriction to patients initiating therapy while any frontline trial was enrolling at the center. We additionally included only patients with complete data for all covariates in this analysis. Statistical Analysis: Demographic and clinical characteristics by trial enrollment status were compared using t-test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Cox proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) with a doubly robust estimator (adjusted models only) of 4-year OS and EFS by trial enrollment status. A stepwise propensity score (PS) approach assessed the impact of potential drivers of the associations between trial enrollment and overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). PS were computed by logistic regression and generated stabilized inverse probability weights used for adjustment. First, a Base PS model including a predefined set of potential confounders (age, sex, weight category, preferred language, risk classification, mean annual hospital AML volume) was created. Additional variables of interest were then sequentially added to the PS. The change in adjusted HR relative to the unadjusted comparison was used to quantify the proportion of the association explained at each step. Results: 342 pediatric patients diagnosed with AML with representation from three distinct frontline clinical trials (AAML1031, AML08, and AML16) were included. Patients who were Black (11% vs. 24%), Hispanic (24% vs. 28%), publicly insured (44% vs. 55%), higher acuity (3% vs. 8%), and high-risk classification (29% vs. 34%) were underrepresented in the trial enrollment group compared to non-trial enrolled (Table 1). In unadjusted analyses, trial enrollment was significantly associated with superior OS (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.99, p=0.04); there was no significant difference in EFS (HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.69-1.31, p=0.75). Adjustment for the Base PS accounted for 23% of the observed association between trial enrollment and OS (Figure 1). Acuity explained an additional 7% of the association. Inclusion of race/ethnicity and insurance did not result in further adjustment. In fully adjusted analysis, the association was substantially attenuated (HR=0.93, 95% CI 0.59-1.46, p=0.76). Conclusions: Significant sociodemographic and clinical differences exist in frontline trial enrollment for pediatric AML, which may contribute to worse overall survival outcomes for patients not enrolled on trials. Acuity at diagnosis may be a potential modifiable driver of survival differences. These findings support the need to evaluate enrollment patterns across pediatric clinical trials, including how enrollment disparities impact generalizability of clinical trial results, as well as a critical need for interventions designed to improve equity in healthcare access.

Diagnosis to Treatment Interval (DTI) Informs Outcomes across Subtypes of Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Background: Shorter diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) has been shown to be associated with more aggressive disease features and inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; Maurer et al, JCO 2018). Additional confirmatory studies have also shown that DTI is related to tumor volume (Alig et al, JCO 2021) and molecular phenotype (Aluaij et al, Blood 2023). Here we evaluate DTI in a large multicenter cohort of patients prospectively enrolled and followed as part of the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcome (LEO) cohort. Methods: Patients were enrolled within 6 months of diagnosis at one the 8 LEO cohort academic medical centers in the United States between 2015 and 2020. Patients in this analysis had aggressive B-cell lymphoma (BCL) treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. DTI was defined as the initial lymphoma biopsy date until the start of initial chemotherapy; patients with DTI between 0-100 days were evaluated. Short DTI was defined as DTI ≤ 14 days (DTI≤14) as previously described in prior publications (e.g. Maurer et al, JCO 2018) and confirmed via examination of functional forms via splines. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from start of treatment until progression/relapse, retreatment, or death due to any cause. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from start of treatment until death due to any cause. Results: 2565 patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma were evaluated. Median age was 62 years (IQR 51-71) and 1469 (57%) were male. 297 patients (12%) were self-reported non-White race and 314 patients (12%) were self-reported Hispanic or Latino. The majority had DLBCL, NOS subtype (N=1927, 75%), while 227 (9%) had high-grade BCL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HG, DH) and 90 (4%) had high-grade BCL NOS (HG, NOS). Clinical characteristics are summarized in the table. At median follow-up of 49 months (IQR 36-68), 800 patients (31%) had an event and 578 patients (23%) died. EFS at 24 months (EFS24) was 76% (95% CI: 74-77). Median DTI across all subtypes was 21 days (IQR 12-33) and 845 patients (33%) had DTI≤14. Patients with DTI≤14 were significantly younger (median age 59 years) but there was no association between DTI and gender, race, or ethnicity. Patients with DTI≤14 were more likely to have HG, DH or HG NOS subtypes, ECOG PS 2-4, advanced stage, elevated LDH, CNS involvement, B symptoms, and bulky disease ( see table). Patients with DTI≤14 were more likely to receive R-EPOCH-based or intensive therapies (41%) and less likely to receive 1L therapy on a clinical trial (3.8%) compared to DTI&amp;gt;14 (26% and 10.1%, respectively). Consistent with previously reported data, DTI≤14 was associated with inferior EFS (HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.41-1.87, figure), OS (HR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.47-2.04), and EFS24 (OR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.60-2.38). The association between DTI and outcomes remained significant after stratifying for subtype (EFS HR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.46-1.94; OS HR=1.78, 95% CI: 1.50-2.10) and adjustment for IPI (EFS HR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.24-1.65; OS HR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.24-1.74). In subset analysis, DTI≤14 was significantly associated with inferior outcomes within the subtypes of HG, DH (EFS HR=2.70, 95% CI: 1.82-4.01; OS HR=2.97, 95% CI: 1.92-4.60); HG, NOS (EFS HR=2.07, 95% CI: 0.93-4.60; OS HR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.03-5.43); and DLBCL, NOS (EFS HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.27-1.78; OS HR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.45-1.85). Analysis was limited in other subtypes due to number of events. Notably, within the subset of patients with DTI&amp;gt;14, there was no significant difference in EFS between subtypes for DLBCL, NOS (EFS24=80%, EFS HR=ref), HG, DH (EFS24=73%, EFS HR=1.26, 95% CI: 0.92-1.73) and HG, NOS (EFS24=83%, EFS HR =0.84, 95% CI: 0.40-1.78), logrank p=0.29; similar results were observed for OS (p=0.22). Conclusions: Patients requiring early initiation of therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphoma represent a distinct population of patients with more aggressive clinical features and inferior outcomes. In patients with longer DTI, high grade subtypes had similar outcomes to DLBCL, NOS. Efforts should be made to include patients with anticipated short DTI in clinical trials and translational studies to fully capture the spectrum of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

The Optimal Busulfan Dose of Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Younger Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background: In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens have been considered as standard conditioning. MAC can reduce the risk of relapse, but increase non-relapse mortality, including organ toxicity and severe graft versus host disease. Therefore, the optimal busulfan dose in conditioning regimens has not been established in younger patients with AML. Thus, we aimed to investigate post-HCT outcomes according to the busulfan dose of conditioning regimens in younger patients with AML. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes according to the busulfan dose (2 days vs. 3 days vs. 4 days) in 686 adult patients (age &amp;lt;55 years) with AML who had undergone HCT between 2000 and 2020 at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. The clinical data was collected from the Asan Medical Center HCT registry. Patients with AML who had undergone a second or third HCT were excluded from this study. Results: The median age was 41 (range 15-54). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rate was 52.2% and 46.4%, respectively. The 3 days of busulfan (Bu3) (n=88) showed significantly higher OS than 4 days of busulfan (Bu4) (n=229) and 2 days of busulfan (Bu2) (n=369) (2-year OS; 76.1% vs. 65.1% and 56.3%, respectively; P&amp;lt;0.001). The EFS rate of Bu3 and Bu4 was significantly higher than that of Bu2 (2-year EFS; 60.2% and 59.8% vs. 46.9%, respectively; P&amp;lt;0.001). Among the three groups, there was no significant difference in GRFS (P=0.952). The cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower in Bu4 (26.2% at 2 years) than in Bu2 (40.4%) and Bu3 (36.4%) (P&amp;lt;0.001). However, the NRM was significantly higher in Bu4 (13.9% at 2 years) and Bu2 (12.7%) than in Bu3 (3.4%) (P=0.005). In HCT at complete remission (CR) status, Bu3 showed significantly better OS than Bu4 and Bu2 (P=0.039), whereas there was no significant difference in EFS according to the busulfan dose (P=0.121). In patients with refractory disease, however, the higher dose of busulfan (Bu3 or Bu4) did not show survival advantages in terms of OS (P=0.153) and EFS (P=0.829) over Bu2. Regarding donor types, Bu3 showed significantly better OS than Bu2 in HCT from matched sibling donors (MSD) (P=0.030) and haploidentical family donors (HFD) (P&amp;lt;0.001). However, in HCT from unrelated donors (URD), the Bu2 group showed the best GRFS, and OS in Bu2 or Bu3 was significantly longer than in Bu4 (P=0.028). Conclusion: For younger patients with AML, Bu3 would be the optimal conditioning intensity in HCT from MSD or HFD at CR status. In URD, Bu2 or Bu3 would be appropriate. In refractory disease, increasing busulfan dose intensity could not improve post-HCT outcomes.

Donor-derived CAR-T therapy improves the survival of relapsed B-ALL after allogeneic transplantation compared with donor lymphocyte infusion.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy revolutionized treatment for various hematologic malignances. However, limited studies were reported to compare the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) comprehensively. We conducted a single-center, retrospective comparative study that consisted of 12 patients who were treated with DLI (control group) and 12 patients treated with donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cells (experimental group, 6 patients also received CD22 or CD123 CAR-T cells sequentially) with 3 overlaps. The event-free survival (EFS) of patients in experimental group was superior to that of the control group: 516days versus 98days (p = 0.0415). Compared with 7 of 12 patients treated with DLI suffered grades III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), one grade III aGVHD developed in patients treated with CAR-T therapy. No significant difference in the incidence of infection was identified between these two groups. Most patients in the experimental group had only mild cytokine release syndrome and none developed neurotoxicity. The univariate analysis of patients in the experiment group revealed that earlier CAR-T therapy for post-transplantation relapse was associated with better EFS. There was no significant difference in EFS between patients treated with dual-target CAR-T with those with single CD19 CAR-T. In this study, our data supported that donor-derived CAR-T therapy is a safe and potentially effective treatment for relapsed B-ALL after HSCT and may be superior to DLI.

An Optimal Radiomics Nomogram Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT for Identifying Event-Free Survival in Pediatric Neuroblastoma

To investigate whether the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiomics features that combine tumor and bone marrow can more accurately identify event-free survival (EFS) in pediatric neuroblastoma. A total of 126patients with neuroblastoma were retrospectively included and randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio). Radiomics features were extracted to develop a tumor- and bone marrow-based radiomics risk score (RRS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the effectiveness of RRS in EFS risk stratification. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine independent clinical risk factors and construct the clinical models. The conventional PET model was constructed based on conventional PET parameters, and the noninvasive combined model integrated the RRS and the noninvasive independent clinical risk factors. The performance of the models was evaluated using C-index, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 15 radiomics features were selected to build the RRS. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was a significant difference in EFS between the low-risk and high-risk groups as defined by the value of RRS (P<.05). The noninvasive combined model combining RRS and the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group stage achieved the best prognostic prediction of EFS, with a C-index of 0.810 and 0.783 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves and DCA indicated that the noninvasive combined model had good consistency and clinical utility. The 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomics of neuroblastoma allows a reliable evaluation of EFS. The performance of the noninvasive combined model was superior to the clinical and conventional PET models.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery in hepatoblastoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

We retrospectively investigated the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in low-risk patients with hepatoblastoma (HB) who underwent curative resection between February 2009 and December 2017. We also verified the feasibility of the risk stratification system to select the optimal patients for upfront surgery. We compared 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) between the upfront surgery (n = 26) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 104) groups at three oncology centers in Beijing, China. To reduce the effect of covariate imbalance, propensity score matching (PSM) was used. We explored whether preoperative chemotherapy affected surgical outcomes and identified the risk factors for events and death, including resection margin status, PRETreatment EXTent of disease stages, age, sex, pathology classification, and α-fetoprotein levels. The median follow-up period was 64 (interquartile range 60-72) months. After PSM, 22 pairs of patients were identified, and the patient characteristics were similar for all variables included in PSM. In the upfront surgery group, the 5-year EFS and OS rates were 81.8% and 86.3%, respectively. In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, the 5-year EFS and OS rates were 81.8% and 90.9%, respectively. No significant differences in EFS or OS were observed between the groups. Pathological classification was the only risk factor for death, disease progression, tumor recurrence, other tumors found during HB diagnosis, and death from any cause (p = .007 and .032, respectively). Upfront surgery achieved long-term disease control in low-risk patients with resectable HB, thus reduced the cumulative toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs.

Clinical Observation of Venetoclax Combined with Demethylating Agents on the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

To investigate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) combined with demethylating agents (HMA) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). The clinical data of 26 adult R/R AML patients who received the combination of VEN with azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DAC) in Huai'an Second People's Hospital from February 2019 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The treatment response, adverse events as well as survival were observed, and the factors of influencing the efficacy and survival were explored. The overall response rate (ORR) of 26 patients was 57.7% (15 cases), including 13 cases of complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) and 2 cases of partial response (PR). Among the 13 patients who got CR/CRi, 7 cases achieved CRm (minimal residual disease negative CR) and 6 cases did not, with statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) between the two groups (P=0.044, 0.036). The median OS of all the patients was 6.6 (0.5-15.6) months, and median EFS was 3.4 (0.5-9.9) months. There were 13 patients in the relapse group and refractory group, respectively, with response rate of 84.6% and 30.8% (P=0.015). The survival analysis showed that the relapse group had a better OS than the refractory group (P=0.026), but there was no significant difference in EFS (P=0.069). Sixteen patients who treated for 1-2 cycles and 10 patients who treated for more than 3 cycles achieved response rates of 37.5% and 90.0%, respectively (P=0.014), and patients treated for more cycles had superior OS and EFS (both P<0.01). Adverse effects were mainly bone marrow suppression, complicated by various degrees of infection, bleeding, and gastrointestinal discomfort was common, but these could be all tolerated by patients. VEN combined with HMA is an effective salvage therapy for patients with R/R AML and is well tolerated by patients. Achieving minimal residual disease negativity is able to improve long-term survival of patients.

Sodium thiosulfate as cisplatin otoprotectant in children: The challenge of when to use it.

Sodium thiosulfate as cisplatin otoprotectant in children: The challenge of when to use it.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been recommended as standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). But the risk of tumor recurrence still remained, and many patients refused or abandoned radiotherapy because of the intolerable adverse effects in China. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery has become an emerging treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. There was still no consensus on whether nICT was superior to nCT alone in patients with esophageal cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective study, patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received surgery after nICT (n=26, 40%) or nCT alone (n=39, 60%) were included. The patients were classified as nICT or nCT arm. The primary endpoints were pathological tumor response (PTR) and event-free survival (EFS). The different clinic-pathological features were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square (χ2) test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate EFS from the date of treatment to recurrence or death. All tests were 2-sided with a significative P-value defined <.05.ResultsThree (11.5%) of the 26 patients achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) in the nICT group, and four (10.3%) of the 39 patients achieved pCR in the nCT group, respectively (P=1.000). Six (23.1%) of the 26 patients achieved major pathological response (MPR) in the nICT group, and 11 (28.2%) of the 39 patients achieved MPR in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.645). Downstaging was achieved in 13 (44.8%) patients in the nICT group and 16 (55.2%) patients in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.732). To verify the tumor regression grade (TRG) results, we compared them with MPR and pCR, which showed a significant dependency (P< 0.001). Patients who achieved downgrading showed better MPR and pCR rates (P<0.001 and P =0.010). There was no significant difference in EFS between the nICT and nCT groups (HR=1.011, 95% CI: 0.421–2.425, P = 0.981).ConclusionsNeoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, more studies with long-term follow-up were needed to confirm this result.

Impact of Additional Intensive L-Asparaginase Therapy during Consolidation Phase for High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 Protocol

Introduction Treatment of childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) with unfavorable features remains a major challenge. An earlier intervention, aiming at lowering Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) levels, might reduce the risk of relapse and the indication to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 1st complete remission (CR). The AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 protocol included a randomized study for patients with high-risk (HR) features, to investigate if an intensive and continuous exposure to pegylated L-Asparaginase (Peg-L-ASP), given on top of BFM consolidation phase IB, could decrease the levels of MRD and to influence long term outcome. Patients and methods From June 1, 2010 to February 28, 2017, 6136 patients with Ph’ negative ALL, aged between 1-17 years, were enrolled in the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 Study (Eudract number 2007-004270-43). Participating study centers were in Australia, Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, Italy and Switzerland.1097 were classified as HR at the end of induction phase IA (day 33), on the basis of evidence ofKMT2A-AFF1 rearrangement, hypodiploidy (<45 chromosomes, or DNA-index <0.8), prednisone poor response (PPR), poor bone marrow (BM) response at day 15 (i.e. ≥10% blasts by MFC), failure to achieve morphological CR. Treatment consisted of a 7-day prephase with prednisone and 1 intrathecal dose of methotrexate (ITMTX), an induction protocol IA with prednisone or dexamethasone, vincristine, daunomycin, Peg-L-ASP (2 doses), ITMTX and, only in PPR T-ALL cyclophosphamide. Patients eligible were randomized to receive or not 4 weekly doses of Peg-L-ASP (2500 IU/sqm x 4) on top of consolidation phase IB, which included 6-MP, cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside and ITMTX. Thereafter, patients received 3 blocks of non-cross-resistant drugs, 3 reinduction phases with or without cranial radiotherapy (12 Gys), and maintenance therapy till 24 months from diagnosis. The primary endpoint was PCR-MRD reduction to less than 5x10-4at the end of phase IB; secondary endpoint was Event-Free Survival (EFS). Results Overall, 1097 patients were at HR at the end of induction phase IA and 809 (79.2%) were randomized to receive (404) or not (405) 4 doses of Peg-L-Asp during consolidation phase IB. The primary endpoint could be assessed in 732 patients (90.5%). By ITT analysis, the proportion of patients with PCR MRD ≥ 5x10-4 at the end of consolidation phase IB in the experimental arm (EA) vs the control arm (CA) was 13.9% vs 17.0% with no significant difference (p-value=0.25).There were more toxic deaths during consolidation phase IB among patients randomized to Peg-L-Asp (n=14, 12 of them due to infections), vs controls (n=1): 7 of them, all in the EA, however, occurred before starting the randomized treatment. Deaths in CR after phase IB were 24 vs 24 in the EA vs CA (of whom 10 vs 12 were after HSCT in CR1, performed in 87 and 90 patients respectively). In the EA and CA the overall 5-year EFS by ITT was 70.4% (2.3) and 75.0% (2.2) (p-value=0.18), the 5-year cumulative incidence of death in CR was 9.5% (1.5) vs 5.7% (1.2) (p-value=0.08) and that of relapse was 17.7% (1.9) vs 17.2% (1.9), respectively (p-value=0.94). Non HSCT related deaths were due to infections in 23/28 in the EA, and in 10/13 in CA patients. The 5-year overall survival probability was 81.5% (2.0) and 84.0% (1.9) respectively (p-value=0.25). Discussion In this randomized study, results (ITT analysis) show a very modest, not significant decrease in the percentage of patients with high MRD in the EA, and no significant difference in EFS between the two arms. The trial results suggest that the additional administration of intensive Peg-L-Asp in phase IB is associated with higher, although not statistically significant, mortality in CR and very similar relapse incidence. However, some fatal events in phase IB occurred very early after randomization, before the start of the planned treatment with Peg-L-Asp. Importantly, in both analyses, by ITT and by treatment given, there is no evidence of benefit on reduction of relapses by the additional therapy with Peg-L-ASP in phase IB. These findings indicate that an early intensification of chemotherapy with Peg-L-Asp in patients defined as HR does not improve the outcome of children with HR ALL treated according to AIEOP-BFM regimen, thus suggesting that further improvements with conventional chemotherapy might be difficult in the context of intensive treatment protocols. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment with Curative Intent in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Introduction Lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) is a rare, aggressive lymphoma that is often classified as a subtype of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). There is no consensus on the best treatment approach. It is often treated on ALL-type protocols involving prolonged courses of multiagent chemotherapy regimens; the reported long-term disease-free survival is 45-65%. In British Columbia, we take an alternative approach of consolidating initial response to induction chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT). We present our experience with this treatment pathway. Methods We identified 35 patients who received treatment with curative intent for LBL at our centre over the 15-year-period between January 2007 and January 2022 from our database. We excluded one patient who declined AutoSCT, one who received ALL-type chemotherapy and one who had upfront allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) due to complex karyotype. We collected data pertaining to demographics, disease characteristics, treatment course and outcome on the remaining 32 patients by review of clinical documents and laboratory and radiology reports. The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS), defined as time from diagnosis to disease progression, relapse or death. Surviving patients were censored at the last follow up. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival and log-rank test and cox-hazard model for comparison of survival. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA® version 16.1 (Texas, USA). Results The median age was 35 years (range 18-64). 27/32 (84%) had T-LBL. Bone marrow, CSF and extranodal involvement was seen in 7 (22%), 3 (9%) and 24 (75%) patients respectively. The majority of patients (30/32, 94%) received induction chemotherapy on the NHL 98-01 protocol (consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and asparaginase). 16/32 (50%) achieved complete remission and 15/32 (47%) partial response post-induction. 28/32 (88%) proceeded to AutoSCT; four patients had early disease progression, preventing AutoSCT. 21/28 (75%) required bridging chemotherapy - most commonly high dose cytarabine (3000 mg/m2 on days 1-6). Nearly all patients (26/28, 93%) received conditioning with VP16-CyTBI (etoposide 1800/m2 on day -7, cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg on days -6 to -4 and TBI 200cGy BID on days -3 to -1) pre-AutoSCT. Two received BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan); both died from disease relapse post-AutoSCT. The stem cell source was bone marrow in 54% and peripheral blood in 46%. During treatment, all but one had febrile neutropenia and 12/21 (63%) had positive microbiology. Three patients were treated for invasive fungal infection, although only one had a confirmed diagnosis. 5/32 (16%) developed C. difficile infection. 14/32 (44%) patients had unplanned hospital admissions with an average length of stay of 21 days. 5/32 (16%) required ICU admission, two at initial presentation and two post-AlloSCT. Significant viral infections were seen only in the AlloSCT setting. After a median follow-up of 43 months (range 3-166), 16/32 (50%) patients remained alive, all but one in remission. The estimated 5-year EFS was 46% (95% CI 27-63). 13/28 (46%) patients relapsed post-AutoSCT; the median time to relapse was 10 months (range 3-57). At relapse, eight patients presented with ALL (one with concomitant CSF involvement, one with testicular involvement); three had mediastinal disease; one transformed to mixed phenotype leukemia, myeloid/lymphoid; and one had isolated CSF involvement. 3/13 (23%) who relapsed post-AutoSCT went on to receive AlloSCT following salvage chemotherapy; all died in remission from an infection at 1, 3, and 22 months post-AlloSCT respectively. All other deaths were with relapsed disease. There was no statistically significant difference in EFS by stem cell source (p=0.25). EFS was significantly longer in patients with T-LBL compared to those with B-LBL (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.74, p=0.007; graph 2). Discussion Autologous stem cell transplantation with TBI-based conditioning for treatment of T-LBL is a viable treatment approach with acceptable tolerability and survival outcome. It also offers the advantage of a shorter treatment course compared to ALL-type chemotherapy. Further research is required to make direct comparison between these two distinct therapeutic approaches and provide guidance on the best practice. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Association of Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Breast Cancer Recurrence in the Neoadjuvant I-SPY2 Trial

Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer strongly correlates with overall survival and has become the standard end point in neoadjuvant trials. However, there is controversy regarding whether the definition of pCR should exclude or permit the presence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To examine the association of residual DCIS in surgical specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer with survival end points to inform standards for the assessment of pathologic complete response. The study team analyzed the association of residual DCIS after NAC with 3-year event-free survival (EFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and local-regional recurrence (LRR) in the I-SPY2 trial, an adaptive neoadjuvant platform trial for patients with breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This is a retrospective analysis of clinical specimens and data from the ongoing I-SPY2 adaptive platform trial of novel therapeutics on a background of standard of care for early breast cancer. I-SPY2 participants are adult women diagnosed with stage II/III breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Participants were randomized to receive taxane and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy with or without 1 of 10 investigational agents, followed by definitive surgery. The presence of DCIS and EFS, DRFS, and LRR. The study team identified 933 I-SPY2 participants (aged 24 to 77 years) with complete pathology and follow-up data. Median follow-up time was 3.9 years; 337 participants (36%) had no residual invasive disease (residual cancer burden 0, or pCR). Of the 337 participants with pCR, 70 (21%) had residual DCIS, which varied significantly by tumor-receptor subtype; residual DCIS was present in 8.5% of triple negative tumors, 15.6% of hormone-receptor positive tumors, and 36.6% of ERBB2-positive tumors. Among those participants with pCR, there was no significant difference in EFS, DRFS, or LRR based on presence or absence of residual DCIS. The analysis supports the definition of pCR as the absence of invasive disease after NAC regardless of the presence or absence of DCIS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01042379.

Two-drug versus three-drug induction chemotherapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized controlled trial

The benefit of three-drug induction chemotherapy over a two-drug induction has not been evaluated in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We, therefore, conducted a randomized controlled trial to ascertain the benefit of a three-drug induction regimen. Patients aged 1–18 years with newly diagnosed AML were randomized to two cycles of induction chemotherapy with daunorubicin and ara-C (DA) or two cycles of ara-C, daunorubicin, and etoposide (ADE). After induction, patients in both arms received consolidation with two cycles of high-dose ara-C. The study’s primary objective was to compare the event-free survival (EFS) between the two arms. The secondary objectives included comparing the composite complete remission (cCR) rates, overall survival (OS), and toxicities. The study randomized 149 patients, 77 in the DA and 72 in the ADE arm. The median age was 8.7 years, and 92 (62%) patients were males. The median follow-up was 50.9 months. The cCR rate in the DA and ADE arm were 82% and 79% (p = 0.68) after the second induction. There were 13 (17%) induction deaths in the DA arm and 12 (17%) in the ADE arm (p = 0.97). The 5-year EFS in the DA and ADE arm was 34.4% and 34.5%, respectively (p = 0.66). The 5-year OS in the DA and ADE arms was 41.4% and 42.09%, respectively (p = 0.74). There were no significant differences in toxicities between the regimens. There was no statistically significant difference in EFS, OS, CR, or toxicity between ADE and DA regimens in pediatric AML. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (Reference number: CTRI/2014/11/005202).

Expression of neuroblastoma-related genes in bone marrow at end of high-risk neuroblastoma therapy.

Minimal disease quantification may predict event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). We evaluated mRNA expression of five neuroblastoma-associated genes (NB5 assay) in bone marrows (BM) of patients with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma who received consistent immunotherapy. mRNA expression of CHGA, DCX, DDC, PHOX2B, and TH genes in BM of 479 patients enrolled on the immunotherapy arm of Children's Oncology Group trials ANBL0032 and ANBL0931 was evaluated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based TaqMan low-density array. Results from end-consolidation and end-therapy were analyzed for association with five-year EFS/OS and patient and tumor characteristics. Tests of statistical significance were two-sided. NB5 assay detected neuroblastoma-related mRNA in 222 of 286 (77.6%) of BMs obtained at end-consolidation and 188 of 304 (61.8%) at end-therapy. Any mRNA level detected in end-therapy BM correlated with significantly worse EFS (57% [49.6%-63.7%] vs 73.0% [63.5%-80.4%]; P=0.005), but not OS. Analysis limited to patients in complete response at end-therapy still found a significant difference in EFS with detectable versus not detectable NB5 assay results (58.9% [49.5%-67.1%] vs 76.6% [66.1%-84.2%]; P=0.01). End-consolidation results did not correlate with EFS or OS. Multivariable analysis determined end-therapy NB5 assay BM results (P=0.02), age at diagnosis (P=0.002), and preconsolidation response (P=0.02) were significantly associated with EFS independent of other clinical and biological parameters evaluated, including end-therapy response. If further validated in additional patient cohorts, the NB5 assay's ability to independently predict EFS from end-therapy could improve patient stratification for novel maintenance therapy trials after current end-therapy to improve outcome.