Significant Differences In Shear Bond Strength Research Articles

Influence of Modifying the Resin Coat Application Protocol on Bond Strength and Microleakage of Metal Orthodontic Brackets

To determine the shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of metal brackets bonded with two different adhesives when a resin coat and the adhesive were light-cured separately or simultaneously. Eighty stainless steel brackets were bonded to the enamel of extracted premolars, 40 with Transbond Plus adhesive (group 1) and 40 with Transbond XT (group 2). Each group was subdivided into four equal subgroups; a, b, c, and d. Brackets in subgroups a and b were bonded with the adhesive without coating. For brackets in subgroup c, Ortho-Choice Ortho-Coat was applied and cured after curing of the adhesive, while the coat was applied and cured with the adhesive for brackets in subgroup d. The specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue dye. After debonding, the teeth and brackets were examined with a stereomicroscope. The data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Duncan multiple range test, and Pearson correlation. Both adhesives had comparable SBS. Curing of the coat after curing of the adhesive showed significantly higher SBS than other protocols. There was no significant difference in SBS of the adhesives without coating and with curing of the coat and adhesive simultaneously. Application of the coat significantly reduced microleakage. There was a significant negative relationship between SBS and microleakage. SBS was significantly improved with curing of the coat and adhesive separately, while it was not adversely affected when the coat and adhesive were cured simultaneously. Using the coat with either protocol significantly reduced the microleakage.

A New Technique With Sodium Hypochlorite to Increase Bracket Shear Bond Strength of Fluoride-releasing Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: Comparing Shear Bond Strength of Two Adhesive Systems With Enamel Surface Deproteinization Before Etching

By eliminating the organic substances from the enamel surface before etching (deproteinization), orthodontic bond strength can theoretically be increased because the resulting etch-pattern is predominantly type 1 and 2, instead of type 3. Fluoride-releasing resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIs) might then routinely be used to bond brackets, instead of composite resins. Reducing the incidence of white spot lesions, a major current iatrogenic effect of orthodontic treatment, is a worthy cause which might be achieved due to the fluoride-releasing properties of RMGIs. The objective of this study was to determine whether deproteinization of human dental enamel surfaces, with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) before etching, increases orthodontic bracket shear bond strength (SBS) of 2 adhesive systems: a composite resin and a RMGI. Seventy-six extracted human premolars were cleaned, and randomly divided into 4 groups (2 experimental and 2 control), with 19 premolars in each group. In group 1 (experimental) and group 2 (control), brackets were bonded to the teeth using Transbond XT (3M Unitek Orthodontic Products, Monrovia, CA) and in group 3 (experimental) and group 4 (control), Fuji Ortho LC (GC America, Inc., Alsip, IL) was used. The buccal surfaces of the premolars in experimental groups 1 and 3 were deproteinized with 5.25% NaOCl for 1 minute followed by rinsing, drying, and acid etching for 30 seconds. Subsequently, the acid was rinsed off, the enamel was dried (and remoistened in the Fuji Ortho LC groups), and orthodontic brackets were bonded, either with primer and composite resin, or with RMGI. The same protocol was used in the 2 control groups (2 and 4), except that NaOCl was not used. The teeth were then stored in distilled water at room temperature for a maximum of 24 hours, thermo-cycled 500 times, between 5°C and 55°C, placed in a controlled Water Bath, at 37°C for 24 hours, mounted on acrylic rings, and debonded using a universal testing machine. The enamel surfaces were examined at 10× magnification to determine the amount of residual adhesive remaining on the tooth. An analysis of variance was used to determine whether there was a significant difference in SBSs between the 4 test groups, together with a post hoc test to determine possible significant differences among the pair of means; a χ 2 test was used to compare the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. There were no significant differences in the SBS ( P = 0.05) between the Transbond XT groups. There were significant differences in the SBS ( P = 0.05) between the Fuji Ortho LC groups. The mean SBS for Transbond XT with NaOCl was 9.41 ± 4.46 megapascals (MPa); for Transbond XT without NaOCl, 8.12 ± 3.10 MPa; for Fuji Ortho LC with NaOCl, 9.64 ± 5.01 MPa; and for Fuji Ortho LC without NaOCl, 5.71 ± 3.87 MPa. The comparisons of the adhesive remnant index scores between the 2 Transbond groups (χ 2 = 6.41) indicated that bracket failure mode was not significantly different ( P 2 = 24.08) indicated that bracket failure mode was significantly different ( P

Can intra-coronally bleached teeth be bonded safely after antioxidant treatment?

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of antioxidant treatment and delayed bonding, following intra-coronal bleaching, on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure site of brackets bonded to enamel. Eighty mandibular incisors were divided into four equal groups. After root canal filling, specimens in Group 1 were used as control and not bleached. For experimental groups 2 to 4, bleaching agent was placed into the rest of the cavity for a four-day period and this bleaching treatment was performed two times. In Group 2, specimens were bonded immediately after bleaching; in Group 3, specimens were bleached and then immersed in artificial saliva for 30 days before bonding; in Group 4, specimens were bleached, treated with an antioxidant agent, and then bonded. The SBS values of bonded brackets were measured in megapascal (MPa), while adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were determined after the brackets failed. The SBS values of Group 1 (mean: 20.3+/-7.1 MPa) and Group 4 (mean: 18.2+/-6.1 MPa) were significantly higher (p>0.001) than those of Group 2 (mean: 4.9+/-3.2 MPa) and Group 3 (mean: 8.7+/-4.9 MPa). No significant differences in SBS were found between Groups 1 and 4, and between Groups 2 and 3.

Adhesive Bonding of Resin Composite to Various Ni‐Cr Alloy Surfaces Using Different Metal Conditioners and a Surface Modification System

This study evaluated the effect of three metal conditioners [Metal Photo Primer (MPP), Cesead II Opaque Primer (OP), Targis Link (TL)], and one surface modification system [Siloc (S)] on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a prosthetic composite material to Ni-Cr alloy. Rivet-shaped specimens were cast, and three surface treatments were evaluated: Polishing (P); sandblasting with either 50 microm (50SB) or 250 microm (250SB) Al(2)O(3). All products were applied to half of the specimens, while the other half remained without the materials. Veneering resin composite (8-mm diameter, 2-mm thick) was applied and light-exposed for 90 seconds in a laboratory light-curing unit. The specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, and half were subjected to 500 thermal cycles consisting of water baths at 4 degrees C and 60 degrees C. All specimens were submitted to SBS test (0.5 mm/min) until failure. Failure patterns were determined using optical and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test (preset alpha of 5%). The SBS values of OP and TL groups were higher than those of MPP and S within the 50SB treatment (p < 0.05). No significant difference in SBS was noted between OP and TL as well as between MPP and S. On the other hand, no significant differences were found among conditioners within the 250SB group (p > 0.05). The SBS values of MPP, OP, and S from the 250SB group were higher than those from 50SB (p < 0.05). No significant difference in SBS was noted among most groups with conditioners after thermocycling. The only exception was observed for MPP, which showed an increase in SBS after thermocycling (p < 0.05). Differences in SBS were noted among the groups with conditioners (p < 0.05), and no significant difference in SBS was noted between TL and OP groups, which showed the highest values among all within the P group. No significant difference was noted between MPP and S. Debonded surfaces showed adhesive failures predominantly located between metal surface and opaque resin. The OP and TL conditioners and surface sandblasting with 250 microm Al(2)O(3) promoted the highest SBS between resin and the Ni-Cr metal surface.

An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding

In orthodontics, adhesive failures can occur because of saliva contamination during bonding. However, most in vitro studies concerning bond strength of saliva-contaminated enamel disregard the influence of temperature changes in a wet environment. The aim of the present study was to compare the influence of saliva, blood and etching gel remnant contamination on shear bond strength (SBS) after thermocycling. After etching of extracted human third molars (n = 80), a conventional primer (Transbond XT) and a moisture-insensitive primer (Transbond MIP) were evaluated using the adhesive, Transbond XT, under dry conditions and after contamination with saliva, blood and etching gel remnants. To simulate temperature changes and the moisture of saliva in the oral cavity, all samples were thermocycled (6,000 x 5 degrees C/55 degrees C) in a mastication device before SBS testing. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine statistical differences. Under dry conditions Transbond XT and Transbond MIP showed no significant difference in SBS. However, clinically unacceptable (P = 0.005) bond strength was observed using Transbond XT after saliva and blood contamination. In wet conditions only Transbond MIP showed sufficient bond strength. If contamination during bonding is expected, a hydrophilic primer should be used. Under dry conditions hydrophilic or hydrophobic primers could be applied. Blood contamination seems to be a more serious problem for bond strength than saliva or etching gel contamination.

Effects of surface treatments on bond strength of glass‐infiltrated ceramic

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various surface treatments on the bond strength at the In‐Ceram/resin composite interface. Ninety‐eight In‐Ceram specimens were divided into seven groups and exposed to various surface treatments as follows: (A) control (B) saliva contamination (C) saliva contamination plus aluminum oxide sandblasting (D) glove powder contamination (E) glove powder contamination plus aluminum oxide sandblasting (F) rough aluminum oxide sandblasting and (G) excess glass infiltration. A resin composite cylinder was cemented to each In‐Ceram specimen with Panavia 21 resin luting cement. Half of the cemented specimens in each group were stored in water for 24 h, and the other half were stored in water for 2 weeks and then were thermo‐cycled for 2000 cycles. Shear bond strengths (SBS) of seven specimens in each subgroup were determined and analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test as well as Student‘s t‐test. Scanning electronic microscopy was used to identify the type of bond failure. Shear bond strength was significantly decreased by saliva and glove powder contaminations (P &lt; 0·05). Sandblasting treatment did not improve the saliva‐contaminated specimens. However, the glove powder plus sandblasting group showed no significant difference in SBS compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in SBS between the excess glass‐infiltrating group and the control group. The SBS was significantly decreased by rough aluminum oxide sandblasting (P &lt; 0·05). The SBS values of groups without thermocycling were significantly greater than those of groups with thermocycling (P &lt; 0·05). There were no significant differences among SBS values of the seven groups with thermocycling. Combined cohesive and adhesive bond failures were seen in every group. Various surface treatments or contaminants may significantly influence the bond strength of In‐Ceram restorative in clinical use.

Effect of Universal Testing Machine Crosshead Speed on the Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Failure Mode of Composite Resin to Enamel and Dentin

An investigation was conducted to determine if testing machine crosshead speed influenced shear bond strength (SBS) or the failure mode of composite bonded to enamel and dentin. Composite cylinders were bonded to 50 enamel and 50 dentin surfaces and thermocycled. Groups of 10 samples were debonded at speeds of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mm/min. Data were examined with analysis of variance and post-hoc testing. Failure modes were determined using 10x magnification. With enamel, no significant differences in SBS existed, and cohesive vs. adhesive failure modes were similar for all groups. With dentin, the 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mm/min samples had significantly higher SBS than the 0.1 and 10.0 mm/min samples (p < 0.05). No other differences in SBS were found. Samples tested at 0.5 mm/min demonstrated strikingly better cohesive vs. adhesive results than all other groups. SBS and cohesive vs. adhesive failures achieved with dentin bonding were significantly affected by crosshead speed.