INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sacral Neuro Stimulation (SNS) is an FDA approved treatment for urgency/frequency, urge incontinence, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. Successful outcome is predicated on accurate location of the lead based on anatomy and physiologic response. Adjacent foramina S2, S3, and S4 may have sufficient locational overlap to cause unintended clinical localization of the wrong foramina. Detailed anatomic imaging and analysis may provide relevant information regarding lead placement effecting patient response. METHODS: DICOM images from a de-identified, IRB-approved database of 1mm slice pelvic CT images were rendered into 3D models using Mimics (Materialise) software. Images with bony deformity were excluded. Points of interest, tagged throughout each pelvis, were used to measure angles and distances of interest on the rendered 3D volumetric models. Both male and female pelvic CT images were included. The medial-lateral distance from the medial edge of the S2-S4 foramina to the sacral spinous processes were measured, along with the caudad-cephalad distances from the cephalad edge of S2-S4 foramina to the dorsal aspect of the sacro-iliac (SI) joints. The position of S2, S3, and S4 relative to the sacral spinous processes and inferior SI joints were determined, with sub-populations (clusters) of S2, S3, and S4 foramina identified. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 (IBM, Somers, NY). RESULTS: Of the 150 pelvises enrolled, 133 met criteria for inclusion. The greatest adjacent population overlap occurs bilaterally between the most caudad cluster of S2 and the most cephalad cluster of S3, regarding which up to 9% (12/133) of the left and up to 14% (18/133) of the right S2 foramina may be errantly localized during a clinical attempt to locate S3. Overlap between the most caudad S3 cluster with the two most cephalad S4 clusters represents insignificant clinic impact ( 4%). 20% of the total population had a fifth left sacral foramen, and 22% had a fifth right sacral foramen. CONCLUSIONS: Significant anatomic variation exists in regard to foramen location. Reliance on anatomic landmarks alone or unreliable physiologic responses may hinder accurate lead placement. Further investigation, such as cadaveric or clinical trial, is necessary to obtain more conclusive data regarding the true clinical incidence of errant foramen localization.