Significance Of Drug Interactions Research Articles

Cardiac glycosides. Drug interactions of clinical significance.

Several commonly coadministered drugs interfere significantly with the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of cardiac glycosides. Only a few of these interactions (e.g. amiodarone, propafenone, quinidine) take place consistently, and although their extent may vary in individual patients, digitalis dosage adjustments should be made to avoid underdigitalization or toxicity. In other instances the appearance of clinically significant interactions depends on individual pharmacokinetic/metabolic characteristics (e.g. erythromycin, tetracycline), and the result cannot be anticipated on clinical grounds. Some interactions are controversial, having not been confirmed by all studies; others have been shown only in healthy volunteers but lack the definition of their relevance in the context of disease states. In view of the possible impact on the individual patient, close clinical monitoring (which may be supplemented with evaluation of digitalis plasma concentration) is recommended when prescribing cardiac glycosides with other therapeutic agents for which the possibility of an interaction has been reported.

Adverse drug interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Recognition, management and avoidance.

The prevalence and incidence of adverse drug interactions involving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remains unknown. To identify those proposed drug interactions of greatest clinical significance, it is appropriate to focus on interactions between commonly used and/or commonly coprescribed drugs, interactions for which there are numerous well documented case reports in reputable journals, interactions validated by well designed in vivo human studies and those affecting high-risk drugs and/or high-risk patients. While most interactions between NSAIDs and other drugs are pharmacokinetic, NSAID-related pharmacodynamic interactions may be considerably more important in the clinical context, and prescriber ignorance is likely to be a major determinant of many adverse drug interactions. Prescribing NSAIDs is relatively contraindicated for patients on oral anticoagulants due to the risk of haemorrhage, and for patients taking high-dose methotrexate due to the dangers of bone marrow toxicity, renal failure and hepatic dysfunction. Combination NSAID therapy cannot be justified as toxicity may be increased without any improvement in efficacy. Where lithium or anti-hypertensives are coprescribed with NSAIDs, close monitoring is mandatory for lithium toxicity and hypertension, respectively, and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or sulindac are preferred. Phenytoin or oral hypoglycaemic agents may be administered with NSAIDs other than pyrazoles and salicylates provided that patients are monitored carefully at the initiation and cessation of NSAID treatment. Digoxin, aminoglycosides and probenecid may be coprescribed with NSAIDs, but close monitoring is required, particularly for high-risk patients such as the elderly. Indomethacin and triamterene should be avoided due to the risk of renal failure. High dose aspirin should be replaced by naproxen in patients on valproic acid (sodium valproate) and care is required when corticosteroids are administered to patients taking salicylates long term in high dosage. Interactions between NSAIDs and antacids or cholestyramine are generally avoidable. Adverse drug interactions involving NSAIDs may be limited by rational prescribing and by careful monitoring, particularly for high-risk patients, drugs and therapy periods.

Drug Interactions of Clinical Significance with Opioid Analgesics

Opioid analgesics and other drugs interact through multiple mechanisms, resulting in pharmacological effects that depend upon the pharmacodynamic action studied, the interacting agents and the route of administration. Many interactions result from induction or inhibition of the hepatic cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenase system. The elimination of opioids is largely dependent on hepatic metabolism, and drug interactions involving this mechanism can therefore be clinically significant. Antibiotics are often used concomitantly with opioids in patients undergoing medical or surgical procedures; the best documented metabolic interactions are with erythromycin and rifampicin (rifampin). Erythromycin increases and rifampicin decreases the effects of opioids. Cimetidine may increase the effects of opioids by increasing their duration of action; there have been no documented cases of interactions with ranitidine. Carbamazepine, phenytoin and the barbiturates can enhance the metabolism of opioids that rely on hepatic metabolism. Other pharmacokinetic interactions include those with benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines and metoclopramide. Interactions involving pharmacodynamic mechanisms are more common than pharmacokinetic ones. Such interactions are manifested clinically as as a summation (additive or synergistic) of similar or opposing pharmacological effects on the same body system. Idiosyncratic interactions also occur, the mechanisms of which have not been proven to be solely modulated by either pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic means. The knowledge of particular opioid-drug interactions, and the causative pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and idiosyncratic mechanisms, allows for the safer administration of opioid analgesics.

Significance of drug interactions with rifampin in Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis

Significance of drug interactions with rifampin in Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of N-Acetylcysteine

N-Acetylcysteine is useful as a mucolytic agent for treatment of chronic bronchitis and other pulmonary diseases complicated by the production of viscous mucus. It is also used as an antidote to paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning and found to be effective for the prevention of cardiotoxicity by doxorubicin and haemorrhagic cystitis from oxazaphosphorines. After an oral dose of N-acetylcysteine 200 to 400 mg the peak plasma concentration of 0.35 to 4 mg/L is achieved within 1 to 2 hours. Although the data are conflicting, it appears that the administration of charcoal may interfere with drug absorption, with up to 96% of the drug adsorbed on to the charcoal. Information on absorption in the presence of food or other drugs is not available. The volume of distribution ranges from 0.33 to 0.47 L/kg and protein binding is significant, reaching approximately 50% 4 hours after the dose. Pharmacokinetic information is not available as to whether or not N-acetylcysteine crosses the blood-brain barrier or placenta, or into breast milk. Renal clearance has been reported as 0.190 to 0.211 L/h/kg and approximately 70% of the total body clearance is nonrenal. Following oral administration, reduced N-acetylcysteine has a terminal half-life of 6.25h. Little is known of the metabolism of this agent, although it is believed to be rapidly metabolised and incorporated on to proteins. The major excretory product is inorganic sulphate. Frequently reported side effects are nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Biochemical and haematological adverse effects are observed but are not clinically relevant. Drug interactions of clinical significance have been observed with paracetamol, glutathione and anticancer agents.

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions

Clinical pharmacokinetics of clofazimine. A review.

Clofazimine is useful in the treatment of Hansen's disease (leprosy) and some dermatological disorders, and is currently being used in drug regimens for patients with human immunodeficiency viral infections who are also infected with Mycobacterium avium complex. After an oral dose, absorption is variable, but when given in an oil-wax suspension is approximately 70%. Administration with food appears to increase the peak plasma drug concentration and reduce the time to peak level. Data on the volume of distribution and percentage or type of protein binding are not available; however, the drug undergoes extensive tissue distribution. Clofazimine does not cross the blood-brain barrier, but does cross the placenta, and is found in human breast milk. To date 3 urinary metabolites have been identified in man, but their biological activity is unknown. A substantial portion of the unchanged drug is excreted in faeces. The elimination half-life is variable, with values as long as 70 days being quoted in the literature. Frequently reported side effects of clofazimine are hyperpigmentation of the skin and conjunctiva, and abdominal pain. These resolve upon cessation of therapy. Biochemical and haematological adverse effects have been reported, but are generally not clinically relevant. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of potential clinical significance have been observed with dapsone, oestrogen, rifampicin and vitamin A.

Cyclosporine pharmacokinetic drug interactions

Cyclosporine (CyA) is commonly prescribed as an immunosuppressive to prevent rejection of organ transplants. Numerous pharmacokinetic drug interactions of potential clinical significance exist because other drugs may induce or inhibit the metabolism of CyA. Case reports and studies demonstrate that rifampin, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine may induce the hepatic metabolism of CyA, causing decreased CyA concentrations. Graft rejection through inadequate immunosuppression may be associated with subtherapeutic or decreased CyA levels. Erythromycin, ketoconazole, calcium channel blockers, and sex hormones appear to inhibit CyA metabolism, causing increased CyA concentrations. Signs and symptoms of renal, hepatic, or neurotoxicity may be evident with increased or toxic CyA levels. Mutual inhibition of metabolism occurs between CyA and corticosteroids. Intravenous sulphadimidine and trimethoprim may cause decreased CyA concentrations by an unknown mechanism.

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions.

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptive steroids.

Oral contraceptive steroids are of 2 types: oestrogens, of which ethinyloestradiol is the most important, and progestagens, of which levonorgestrel and norethisterone are the most commonly used. All these steroids can be measured by a number of analytical techniques but there is little doubt that radioimmunoassay is the most convenient. All the steroids are well absorbed in humans but while levonorgestrel is completely bioavailable, norethisterone has an average bioavailability of 70%. Ethinyloestradiol, too, is subject to presystemic metabolism with a mean bioavailability of 40 to 45%. The main site of presystemic metabolism is the gut wall, with the production of ethinyloestradiol sulphate. The progestagens norethynodrel, ethynodiol diacetate and lynoestrenol are quantitatively metabolised to norethisterone. The pharmacokinetics of the contraceptive steroids are best described by a 2-compartment open model. The terminal plasma half-life of levonorgestrel varies from 11 to 45 hours and of norethisterone from 5 to 14 hours. The β-phase half-life of ethinyloestradiol varies from 6 to 20 hours. The apparent volume of distribution of these contraceptive steroids (after intravenous administration) is between 1.5 and 4.3 L/kg. During long term treatment with oral contraceptive steroids, steady-state plasma concentrations of ethinyloestradiol (24 hours after administration) are between 10 and 200 pg/ml. Plasma concentrations of norethisterone and levonorgestrel at steady-state are higher than predicted from the single-dose kinetics because of enhanced binding of the progestagens following the induction of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) by ethinyloestradiol. Concentrations are in the range of 1.6 to 15.2 ng/ml for norethisterone and 0.8 to 4.5 ng/ml for levonorgestrel. All the contraceptive steroids are bound to proteins in plasma. Ethinyloestradiol is 97 to 98% bound to plasma albumin. The progestagens are bound both to albumin (levonorgestrel 93 to 95%; norethisterone 79 to 80%) and more specifically to SHBG. The binding capacity of SHBG can be enhanced by treatment with ethinyloestradiol or with more conventional enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenobarbitone, carbamazepine or rifampicin. Norethisterone and levonorgestrel are chiefly metabolised by reduction in the A ring and this is followed by conjugation with glucuronide or sulphate. The metabolism of levonorgestrel is stereoselective. Ethinyloestradiol is primarily hydroxylated at the 2 position but a wide variety of hydroxylated and methylated metabolites are formed and these are present both free and as glucuronide and sulphate conjugates. Ethinyloestradiol is conjugated directly at the 3 position (unlike the progestagens) and thus is liable to enterohepatic recirculation. Ethinyloestradiol sulphate concentrations in plasma are many times higher than that of the unchanged drug. The oral contraceptive steroids are involved in drug interactions of clinical significance. While the effect of contraceptive steroids on other drugs is small and unlikely to be of clinical significance, failure of contraception often occurs if enzyme-inducing agents such as rifampkin, phenobarbitone or carbamazepine are coadministered. Oral antibiotics do not seem to cause a significant loss of contraception in the large majority of women. Vitamin C will enhance the effect of contraceptive steroids by competing for sulphate conjugation in the gut wall, thus leading to increased bioavailability of ethinyloestradiol.

The significance of drug interactions with human TBGg and CBG under physiological conditions: A new approach

We have studied the binding of a variety of drugs to testosterone-binding globulin (TeBG) and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) in vitro under equilibrium conditions at physiological pH and temperature using a solid phase method. Using a mass action law model of steroid transport, we have computed the binding of these drugs to TeBG and CBG in vivo. and the consequence of this binding on the transport of the endogenous steroids. Most of the synthetic steroids examined bound to TeBG or CBG in vitro. Moreover, many of these drugs are administered in doses which result in plasma concentrations sufficient to alter the transport of the endogenous steroids by displacing them from their TeBG or CBG binding sites. These results indicate that drug interactions with steroid hormone transport should be considered an additional mechanism of drug action in vivo.

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results, 3rd ed

Drug Interactions: Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results, 3rd ed

Drug Interactions. Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results.

Drug Interactions. Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results.

The significance of drug interactions in the evaluation of psychotropic drugs.

The significance of drug interactions in the evaluation of psychotropic drugs.

Antimicrobial Drug Interactions

agents. Several factors appear to be involved in such failures, including improper selection of the drug, inappropriate route or dose, and failure to begin therapy early enough or maintain it long enough(l). Another cause of therapeutic failure which is often overlooked is antimicrobial drug interactions. This article discusses drug interactions of potential clinical significance involving antifungals, chloramphenicol, lincomycin, penicillins, cephalosporins, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, antituberculars, and sulfonamides. A greater awareness of these drug interactions on the part of all health professionals can contribute to a decrease in the morbidity, and perhaps mortality, associated with multiple drug use.

Significance of Drug Interactions

Significance of Drug Interactions

Drug Interactions. Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results.

Drug Interactions. Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions and Drug Effects on Clinical Laboratory Results.

An Epidemiological Study of the Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions in A Private Community Hospital

An Epidemiological Study of the Clinical Significance of Drug-Drug Interactions in A Private Community Hospital