Among the factors which have been investigated in an attempt to explain the differences in the curability of cervical cancer is the type of cell making up the growth. Whether or not growths composed of different types of cells actually react differently to treatment, either irradiation or operation, is unknown, but many have entertained the opinion that such is the case. If they are right, the determination of cell type becomes of great importance. There is a growing doubt that differences in cell type bear a relation to the degree of radiation sensitivity, but the opinion that they are related to curability by operation still prevails. This latter opinion would appear to rest on rather flimsy evidence. Logic certainly tells us that cure by operation should depend entirely upon whether or not all the cancer present is removed, without reference to the type of cell composing it. It is my purpose, however, to present a brief resume of investigations of the cell type in a series of cases for which five-year results were available. Cervical carcinomas may be divided into the squamous or epidermoid, which make up 90 to 95 per cent of the cases, and the cylindrical-cell or adenocarcinomas, which constitute the remainder. While the latter were formerly considered more resistant to treatment than the squamous-cell growths, the majority of authorities now consider that such is not the case. It is usually not possible to differentiate the two forms either by clinical examination or by their response to radiation. Since the number of cervical adenocarcinomas is quite small, few studies on the significance of variations in the cell type have been attempted. Norris' (6) recent article, in which he reports the details of 43 cases, summarizes the results of others. Such growths have been divided into ripe, mid-ripe, and unripe forms, into highly differentiated and undifferentiated forms, and into adenoma malignum, intermediate, and true adenocarcinoma forms, but attempts to correlate these various forms with curability have remained unconvincing. This may possibly be due to the fact that such deductions have of necessity been made from small numbers of cases. Norris believes that those growths with a high mitosis content are the most malignant and the most sensitive to radiation, and inclines to the belief that adenoma malignum carries a better prognosis than the true adenocarcinoma. He believes, too, that adenocarcinomas of the cervix as a group are no less sensitive to radiation than are squamous-cell cancers. Because of the small number I have not attempted to study our cases of cervical adenocarcinoma, but have confined my attention entirely to growths made up of squamous cells.
Read full abstract