Shoulder Outcome Measure Research Articles

Study of Hamate Fractures in a Single Tertiary Hands Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review

The primary purpose of our study was to investigate hamate fractures at a single tertiary hand surgery unit in Western Australia, particularly comparing operative and nonsurgical outcomes. Patients with hamate and/or hamate plus fifth carpometacarpal injury at our hand unit between 2019 and 2022 were identified. All patients had Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) patient-reported outcome measures recorded post treatment. Patients managed operatively and nonsurgically had a period of splinting with plaster of Paris and/or thermoplastic splint for a minimum of 2 weeks. All patients underwent hand therapy. Forty-eight patients with hamate and/or hamate plus fifth carpometacarpal injury were included in this study. Thirteen patients had Milch type 1 fractures, and 35 had Milch type 2 fractures. Six Milch type 1 fractures were managed operatively, and seven were managed nonsurgically. The average QuickDASH score for the operative group was 0.38. The average QuickDASH score for the nonsurgical group was 0.65. Sixteen Milch type 2 fractures were managed operatively, and 19 were managed nonsurgically. The average QuickDASH score for the operative group was 1.3. The average QuickDASH score for the nonsurgical group was 3.5. For Milch type 2 fractures, patient-reported outcome measures were better for the operative group compared with the nonsurgical group. Therapeutic IV.

Impact of Pronator Quadratus Muscle Tear in Distal Radius Fractures on Patient Outcomes: Analyses of 55 Patients in a Volar Locking Plate Arm of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background The advantage of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair following internal fixation via the volar approach in distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery remains unconfirmed in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and functional results between patients with an intact PQ and those with a ruptured PQ before undergoing surgery with a volar locking plate for dorsally displaced unstable extra-articular DRFs. Methods A total of 120 patients aged 55 years and older were included in a randomized controlled trial comparing a volar locking plate with a dorsal nail plate. Of the 60 patients randomized to the volar plate group, the integrity of the PQ muscle was recorded during surgery for 55 patients, who were included in this study. The outcomes measured were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Measure (QuickDASH) score, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, the EQ-5D index, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, and range of motion (ROM). Results The median age was 67 years (range 55 to 88), and the one-year follow-up rate was 98%. Patients with an identified intact PQ (28/55) before surgical release had better QuickDASH scores after one year (2.5 vs 8.0, mean difference 5.5, 95% CI: 1.3 to 9.8, p=0.028). Patients in the intact group also had better EQ-5D Index scores after one year (0.94 vs 0.85, mean difference 0.089, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.174, p=0.031), and demonstrated better grip strength throughout the trial; after one year: 24 kg vs 20 kg (mean difference 3.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.6, p=0.016). After one year, the intact group had regained 96% of their grip strength and the nonintact group had regained 93% of their grip strength compared to the uninjured side. The observed differences may be of questionable clinical importance, as they were lower than those of previously proposed minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Conclusions Patients with a DRF and a ruptured PQ prior to surgery exhibited higher QuickDASH scores and lower EQ-5D index scores after one year. The integrity of the PQ should be reported in future studies.

Treatment strategies for simple elbow dislocation - a systematic review

BackgroundCurrent treatment concepts for simple elbow dislocation involve conservative and surgical approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the superiority of one treatment strategy over the other by a qualitative analysis in adult patients who suffered simple elbow luxation.Study designA systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and following the suggestions for reporting on qualitative summaries was performed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including variations and combinations of the following keywords: elbow, radiohumeral, ulnohumeral, radioulnar, luxation, and therapy. Seventeen studies that performed a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment strategies as conservative or surgical procedures were included. Reviews are not selected for further qualitative analysis. The following outcome parameters were compared: range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (Quick-DASH), recurrent instability, pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and time to return to work (RW).ResultsEarly mobilization after conservative treatment strategies showed improved ROM compared to immobilization for up to 3 weeks after surgery with less extension deficit in the early mobilization group (16° ± 13°. vs. 19.5° ± 3°, p < 0.05), as well as excellent clinical outcome scores. Surgical approaches showed similar results compared to conservative treatment, leading to improved ROM (115 vs. 118 ± 2.8) and MEPS: 95 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4.ConclusionConservative treatment with early functional training of the elbow remains the first-line therapy for simple elbow dislocation. The surgical procedure provides similar outcomes compared to conservative treatment regarding MEPS and ROM for patients with slight initial instability in physical examination and radiographs. People with red flags for persistent instability, such as severe bilateral ligament injuries and moderate to severe instability during initial physical examination, should be considered for a primary surgical approach to prevent recurrent posterolateral and valgus instability. Postoperative early mobilization and early mobilization for conservatively treated patients is beneficial to improve patient outcome and ROM.

Concurrent validity study of QuickDASH with respect to DASH in patients with traumatic upper extremity amputation

BackgroundThe Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for many upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. In patients with severe traumatic conditions, limited evidence exists regarding the equivalence between DASH and its shortened version, QuickDASH, which is more feasible in clinical practice. The rationale of this study was to analyze the concurrent validity of QuickDASH with respect to DASH in patients with traumatic upper extremity amputation.MethodsThis study is based on a consecutive cohort of traumatic upper extremity amputation patients treated with replantation or revision (completion) amputation at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. We estimated the concurrent validity of QuickDASH with respect to DASH by correlation coefficients, mean score differences, Bland–Altman plots, and distribution density. Additionally, we assessed internal reliability with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and item-total correlations.ResultsWe found a very strong linear correlation between DASH and QuickDASH scores (r = 0.97 [CI 95% 0.97–0.98], p < 0.001). The mean difference between DASH and QuickDASH was minor (MD = -1, SD 4 [CI95% from -1 to 0] p = 0.02). The mean sub-score for the activity domain was higher for QuickDASH than DASH (MD = -3 [CI95% from -4 to -3] p < 0.000) and lower for the symptom domain (MD = 7 [CI95% from 6 to 9] p < 0.000). The Bland and Altman plot showed good agreement between DASH and QuickDASH scores, but there was measurement error in QuickDASH with high scores (r = -0.20, [CI95% from -0.31 to -0.09], p = 0.001).ConclusionQuickDASH demonstrates higher total scores than the full DASH and emphasizes rating of activity over symptoms. Still, on average the differences in total scores are likely less than the MCID of DASH, and consequently, this study shows that QuickDASH can be recommended instead of the full DASH when assessing a traumatic condition.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered.

Ab. No. 49 Guidelines Used in Cross Cultural Adaptation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder And Hand (Dash) Questionnaire: A Narrative Review

Introduction: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure is a widely used patient reported outcome measure. DASH was originally developed in English in 1996 by the institute for Work and Health (IWH).1,2Since then, clinicians and researchers have been using it in the field of hand therapy. The DASH has proved to be a reliable and valid questionnaire for various upper extremity disorders and been translated into many different languages. Narrative review is comprehensive, critical and objective analysis of research. This study is done to establish a theoretical framework and focus on procedures used in cross cultural adaptation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure in different languages and describe it. Methods: All Articles are searched from different databases using key words and reviewed critically for cross cultural translation process of disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure. All articles are reviewed as per PRISMA checklist is used for analyzing and reporting articles for cross cultural adaptation process. Result: 17 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The overall rating for the process of cross-cultural adaptation process is good. The reviewed studies used the guidelines given by Beaton et al, Guillemin and criteria suggested by the institute for Work and Health (IWH). Conclusion: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation process requires careful selection of the members according to suggested guidelines and should be done with great care to provide best properties. In this review, all include studies follow the guidelines as per Beaton et al, Guillemin and criteria suggested by the institute for Work and Health (IWH).

Patient-reported function, quality of life and prosthesis wear in adults born with one hand: a national cohort study.

We invited individuals aged above 16 years with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency at and above the wrist born in Norway between 1970 and 2006 to complete the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure, the 5-Level EuroQoL-5-Dimension instrument, the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and a single-item questionnaire on arm function, appearance, pain and prosthesis wear. Of 154 eligible participants, 58 (38%) responded. Their scores were not different from the general population. All had been offered prostheses, and 56 (97%) had been fitted at a median age of 1 year (interquartile range 0-2.8). Of the participants, 37 (64%) were still prosthesis wearers, while 21 (36%) were non-wearers or using gripping devices only. Prosthesis wearers had higher levels of 'vitality' as assessed by the RAND-36 and rated their arm appearance higher, but there were no other score differences, indicating that prosthesis rejection is not associated with worse functional outcomes.Level of evidence: III.

Posttraumatic arthritis and functional outcomes of nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures after 3 years

Recent studies have shown that distal radius fractures (DRFs) in elderly patients can be treated nonoperatively with good functional results after 1 year. However, scientific evidence regarding longer follow-up to assess posttraumatic arthritis (PA), complications, and functional outcomes is scarce. This prospective case series aimed to evaluate these outcomes in a cohort of patients ≥ 65-year-old with nonoperatively treated DRFs after a minimum of 3 years. The primary outcome was PA. Secondary outcomes were complications, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), pain, range of motion and grip strength. The full data of 32 patients with a mean follow-up of 3.3 years were available: 10/32 patients had radiological signs of PA, but only 2 of these patients reported pain. A total of 11/32 fractures healed in malunion (> 10° dorsal angulation). There was no significant difference in QuickDASH or PRWHE from 1 year to the latest follow-up after more than 3 years. This study thus adds to the literature stating that radiological signs, including PA and malunion, do not necessarily result in symptoms. Moreover, it underpins that nonoperative treatment of these patients results in good functional outcomes after 1 and 3 years.

Orthotic intervention options to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger: A systematic review

BackgroundThe design and efficacy of orthotic intervention to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger vary widely. PurposeTo identify types of orthoses (including relative motion), effectiveness, and outcome measurements used to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger. Study DesignSystematic review. MethodsThe study was undertaken according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registry, number CRD42022322515. Two independent authors electronically and manually searched, and screened 4 databases; selected articles following pre-set eligibility criteria; assessed the quality of the evidence using the Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study; and extracted the data. ResultsOf the 11 articles included, 2 involved pediatric trigger finger and 9 adult trigger finger. Orthoses for pediatric trigger finger positioned finger(s), hand, and/or wrist of children in neutral extension. In adults, a single joint was immobilized by the orthosis, blocking either the metacarpophalangeal joint or the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint. All studies reported positive results with statistically significant improvements and medium to large effect size to almost every outcome measure, including the Number of Triggering Events in Ten Active Fist 1.37, Frequency of Triggering from 2.07 to 2.54, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure from 0.46 to 1.88, Visual Analogue Pain Scale from 0.92 to 2.00, and Numeric Rating Pain Scale from 0.49 to 1.31. Severity tools and patient-rated outcome measures were used with the validity and reliability of some unknown. ConclusionsOrthoses are effective for non-surgical management of pediatric and adult trigger finger using various orthotic options. Although used in practice, evidence for the use of relative motion orthosis is absent. High-quality studies based on sound research questions and design using reliable and valid outcome measures are needed.

Dumontier group 2 radiocarpal fracture-dislocation: The results of open reduction and fixation without volar ligament repair

IntroductionThe radiocarpal fracture-dislocations are a spectrum of severe injury involving both the bony and ligamentous structures that stabilise the wrist joint. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of open reduction and fixation without volar ligament repair for Dumontier group 2 radiocarpal fracture-dislocation and to evaluate the incidence and clinical relevance of ulnar translation and advanced osteoarthritis. Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with Dumontier group 2 radiocarpal fracture-dislocation treated in our institute. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH), and Mayo modified wrist scores (MMWS) were collected. Furthermore, extension‒flexion and supination‒pronation arcs were collected by reviewing chart, either. We divided the patients into two groups according to the presence or absence of advanced osteoarthritis, and presented the differences in the pain, disability, wrist performance, and range of motion between the two groups. We performed the same comparison between the patients with and those without the ulnar translation of the carpus. ResultsThere were sixteen men and six women with a median age of 23 years (range, 20‒48 years). The median follow-up period was 33 months (range, 12–149 months). The median VAS, DASH and MMWS were 0 (range 0–2), 9.1 (range, 0–65.9) and 80 (range, 45–90), respectively. The median flexion‒extension and pronation‒supination arcs were 142.5° (range, 20°‒170°) and 147.5° (range, 70°‒175°), respectively. Ulnar translation was recognised in four patients and the development of advanced osteoarthritis was noted in 13 patients during the follow-up period. However, neither was highly correlated with functional outcomes. ConclusionThe current study postulated that ulnar translation might occur following treatment for Dumontier group 2 lesions, whereas injury was predominantly caused by rotational force. Therefore, radiocarpal instability should be recognized during the operation. However, the clinical relevance of ulnar translation and wrist osteoarthritis needs to be assessed in further comparison studies.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tears

The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon. The study was a retrospective review of repairs of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon performed by multiple surgeons from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging indicative of distal biceps pathology without a complete tear and surgical treatment with intraoperative confirmation of a partial tear. The presence of preceding trauma, duration of symptoms, and postoperative complications were documented. Patients were contacted for outcome assessment using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation outcome measures. Clinical outcomes were obtained from 56 of 74 (76%) eligible patients with an average follow-up of 46 months (range: 15-85 months). After surgery, the median QuickDASH was 2.3 (interquartile range, 0-9.7), and the median Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation score was 1 (interquartile range, 0-12). Postoperative QuickDASH scores were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Known traumas preceding the symptoms and duration of symptoms before surgery were not significantly associated with the outcome. Of all eligible patients, 30 complications were reported in 25 (34%) patients and included 2 reruptures, 2 cases of heterotopic ossification, 1 deep infection, 1 case of implant irritation, 21 neuropraxias, and 3 hematomas. Five (7%) patients underwent 6 reoperations including 1 revision for a rerupture, 1 irrigation and debridement, 2 heterotopic ossification excisions, 1 hematoma evacuation, and 1 implant removal. The results suggest that the repair of partial distal biceps tendon tears is a viable treatment option with significant improvement in QuickDASH. There was no significant relationship between the postoperative outcome and duration of symptoms or known traumas preceding the symptoms. Therapeutic IV.

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries?

Background:Various clinical outcome scores have been described to evaluate postoperative shoulder function after operatively treated acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability. Clinical outcome scores can be divided between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examiner-dependent outcome measures (EDOMs) after a clinical examination by a physician. The correlation between PROMs and EDOMs, and thus their interchangeability with regard to operatively treated ACJ instability, has not yet been evaluated.Purpose:To investigate whether PROMs are a reasonable substitute for EDOMs. Correlations between global shoulder (GS) and ACJ-specific outcome measures were also investigated.Study Design:Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Included in this study were 131 consecutive patients with operatively treated ACJ instability between 2011 and 2017. Postoperative shoulder function was measured using PROMs, including the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test, and Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), and EDOMs, including the Constant-Murley score (CMS), Taft score, ACJ instability (ACJI) score, and SICK Scapula Score (SSS). Associations between PROM and EDOM scores were calculated using the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients for linear and nonlinear variables, respectively, and were interpreted using the Cohen classification. The scores were further stratified into GS versus ACJ-specific measures.Results:A strong correlation was observed between several PROMs and EDOMs (CMS vs SSV [r = 0.59; P = .02] and CMS vs NCS [r = 0.79; P ≤ .001]) and between several GS and ACJ-specific scores (CMS vs NCS; CMS vs ACJI [rs = 0.69; P < .001]; and CMS vs SSS [r = –0.68; P < .001]).Conclusion:Based on the results of this study, PROMs such as the SSV (a GS measure) and the NCS (an ACJ-specific measure) can substitute for EDOMs.Clinical Relevance:PROMs that can be substituted for EDOMs can enable the conduct of clinical studies in circumstances in which in-person clinical follow-up of the patient by a physician is not possible.

Clinical long-term results of radial head arthroplasty in comminuted radial head fractures.

Modern radial head prostheses have recently become more common in the treatment of comminuted radial head fractures. The goal of this study was to evaluate how well the EVOLVE® modular metallic radial head implant prosthetic restores the functional range of motion and stability of the elbow. 30 patients with comminuted radial head fractures received an arthroplasty with an EVOLVE® prosthesis in our institution. 20 of those patients were available for long-term follow-up (mean > 10years). The outcomes were assessed on the basis of pain, motion, and strength. The overall outcome was scored with functional rating scores. According to the Broberg-Morrey elbow evaluation score, after a mean follow-up period of 10.2years, ten (50.0%) patients were rated as very good, four (20.0%) as good, six (30.0%) as satisfactory, and none as poor. In the long-term results the Broberg-Morrey score increased from 79 (in short-term results) to 89 points. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome measure questionnaire showed an average of 16.2 points. Initially, patients had an extension deficit of 20°, which was reduced to 5° at the latest follow-up. In our long-term results, an improvement in the function of the elbow was observed after arthroplasty using a metallic modular radial head implant. Comminuted radial head fractures with elbow instability can be treated effectively with the EVOLVE® radial head prosthesis, which restores stability in acute treatment. Our long-term results after 10.2years demonstrate good functional outcome and low major complication rate. IV.

Dynamics of balance indicators, activities of daily living, and quality of life of elderly suffering from Parkinson's disease and frailty after proximal humerus fracture following physiotherapeutic functional training.

Balance dysfunction in elderly patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a high-risk fall precaution, along with sarcopenia and senile asthenia, which leads to traumas, including fractures of the proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a functional training as part of a physical therapy program on balance, upper limb (UL) function, daily living activities, and quality of life in elderly patients with PD and frailty, following proximal humerus fractures. We examined 33 elderly patients with PD and frailty in the recovery period after PHF. The control group included individuals who underwent rehabilitation according to the general principles of kinesitherapy. The treatment group consisted of patients engaged in a program of physical therapy directed at improving balance, function of the upper UL, motor stereotype, and activities of daily living. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH), Wrist Dynamometry, Falls efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Barthel Activities of daily living (ADL) Index, Lawton Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) Scale, PD Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). According to all studied indicators, the patients of both groups showed a statistically and significantly better result compared to the initial data (p<0.05), but the treatment group showed better outcomes compared with the control group (p<0.05).

Outcome After Pollicization for Congenital Thumb Deficiency: A Cohort Study of Cases in a Single Unit, 1987 to 2016

To investigate the functional and aesthetic outcomes in a cohort with pollicizations performed due to congenital anomalies in our hospital. From 1987 to 2016, we performed pollicizations in 32 hands of children aged 1 to 8 years (median, 2 years). We followed-up on 31 of the hands from 1 to 31 years (median, 10 years) after the procedure. The participants and their caregivers self-assessed their function and appearance with visual analogue scales and patient-reported outcome measures (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Upper Extremity; the short version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure; and EQ-5D-3L). We examined the hands with regard to motion, strength, sensitivity, and function. There were 2 complications and 6 reoperations. Participants with mild anomalies (radial longitudinal deficiency Bayne type N/0 to 2) had better subjective and objective hand function than participants with severe anomalies (radial longitudinal deficiency Bayne type 3-4, ulnar dimelia, 5-finger hand). Hands with preoperatively near-normal index fingers had, in most cases, good thumb opposition and pinch, and hands in both groups benefited from the creation of a cylinder grip. Grip and pinch strength were lower than reported in cohort studies where an additional opponensplasty had been performed. Hands with severe congenital anomalies also benefited from the procedure. We recommend a simplified follow-up program to identify cases where additional surgeries to enhance strength should be considered during growth of the child. Therapeutic IV.

A hybrid technique combining intramedullary pinning with extramedullary plate fixation in unstable and comminuted radial head fractures following on-table reconstruction

BackgroundManagement of comminuted radial fractures remains controversial. Currently, the emergence of on-table reconstruction technique has made fixation in comminuted radial head fractures more viable. However, the present study reported an intro-operative unstable displacement from the reconstructed radial head to the neck during plate fixation, characterized by a poor radiocapitellar contact and incongruity between the radial head and neck. A hybrid technique combining with intramedullary pining was performed in our study to restore the normal alignment and maintain the stability of fixation. Therefore, the purpose of this article aimed to prove the feasibility of unstable comminuted radial head fractures treated with the extramedullary plate and intramedullary pinning fixation using titanium elastic nails.MethodsThe clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of the groups were compared during follow-up. The radiographic examination was conducted to evaluate the status of bone union, heterotopic ossification and post-traumatic arthritis. The functional assessment was performed to evaluate clinical effects, which included measurements of range of motion (ROM) in the elbow, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Elbow Self-Assessment score (ESAS), Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)Outcome Measure score.ResultsThirteen patients with unstable fractures were participated with an average follow-up of (38.6 ± 4.5) months for the experimental group and (32.0 ± 6.3) months for the control group, respectively. The functional outcomes in the experimental group, including MEPS and DASH, were significantly superior to the control group. However, no significant difference was observed in the elbow ROM and VAS score between two groups. In the last follow-up, one patient with post-traumatic arthritis rated as grades 1 and two with heterotopic ossifications were observed in the experimental group. In the control group, degenerative changes were observed in three cases (grade 1 in two cases and grade 2 in one case) and heterotopic ossifications rated as grade I were found in two patients.ConclusionCollectively, intramedullary pinning with extramedullary plate fixation is feasible in unstable comminuted radial head fractures, which can be considered as a remedial surgery for on-table reconstruction technique.

Responsiveness of five shoulder outcome measures at follow-ups from 3 to 24\u2009months

BackgroundTo assess responsiveness of five outcome measures at four different follow-ups in patients with SLAP II lesions of the shoulder.Methods119 patients with symptoms and signs, MRI arthrography and arthroscopic findings were included. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Oxford Instability Shoulder Score (OISS), EuroQol (EQ-5D3L), Rowe Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The analysis contains both anchor-based and distribution-based methods, and hypothesis testing.ResultsConfidence intervals for ROC cut-off values, representing MID, for OISS, CMS and EQ-5D3L crossed zero at 3 months. Cut-off values were stable between 6- and 24-months follow-up. At 24-months ROC cut-off values (95% CI) were: Rowe 18 (13 to 24); WOSI 331 (289 to 442); OISS 9 (5 to 14); CMS 11 (9 to 15) and EQ-5D3L 0.123 (0.035 to 0.222). MID95%limit estimates were substantially higher than ROC cut-off values and MIDMEAN at all follow-ups for all instruments. The reliable change proportion (RCP) values in the improved group were highest for WOSI and the Rowe Score (ranging from 68 to 87%) and significantly lower for CMS. EQ-5D3L had the lowest values (13 to 16%). We found a moderate correlation between mean change scores of the outcome measures and the anchor, except for the EQ-5D3L.ConclusionsIn patients with SLAP II-lesions the patient reported OISS and WOSI and the clinical Rowe score had best responsiveness. Our results suggest that 3 months follow-up is too early for outcome evaluation.

Arthroscopic resection of recurrent wrist ganglions – A retrospective study of 17 patients

BackgroundArthroscopic resection has become a favorable alternative for wrist ganglions. However, for recurrent wrist ganglions, arthroscopic resection is relatively contraindicated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic resection for recurrent wrist ganglions and to identify their safety and efficacy. MethodsFrom June 2011 to February 2017, 17 patients with recurrent wrist ganglion were treated with arthroscopic resection. We evaluated the visual analog scale, modified Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Patients were questioned for pain reduction, pain during pushups, and any difficulty in returning to work. Recurrence and complications were also assessed at each follow-up visit. ResultsWe enrolled 17 patients and median follow-up was 58 months. The reduction in pain was significant. Only 2 of the 17 patients had residual pain after arthroscopic resection. One female patient showed recurrences 3 years later. Although 2 cases of stiffness were noted after the operation, no significant complication was present 3 months postoperatively. Most patients had good recovery and could resume work; however, 2 patients reported fair recovery. ConclusionThe results of this study confirmed that arthroscopic excision could be an effective and safe treatment for recurrent ganglions; therefore, should not be contraindicated for treating recurrent wrist ganglions. Nevertheless, further prospective studies with larger patient numbers are needed to establish a stronger evidence for arthroscopic resection of recurrent wrist ganglions.

Association Between Body Mass Index and Functional Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Extra-articular Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study.

The association between body mass index (BMI) and functional outcomes is unknown in elderly individuals with distal radius fracture (DRF). The aim of this study is to evaluate if there is association between BMI and functional outcomes in patients older than 60years with DRF treated conservatively. A prospective observational study was performed. A total of 228 patients with extra-articular DRF were prospectively recruited. All patients were categorized by their BMI as normal, overweight, or obese. Functional outcomes were assessed after cast removal and at 1-year follow-up. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires were used to assess upper limb and wrist/hand function, respectively, while the Jamar Dynamometer was used to assess grip strength. Of the total number of patients, 184 were female (80.7%), 87 were overweight (38.2%), and 111 were obese (48.7%). After cast removal, the correlations between BMI and functional outcomes were DASH 0.06 (p = 0.578), PRWE 0.04 (p = 0.692), and grip strength -0.02 (p = 0.763). At 1-year follow-up, the correlations were DASH 0.55 (p = 0.036), PRWE 0.32 (p = 0.041), and grip strength -0.21 (p = 0.043). This study suggests that at 1-year follow-up, there was a low-to-moderate association between BMI and poor functional outcomes in elderly patients with extra-articular DRF treated conservatively. Level IV, observational prospective study.

The critical difference in the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) outcome measure after essential upper extremity tumor surgery.

The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) is a scored questionnaire that is widely used to evaluate the health-related quality of life of patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. However, numerical changes in the measure scores lack clinical significance without meaningful threshold change values of outcome measures that are diagnostically specific. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is useful for the interpretation of scores by defining the smallest change that a patient would perceive. However, the MCIDs of the scores in orthopedic oncology patients has not been reported. We aimed to determine the MCIDs of the measure in orthopedic oncology patients. Data from our health-related quality of life database from 1999 to 2005 were retrospectively reviewed after institutional review board approval. Seventy-eight patients who underwent surgery and completed 2 surveys during postoperative follow-up were evaluated. Two different methods were used to estimate the MCIDs: distribution-based and anchor-based approaches (the latter used receiver operating characteristic analysis). Using distribution-based methods, the MCIDs of the DASH questionnaire were 7.4 and 8.3 by half standard deviation and the 90% interval of minimal detectable change, respectively. By anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic analysis), the MCID was 8.3. The MCID values calculated by each method validates that the results for upper extremity oncology patients were similar to those reported in other orthopedic conditions. These results identify the threshold for meaningful improvements in DASH scores in orthopedic oncology patients and establish the reference to evaluate health-related quality of life and the outcomes of upper extremity oncology surgery. These data should be further refined for disease- and reconstruction-specific analyses.