Shoulder Complex Kinematics Research Articles

How execution of tennis forehand overhead smash changes the shoulder complex kinematics: musculoskeletal modeling

How execution of tennis forehand overhead smash changes the shoulder complex kinematics: musculoskeletal modeling

Evaluation of the range of motion of scapulothoracic, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints: State of the art.

The scapulothoracic, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints play a fundamental role in the shoulder function. Shoulder complex kinematics have been studied with different methods using: goniometers, 2 static radiographs, 3D motion analyzers (invasive or noninvasive) and digital inclinometers. Goniometers have been used traditionally to assess scapular rotation in relation to the thorax. The intrinsic limit of multiple static two-dimensional shoulder radiographs is the attempt of describing in two what is occurring in three dimensions. Technology innovations have led to the development of the 3D shoulder complex kinematics analysis ETS (Electromagnetic tracking systems) using sensors (invasive bone-pin markers or noninvasive skin surface marker) stitched to the scapula/clavicula, thorax, and humerus. Despite being uncomfortable, invasive 3D motion cortical pins analyzers still represent the current gold standard for tracking shoulder complex kinematics. Therefore, access to three-dimensional biomechanical instrumentations for collecting kinematic data represents an active problem for many physicians. A precise, easy to use and low-cost non-invasive method able to draw and analyze the kinematics of the shoulder complex has not been developed yet. Further researches are necessary to design a new non-invasive method able to draw and analyze the kinematics of the scapula and the whole shoulder complex, precisely.

The Coupled Kinematics of Scapulothoracic Upward Rotation.

Scapulothoracic upward rotation (UR) is an important shoulder complex motion allowing for a larger functional work space and improved glenohumeral muscle function. However, the kinematic mechanisms producing scapulothoracic UR remain unclear, limiting the understanding of normal and abnormal shoulder movements. The objective of this study was to identify the coupling relationships through which sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joint motions contribute to scapulothoracic UR. This was a cross-sectional observational study. Sixty participants were enrolled in this study; 30 had current shoulder pain, and 30 had no history of shoulder symptoms. Shoulder complex kinematics were quantified using single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape matching and were described as finite helical displacements for 30-degree phases of humerothoracic elevation (30 degrees-60 degrees, 60 degrees-90 degrees, and 90 degrees-120 degrees). A coupling function was derived to estimate scapulothoracic UR from its component motions of acromioclavicular UR, sternoclavicular posterior rotation, and sternoclavicular elevation as a function of acromioclavicular internal rotation. The proportional contributions of each of the component motions were also calculated and compared between phases of humerothoracic elevation and groups. Scapulothoracic UR displacement could be effectively predicted using the derived coupling function. During the 30- to 60-degree humerothoracic elevation phase, acromioclavicular UR accounted for 84.2% of scapulothoracic UR, whereas sternoclavicular posterior rotation and elevation each accounted for < 10%. During later phases, acromioclavicular UR and sternoclavicular posterior rotation each accounted for 32% to 42%, whereas sternoclavicular elevation accounted for < 11%. Error due to the tracking of sternoclavicular posterior rotation may have resulted in an underprediction of its proportional contribution and an overprediction of the proportional contribution of acromioclavicular UR. Acromioclavicular UR and sternoclavicular posterior rotation are the predominant component motions of scapulothoracic UR. More research is needed to investigate how these coupling relationships are affected by muscle function and influenced by scapular dyskinesis.

Shoulder complex kinematics pre- and post- rotator cuff repair

This study investigated shoulder complex joint kinematics and functional outcomes before and after full-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff repair. Nine adults (mean age 63.4 ± 6.2 years) participated in three test sessions: 0–12 weeks pre-operatively, 9–12 weeks, and 22–30 weeks post-operatively. Upper extremity kinematics of the surgical arm’s glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular and thoracohumeral joints over the duration of a hair combing task were quantified with motion analysis using inverse kinematics. The UCLA Shoulder Rating and Simple Shoulder Test shoulder health outcomes were administered at each session to determine patients’ perceived function of their surgical shoulder. Results indicated multiple significant increases over time among the three joints comprising the shoulder complex in the coronal and transverse planes, despite no increases in thoracohumeral motion, and suggest that thoracohumeral motion alone does not provide a comprehensive assessment. Interestingly, more significant increases were observed at the 6-month evaluation than the 3-month evaluation, which is not aligned with the standard rehabilitation endpoint. Thus, our findings suggest that clinicians should evaluate all joints of the shoulder complex during longer-term rehabilitation assessment. Ultimately, knowledge of patients’ pre-operative and post-operative shoulder complex kinematics may help to improve rehabilitation to promote improved patient outcomes.

A New Skeleton Model and the Motion Rhythm Analysis for Human Shoulder Complex Oriented to Rehabilitation Robotics.

Rehabilitation robotics has become a widely accepted method to deal with the training of people with motor dysfunction. In robotics medium training, shoulder repeated exercise training has been proven beneficial for improving motion ability of human limbs. An important and difficult paradigm for motor function rehabilitation training is the movement rhythm on the shoulder, which is not a single joint but complex and ingenious combination of bones, muscles, ligaments, and tendons. The most robots for rehabilitation were designed previously considering simplified biomechanical models only, which led to misalignment between robots and human shoulder. Current biomechanical models were merely developed for rehabilitation robotics design. This paper proposes a new hybrid spatial model based on joint geometry constraints to describe the movement of the shoulder skeletal system and establish the position analysis equation of the model by a homogeneous coordinate transformation matrix and vector method, which can be used to calculate the kinematics of human-robot integrated system. The shoulder rhythm, the most remarkable particularity in shoulder complex kinematics and important reference for shoulder training strategy using robotics, is described and analyzed via the proposed skeleton model by three independent variables in this paper. This method greatly simplifies the complexity of the shoulder movement description and provides an important reference for the training strategy making of upper limb rehabilitation via robotics.

Validation of single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape-matching for quantifying shoulder complex kinematics

Fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape-matching has emerged as the standard for non-invasively quantifying kinematics. However, its accuracy has not been well established for the shoulder complex when using single-plane fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape-matching for quantifying full shoulder complex kinematics. Tantalum markers were implanted into the clavicle, humerus, and scapula of four cadaveric shoulders. Biplane radiographs were obtained with the shoulder in five humerothoracic elevation positions (arm at the side, 30°, 60°, 90°, maximum). Images from both systems were used to perform marker tracking, while only those images acquired with the primary fluoroscopy system were used to perform 2D/3D shape-matching. Kinematics errors due to shape-matching were calculated as the difference between marker tracking and 2D/3D shape-matching and expressed as root mean square (RMS) error, bias, and precision. Overall RMS errors for the glenohumeral joint ranged from 0.7 to 3.3° and 1.2 to 4.2 mm, while errors for the acromioclavicular joint ranged from 1.7 to 3.4°. Errors associated with shape-matching individual bones ranged from 1.2 to 3.2° for the humerus, 0.5 to 1.6° for the scapula, and 0.4 to 3.7° for the clavicle. The results of the study demonstrate that single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape-matching can accurately quantify full shoulder complex kinematics in static positions.

Sports Physical Therapy Section Poster Presentations (Abstracts SPO1–SPO119)

Sports Physical Therapy Section Poster Presentations (Abstracts SPO1–SPO119)

Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers: A review

The shoulder complex presents unique challenges for measuring motion as the scapula, unlike any other bony segment in the body, glides and rotates underneath layers of soft tissue and skin. The ability for clinicians and researchers to collect meaningful kinematic data is dependent on the reliability and validity of the instrumentation utilized. The aim of this study was to review the relevant literature pertaining to the reliability and validity of electromagnetic tracking systems (ETS) and digital inclinometers for assessing shoulder complex motion. Advances in technology have led to the development of biomechanical instrumentation, like ETS, that allow for the collection of three-dimensional kinematic data. The existing evidence has demonstrated that ETS are reliable and valid instruments for collecting static and dynamic kinematic data of the shoulder complex. Similarly, digital inclinometers have become increasingly popular among clinicians due to their cost effectiveness and practical use in the clinical setting. The existing evidence supports the use of digital inclinometers for the collection of shoulder complex kinematics as these instruments have been demonstrated to yield acceptable reliability and validity. While digital inclinometers pose a disadvantage to ETS regarding accuracy, precision, and are limited to two-dimensional and static measurements, this instrument provides clinically meaningful data that allow clinicians and researchers the ability to measure, monitor, and compare shoulder complex kinematics.

Three-dimensional shoulder complex kinematics in individuals with upper extremity impairment from chronic stroke

Purpose: To evaluate shoulder complex kinematics in persons with chronic upper extremity (UE) impairments due to stroke and determine if kinematics predicts motor function based on the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA). Methods: Sixteen stroke survivors with chronic UE impairments (age range = 46–80 years, male = 8, female = 8, mean (SD) 66 (40) months post-stroke) performed the UE portion of the FMA with the shoulder/elbow subscale (FM_se) documented. Three-dimensional kinematics of the shoulder complex was collected with the Motion Monitor™ (Innsport, Chicago, IL, USA). Participants performed three repetitions of arm elevation in the frontal, sagittal and self-selected planes. The third repetition was analyzed. Scapular and humeral kinematics were calculated in the self-selected plane. Scapulohumeral rhythm was analyzed at peak elevation. Backward stepwise regression analysis predicted kinematic contributions to the FM_se. Results: Mean (SD) FM_se score was 25.3 1(10.9). Peak humeral elevation ranged from 45.6° to 129.2° (median 106.7°). Scapulohumeral rhythm was 4.1:1 when humeral elevation ranged from 45° to 50°, 1.5:1 from 80° to 95° and 2.1:1 from 105° to 130°. Humeral elevation, scapular upward rotation and scapular internal rotation predicted 65.4% of FM_se score variability. Conclusions: Persons with chronic UE impairments from stroke demonstrated reduced peak elevation and altered scapulohumeral rhythm. Three predictors of the FM_se were humeral elevation, scapular upward rotation and scapular internal rotation.Implications for RehabilitationThree-dimensional analyses of shoulder elevation in stroke survivors with chronic upper extremity impairments reveal altered scapulohumeral rhythm in their paretic limb.Those with greater elevation limitations demonstrate larger scapular contribution. Humeral elevation, scapular upward rotation and scapular internal rotation predict motor function as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment.Clinicians should include examination of and intervention to all the components of the shoulder complex to address functional deficits.

Effectiveness of the end-range mobilization and scapular mobilization approach in a subgroup of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: A randomized control trial

Treatment strategies targeting abnormal shoulder kinematics may prevent pathology or if the pathology develops, shorten its duration. We examined the effectiveness of the end-range mobilization/scapular mobilization treatment approach (EMSMTA) in a subgroup of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome (FSS). Based on the kinematics criteria from a prediction method, 34 subjects with FSS were recruited. Eleven subjects were assigned to the control group, and 23 subjects who met the criteria were randomly assigned to the criteria-control group with a standardized physical therapy program or to the EMSMTA group. Subjects attended treatment sessions twice a week for 8 weeks. Range of motion (ROM), disability score, and shoulder complex kinematics were obtained at the beginning, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Subjects in the EMSMTA group experienced greater improvement in outcomes compared with the criteria-control group at 4 weeks (mean difference = 0.2 of normalized hand-behind-back reach) and 8 weeks (mean difference = 22.4 degrees humeral external rotation, 0.31 of normalized hand-behind-back reach, 7.5 disability, 5 degrees tipping and 0.32 rhythm ratio). Similar improvements were found between the EMSMTA group and control group. The EMSMTA was more effective than a standardized physical therapy program in a subgroup of subjects who fit the criteria from a prediction method.

Scapular Summit 2009, July 16, 2009, Lexington, Kentucky

This was the third research meeting focused on scapular function and dysfunction, following similar meetings in 2003 and 2006. The purpose of this meeting, hosted by the Shoulder Center of Kentucky, was to continue to examine the biomechanical and clinical factors thought to be associated with the role of the scapula in shoulder function and dysfunction. Since the last Summit, much more information has been created in this area, and it was thought that enough progress had been made that an organized overview of current knowledge could provide some consensus statements to guide further research and provide assessment and treatment guidelines. A call for abstracts was extended to researchers with proven interest and published research on the scapula. The meeting was organized around 3 primary categories of information: scapular kinematics and dysfunction, clinical evaluation of the scapula, and interventions. The last session of the meeting involved development of consensus statements for each category. This document represents the current state of knowledge concerning the aspects of scapular function and dysfunction discussed at the Summit. It is expected that, as more knowledge is developed, the gaps will be filled in and a clearer understanding of the roles of the scapula in shoulder function will emerge. This issue includes the consensus statements and abstracts from the Summit.

Functional activity characteristics of individuals with shoulder dysfunctions

Shoulder-related dysfunction affects individuals’ ability to function independently and thus decreases quality of life. Functional task assessment is a key concern for a clinician in diagnostic assessment, outcome measurement, and planning of treatment programs. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the FASTRAK 3-dimensional (3-D) motion analysis and surface electromyography (sEMG) systems to analyze 3-D shoulder complex movements during functional tasks and compare motion patterns between subjects with and without shoulder dysfunctions (SDs).For the test, sEMG and 3-D motion analysis systems were used to characterize the functional tasks. Twenty-five asymptomatic male subjects and 21 male subjects with right shoulder disorders performed four functional tasks which involved arm reaching and raising activities with their dominant arms. Reliability was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Motion pattern was compared between two groups using mixed analysis of variances (ANOVAs). Shoulder complex kinematics and associated muscular activities during functional tasks were reliably quantified (ICC = 0.83–0.99) from the means of three trials. Relative to the group without SDs, the group with SDs showed significant alteration in shoulder complex kinematics (3°–40°) and associated muscular activities (3–10% maximum). Scapular tipping, scapular elevation, upper trapezius muscle function, and serratus anterior muscle function may have implications in the rehabilitation of patients with SDs.

Three-Dimensional in Vivo Kinematics of the Shoulder during Humeral Elevation.

Shoulder kinematics, including scapular rotation relative to the trunk and humeral rotation relative to the scapula, were examined during humeral elevation in three vertical planes via video analysis of intracortical pins. Helical axis parameters provided an easily interpretable description of shoulder motion not subject to the limitations associated with Cardan/Euler angles. Between 30 and 150° of elevation in each plane, the scapula rotated almost solely about an axis perpendicular to the scapula. Additional scapular rotation appeared to support the notion that the scapula moves "toward" the plane of elevation. Humeral rotation took place mainly in the plane of the scapula independent of the plane of elevation. Many parameters of shoulder complex kinematics were quite similar across all planes of elevation, suggesting a consistent movement pattern with subtle differences associated with the plane of elevation.