Katherine E. Manthorne Art: National Museum of Art, Smithsonian Institution-these are the first words that we encounter on the journal's cover. They announce a historic agenda that extends nationwide and embraces the potential participation of an immense body of readers and contributors. Such an ambitious mission raises a number of questions, two of which demand immediate attention. The first surrounds the use of the term American. So far, it has been used in these pages as a shorthand notation to refer almost exclusively to the United States, a single country of fifty states. This traditional focus often complicates efforts to address the rich art of our fellow inhabitants in the Americas. Notwithstanding this problematic concern, ongoing sociopolitical debates have reinforced our awareness of the need to account for the multiplicity of voices within the United States of America.' Yet while scholars debate the validity of the melting pot as a legitimate schema for national developments, the popular tendency has been to retain that myth. So whose story, whose art history, then, do we tell? In this climate of multicultural awareness, it is all too common to promise ever-widening representation. Since its inception, Art has played an active role in the rethinking of the discipline on issues of race and gender and of folk art and crafts production. We can do even better in questioning the politics of art, with its unwritten edicts for inclusion and exclusion. But it requires the participation of all to redress the balances and ensure that this journal's content speaks to our shared concerns. The second point centers on the concept of art and brings us to the heart of the current controversy over elitism versus democracy in the arts. One side might be represented by the recent National Endowment for the Arts report entitled American Canvas, which accused the arts of the sin of elitism. The other side finds its most prominent spokesperson in Metropolitan Museum of Art director Philippe de Montebello, who in turn has resoundingly asserted elitism as a virtue rather than a vice. Where in relation to these two endpoints should Art situate itself? To stake its claim, we need to pay attention to what has been called the ideology of democracy. In this world view, not only are all men and women created equal, but so too are all cultures and their artifacts.2 This democratizing tendency has been affirmed by much of the new art history and the newer move toward the study of visual culture as an alternative to more circumscribed definitions of artistic production. To date Art has subscribed to this principle, publishing essays on the art of Winslow Homer or Jackson Pollock alongside those on Elvis Presley's Graceland and a nodding-head pink flamingo. The journal's