Short-term Hormone Therapy Research Articles

Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial

How best to treat rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration after radical prostatectomy is an urgent clinical question. Salvage radiotherapy delays the need for more aggressive treatment such as long-term androgen suppression, but fewer than half of patients benefit from it. We aimed to establish the effect of adding short-term androgen suppression at the time of salvage radiotherapy on biochemical outcome and overall survival in men with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy. This open-label, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, was done in 43 French study centres. We enrolled men (aged ≥18 years) who had received previous treatment for a histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate (but no previous androgen deprivation therapy or pelvic radiotherapy), and who had stage pT2, pT3, or pT4a (bladder neck involvement only) in patients who had rising PSA of 0·2 to less than 2·0 μg/L following radical prostatectomy, without evidence of clinical disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally via an interactive web response system to standard salvage radiotherapy (three-dimensional [3D] conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, of 66 Gy in 33 fractions 5 days a week for 7 weeks) or radiotherapy plus short-term androgen suppression using 10·8 mg goserelin by subcutaneous injection on the first day of irradiation and 3 months later. Randomisation was stratified using a permuted block method according to investigational site, radiotherapy modality, and prognosis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00423475. Between Oct 19, 2006, and March 30, 2010, 743 patients were randomly assigned, 374 to radiotherapy alone and 369 to radiotherapy plus goserelin. Patients assigned to radiotherapy plus goserelin were significantly more likely than patients in the radiotherapy alone group to be free of biochemical progression or clinical progression at 5 years (80% [95% CI 75-84] vs 62% [57-67]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·38-0·66; p<0·0001). No additional late adverse events occurred in patients receiving short-term androgen suppression compared with those who received radiotherapy alone. The most frequently occuring acute adverse events related to goserelin were hot flushes, sweating, or both (30 [8%] of 366 patients had a grade 2 or worse event; 30 patients [8%] had hot flushes and five patients [1%] had sweating in the radiotherapy plus goserelin group vs none of 372 patients in the radiotherapy alone group). Three (8%) of 366 patients had grade 3 or worse hot flushes and one patient had grade 3 or worse sweating in the radiotherapy plus goserelin group versus none of 372 patients in the radiotherapy alone group. The most common late adverse events of grade 3 or worse were genitourinary events (29 [8%] in the radiotherapy alone group vs 26 [7%] in the radiotherapy plus goserelin group) and sexual disorders (20 [5%] vs 30 [8%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Adding short-term androgen suppression to salvage radiotherapy benefits men who have had radical prostatectomy and whose PSA rises after a postsurgical period when it is undetectable. Radiotherapy combined with short-term androgen suppression could be considered as a reasonable option in this population. French Ministry of Health, AstraZeneca, and La Ligue Contre le Cancer.

Can short-term hormone therapy for rising PSA prolong survival?

Can short-term hormone therapy for rising PSA prolong survival?

Abstract OT3-2-04: ADAPT - Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

Abstract Background: Early therapy response is currently not regarded for further treatment decisions as standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Predictive markers for the success of a certain therapy could support the physician’s choice of adequate and beneficial therapies by simultaneous reduction of unnecessary toxicity. Proliferation makers as Ki-67 seem to be a suitable tool, as dynamic changes of proliferation (as result of induction therapy) have been shown to be most important for outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prediction in patients with pCR in distinct BC subtypes (luminal B, TNBC, HER2+). Methods: Trial design: ADAPT combines early assessment of prognosis by conventional markers (e.g. molecular classification, nodal status) with dynamic measurement of proliferation changes during a 3-week induction therapy, using baseline diagnostic core biopsy and a second biopsy after induction therapy. ADAPT consists of an umbrella trial and five different sub-trials (HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, HR-/HER2-, Elderly) and is set up as prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized phase II/III trial. Subtype-specific treatment across the sub-trials is highly innovative and involves the following treatment strategies: • HR+/HER2-: endocrine therapy (ET) vs. chemotherapy (4xPac q2w – 4xEC q2w vs. 8xNab-Pac q1w – 4xEC q2w) + ET, depending on risk classification/early response. • HER2+/HR+: T-DM1 vs. T-DM1 + ET vs. trastuzumab + ET. • HER2+/HR-: Trastuzumab + Pertzumab ± Paclitaxel q1w. • TN: Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs. nab-Pac + Carboplatin. • Elderly: 2xMyocet + Cyclophosphamide q3w, depending on cPR/cCR or NC/toxicity the treatment will be continued for two more cycles or changed to 6xPac q1w. Adaptation/change in therapy regimens can be made by interim analysis after n=130 in each sub-trial. Eligibility criteria: Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive BC with known HR-/HER2-status (central pathology) for allocation to the respective sub-trial. Pts requiring chemo- or targeted (anti-HER2) therapy must have adequate laboratory values and organ function and must have no contraindications for the planned treatment. Primary endpoints: Evaluation of dynamic test for outcome prediction/prospective comparison of 5yr EFS in responders (intermediate risk (RS 12-25) / good response to short-term ET in HR+/HER2- or pts with pCR in HER2+/TN BC) compared to low risk HR+/HER2- (RS≤11, N0-1) pts (control group). Statistical methods: Assumption across sub-protocols: adjuvant CTx can be spared in HR+/HER2- or pCR be achieved in HER2+/TN in expected 1120 (HR+/HER2-) or 170 (HER2+/TN) pts, respectively. Outcome will be compared to the control group (expected n=640 HR+/HER2- pts: low risk (by RS), i.e. no CTx). Assuming 94% 5yr survival in control group, one-sided test of non-inferiority at 95% CI will have 80% power for survival non-inferiority margin of 3.2% (i.e. 90.8% survival). Present and target accrual: By June 2014, 73 active sites have recruited 1820 pts for ADAPT HR+/HER2-. Target accrual is 4000 pts. 190 of 380 pts were successfully randomized for ADAPT HER2+/HR+. ADAPT HER2+/HR- has included 17 of 220 pts and ADAPT Triple Negative has recruited 150 of 336 pts. Citation Format: Ulrike Nitz, Oleg Gluz, Raquel von Schumann, Daniel Hofmann, Ronald E Kates, Sherko Kuemmel, Michael Braun, Claudia Schumacher, Benno Nuding, Bahriye Aktas, Helmut Forstbauer, Nicolai Maass, Mahdi Rezai, Stefan Kraemer, Mathias Warm, Rachel Wuerstlein, Nadia Harbeck. ADAPT - Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-2-04.

Effect of transdermal hormone therapy on platelet haemostasis in menopausal women.

Despite the undeniably positive effect on the quality of life of menopausal women, menopausal hormone therapy (HT) also has negative side-effects, which include, among others, thromboembolic complications. To assess the effect of a popular type of this therapy - transdermal HT on platelet hemostasis, which plays a significant role in intravascular coagulation. The study group consisted of 92 postmenopausal women: 1) group G1 (n=30), treated with transdermal HT (17β-estradiol 50 μg/day plus NETA 170 μg/day); 2) group G2 (n=31), treated with the above transdermal HT and low dosage of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA); 3) control group P (n=31). All the women qualified for the study had two or more risk factors for arterial thrombosis, such as: smoking, hypertension, visceral obesity, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, elevated levels of PAI-1, and increased fibrinogen, increased activity of coagulation factor VII. After three months of therapy, in the G1 group there was a decrease in platelet count (p = 0.004) and a decrease in GP IIb/IIIa - a platelet receptor for fibrinogen (p = 0.022). In the G2 group, no changes in the tested parameters were observed. 1) Transdermal HT in the form of combined, estrogen-progestogen patches favourably modifies platelets haemostasis, reversing the adverse effects that occur after menopause. 2) The use of low ASA doses as a thromboprophylaxis in short-term transdermal HT is not necessary.

Hormone therapy in oophorectomized BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have greatly elevated lifetime risks of breast, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancers. Bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended to prevent cancer in these women. As it is often performed before natural menopause, it may be accompanied by menopausal symptoms, impaired quality of life, and increased cardiovascular risk. In this review, we describe the indications, timing, and implications of salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA-positive women, with a special focus on the risks and benefits of hormone therapy (HT). Furthermore, retrospective and prospective trials of HT in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy are debated. Hormonal deprivation after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy may negatively impact health and quality of life; most women experience menopausal symptoms shortly after surgical operation. Literature data suggest that HT generally reduces vasomotor symptoms related to surgical menopause, improving sexual functioning without affecting survival. Despite the limitations of retrospective and prospective observational studies, short-term HT seems to improve quality of life and does not seem to have an adverse effect on oncologic outcomes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers without a personal history of breast cancer. Therefore, randomized and larger trials are urgently needed.

RTOG 9202 Secondary Analysis Shows For Prostate Cancer Patients, Short-term Hormonal Therapy as Effective as Long-Term

RTOG 9202 Secondary Analysis Shows For Prostate Cancer Patients, Short-term Hormonal Therapy as Effective as Long-Term

Efficacy of chemotherapy after hormone therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Objective:According to the guidelines for metastatic breast cancer, hormone therapy for hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer without life-threatening metastasis should be received prior to chemotherapy. Previous trials have investigated the sensitivity of chemotherapy for preoperative breast cancer based on the efficacy of neoadjuvant hormone therapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in hormone therapy–effective and hormone therapy–ineffective cases.Methods:Patients who received chemotherapy after hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer between 2006 and 2013 at our institution were investigated.Results:A total of 32 patients received chemotherapy after hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer. The median patient age was 59 years, and most of the primary tumors exhibited a T2 status. A total of 26 patients had an N(+) status, while 7 patients had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive tumors. A total of 13 patients received clinical benefits from hormone therapy, with a rate of clinical benefit of subsequent chemotherapy of 30.8%, which was not significantly different from that observed in the hormone therapy–ineffective patients (52.6%). A total of 13 patients were able to continue the hormone therapy for more than 1 year, with a rate of clinical benefit of chemotherapy of 38.5%, which was not significantly different from that observed in the short-term hormone therapy patients (47.4%). The luminal A patients were able to continue hormone therapy for a significantly longer period than the non-luminal A patients (median survival time: 17.8 months vs 6.35 months, p = 0.0085). However, there were no significant differences in the response to or duration of chemotherapy.Conclusion:The efficacy of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer cannot be predicted based on the efficacy of prior hormone therapy or tumor subtype, and clinicians should administer chemotherapy in all cases of hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer, if needed.

Effect of Long-term Hormonal Therapy (vs Short-term Hormonal Therapy): A Secondary Analysis of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated on RTOG 9202

Effect of Long-term Hormonal Therapy (vs Short-term Hormonal Therapy): A Secondary Analysis of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated on RTOG 9202

High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Dose-Escalated RT: An Analysis of Hormonal Therapy Use and Duration, and Prognostic Implications of PSA Nadir ≤0.2 to Select Men for Short-term Hormonal Therapy

Objectives To determine prognostic factors to select high-risk men receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) who will have favorable outcomes with short-term (ST) or no androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods Medical records of 458 men treated with definitive RT for high-risk, nonmetastatic prostate cancer at 3 academic referral centers from 1988 to 2009 were examined. Median dose was 76.4 Gy. Men received no ADT (n=105), STADT ( Results Seven-year FFDM was 83% and CSS was 91%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir ≤0.2 (HR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64) and Gleason score (GS) were associated with FFDM and CSS (all P 0.05). Those with PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL had improved outcomes. Men with GS 9 disease did poorly despite a PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL and had improved CSS with LTADT (95% vs. 71%, P Conclusions Select men with high-risk disease treated with dose-escalated RT may not require LTADT. In men treated with ADT, PSA nadir ≤0.2 is an independent prognostic factor associated with FFDM and CSS. Men without GS 9 may have acceptable outcomes with STADT if PSA nadir is ≤0.2 ng/mL. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the role of PSA nadir in determining the optimal length of adjuvant ADT.

Prostate‐specific antigen response after short‐term hormone therapy plus external‐beam radiotherapy and outcome in patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 9413

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) complete response (PSA-CR), measured at the end of external-beam radiotherapy and short-term hormone therapy, on treatment outcomes. The phase 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 trial, as part of its original protocol, used the assessment of PSA-CR (ie, PSA ≤0.3 ng/mL) at the end of short-term HT as a secondary endpoint. Short-term HT consisted of futamide plus a lutenizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist for 4 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. Cumulative incidence was used to estimate biochemical failure, distant metastasis, and disease-specific survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to correlate PSA-CR after short-term hormone therapy with all endpoints, and the following variables were considered for analysis: PSA at baseline, Gleason score, treatment arm, age, and baseline testosterone status. Phoenix consensus definition was used to define PSA failure. For 1070 evaluable patients, the median PSA at the end of short-term hormone therapy was 0.2 ng/mL. In total, 744 patients (70%) had a PSA-CR. At a median follow-up of 7.2 years, failure to obtain a PSA-CR was associated significantly with worse disease-specific survival (P = .0003; hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.97), with worse disease-free survival (P = .003; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09-1.50), and with a higher incidence of distant metastasis (P = .0002; HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.37-2.69) and biochemical failure (P < .0001; HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.29-1.91). Other factors that were associated with worse disease-specific survival were Gleason scores from 8 to 10 (P = .0002; HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.71-5.47) and PSA levels >20 ng/mL (P = .04; HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02-2.30). The current results indicated that failure to obtain a PSA-CR (PSA ≤0.3 ng/mL) after short-term hormone therapy and external-beam radiotherapy appears to be an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes and could help identify patients who may benefit from the addition of long-term androgen ablation.

Death from high‐risk prostate cancer versus cardiovascular mortality with hormonal therapy

Randomized trials have demonstrated improved survival when hormonal therapy (HT) is added to radiation therapy (RT) for high-risk prostate cancer. However, it is still unknown whether men who have a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or MI risk factors achieve a superior outcome from HT. A Markov decision analysis model was used to compare quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) in men aged 50, 60, and 70 years who received RT and no HT, 6 months of HT (short-term), or 3 years of HT (long-term) for high-risk prostate cancer stratified by cardiac risk group. In men with a history of MI, there was a decrease of 0.1 to 0.2 quality-adjusted life years and 0.5 to 0.6 quality-adjusted life years across all ages with short-term HT and long-term HT, respectively, compared with no HT. In men without MI, receipt of short-term or long-term HT was associated with a QALE benefit versus no HT in all cohorts. Among men without MI, the optimal duration of HT was a function of age and the number of MI risk factors. Long-term HT improved QALE (range, 1.4-5.4 years) for men aged 50 or 60 years except those with MI; whereas, for men aged 70 years with 4 cardiac risk factors, short-term and long-term HT yielded identical QALE. Men who received RT for high-risk prostate cancer and had a history of MI experienced net harm when they received HT. Men without MI gained a QALE benefit from HT, even if they had up to 4 cardiac risk factors. The optimal duration of HT is a function of patient age and the number of cardiac risk factors.

Short-term versus long-term hormone therapy plus radiotherapy or prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare the efficacy and safety of short-term versus long-term hormonotherapy (HT) plus radiotherapy (RT) or prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. Literatures were searched from Embase, PubMed, Web of science and Cochrane Library up to October, 2012. Quality of the study was evaluated according to the Cochrane's risk of bias of randomized controlled trial (RCT); the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System was used to rate the level of evidence. RevMan 5.1 was used for statistical analysis. Two comparisons were of interest: RT plus short-term HT versus RT plus long-term HT and RP plus short-term HT versus RP plus long-term HT. Pooled risk ratio or standardized mean differences were calculated; HT adverse reactions were descriptively evaluated. Nine RCTs (total 4,743 patients) were included, 7 RCTs compared RT plus short-term HT with RT plus long-term HT, 2 RCTs compared RP plus short-term HT with RP plus long-term HT. Meta-analysis showed there was no significant difference in overall survival, disease-free survival and PSA level before RP; long-term was superior to short-term hormonotherapy in biochemical failure rate, clinical progression rate, prostate cancer-specific mortality, positive surgical margin rate and prostate volume before RP. Systematic review demonstrated adverse events caused by the increased length of HT were more common. Long-term HT plus RT showed a trend toward improved overall survival; long-term HT plus RP declined positive surgical margin rate and prostate volume before RP. So, long-term HT may benefit more, but it did not significantly improve the patients' overall survival, and the adverse reactions are inevitable.

Hormone therapy for postmenopausal women—An unanswered issue

Abstract Menopause is a biological and natural process that occurs as part of aging in women and is secondary to ovarian failure with resultant estrogen deficiency; therefore, menopause should not be considered as a disease. However, there is no doubt that estrogen deficiency induces general psychological and physical changes, and that postmenopausal women will experience many health-related issues and problems, including osteoporotic fractures, coronary heart disease (CHD), and most importantly for the quality of life (QOL) and vasomotor symptoms (VMS) such as hot flashes and night sweats. Hormone therapy (HT) is very effective in the management of postmenopausal women with symptoms. With the large number of patients being treated with HT, especially the combination of estrogen and progestin therapy (EPT) in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, clinicians now recognize the potential adverse effects of EPT. Although this concept is much clearer now, some women might still benefit from short-term HT, especially for young postmenopausal women. In this review, some health issues of postmenopausal women, especially alternative therapies are discussed.

Abstract OT3-3-02: ADAPT - Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

Abstract Background: Appropriate indication for chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer (BC), prediction of CTx response, and addition of novel targeted therapies are the most important questions in adjuvant therapy of early BC. Few well evaluated prognostic tests identify patients (pts) with a low-risk profile resulting in a low enough CTx benefit to justify omission of CTx. Several clinical trials with results still pending have already addressed this question such as TAILORx, MINDACT, NNBC-3, WSG-planB. However, proliferation seems to be a key part of all prognostic genomic signatures. Moreover, dynamic changes of proliferation (as a result of endocrine, cytotoxic and targeted therapy) during therapy have been shown to be most important for outcome prediction in patients with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in distinct BC subtypes (luminal B, TNBC, HER2+). Trial design: ADAPT is one of the first new generation adjuvant trials dealing with individualization of adjuvant decision-making in early BC. The WSG-ADAPT trial combines static assessment of prognosis of patients by a genomic signature (Recurrence Score in HR+ disease) and conventional prognostic markers (nodal status) with dynamic measurement of proliferation/apoptosis changes during a short course of preoperative therapy. ADAPT will establish early predictive molecular surrogate markers for outcome by assessing response to a short 3-week induction treatment, using a baseline diagnostic core biopsy and a second biopsy after induction treatment. ADAPT consists of an umbrella trial and four different sub-protocols (HR+/HER2−, HR+/HER2+, HR−/HER2+ HR−/HER2−) and is set up as a prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized phase II/III trial. Eligibility criteria: Pre-/postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive early BC. Women identified to require chemo- or targeted (anti-HER2) therapy must have adequate laboratory values and organ function. Pts must have no contraindications for the planned treatment. Specific aims: Primary endpoints will include evaluation of the dynamic test for outcome prediction and prospective comparison of 5yr EFS in responders (intermediate risk (RS 12–25) and good response to short-term endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2− as well as pts with pCR in HER2+/triple negative (TN) disease) compared to low risk HR+/HER2− (RS≤11, N0-1) pts (control group). Secondary endpoints will include overall survival. Statistical methods: Assumption across sub-protocols is that adjuvant CTx can be spared in HR+/HER2− BC or pCR be achieved in HER2+/TN in expected 1120 (HR+/HER2−) or 170 (HER2+/TN) pts respectively within the main phase. Their outcome will be compared to the control group (expected n=640 HR+/HER2− pts: low risk (by RS) and thus no CTx). Assuming 94% 5yr survival in control group, one-sided test of non-inferiority at 95% CI will have 80% power for a survival non-inferiority margin corresponding to 3.2% (i.e. 90.8% survival). Present and target accrual: By June 2012, 11 of 12 initial sites have been initiated, and 7 pts recruited. Target accrual for run-in phase is 400 pts (4000 for run-in and main phase). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-3-02.

Early salvage radiation therapy combined with short-term hormonal therapy in recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Single-institution 4-year data on outcome, toxicity, health-related quality of life and co-morbidities from 184 consecutive patients treated with 70 Gy

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 70 Gy salvage radiotherapy (SRT) combined with short-term neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in the treatment of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to consider quality of life (QoL), survival outcomes and impact of co-morbidities on treatment-related rectal-genitourinary toxicity. Electronic records of 184 SRT patients treated consecutively between October 2001 and February 2007 were analyzed. Median age was 64 years (median follow-up 48 months). NHT was given to 165 patients (median 3 months). Pre-RP and pre-SRT PSA, PSA doubling time, Gleason score (GS), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and detectable post-SRT PSA were recorded. Any detectable PSA or PSA >0.1 ng/ml + nadir was considered biochemical failure (BcF). The Charlson co-morbidity index was used to correlate co-morbidities and rectal-genitourinary toxicity. Scores from the health-related QoL EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR-25 questionnaires were also evaluated. In 116 (63%) patients, a long-lasting curative effect was indicated by undetectable PSA levels. In univariate analysis, using BcF as an outcome variable, p<0.001 was found for GS, pre-SRT PSA, SVI and detectable post-SRT PSA. Multivariate analysis showed p=0.01 for SVI, p=0.09 for GS, and detectable post-SRT PSA (p=0.01); with metastases as an outcome variable, only SVI was significant (p=0.007). Cancer-specific and overall survival were 99 and 95%, respectively. Although microscopy showed SVI or GS 8-10 in the prostatectomy specimens 17/40 (43%) and 13/29 (45%), respectively, of patients still showed undetectable PSA at long-term follow-up (median 55 months) after SRT. Likewise, 11/31 (36%) patients with pre-SRT PSA >1.0 ng/ml and 80/134 (60%) patients with PSA doubling time (PSADT) <10 still showed undetectable PSA after 50 months. Slightly elevated acute and late rectal-genitourinary grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. No association with co-morbidity/toxicity was found. EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were similar to or slightly better than reference values. SRT with 70 Gy combined with 3-month NHT results in long-term undetectable PSA in >50% of patients with recurrence after RP with acceptable rectal-genitourinary toxicity and without negatively affecting long-term QoL. Non-metastatic patients should not be disqualified from receiving SRT although presenting with poor prognostic factors at surgery.

The Impact of Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy on Cancer Control: The 30-Year Anniversary

Radical prostatectomy has decreased prostate cancer specific mortality in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. We report oncological outcomes of the longest running series of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy on the 30th anniversary of the inaugural operation. A total of 4,478 men underwent anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy, as performed by a single surgeon (PCW), at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions from 1982 to 2011, without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. During a median followup of 10 years (range 1 to 29), we examined progression-free, metastasis-free and cancer specific survival. The overall 25-year progression-free, metastasis-free and cancer specific survival rates were 68%, 84% and 86%, respectively, although there were significant differences in treatment outcomes between men treated in the pre-PSA and PSA eras. In each era, there were significant differences in progression-free, metastasis-free and cancer specific survival by D'Amico risk groups. In multivariable models considering prostatectomy features, pathological stage and grade were significantly associated with the risk of metastatic progression and disease specific mortality. Excellent prostate cancer specific survival was demonstrated up to 30 years after surgery. Clinical risk categories and pathological tumor features were significant predictors of long-term disease specific outcomes, supporting their ongoing use in risk stratification and management decisions. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy continues to represent the gold standard in the surgical management of clinically localized prostate cancer to which alternate treatment options should be compared.

Discordant Cellular Response to Presurgical Letrozole in Bilateral Synchronous ER+ Breast Cancers with aKRASMutation orFGFR1Gene Amplification

We describe herein a patient presenting with bilateral estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumors who was enrolled in a clinical trial exploring molecular aberrations associated with hormone-refractory tumor cell proliferation. Short-term (two week) hormonal therapy with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole substantially reduced proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemistry in one tumor, whereas the second was essentially unchanged. Extensive molecular and genetic work-up of the two tumors yielded divergent lesions in the two tumors: an activating KRAS mutation in the responsive tumor and an amplification of the fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (FGFR1) locus in the treatment-refractory tumor. These findings provide an insight to possible mechanisms of resistance to antiestrogen therapy in ER+ breast cancers. First, they illustrate the necessity of clinically approved assays to identify FGFR1 gene amplification, which occur in approximately 5% of breast tumors and have been linked to antiestrogen resistance. It is quite possible that the addition of FGFR inhibitors to ER-targeted therapy will yield a superior antitumor effect and improved patient outcome. Second, they suggest that the role of activating mutations in RAS, although rare in breast cancer, may need to be explored in the context of ER+ breast tumors.

Short-term hormone therapy improves sCD40L and endothelial function in early menopausal women: Potential role of estrogen receptor polymorphisms

ObjectiveHormone therapy (HT) has been suggested to improve vascular function and inflammation in menopausal women, although not consistently. We aimed to investigate the effects of HT on endothelial function and inflammation, especially sCD40L, in early menopausal women, and the effect of common estrogen receptor (ER) polymorphisms on vascular responses to HT. Study designEighty-four early menopausal women (<3 years in menopause) with menopausal complaints eligible for HT. Forty women received transdermal 17β-estradiol plus cyclical micronized progesterone for 3 months while 44 did not (controls). Main outcome measuresBrachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and vascular inflammation markers (sICAM, sP-Selectin and sCD40L). Genetic polymorphisms of ERα (PvuII 454-397T>C and XbaI 454-351A>G) and ERβ (AluI 1730A>G) were also assessed. ResultsThe two groups did not differ at baseline. Following HT, vasomotor complaints’ severity, blood pressure, LDL, sCD40L, sICAM and sP-Selectin decreased and FMD increased compared to controls (P<0.05 for all). ERβ AluI A allele presence was the most important independent predictor of HT-induced increase in FMD while ERα XbaI A allele was the only independent predictor of decrease in sCD40L. ConclusionsShort-term HT in early menopausal women improved endothelial function and inflammation. Specific ER polymorphisms that were found to be main determinants of HT-induced effects on endothelium could identify subgroups of women who may benefit the most from HT.

RhoC and guanine nucleotide exchange factor Net1 in androgen‐unresponsive mouse mammary carcinoma SC‐4 cells and human prostate cancer after short‐term endocrine therapy

Endocrine resistance is a critical issue in managing patients with prostate cancer. This study is undertaken to search for a potential molecular target connected with this process using a model system of androgen-dependent and androgen-unresponsive SC-3 and SC-4 cells. Expression profiles, actin stress fiber organization, and the levels of activated Rho GTPases were compared between SC-4 and SC-3 cells using an oligonucleotide microarray, phalloidin staining, and a Rho activation assay. The cell viability was analyzed with a Rho inhibitor or by stable transfection with either a dominant-negative (DN) form of RhoC or a mutant form of NET1 (mutNET1). The expressions of RhoC, NET1, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers were immunohistochemically analyzed in human prostate cancer specimens after short-term endocrine therapy and in an untreated condition. SC-4 cells exhibited mesenchymal phenotypes with activation of Rho signals. Treatment with a Rho inhibitor suppressed the cell viability in SC-4 cells, but not in SC-3 cells. The cell viability of SC-4 cells stably expressing DN-RhoC and mutNET1 was also attenuated. In the immunohistochemical analysis, NET1 and the EMT marker of N-cadherin were expressed at higher levels in prostate cancers after short-term endocrine therapy than in untreated tumors, and RhoC expression was maintained after short-term endocrine therapy. Rho signaling is involved in the cell survival of SC-4 cells. The higher expressions of RhoC and NET1 in human prostate cancers after short-term endocrine therapy suggest that RhoC and NET1 may become therapeutic targets during endocrine therapy.

Sleep problems after short-term hormone therapy suspension

Because hormone therapy use benefits sleep, sleep problems may occur after suspension. We tested the effects of short-term hormone therapy suspension on sleep problems. A total of 1,704 women aged 45 to 80 years at Group Health were randomized to suspend hormone therapy for 1 or 2 months or to continue using hormone therapy. This study included 1,405 women willing to suspend hormone therapy use who returned both baseline and follow-up questionnaires, administered within approximately 3 months of randomization. We used generalized linear models to examine the relationships between hormone therapy suspension and nine individual items from a modified General Sleep Disturbance Scale (number of days experienced in the past week) and an overall sleep quality index at follow-up. We tested whether age, hormone therapy type, or duration of use modified these relationships. Suspension of hormone therapy for 1 or 2 months was associated with greater frequency of sleep problems for the overall sleep quality index and most individual sleep items. For example, the incident rate ratios for waking too early (95% CI) were 1.23 (1.10-1.38) for the women in the 1-month suspension group and 1.30 (1.17-1.45) for the 2-month suspension group, compared with women who continued the use of hormone therapy. Age and type of and duration of hormone therapy use did not modify these relationships. Short-term hormone therapy suspension was related to moderately greater frequency of sleep problems. Alternative forms of sleep management may benefit women who choose to discontinue hormone therapy use.