Short-term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Research Articles

Meta-analysis of 3-month vs 12-month dual anti-platelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the era of second generation drug-eluting stents is a matter of debate as increasing evidence suggests that shorter periods of DAPT are feasible and reduce bleeding events. However, the non-inferiority design of the published trials regarding ischemic events still raises doubt on its effectiveness. Methods We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate short-term (≤ 3 months) vs long-term (≥ 12 months) DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes of patients between these two regimens. Primary outcome of interest included a composite of ischemic events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, re-revascularization and stroke) and secondary outcome was major bleeding as assessed by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification ≥ 3 after 1 year of follow up. Event rates were extracted and Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results We identified a total of 5 trials with 18.682 randomized patients. The use of short-term DAPT was not associated with increased risk of ischemic events (0.90 [0.75-1.08], p=0.250; Figure 1) and was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding (0.74 [0.65-0.84], p<0.001; Figure 2). Conclusion The present meta-analysis provides an updated data on the use of DAPT duration. Short-term DAPT appears to be equivalent to long-term DAPT regarding ischemic risk and a superior strategy in optimizing bleeding risk reduction.Forest plot of ischemic outcomesForest plot of bleeding outcomes

A meta-analysis on the efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy vs ticagrelor plus aspirin dual therapy on patients with ACS who underwent PCI

Abstract Background Major adverse cardiovascular events remain the major cause of mortality and morbidity after acute coronary syndrome, including patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Several studies have shown increased incidence of re-infarction, cardiac death, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all-cause mortality among these patients. The use of dual antiplatelet therapy has been recommended for post-procedural patients, according to guidelines. However, prolonged exposure to dual antiplatelets raised concerns on risk of bleeding. Our study aims to determine whether short term dual antiplatelet therapy followed with Ticagrelor monotherapy will benefit patients who are at higher risk of bleeding. Objective To determine the efficacy of Ticagrelor monotherapy after three months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy versus 12 months of Ticagrelor plus Aspirin dual therapy in the prevention of MACE and bleeding among patients who had ACS and have undergone PCI. METHODOLOGY Randomized controlled trials on Ticagrelor monotherapy vs Ticagrelor + Aspirin Dual Therapy with outcomes on myocardial infarction, cardiac death, stroke, stent thrombosis, bleeding, all-cause mortality, were searched through PubMed. Results A total of 10,175 participants who had Acute Coronary Syndrome who have undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention were included in this analysis. Our results showed that discontinuing Aspirin after 3 months of Dual antiplatelet was not associated with significant increase in the risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: Myocardial Infarction (RR 0.96 95% CI 0.73-1.25), Cardiac Death (RR 0.92 95% CI 0.74-1.14), Stroke (RR 1.27 95% CI 0.69 -2.31), Stent Thrombosis (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.48-1.59), Bleeding (RR 0.58 , 95% CI 0.49- 0.69) and All Cause Death (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52 – 1.14). Discontinuing Aspirin 3 months was associated with lower risk of bleeding (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.49 - 0.69). Conclusion Minimizing the duration of exposure to antiplatelet agents with the use of Ticagrelor monotherapy after three months of DAPT among ACS patients who underwent PCI significantly reduced the incidence of bleeding, particularly among those who are at higher risk of bleeding. There is no significant difference in the risk for myocardial infarction, cardiac-related deaths, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all-cause mortality between the two groups.

Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12inhibitor, has been the principal antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary disease. Particularly in patients with ACS, which presents a higher ischemic risk than chronic coronary artery disease, DAPT for up to 12 months is the recommended standard treatment. However, to decrease bleeding events related to the potency of P2Y12inhibitors and a prolonged duration of DAPT, recent studies have suggested P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy after short-term DAPT (1-3 months), which decreased the bleeding risk without an increased ischemic risk. In this article, we discuss the evidence related to the efficacy of a P2Y12inhibitor as single-antiplatelet therapy after short-term DAPT compared with standard DAPT, with a focus on patients with ACS treated with DES.

Early clinical experience with the new generation Pipeline Vantage flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms using short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.

The Pipeline Vantage flow diverter with Shield technology (PV) used in this study is a 4th-generation flow diverter (FD) designed to reduce thrombogenicity, promote endothelialization of the implant and increase efficiency in achieving aneurysm closure. In this study, we report the aneurysm occlusion rate, complication rate and clinical outcome with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the treatment of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms using the PV. We retrospectively identified patients treated between September 2021 and January 2023 with the PV and subsequently underwent short-term DAPT for 3 months. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, peri- and post-procedural complications, clinical outcomes and the grade of aneurysm occlusion were documented. Thirty patients with 32 aneurysms were treated. Successful FD implantation was achieved in all cases (100%). No periprocedural complications were documented. The overall symptomatic complication rate was 10% and the neurologic, treatment-related symptomatic complication rate was 6.6%. Only one symptomatic complication (3.3%) was device-related. Permanent clinical deterioration occurred in 2/30 patients (6.6%), leading to deterioration of the mRS within the first 3 months after treatment. No mortality was documented. The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion after 3 months and after a mean imaging follow-up of 9.9 months was 65.6% and 75%, respectively. Implantation of the PV for the treatment of saccular intracranial aneurysms achieves a good aneurysm occlusion rate with a low rate of complications. In addition, the use of short-term DAPT after PV implantation appears to be safe.

TCT-638 New Insights Into Long- Versus Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration in Patients After Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Findings From a Prospective Observational Study

TCT-638 New Insights Into Long- Versus Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration in Patients After Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Findings From a Prospective Observational Study

Net clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Contemporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies, such as short-term DAPT or de-escalation of DAPT, have emerged as attractive strategies to treat patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain whether they are suitable for elderly patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched in September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DAPT strategies, including standard (12 months), short-term, uniform de-escalation, and guided-selection strategies for elderly patients with ACS (age ≥ 65 years) were identified, and a network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary endpoint was the net clinical benefit outcome, a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and clinically relevant bleeding (equivalent to bleeding of at least type 2 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium). The secondary outcomes were MACE and major bleeding. Sixteen RCTs with a combined total of 47,911 patients were included. The uniform de-escalation strategy was associated with an improved net clinical benefit compared with DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors. The short-term DAPT strategy was associated with reduced risks of the primary outcome and major bleeding compared with DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors, however, it was ranked as the least effective strategy for MACE compared with other DAPT strategies. Uniform de-escalation and short-term DAPT strategies may be advantageous for elderly patients, but need to be tailored based on individual bleeding and ischemic risks. Further RCTs of contemporary DAPT strategies specifically designed for elderly patients are warranted to confirm the findings of the present study.

Determinants and Temporal Trends of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Mild Noncardioembolic Stroke.

Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces early stroke recurrence after mild noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (NCIS). We aim to evaluate temporal trends and determinants of DAPT prescription after mild NCIS in the Florida Stroke Registry, a statewide registry across Get With The Guidelines-Stroke participating hospitals. In this cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study, we included patients with mild NCIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤3) who were potentially eligible for DAPT across 168 Florida Stroke Registry participating hospitals between January 2010 and September 2022. Using antiplatelet prescription as the dependent variable (DAPT versus single antiplatelet therapy), we fit logistic regression models adjusted for patient-related factors, hospital-related factors, clinical presentation, vascular risk factors, and ischemic stroke subtype, to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs. From 283 264 Florida Stroke Registry ischemic stroke patients during the study period, 109 655 NCIS were considered eligible. Among these, 37 058 patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >3 were excluded, resulting in a sample of 72 597 mild NCIS (mean age 68±14 years; female 47.3%). Overall, 24 693 (34.0%) patients with mild NCIS were discharged on DAPT and 47 904 (66.0%) on single antiplatelet therapy. DAPT prescription increased from 25.7% in 2010 to 52.8% in 2022 (β/year 2.5% [95% CI, 1.5%-3.4%]). Factors associated with DAPT prescription were premorbid antiplatelet therapy (aOR, 4.66 [95% CI, 2.20-9.88]), large-artery atherosclerosis (aOR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.97]), diabetes (aOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.13-1.47]), and hyperlipidemia (aOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.39]), whereas female sex (aOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.93]), being non-Hispanic Black patients (compared with non-Hispanic White patients; aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.90]), admission to a Thrombectomy-capable Stroke Center (compared with Comprehensive Stroke Center; aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]), time-to-presentation 1 to 7 days from last seen well (compared with <24 h; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]), and small-vessel disease stroke (aOR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94]) were associated with not receiving DAPT at discharge. Despite a temporal trend increase in DAPT prescription after mild NCIS, we found substantial underutilization of evidence-based DAPT associated with significant disparities in stroke care.

Short Versus Long Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Patients with Diabetes.

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with increasing data suggestive of acceptable short-term duration. Metabolically accelerated atherosclerosis associated with diabetes makes it essential to study short-term DAPT in this subgroup. With limited studies determining optimal DAPT strategies after second-generation stents in this subset, we aimed to establish the optimal duration of DAPT in the diabetic population using second-generation stents. To determine optimal DAPT duration in diabetic population undergoing PCI in 2nd generation stents. We conducted an electronic database search of randomized controlled trials from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. A meta-analysis was conducted comparing outcomes of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT therapy versus long-term (12 months) DAPT therapy in the diabetic population undergoing PCI with second-generation stents. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 3117 diabetic patients. Short-term DAPT did not show any statistical difference from long-term DAPT in achieving primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.35, P = 0.84). Overall mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.52-1.63, P = 0.98), myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR)OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.94, P = 0.85], stent thrombosis (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.55-2.60, P = 0.55), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.45-2.73, P = 0.74), and stroke (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.082-2.43, P = 0.81) did not show any statistical difference between the 2 groups. Similarly, a subgroup analysis of study population comparing 6 versus 12 months of DAPT in diabetic population did not show any difference in net primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.86, 95% CI 0.45-1.45, P = 0.60). There was no significant heterogeneity noted between the 2 groups. This meta-analysis showed no statistically significant benefit of longer DAPT over shorter DAPT therapy in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent in patients with diabetes.

Short-Term DAPT and DAPT De-Escalation Strategies for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Short-term (≤6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and DAPT de-escalation become attractive for patients with acute coronary syndrome. A systemic search identified randomized controlled trials that included patients with acute coronary syndrome treated using (1) standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel, prasugrel (standard/low dose), or ticagrelor; (2) extended DAPT (≥18 months); (3) short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin; (4) 12-month DAPT with unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y12 inhibitors to low-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitor or clopidogrel at 1 month; and (5) guided selection DAPT with genotype or platelet function tests. The primary efficacy outcome (major adverse cardiovascular events) was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding. This meta-analysis included 32 randomized controlled trials with 103 497 patients. While there were no differences in efficacy between short, unguided de-escalation and guided selection strategies, unguided de-escalation was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.67 [0.49-0.93] and 0.68 [0.50-0.93]). Both short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor and unguided de-escalation were associated with reduced risks in safety compared with other strategies, including guided selection (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47-0.93] and 0.48 [0.33-0.71]). Short DAPT followed by a P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding and all-cause death compared with standard, extended DAPT (eg, versus DAPT with clopidogrel; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.64 [0.42-0.97] and 0.60 [0.44-0.82]). By rankogram, unguided de-escalation strategy was the safest and most effective strategy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding while short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor was ranked the best for major bleeding and all-cause death. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, unguided de-escalation was associated with the lowest risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding outcomes, while short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding and all-cause death.

Preferred monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, no studies have compared P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin monotherapy following short-term DAPT. We aimed to compare available strategies for DAPT duration and post-DAPT antiplatelet monotherapy following PCI. MethodsSeven DAPT strategies [ticagrelor or clopidogrel following 1-month DAPT, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT, aspirin following 3–6 months of DAPT (reference strategy), aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor following 6–18-months of DAPT, and DAPT for ≥18 months] were compared using a network meta-analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The primary bleeding outcome was trial-defined major or minor bleeding. ResultsOur analysis identified 25 eligible RCTs, including 89,371 patients who underwent PCI. Overall, none of the strategies negatively affected the primary efficacy outcomes. For primary bleeding outcomes, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.57–0.95). Clopidogrel following 1-month DAPT was also associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.34–0.85), however, the strategy was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. Similar trends were observed among patients with acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk. ConclusionsCompared with aspirin monotherapy following short-term DAPT, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes without increasing any ischemic outcomes.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Concise Review for Clinicians.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combines two antiplatelet agents to decrease the risk of thrombotic complications associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Emerging data about the duration of DAPT is being published continuously. New approaches are trying to balance the time, benefits, and risks for patients taking DAPT for established cardiovascular diseases. Short-term dual DAPT of 3-6 months, or even 1 month in high-bleeding risk patients, is equivalent in terms of efficacy and effectiveness compared to long-term DAPT for patients who experienced percutaneous coronary intervention in an acute coronary syndrome setting. Prolonged DAPT beyond 12 months reduces stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction rates but increases bleeding risk. Extended DAPT does not significantly benefit stable coronary artery disease patients in reducing stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death. Ticagrelor and aspirin reduce cardiovascular events in stable coronary artery disease with diabetes but carry a higher bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy duration in atrial fibrillation patients after percutaneous coronary intervention depends on individual characteristics and bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy is crucial for post-coronary artery bypass graft and transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Aspirin (ASA) monotherapy is preferred. Antiplatelet therapy duration in peripheral artery disease depends on the scenario. Adding vorapaxar and cilostazol may benefit secondary prevention and claudication, respectively. Carotid artery disease patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke benefit from antiplatelet therapy and combining ASA and clopidogrel is more effective than ASA alone. The optimal duration of DAPT after carotid artery stenting is uncertain. Resistance to ASA and clopidogrel poses an incremental risk of deleterious cardiovascular events and stroke. The selection and duration of antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease requires careful consideration of both efficacy and safety outcomes. The use of combination therapies may provide added benefits but should be weighed against the risk of bleeding. Further research and clinical trials are needed to optimize antiplatelet treatment in different patient populations and clinical scenarios.

Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundVarious durations and de-escalation strategies of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have been tested in randomized controlled trials (RCT)s. However, evidence by specific ACS subtype is unknown. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched in February 2023. RCTs on DAPT strategies included STEMI or NSTE-ACS patients with standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel or potent P2Y12 inhibitors, short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitors or aspirin, unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y12 inhibitors to low-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors or clopidogrel at one month, and guided selection with genotype or platelet function tests were identified. The primary outcome was the net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and clinically relevant bleeding events. ResultsTwenty RCTs with a combined total population of 24,745 STEMI and 37,891 NSTE-ACS patients were included. In STEMI patients, unguided de-escalation strategy was associated with a lower rate of NACE compared with standard DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors (HR:0.57; 95% CI:0.34–0.96) without increased risk of MACE. In NSTE-ACS patients, unguided de-escalation strategy was associated with a lower rate of NACE compared with the guided selection strategy (HR:0.65; 95% CI:0.47–0.90), standard DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors (HR:0.62; 95% CI:0.50–0.78) and standard DAPT using clopidogrel (HR:0.73; 95% CI:0.55–0.98) without increased risk of MACE. ConclusionUnguided de-escalation strategy was associated with a reduced risk of NACE and may be the most effective DAPT strategy for STEMI and NSTE-ACS.

Critical Appraisal of the Methodological Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing 12 Months Versus Short-Term (

Critical Appraisal of the Methodological Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing 12 Months Versus Short-Term (<12 Months) DAPT Post-PCI With DES: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Short Versus Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI in Contemporary Practice: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR patients) represent an important subset of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It remains unclear whether a shortened duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) confers benefits compared with prolonged duration of DAPT in this patient population. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare bleeding and ischemic outcomes among HBR patients receiving short- versus long-term DAPT after PCI. A meta-analysis of studies comparing short-term (1-3months) and long-term (6-12months) DAPT after PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents in HBR patients was performed. Six studies [1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 2 RCT subanalyses, and 3 prospective propensity-matched studies] involving 15,908 patients were included in the meta-analysis. During a follow-up of 12months, short-term DAPT was associated with a reduction in major bleeding events [odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.95; p = 0.03, I2 = 71] and comparable definite/probable stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke, compared with long-DAPT. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin was comparable to SAPT with P2Y12 inhibitor, with no treatment-by-subgroup interaction for major bleeding events (p-interaction = 0.27). In studies including patients presenting with MI, a trend of more frequent MI was noted in the short-DAPT arm (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.59; p = 0.07; I2 = 0). In a sensitivity analysis comparing 3- and 12-month DAPT, the 3-month DAPT strategy was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.15-4.87; p = 0.02, I2 = 0%). Short-term DAPT after PCI in HBR patients was associated a reduction in major bleeding events and similar ischemic outcomes. However, a higher risk of ischemic stroke and MI at 1 year of follow-up was seen in some subsets.

Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events of Ticagrelor Monotherapy after Short-term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) in Diabetics and Non-Diabetics Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term (1-3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor can reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its effect in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals has not been evaluated as a meta-analysis so far. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted covering PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus without date restrictions for English published clinical trials. The authors searched the mentioned databases, wherein the screening led to 151 studies, of which 40 were assessed for eligibility, and finally, three studies were included. These trials compared ticagrelor monotherapy after a short duration of aspirin plus ticagrelor with conventional 12 months DAPT. The results showed that the risk of major bleeding (based on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5) for ticagrelor monotherapy subjects was lower in both diabetics and non-diabetics. It was especially significant in non-diabetic patients (HR 95%CI: 0.79(0.64, 0.98); p=0.029). In cardiovascular events assessment, the pooled estimate on cardiac deaths was significantly lower in diabetic subjects treated by ticagrelor monotherapy (HR 95%CI: 0.71(0.51, 1); p=0.05), while this reduction was not significant for non-diabetics (p=0.843) in comparison to patients treated by 12 months DAPT. However, there was no significant decrease or rise in myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke in patients treated by short-term DAPT strategy. In conclusion, discontinuing aspirin after short-duration DAPT could minimize the incidence of cardiac death and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding in diabetic and non-diabetic patients who underwent PCI, with no increase in MI and ischemic stroke.

Comparative effectiveness of dual to single antiplatelet therapy after one year versus seven years in patients with acute ischemic stroke combined with cerebral microbleeds

BackgroundCerebral microbleeds (CMBs) were thought to be associated with stroke. The relationship CMBs, antiplatelet therapy and prognosis is still unclear. Our aim here was to compare the long-term risk of stoke between dual and single antiplatelet therapies in patients of acute ischemic stroke (IS) combined with CMBs. MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1017 acute IS patients received susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. We constructed a sample of patients received short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (n = 154) and received single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (n = 125), followed them for up to 7 years (median 33 months). DAPT was prescribed for at least 3 weeks, followed by using SAPT. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, recurrence IS or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Secondary endpoints were a composite of recurrent IS or ICH, and the recurrent IS. ResultAt last follow-up, rated of the endpoints were similar in patients treated with SAPT and DAPT (P > 0.05). The IS risk was higher in patients treated with SAPT in the first year after the occurrence of acute IS (P = 0.035). And in 0–1 year or in 1–7 year, the risk of primary endpoint and main secondary endpoint were similar among patients treated with SAPT and DAPT (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe study is limited due to different baseline characteristics. We initially consider that the short-term DAPT may be considered to potentially reduce the rate of recurrent IS in the first year. In patients of IS combined with CMBs, the short-term DAPT may be recommended to reduce the recurrent IS.

A comparison of safety and efficacy between long-term DAPT and intensive statins combined with short-term DAPT for acute ischemic stroke

ObjectivesThe current study compared the safety and efficacy of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin plus clopidogrel) and intensive rosuvastatin with short-term DAPT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsA total of 220 patients were enrolled 72 h after the onset of mild to moderate AIS, and divided into a control group treated with 21-day DAPT and a study group treated with intensive rosuvastatin with 7-day DAPT on a voluntary basis. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke and hemorrhage during a 90-day follow-up period in an intention-to-treat analysis. The secondary outcome was clinical efficacy with respect to alleviating existing focal nerve defect symptoms. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate treatment differences.ResultsClinical efficacy was evident in 87.3% of patients in the study group, compared with 84.3% in the control group (p = 0.042). Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 9 patients (7.6%) in the study group and in 9 (8.8%) in the control group (p = 0.767). Hemorrhage occurred in 6 patients (5.1%) in the study group and in 15 (14.7%) in the control group (p = 0.023). In comparisons of levels of ALT, AST, LDH, and CK in the two groups before and 2 weeks after therapy, only CK differed significantly (p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared to long-term DAPT, intensive rosuvastatin with short-term DAPT was equivalent in reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. It alleviated symptoms more rapidly, and significantly reduced the risk of bleeding, without causing an increase in transaminase or muscle enzymes.Clinical trial registrationChina Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR1800017809)

Short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted treatment of CErebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE): a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThe optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) for cerebral aneurysm remains uncertain. This randomized trial of short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted...

Contemporary Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Guidelines.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The annual incidence of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795,000 cases per year in the United States, of which 87% are ischemic in nature. In addition to the management of modifiable high-risk factors to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) play an important role in secondary stroke prevention. This review will discuss the published literature on the use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants in secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), including their pharmacology, efficacy, and adverse effects. We will also highlight the role of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary stroke prevention, along with supporting literature. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA. However, as shown in recent trials, short-term DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 21-30days is more effective than SAPT in patients with minor acute non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA. Although short-term DAPT is highly effective in preventing recurrent stroke, a more prolonged course can increase bleeding risks without additional benefit. DAPT for 90days, followed by aspirin monotherapy for patients with large vessel intracranial atherosclerotic disease, is suitable for secondary stroke prevention. However, patients need to be monitored for both minor (e.g., bruising) and major (e.g., intracranial) bleeding complications. Conversely, oral warfarin and newer direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are the agents of choice for secondary stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular cardioembolic strokes. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to decreased bleeding risks, including ICH, lack of need for international normalized ratio monitoring, no dietary restrictions, and limited drug-drug interactions. The choice between different antiplatelets and anticoagulants for prevention of ischemic stroke depends on the underlying stroke mechanism, cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms, bleeding risk profile, compliance, drug tolerance, and drug resistance. Physicians must carefully weigh each patient's relative benefits and bleeding risks before initiating an antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment regimen. Further studies are warranted to study the optimal duration of DAPT in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis since the benefit is most pronounced in the short term while the bleeding risk remains high during the extended duration of therapy.

Divergence Between Clinical Trial Evidence and Actual Practice in Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved that short-term (21-90 days) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the risk of early ischemic recurrences after a noncardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) without substantially increasing the hemorrhagic risk. We aimed at understanding whether and how real-world use of DAPT differs from RCTs. READAPT (Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or TIA) is a prospective cohort study including >18-year-old patients treated with DAPT after a noncardioembolic minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from 51 Italian centers. The study comprises a 90-day follow-up from symptom onset. In the present work, we reported descriptive statistics of baseline data of patients recruited up to July 31, 2022, and proportions of patients who would have been excluded from RCTs. We compared categorical data through the χ² test. We evaluated 1070 patients, who had 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years median age, were mostly Caucasian (1045; 97.7%), and were men (711; 66.4%). Among the 726 (67.9%) patients with ischemic stroke, 226 (31.1%) did not meet the RCT inclusion criteria because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >3 and 50 (6.9%) because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >5. Among the 344 (32.1%) patients with TIA, 69 (19.7%) did not meet the RCT criteria because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <4 and 252 (74.7%) because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <6 and no symptomatic arterial stenosis. Additionally, 144 (13.5%) patients would have been excluded because of revascularization procedures. Three hundred forty-five patients (32.2%) did not follow the RCT procedures because of late (>24 hours) DAPT initiation; 776 (72.5%) and 676 (63.2%) patients did not take loading doses of aspirin and clopidogrel, respectively. Overall, 84 (7.8%) patients met the RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria. The real-world use of DAPT is broader than RCTs. Most patients did not meet the RCT criteria because of the severity of ischemic stroke, lower risk of TIA, late DAPT start, or lack of antiplatelet loading dose. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.