Introduction: Barrett esophagus (BE) is a complication of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and subtantially increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. There are no direct data supporting screening among the general population or even in patients with chronic reflux symptoms but surveillance programmes for the detection of dysplasia and neoplasia are accepted. Issues related to clinical manifestations, diagnosis and malignant transformations have not been well stablished in our country. Aims: To assess the prevalence of endoscopic diagnosis, epidemiology and progress of BE in a population belonging to a health maintenance organization (HMO). Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with BE from January 2004 to August 2008 in a HMO were included. Age at onset, sex, symptoms, previous diagnosis of BE, endoscopic findings, histopatological results and surveillance were reviewed from their electronic medical records. Results: Among 147.109 individuals enrolled in the HMO, 110 patients were diagnosed as Barrett (estimated prevalence 74.8/100.000). Mean age at time of diagnosis was 67 years (30-90). The male: female ratio was 1.5: 1. Patients were initially refered because of symptoms associated with GERD (66%), dyspepsia (8%), others (13%) or because of BE control (13%). According to Prague criteria 37 patients had circumferential extent, 19 (51%) of them had long-segment BE (more than 3 cm) and 18 (49%) short-segment BE (less than 3 cm). On the other hand, 67 patients only had tongue like extent, of which 52 (78%) had long-segment BE and 15 (22%) short-segment BE. Four patients had both circumferencial and tongue like extents (1 short-segment BE and 3 long-segment BE) and 2 had esophageal stenosis. Most patients had concomitant endoscopic lessions: hiatus hernia (47%), erosive esophagitis (7%), both of them (24%), others (11%) and only 11% had no other finding but BE. At their first endoscopy 79 patients (72%) did not have dysplasia, 28 (25%) had low grade dysplasia (LGD), 1 (1%) had high grade dysplasia (HGD) and 2 (2%) had adenocarcinoma. Fifty seven patients underwent endoscopic surveillance with a total of 88 endoscopic procedures with biopses: in 65 dysplasia remained stable, in 14 dysplasia presented some kind of regression and in 9 metaplasia progressed (7 to LGD, 1 to HGD and 1 to adenocarcinoma). Conclusions: Prevalence of endoscopic diagnosis of BE in a HMO population from Argentina is lower than previous reports from other countries. The same occurs with male: female ratio although mean age is higher. We found more dysplasia than that reported in other series. However we should initiate a prospective study in order to corroborate these findings.