Short-interval Group Research Articles

406. EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL TIMING OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has gradually become a first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. After the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients usually undergo minimally invasive surgery to ensure complete removal of the tumor and lymphatic tissue. However, the optimal interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery is still an unknown factor, and whether it affects postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients remains unknown. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to explore the specific impact of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery on patients, and to find the optimal interval time. Methods Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery from two institutions between October 2012 and September 2022 were included in this study. The time interval is defined as the days between the last time a patient receives neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and the execution of surgery. Determine the optimal interval truncation point using the surv_cutpoint function in the survminer package. The main research result is the OS and DFS of different interval groups. A multivariate Cox regression model was established to determine the main factors affecting Patient's OS. Construct a nomogram based on selected factors to meet clinical needs. Results 252 patients were included in the study. The average interval between patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery is 59 days. The earliest interval for patients to undergo surgery is 28 days. Determine the optimal interval of 46 days based on the survminer package and divide the patients into two groups. The five-year OS rates for the short interval group and the long interval group were 82.6% and 61.0% (P = 0.023). The five-year DFS rates for the two groups were 67.6% and 48.2% (P=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression shows that the time interval, patient's sex, tumor differentiation, ypT, and ypN are the main factors affecting overall survival. Conclusions The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery has a certain impact on patient survival, and it is recommended to undergo surgery between 28 and 46 days to improve patient prognosis and survival.

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery on prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a real-world study

BackgroundThe time interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery is 6 weeks for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether delayed surgery affects prognosis remains unclear.MethodsClinical data of locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022 were collected. The surgery outcomes and prognosis were compared between short-interval (time to surgery ≤ 6 weeks) and long-interval groups (time to surgery > 6 weeks).Results152 patients were enrolled totally, with a ratio of 91:61 between short-interval and long-interval groups. The rate of pathological complete response in the short-interval and long-interval groups were 34.1% and 24.6% (P = 0.257). Delayed surgery did not have a significantly impact on the number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.133), operative duration (P = 0.689), blood loss (P = 0.837), hospitalization duration (P = 0.293), chest drainage duration (P = 0.886) and postoperative complications (P > 0.050). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) rates were 85.10% in the short-interval group, and 82.07% in the long-interval group (P = 0.435). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.41% and 70.86% in the two groups (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy (tumor regression grade 0) exhibited inferior 3-year OS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 51.85% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.035) and DFS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 47.40% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.014) in the long-interval group.ConclusionsDelayed surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not further improve pathological response; instead, it resulted in a poorer DFS. Especially for patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy, delayed surgery increases the risk of mortality and recurrence.

Anisotropy component of DTI reveals long-term neuroinflammation following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in rats

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the long-term effects of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) with varying inter-injury intervals by measuring diffusion tensor metrics, including mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and diffusion magnitude (L) and pure anisotropy (q).MethodsEighteen rats were randomly divided into three groups: short-interval rmTBI (n = 6), long-interval rmTBI (n = 6), and sham controls (n = 6). MD, FA, L, and q values were analyzed from longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging at days 50 and 90 after rmTBI. Immunohistochemical staining against neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and myelin was performed. Analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficient, and simple linear regression model were used.ResultsAt day 50 post-rmTBI, lower cortical FA and q values were shown in the short-interval group (p ≤ 0.038). In contrast, higher FA and q values were shown for the long-interval group (p ≤ 0.039) in the corpus callosum. In the ipsilesional external capsule and internal capsule, no significant changes were found in FA, while lower L and q values were shown in the short-interval group (p ≤ 0.028) at day 90. The q values in the external capsule and internal capsule were negatively correlated with the number of microglial cells and the total number of astroglial cells (p ≤ 0.035).ConclusionTensor scalar measurements, such as L and q values, are sensitive to exacerbated chronic injury induced by rmTBI with shorter inter-injury intervals and reflect long-term astrogliosis induced by the cumulative injury.Relevance statementTensor scalar measurements, including L and q values, are potential DTI metrics for detecting long-term and subtle injury following rmTBI; in particular, q values may be used for quantifying remote white matter (WM) changes following rmTBI.Key PointsThe alteration of L and q values was demonstrated after chronic repetitive mild traumatic brain injury.Changing q values were observed in the impact site and remote WM.The lower q values in the remote WM were associated with astrogliosis.Graphical

Association between interpregnancy interval and the labor curve

Both short and long interpregnancy intervals are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, the impact of interpregnancy intervals on labor progression is unknown. We examined the impact of interpregnancy intervals on the labor curve, hypothesizing that those with a longer interpregnancy intervals would have slower labor progression. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with a history of one prior vaginal delivery admitted for induction of labor or spontaneous labor with a singleton gestation ≥37 weeks at an academic medical center between 2004 and 2015. Repeated measures regression was used to construct labor curves, which were compared between patients with short interpregnancy intervals, defined as <3 years since the last delivery, and long interpregnancy intervals, defined as >3 years since the last delivery. We chose this interval as it approximates the median birth interval in the United States. Interval-censored regression was used to estimate the median duration of labor after 4 centimeters of dilation, stratified by type of labor (spontaneous vs induced). Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. Of the 1331 patients who were included in the analysis, 544 (41%) had a long interpregnancy interval. Among the entire cohort, there were no significant differences in first or second-stage progression between short and long interpregnancy interval groups. In the stratified analysis, first-stage progression varied between groups on the basis of labor type: long interpregnancy interval was associated with a slower active phase among those being induced and a quicker active phase among those in spontaneous labor. The second-stage duration was similar between cohorts regardless of labor type. Multiparas with an interpregnancy interval >3 years may have a slower active phase than those with a shorter interpregnancy interval when undergoing induction of labor. Interpregnancy interval does not demonstrate an effect on the length of the second stage.

P-703 Is the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval associated with ART outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Study question Is the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes? Summary answer Limited evidence suggests that extending the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval from 33-36h to 37-41h does not affect ART outcomes. What is known already The time interval between final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval varies among IVF centres, although an interval of 33–36 h is the most widely adopted. The use of a prolonged time interval of 37-41h has been suggested to increase the number and competence of oocytes retrieved, their maturation, their ability to be fertilized, their capacity to produce usable embryos and the probability of pregnancy. Considering recently published data, a systematic review is warranted to provide clinicians with updated, evidence-based information regarding the optimal time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to evaluate the effect of the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval on ART outcomes. For this purpose, a literature search was carried out until January 2024 in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate, while ovulation before oocyte retrieval, oocytes retrieved, maturation rate, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, implantation rate and miscarriage rate were secondary outcomes. Participants/materials, setting, methods Citation, demographic, methodological and clinical data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the RoB2 Tool by Cochrane. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by I2. In dichotomous data, estimates were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the fixed or random effects method. In continuous data, differences were pooled across resulting in a weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. Main results and the role of chance Six eligible RCTs (n = 1081) were identified, published between 1991-2023. In three trials, conventional insemination was used for fertilization, in two trials this was performed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), whereas in one trial either conventional insemination or ICSI were used. The time intervals between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval compared, varied between studies (34.5-36 vs 38.5-40h, 33 vs 41h, 34 vs 38h, 35 vs 37h, 34 vs 39h and 36 vs 38h). Patients were grouped in advance based on these time intervals (short interval group: 33-36h versus long interval group: 37-41h). Ovarian stimulation was performed with GnRH analogues (GnRH antagonists:1 GnRH agonists:5) and gonadotrophins (HMG:4 recombinant FSH:2, while triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed with hCG( recombinant hCG:1 urinary hCG:5). None of the studies was deemed as of low risk of bias. No statistically significant differences were observed between the short nd long interval groups regarding clinical pregnancy rate per randomized patient (RR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.62-1.11; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2:36.4%; five studies, 827 patients). Furthermore, it was not feasible to pool any of the secondary outcome data. This was either because they were not reported, or due to the fact that they were reported inappropriately. Limitations, reasons for caution This meta-analysis included a limited number of RCTs, which were generally of low quality due to methodological limitations and of high risk of bias. Moreover, the total number of patients is still not large enough to draw solid conclusions. Wider implications of the findings Taking into account the limitations of the current meta-analysis, it appears that clinicians may elect a shorter (33–36 h) or a longer (37-41h) interval regarding the timing of oocyte retrieval following triggering final oocyte maturation, without affecting clinical pregnancy rate. Trial registration number PROSPERO: CRD42024501986

Oncologic investigation of the interval from stent placement to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) procedure for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, evidence regarding the optimal interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery is lacking. We retrospectively collected data from patients with BTS between January 2013 and October 2021. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses were used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between the short-interval (SI) and long-interval (LI) groups, using a cutoff of 20days. In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study (SI group, n = 63; LI group, n = 75). In the matched cohort, the patients' backgrounds were well balanced. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was not significantly different between the SI and LI groups (19.0% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the SI and LI groups in the 3-year recurrence-free survival (68.0% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.73) or 3-year overall survival rates (86.0% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.72). A longer interval did not deteriorate the oncological outcomes. Individual perioperative management with an appropriate interval to improve the patient's condition is required to ensure safe surgery.

Impact of endoscopic surveillance on the early diagnosis and endoscopic resection likelihood of gastric cancer.

Endoscopy could help detect early gastric cancer (EGC) and improve the prognosis of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of endoscopy and endoscopic surveillance on the early detection of gastric cancer (GC), GC staging, and treatment selection. Patients with GC diagnosed at our center from 2010 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and allocated to the short-interval group (had received endoscopy within 3years before diagnosis), the long-interval group (had received endoscopy more than 3years before diagnosis), and the unchecked group (had not received endoscopy before diagnosis). The differences in GC staging and treatment modalities among the three groups were analyzed, and the differences in the clinical and pathological features of EGC were further analyzed. One thousand and twenty-five GC patients were included, with 395 cases of EGC and 630 cases of advanced GC. The proportions of EGC in the short-interval, long-interval, and unchecked groups were 98.0%, 84.2%, and 29.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among the 387 lesions of 367 EGC patients were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), 341 (88.1%) exhibited curative resection, and 46 (11.9%) involved noncurative resections. Lesions of EGC differed significantly in diameter, depth of invasion, and curative resection rate (p = 0.033, 0.019, and 0.005, respectively). In the short-interval group, 87.8% of the lesions were ≤ 2cm, 95.6% of the invasion depths were confined to the mucosal layer, and 96.7% of the eCura scores were A or B. Compared with the unchecked group, they had smaller diameters (RR = 0.419, 95% CI 0.234-0.752), shallower invasion depths (RR = 0.286, 95% CI 0.105-0.777), and a higher curative resection rate (RR = 0.215, 95% CI 0.068-0.676). Endoscopic surveillance at 3-year intervals can help detect EGC, and the EGC lesions found have smaller diameters and shallower depths of invasion, helping improve the curative resection rate of ESD.

Timing to Surgery and Lymph Node Upstaging in Gastric Cancer: An NCDB Analysis.

Prior studies have shown tumor specificity on the impact of longer time interval from diagnosis to surgery, however in gastric cancer (GC) this remains unclear. We aimed to determine if a longer time interval from diagnosis to surgery had an impact on lymph node (LN) upstaging and overall survival (OS) outcomes among patients with clinically node negative (cN0) GC. Patients diagnosed with cN0 GC undergoing surgery between 2004-2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and divided into intervals between time of diagnosis and surgery [short interval (SI): ≥ 4 days to < 8 weeks and long interval (LI): ≥ 8 weeks]. Multivariable regression analysis evaluated the independent impact of surgical timing on LN upstaging and a Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated survival outcomes. Of 1824 patients with cN0 GC, 71.8% had a SI to surgery and 28.1% had a LI to surgery. LN upstaging was seen more often in the SI group when compared to LI group (82% versus 76%, p = 0.004). LI to surgery showed to be an independent factor protective against LN upstaging [adjusted odds ratio = 0.62, 95% CI: (0.39-0.99)]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that time to surgery was not associated with a difference in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% CI: (0.71-1.17)], however uncontrolled Kaplan-Meier curves showed OS difference between the SI and LI to surgery groups (p = 0.037). Timing to surgery was not a predictor of LN upstaging or overall survival, suggesting that additional medical optimization in preparation for surgery and careful preoperative staging may be appropriate in patients with node negative early stage GC without affecting outcomes.

Social determinants among Black people during pregnancy following a short interpregnancy interval

Short interpregnancy interval has been shown to be a key contributor to infant mortality. Black pregnant people have a higher incidence of short interpregnancy interval than people of other races and ethnicities, as well as higher rates of infant mortality. Understanding the factors related to racial disparities in short interpregnancy interval and infant mortality are a public health priority. This study aimed to examine the relationship between social determinants of health and interpregnancy interval in Black pregnant people by comparing those with a short interpregnancy interval defined as <18 months with those with a referent interpregnancy interval defined as ≥18 months. This was a nested case-control study from a prospective cohort analyzing social determinants of health in 576 postpartum patients at an urban medical center, 2011-2021. Sociodemographic, pregnancy, and maternal characteristic data were collected from participants' medical records. Structured interviews measured participants' health behaviors, physical environment, social support, health literacy, and structural drivers. Differences in social determinants of health among Black study participants were compared between those with a short interpregnancy interval (<18 months) and those with a referent interpregnancy interval (≥18 months). The odds ratios were calculated to assess the association between short interpregnancy interval and social determinants. Factors with significant differences between the short interpregnancy interval and referent interpregnancy interval groups in Black participants were compared with that of White groups for social context. Black participants with a short interpregnancy interval were more likely to report financial support from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.1), negative feelings toward the pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.9), choosing not to breastfeed because they do not like it (odds ratio ,12.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-543.1), not receiving prenatal care as early as desired (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-7.2) because of consid- eration of pregnancy termination (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-30.5) and less likely to report low levels of social support (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.8) than Black participants with a referent interpregnancy interval. Social determinants of health that differed between participants with a short interpregnancy interval and those with a referent interpregnancy interval were Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children support, feelings toward the pregnancy, social support, breastfeeding intent, and delayed prenatal care because of consideration of abortion. Previous studies examining infant mortality risk factors used White people as the referent group when analyzing social determinants. Our study focused specifically on understanding the lives of Black pregnant people so that future public health initiatives focused on social determinants may attenuate the racial disparity of infant mortality in the United States.

P-626 Time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated meta-analysis

Abstract Study question To explore whether prolonged hCG-ovum pickup(hCG-opu) interval improves assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Summary answer The clinical pregnancy rates can be increased by prolonging the hCG-opu interval, which would help develop more reasonable time schedules for fertility centers and patients. What is known already hCG-OPU interval greatly affects ART success, which allows to obtain the maximum number of competent mature oocytes while avoiding spontaneous ovulation. There is also no consensus regarding the optimal time between hCG-OPU, which some studies had shown that ideal ART outcomes could be obtained when oocyte retrieval was done more than 36 h -39 h after hCG priming, while others have concluded that an interval of more than 36 hours does not improve ART outcomes. Study design, size, duration CENTRAL, CNKI, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Web of Science up to February 7, 2022 were searched for studies reporting associations between hCG-ovum pickup intervals and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. We searched for prospective or retrospective cohort studies measuring the hCG-OPU interval, using 36 hours as the cutoff value between short and long intervals. A combination of the following key search terms was used: “oocyte retrieval,” “human chorionic gonadotropin,” and “interval.” Participants/materials, setting, methods Studies analyzing the relationship between the hCG-OPU interval and ART outcomes were considered eligible for abstract screening. Intervention types included short (≤36 h) and long (&amp;gt;36 h) hCG-ovum pickup intervals in assisted reproductive technology cycles. All outcomes were based upon only fresh embryo transfers. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Main results and the role of chance 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis, including five retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study, and six randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials. The short and long interval groups had similar oocyte maturation rates, fertilization rate and high-quality embryo rate (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45–1.06; I2 = 91.1%, OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77–1.0; I2 = 44.4% and OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.95–1.17; I2 = 8.6%, respectively). The clinical pregnancy rates in the long retrieval group were significantly higher than in the short retrieval group (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45–0.95; I2 = 35.4%). The groups had similar miscarriage and live birth rates (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.66–5.60; I2 = 0.0% and OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24–1.04; I2 = 0.0%, respectively). Limitations, reasons for caution Using studies without patient data represents a potential source of bias. The hCG-OPU intervals were selected based on clinical relevance, resulting in statistical heterogeneity. Despite sensitivity analysis, such heterogeneity sources call for caution when interpreting the results. Wider implications of the findings The clinical pregnancy rates can be increased by prolonging the hCG-OPU (&amp;gt;36h), which would support the search for better clinical outcomes. The finding should be validated. And if validated by multicenter, randomized, controlled trials, long interval could be implemented in ART programs, resulting in better clinical pregnancy outcomes. Trial registration number not applicable

Impact of endoscopy intervals on metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Comparison between 1 year and half-a-year.

Japanese guidelines recommend posttreatment endoscopy once or twice a year after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. However, the impact of endoscopy intervals on metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) remains unclear, especially the difference between 1-year and half-a-year intervals. We aimed to investigate this difference. This study retrospectively investigated 2429 patients who underwent gastric ESD between May 2001 and June 2019 at our hospital. Patients who developed MGC were classified based on those who underwent the previous endoscopy within at least 7 months (short-interval group) and within 8-13 months (regular-interval group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for possible confounders. The primary outcome was the proportion of MGC beyond curative ESD criteria established in the guidelines. A total of 216 eligible patients developed MGC. The short- and regular-interval groups included 43 and 173 patients, respectively. Overall, no patients in the short-interval group had MGC beyond curative ESD criteria, while 27 patients in the regular-interval group did. The proportion of MGC beyond curative ESD criteria was significantly lower in the short-interval group than in the regular-interval group before (P = 0.003) and after (P = 0.028) PSM. Although not significant, the short-interval group tended to have a higher stomach preservation rate than the regular-interval group (P = 0.093). Our study indicated a possible benefit of biannual surveillance endoscopy in the early post-ESD period.

Determining the optimal interval between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

In locally advanced rectal cancer, the optimal interval between completion of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RT-ChT) and surgical resection remains unclear due to contradictory data on the benefits of extending this interval. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to determine the impact of this interval on outcomes in patients treated for rectal cancer at our center. We retrospectively reviewed 382 consecutive patients treated for stage II/III rectal cancer between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. We evaluated four different cut-off points (56, 63, 70, and 77days) to determine which had the greatest impact on treatment outcomes. The median time between completion of RT-ChT and surgery was 67.2days (range, 28-294). Intervals > 8weeks (56days) were associated with worse therapeutic outcomes. Specifically, an interval ≥ 77days was associated with a significant decrease in overall survival (OS; 84% vs. 70%; p = 0.004), which is why we selected this interval for the comparative analysis. Several outcome variables were significantly better in the short interval (< 77days) group, including margin involvement (5.2% vs. 13.9%; p = 0.01), sphincter preservation (78% vs. 59.3%; p = 0.003), and distant dissemination (22.6% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.04). No significant between-group differences were found in complete/nearly complete response rates (19.2% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.3). Time to surgery was statistically significant on both the univariate and multivariate analyses. Our findings suggest that surgery should not be delayed more than 8weeks (56days) after neoadjuvant treatment. An interval > 8weeks should only be considered in patients who demonstrate a good response to neoadjuvant RT-ChT.

Assessment of Patients Receiving Short-Interval Botulinum Toxin Chemodenervation Treatment for Laryngeal Dystonia and Essential Tremor of the Vocal Tract

The gold-standard treatment for laryngeal dystonia (LD) and essential tremor of the vocal tract (ETVT) is botulinum toxin (BoNT) chemodenervation. Although safe and effective, it is not curative, and periodic injections are required. Some medical insurance companies only cover injections at a 3-month interval, though some patients benefit from injections more frequently. To determine the proportion and characteristics of patients who receive BoNT chemodenervation treatment in intervals shorter than 90 days. This retrospective cohort study across 3 quaternary care neurolaryngology specialty practices in Washington and California recruited patients who underwent at least 4 consecutive laryngeal BoNT injections for LD and/or ETVT in the past 5 years. Data were collected from March through June 2022 and analyzed from June through December 2022. Laryngeal BoNT treatment. Biodemographic and clinical variables, injection characteristics, evolution during the 3 interinjection intervals, and lifetime laryngeal BoNT treatment data were collected from patient medical records. Logistic regression was used to assess association to the short-interval outcome, defined as an average injection interval shorter than 90 days. Of 255 patients included from the 3 institutions, 189 (74.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 62.7 (14.3) years. The predominant diagnosis was adductor LD (n = 199 [78.0%]), followed by adductor dystonic voice tremor (n = 26 [10.2%]) and ETVT (n = 13 [5.1%]). Seventy patients (27.5%) received short-interval injections (<90 days). The short-interval group was younger than the long-interval group (≥90 days), with a mean (SD) age of 58.6 (15.5) years and 64.2 (13.5) years, respectively, and a mean difference of -5.7 years (95% CI, -9.6 to -1.8 years). There were no patient-related differences between the short- and long-interval groups in terms of sex, employment status, or diagnosis. This cohort study demonstrated that while insurance companies often mandate a 3-month or greater interval for BoNT chemodenervation financial coverage, there is a considerable subset of patients with LD and ETVT who receive short-interval treatment to optimize their vocal function. Short-interval chemodenervation injections demonstrate a similar adverse effect profile and do not appear to predispose to resistance through antibody formation.

Effect of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery on oncological outcomes in poor responders with locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

The optimal interval from completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer remains controversial. It seems that delayed surgery is associated with an increase in pathological complete response rates. However, the prognostic effect of delayed surgery in poor responders is unclear. Patients with locally advanced mid or distal rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant CRT followed by total mesorectal excision at a university teaching cancer center between June 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. According to the tumor regression grade, poor responders (tumor regression grade 2-3) to neoadjuvant CRT were selected for analyses. Patients were divided into the longer interval group (greater than 8 weeks) and the shorter interval group (8 weeks or less) based on the wait time from completion of neoadjuvant CRT therapy to surgery. Results: among 916 eligible patients, 522 patients had a poor tumor response. There were 217 patients in the shorter interval group and 305 patients in the longer interval group. At the baseline, patients in the longer interval group were more likely to have a T3 stage and positive vascular invasion. Compared with patients in the shorter interval group, patients in the longer interval group had significantly worse overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) (log-rank test, overall survival: P =0.004, DFS: P <0.001). The 3-year DFS rates were 75.6 and 63.1% in the shorter interval group and the longer interval group, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, delayed surgery was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 2.003, 95% CI: 1.233-3.253, P =0.005) and recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.555, 95% CI: 1.121-2.156, P =0.008). Patients who had a poor tumor response should be identified by restaging MRI and receive radical surgery in time, without a prolonged interval.

2-4 weeks is the optimal time to operate on colorectal liver metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is generally accepted for treatment of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRLM), but what is a reasonable interval between the latest NAC and surgery is still unknown. The aim of the current study was to investigate the proper timing of surgery after NAC. Subjects were 141 patients with CRLM who underwent NAC and then surgery were retrospectively identified from 2008 to 2020. They were divided into a short interval group (SIG, ≤ 4 weeks) and long interval group (LIG, > 4 weeks) using the software X-tile. The SIG was subclassified group into 3 time periods (1-2 weeks, 2-3 weeks, and 3-4 weeks) to assess the incidence of complications. Patients in the SIG were more likely to have significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (3-year RFS of 47.4% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.043) and no difference in overall survival (OS) (3-year OS 76.1% vs. 79.9%, P = 0.635). The postoperative complication rate was 23.5% in the SIG and 14.0% in the LIG (P = 0.198). The postoperative complication rate in the 1-2 weeks subgroup was marginally higher than that in the > 4 weeks subgroup (35% vs. 14.3% P = 0.055). Multivariate analysis revealed that chemotherapy-free intervals of 1-2 weeks were an independent predictor of increased postoperative complications (OR = 0.263, 95% CI 0.7-0.985 P = 0.048). Patients who underwent surgery within 4 weeks of NAC had better RFS. In addition, 1-2 weeks was an independent factor influencing the development of more complications. For patients with CRLM, performing surgery within 2-4weeks of NAC was feasible and safe, and it did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications but it did prolong RFS.

A short versus a long time interval between semen collection and intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Does a short interval (i.e. ≤90 min), compared to a long interval (i.e. ≥180 min), between semen collection and intrauterine insemination (IUI) increase the cumulative chance of an ongoing pregnancy after six IUI cycles? A long interval between semen collection and IUI resulted in a borderline significant improvement in cumulative ongoing pregnancies and a statistically significant shorter time to pregnancy. Retrospective studies assessing the effect of the time interval between semen collection and IUI on pregnancy outcomes have shown inconclusive results. Some studies have indicated a beneficial effect of a short interval between semen collection and IUI on IUI outcomes, while others have not found any differences. To date, no prospective trials have been published on this subject. The study was performed as a non-blinded, single-center RCT with 297 couples undergoing IUI treatment in a natural or stimulated cycle. The study was conducted between February 2012 and December 2018. Couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility and an indication for IUI were randomly assigned for up to six IUI cycles into either the control group (long interval, i.e. 180 min or more between semen collection and insemination) or the study group (short interval, i.e. insemination as soon as possible after semen processing and within 90 min of semen collection). The study was carried out in an academic hospital-based IVF center in the Netherlands. The primary endpoint of the study was ongoing pregnancy rate per couple, defined as a viable intrauterine pregnancy at 10 weeks after insemination. In the short interval group, 142 couples were analyzed versus 138 couples in the long interval group. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the long interval group (71/138; 51.4%) compared to that in the short interval group (56/142; 39.4%; relative risks 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-0.99; P = 0.044). The time to pregnancy was significantly shorter in the long interval group (log-rank test, P = 0.012). A Cox regression analysis showed similar results (adjusted hazard ratio 1.528, 95% CI 1.074-2.174, P = 0.019). Limitations of our study are the non-blinded design, the long inclusion and follow-up period of nearly seven years and the large number of protocol violations, especially because they predominantly occurred in the short interval group. The non-significant results in the per-protocol (PP) analyses and the weaknesses of the study should be taken into account in the assessment of the borderline significance of the results in the ITT analyses. Because it is not necessary to perform the IUI immediately after semen processing, there can be more time available to choose the optimum work-flow and clinic occupancy. Clinics and laboratories should find their optimal timing of insemination, considering the time between human chorionic gonadotropin injection and insemination in relation to the sperm preparation techniques used as well as the storage time and conditions until insemination. There were no external funding and no competing interests to declare. Dutch trial registry, trial registration number NTR3144. 14 November 2011. 5 February 2012.

Longer interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is associated with improved pathological response, but does not accurately estimate survival in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has been shown to reduce tumor burden and achieve tumor regression in patients with esophageal cancer (ESC). However, the most beneficial time interval between the administration of nCRT and surgery remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the association of the duration of time between nCRT and surgery with the prognosis of patients with ESC. Patients with ESC who received nCRT following surgical resection (n=161) were reviewed and divided into the prolonged time interval group (time interval ≥66 days) and the short time interval group (time interval <66 days), according to the median value. Subsequent analysis revealed that the prolonged time interval group achieved a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate compared with the short time interval group (49.4 vs. 26.3%; P=0.003). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that it was possible to independently estimate a higher pCR rate based on a prolonged time interval (odds ratio, 2.131; P=0.042). However, no association between a prolonged time interval and disease-free survival (DFS) was detected using Kaplan-Meier curves (P=0.252) or multivariate Cox regression (P=0.607) analyses. Similarly, no association was identified between a prolonged time interval and overall survival (OS; P=0.946) based on Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and subsequent multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the time interval also failed to independently estimate OS (P=0.581). Moreover, female sex (P=0.001) and a radiation dose ≥40 Gy (P=0.039) served as independent factors associated with a higher pCR rate, and the pCR rate was an independent predictor of favorable DFS (P=0.002) and OS (P=0.015) rates. In conclusion, the present study revealed that a prolonged time interval from nCRT to surgery was associated with a higher pCR rate, but it failed to estimate the survival profile of patients with ESC.

The long-term outcomes of vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa grafts in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A case series.

To investigate the long-term outcomes for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH) patients undergoing vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa grafts (SIS). A case series. Seventy-eight MRKH syndrome patients and a post-SIS patient who delivered a baby following the world's first robot-assisted uterus transplantation. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome patients were grouped based on the postoperative time and the diagnosis-surgery interval. Outcomes of sexual function and psychological status were assessed using the female sexual function index (FSFI), self-rating scale of body image (SSBI) and self-acceptance questionnaire (SAQ). Anatomical outcomes were measured by clinicians. The primary outcome was restoration of sexual function, defined by an FSFI score in the 'good' range. Anatomical and psychological outcomes were also analysed. Sexual function was restored in 42.3% (33/78) of patients and the total FSFI score was 23.44 ± 4.43. Three factors (body defect, recognition of physical appearance and willingness to change physical appearance scores) in the SSBI and two in the SAQ decreased as the postoperative time increased. Based on the interval between diagnosis and surgery, the total SSBI score was lower in the short-interval group than in the long-interval group (7.25 ± 5.55 versus 12.04 ± 10.21, p=0.038). Nearly half of MRKH patients in our study had good long-term sexual function after SIS vaginoplasty. Sexual function and psychological status improved as postoperative time increased. In addition, reducing the diagnosis to surgery interval was associated with improved psychological function.

Potential Impact of Extending Surveillance Intervals for Patients With 1-2 Low-Risk Adenomas.

Potential Impact of Extending Surveillance Intervals for Patients With 1-2 Low-Risk Adenomas.

Pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and two interval programs of hCG-to-oocyte aspiration

This study aimed to determine the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) if oocyte retrieval was done 32-34 hours or 34:05-36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection. A randomized sample involving 186 patients with tubal failure was divided into groups A (96 patients) and B (90 patients). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed on all patients according to described protocols. The number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte cumulus complex quality, number of fertilized eggs, and pregnancy rates were compared between groups. The total of oocytes retrieved in group B was significantly higher than in group A but not significant (P=0.068). The oocyte maturation rate was also significantly higher in the long interval group B than in the short interval group A (P=0.039). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of fertilization rate (0.040), and the pregnancy rate in group B was higher than that in group A, but it was not significant (P=0.055). The prolonged interval could also increase the pregnancy rate, but it was not significant. It seems that if the interval between hCG priming and oocyte retrieval is prolonged, the percentage of the number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes (MII), and fertilized oocytes increases.