Short Femoral Stem Research Articles

A Customized Distribution of the Coefficient of Friction of the Porous Coating in the Short Femoral Stem Reduces Stress Shielding

Stress shielding and aseptic loosening have been identified as adverse effects of short-stem total hip arthroplasty resulting in hardware failure. However, there is a gap in research regarding the impact of stress shielding in customized porous coatings. The purpose of this study was to optimize the distribution of the coefficients of friction in the porous coating of a metaphyseal femoral stem to minimize stress shielding. Static structural analysis of an implanted short, tapered-wedge stem with a titanium porous coating was performed with the use of Analysis System Mechanical Software under axial loading. To limit computational time, we randomly sampled only 500 of the possible combinations of coefficients of friction. Results indicate that the coefficient of friction in the distal lateral porous coating significantly affected the mid-distal medial femoral surface and lateral femoral surface. The resultant increased proximal strains resulted from an increased coefficient of friction in lateral porous coating and a reduction in the coefficient of friction in medial mid-distal coating. These findings suggest that a customized porous coating distribution may produce strain patterns that are biomechanically closer to intact bone, thereby reducing stress shielding in short femoral stems.

Comparison of mid-term clinical and radiological results of short and conventional femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty

This study aims to answer the question: Which are superior—conventional or short femoral stems?. An Optymis stem was used as a short-femoral stem, and an Accolade II stem was used as a conventional-femoral stem. There were 95 patients in the short femoral stem group (Group 1) and 90 in the conventional stem group (Group 2). The SF-36 Life Quality Score, thigh pain, and the Harris Hip Score were used to evaluate the patients’ clinical outcomes. Pre-operative, immediate post-operative, and final follow-up x-rays were used for radiological evaluation. Stem varus/valgus alignment, hip offset changing, acetabular anteversion/inclination changing, femoral migration, acetabular migration, periarticular ossification, and osteointegration evaluation were assessed for both groups. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 years for Group 1 and 5.2 years for Group 2. No significant difference existed between the two groups in terms of clinical scores (Harris Hip Score, SF-36). Thigh pain was significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.0001). As for radiological parameters, Group 1 exhibited more varus position-related results. In terms of angular stability, Group 1 was found to be more unstable than Group 2 (p = 0.0001). The power to reconstruct femoral offset was superior in Group 1. Periarticular ossification was more frequent in Group 2. Femoral osteointegration was denser proximally in Group 1 and distally in Group 2. When mid-term radiological and clinical results of both femoral stems are evaluated, they have no superiority over each other.

Increased stability of short femoral stem through customized distribution of coefficient of friction in porous coating

Stress shielding and aseptic loosening are complications of short stem total hip arthroplasty, which may lead to hardware failure. Stems with increased porosity toward the distal end were discovered to be effective in reducing stress shielding, however, there is a lack of research on optimized porous distribution in stem’s coating. This study aimed to optimize the distribution of the coefficient of friction of a metaphyseal femoral stem, aiming for reducing stress shielding in the proximal area. A finite element analysis model of an implanted, titanium alloy short-tapered wedge stem featuring a porous coating made of titanium was designed to simulate a static structural analysis of the femoral stem's behavior under axial loading in Analysis System Mechanical Software. For computational feasibility, 500 combinations of coefficients of friction were randomly sampled. Increased strains in proximal femur were found in 8.4% of the models, which had decreased coefficients of friction in middle medial areas of porous coating and increased in lateral proximal and lateral and medial distal areas. This study reported the importance of the interface between bone and middle medial and distal lateral areas of the porous coating in influencing the biomechanical behavior of the proximal femur, and potentially reducing stress shielding.

Do all short stem types restore biomechanical parameters of the hip? Comparison according to femoral neck osteotomy levels.

There is no consensus on ideal short femoral stem design. A classification system proposed by Feyen and Shimmin divides short stems in two types according to femoral neck osteotomy levels: subcapital (IIIA) and standard (IIIB). The study aims to determine which design type is more successful in restoring native biomechanical parameters and whether stem type has an impact on clinical results. In this retrospective comparative study, patients that have undergone short stem hip arthroplasty were evaluated according to stem types: type IIIA (n = 52, 66.7%) (Mathys Optimys) and IIIB (n = 26, 33.3%) (Implantcast Aida and Smith & Nephew SMF). Pelvis X-rays were assessed in terms of femoral neck length, horizontal and vertical hip centres of rotation, horizontal and vertical femoral offsets, abductor lever arm lengths, leg lengths, and stem-shaft angles. Improvement in Harris hip scores, differences between post-operative and pre-operative measurements, and stem-shaft angles were evaluated and compared between two groups. Mean femoral neck resection (8.27 ± 6.68mm in IIIA and 15 ± 6.33mm in IIIB) was significantly different between both groups (p < 0.001). Harris hip scores were increased at post-operative six months in both groups with no difference (84.4 ± 6.4 and 84.6 ± 5.5, p = 0.4). The absolute values of differences between pre-operative and post-operative horizontal centres of rotation (p = 0.63), vertical centers of rotation (p = 0.75), horizontal femoral offsets (p = 0.78), vertical femoral offsets (p = 0.83), abductor lever arm distances (p = 0.63), and leg length (p = 0.21) measurements were not different between both groups. Stem positions were both varus with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.14). We found no difference regarding restoration of biomechanical parameters between short stem designs with different levels of neck osteotomy. Additionally, short stem can mostly result in varus component positioning regardless of the level of neck osteotomy.

Does size matter? Outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty with long or primary stems: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundFemoral reconstruction with long stems is widely accepted as the standard in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, long stems can be technically challenging to insert and can compromise bone stock for future revision. This study aimed to identify whether there was a difference in outcomes with using a long versus primary or short femoral stem in revision.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles comparing long and primary stem length in rTHA for Paprosky 1-3B femoral defects. The primary outcome measure was the reoperation rate after rTHA. Secondary outcomes included infection and dislocation rates, periprosthetic fracture, loosening, mortality, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).ResultsThe results of 3,102 rTHAs performed in 2,982 patients were reported from 9 eligible studies in the systematic review, of which 6 were included in the meta-analysis. The mean patient age was 67.4 and the mean follow-up lasted 5 years (range, 1–15 years). There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate (odds ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.28–2.17, P = 0.63). Similarly, there was no significant difference in dislocation or periprosthetic fracture risk. Harris Hip Score was better with primary stems by a mean difference of 14.4 points (P < 0.05). Pooled 5-year stem-related survival was 91.3% ± 3.5% (SD) for primary stems and 89.9% ± 6.7% (SD) for long stems.ConclusionsA primary stem provided non-inferior outcomes compared with long stems in rTHA with Paprosky type 1-3B femoral defects. Primary stems may yield a more straightforward technique and preserve distal bone stock for future revision particularly in younger patients. In older patients with lower functional demands and who would benefit from a decreased risk of complications, a long cemented stem is recommended.

Midterm Comparative Analysis of Short Femoral Stem Survivorship in Dorr Type A Femurs.

Proximal-distal mismatch has emerged as a prominent concern in Dorr type A femoral morphology, prompting the exploration of short stems as promising alternatives to conventional stems. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using short femoral stems in Dorr type A proximal femoral morphology with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Patients with short femoral stems in Dorr type A between 2011 and 2017 were included. Patients with the Short Modular Femoral (SMF) stem and Metha stem were recruited and patients with a shortened tapered stem (Tri-Lock BPS) were matched by propensity score matching based on age, sex, body mass index, calcar to canal ratio, and diagnosis. Patient-reported outcomes and the presence of thigh pain were assessed at 5 years postoperatively. Revision rate, complication rate, and radiographic outcomes were also assessed and compared. Twenty-two cases (81%) in the SMF stem and 43 cases (65%) in the Metha stem had more than 5 years of follow-up data available. The SMF stem showed a higher failure rate than the other 2 groups, with 18% requiring revision surgery in the SMF stem compared to 4.6% in the Metha stem, and 2.3% in the Tri-Lock BPS. The SMF stem showed considerable complications such as stem position change and lateral cortical hypertrophy with inferior clinical outcomes than the other 2 stem groups. When the Metha stem and the Tri-Lock BPS groups were compared, more intraoperative fractures were observed in the Metha stem, whereas stress shielding and anterior thigh pain were significantly more prevalent in the Tri-Lock BPS. The SMF stem might be less reliable than previously reported, showing a high failure rate and increased radiologic complications. Thus, its use for THA in Dorr Type A femurs needs caution. On the other hand, the Metha stem showed comparable outcomes to the shortened tapered Tri-Lock BPS.

Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients.

Background and Objectives: Implantation of a short femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) could reduce the perioperative time, soft tissue damage, and preserve the bone stock of the proximal femur. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes after the use of short stems in rTHA with a follow-up of 1 to 5 years. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single center, and observational study analyzed the data of 31 patients (12 female, 19 male) with a median (interquartile range) age of 68.2 years (61.2-78.4) and BMI of 26.7 kg/m2 (24.6-29.4) who received an uncemented short femoral stem in rTHA between 2015 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were extracted from medical reports and assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain and satisfaction, and the UCLA Physical Activity Score. Radiographs were analyzed for stem subsidence, fixation, and bone parameters. The Wilcoxon test was used for pre-post rTHA differences (p < 0.05); clinical relevance was interpreted based on effect sizes according to Cohen's d. Results: All the clinical outcome measures improved significantly (p ≤ 0.001) at follow-up compared to preoperative status, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranging from 2.8 to 1.7. At the last follow-up, the median (interquartile) mHHS was 80.9 (58.6-93.5). Stem fixation was stable in all cases. Complications included stem subsidence of 3 mm (n = 1) and 10 mm (n = 1), heterotopic ossification Brooker stage III (n = 2), intraoperative femur perforation (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture Vancouver type A (n = 1), and dislocation (n = 2). Conclusions: The good clinical results in our selective study population of patients with mild to moderate bone deficiency, supported by large effect sizes, together with a complication rate within the normal range, support the consideration of short stems as a surgical option after a thorough preoperative analysis.

5 year follow up of a hydroxyapatite coated short stem femoral component for hip arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study

Short stem, uncemented femoral implants for hip arthroplasty are bone conserving achieving stability through initial metaphyseal press-fit and biological fixation. This study aimed to evaluate the survivorship, mid-term function and health related quality of life outcomes in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a fully hydroxyapatite coated straight short stem femoral component with up to 5 years follow-up. 668 patients were recruited to a multicentre study investigating the performance of the cementless Furlong Evolution® stem for THA. 137 patients withdrew at various time points. The mean follow-up was 49 months. Clinical (Harris Hip Score (HHS), radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures—Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), were recorded pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 3 year and 5 year follow ups. At 5-year follow-up, 12 patients underwent revision surgery, representing a cumulative revision rate of 1.8%. Median OHS, HHS and EQ5D scores improved significantly: OHS improved from a pre-operative median of 21 (IQR 14–26) to 47 (IQR 44–48) (p < 0.001). HHS improved from 52 (IQR 40–63) to 98 (IQR 92–100) (p < 0.001) and EQ5D improved from 70 (IQR 50–80) to 85 (IQR 75–95) (p < 0.001). This fully HA-coated straight short femoral stem implant demonstrated acceptable mid-term survivorship and delivered substantial improvements in function and quality of life after THA.

A Radiographic Evaluation of Short Monolithic Femoral Hip Stem (SMF) for Dysplastic Osteoarthritis: Does Stem Alignment Influence on the Stability?

Background: There have been a few reports of SMFTM stem for dysplastic hips. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of stem alignment in dysplastic femurs on the stability of the implants and on the bone reaction by means of consecutive radiographical analysis. Methods: The preoperative diagnosis is dysplastic osteoarthritis in all patients. Twenty-nine hips in 28 patients after MIS-THA were followed up for two or more years (3.5 years in average). The average age at the surgery was 60. Those who belonged to Crowe’s classification I were 19 and those of II were 10 hips. The shape of the femur was classified as Dorr’s Type A in 5, B in 21, and C in 3 hips. Results: The varus alignment of the stem was 21 hips and non-varus was 8 hips. Crowe’s Grade did not have influence on the stem alignment. The ratio of non-varus alignment was more with Dorr’s Type C than with others. Achieving rate of mediolateral fixation was significantly higher in the varus alignment than in non-varus. The significant subsidence occurred in 3 hips (10.3%) although all stems became stable within 6 months. No revision was necessary. Conclusion: The varus insertion of the stem seemed more secure also in dysplastic femurs, but even non-varus ones seemed acceptable as they brought about no severe problem. Comprehensively evaluating the result, careful selection of the patient is essential to take the advantage of and to overcome the disadvantage of this short stem for dysplastic hips.

Three-year migration analysis of a new metaphyseal anchoring short femoral stem in THA using EBRA-FCA

Cementless calcar-guided femoral short stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have become increasingly popular over the years. Early distal migration of femoral stems measured by Einzel-Bild-Roentgen Analyse, Femoral Component Analyse (EBRA-FCA) has been reported to be a risk factor for aseptic loosening. The aim of this study was to analyse axial migration behavior and subsidence of a new short stem (launched in 2015) over a follow-up period of 3 years. According to the study protocol, 100 hip osteoarthritis patients who consecutively received an unilateral cementless calcar-guided short stem (ANA.NOVA proxy) at a single department were prospectively included in this mid-term follow-up study. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 87 patients with unilateral THA who fulfilled the criteria for migration analysis with EBRA-FCA. The cohort comprised 41 males (mean age: 60 ± 16.5; mean BMI (Body Mass Index): 30 ± 13) and 46 females (mean age: 61 ± 15.5; mean BMI: 27 ± 10). Seven standardized radiographs per patient were analyzed with EBRA-FCA. An average migration of 2.0 mm (0.95–3.35) was observed within the first 3 years. The median increase during the first year was higher than in the second and third year (1.2 mm [IQR: 0.5–2.15] vs. 0.3 mm [IQR: 0.1–0.6 mm] vs. 0.25 mm [IQR: 0.1–0.5 mm]. Detected migration did not lead to stem loosening, instability, dislocation, or revision surgery in any patient. A higher risk for subsidence was observed in male and heavyweight patients, whereas the female gender was associated with a lower risk. No correlation between migration and revision could be observed. Although moderate subsidence was detectable, the performance of the short stem ANA.NOVA proxy is encouraging. Yet, its use may be re-considered in overweight and male patients due to more pronounced subsidence.

Short Uncemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Short Uncemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: influence of stem length on clinical and radiological outcomes at medium-term follow-up.

To evaluate the influence of short versus long stems implanted through a Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) on clinical and radiological outcomes in THA at medium-term follow-up (average follow-up of 44.8months). 167 consecutive total hip arthroplasties treating patients affected by primary hip osteoarthritis were retrospectively evaluated. A standard-length stem (H-MAXs) was used in 70 patients, while a short metaphyseal-fitting femoral stem (MINIMA) was used in 97 patients. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS) were used as outcomes measurements. Post-operatively, Engh's score and Brooker classification were analyzed at 6months, 1year and every 2years until the final FU. The correct size of the implant was evaluated determining the canal fill index (CFI), and all undersized stems were classified according to Magra classification. The average HHS was 83 ± 13.4 in the standard stems group and 87 ± 14.1 for short stems group (p = 0.148). The average FJS was 87.9 ± 15.2 for patients in the standard stems group and 84.5 ± 17.7 with no significant differences (p = 0.327). None of the stems showed radiographic signs of instability (standard stems mean Engh's score: 19.25 versus short stems mean Engh's score: 19.50-p = 0.41). According to Brooker classification, no significant difference in severity was found using different stems (p = 0.715). A high rate of undersized stems was found (standard stems 24%-short stems 25%) but without statistical difference between groups (p = 0.078), while a different trend in malposition following the recent classification proposed by Magra et al. was observed evaluating all undersized stems (p = 0.0387). Both groups achieved good and comparable patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and radiographic stability with fixation observed by bone ingrowth. A high rate of undersized stems was found with a correlation between femoral stem length and specific pattern of malposition. Malalignment in Varus was frequent in shorter stems in contact proximally with medial calcar and distally with lateral cortex, while a uniform undersizing was observed for longer ones with a continuous margin around the stem. However, the stems never presented progressive radiolucent lines over the whole surface of the stem.

Length doesn’t play a role – Sexual activity in men after short stem Total hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundChronic hip pain due to osteoarthritis or hip dysplasia has been shown to negatively affect many daily life aspects. One aspect, however, which persists underestimated is sexual health. The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) are increasing, especially in young patients who have high functional expectations, not only to pain relief, but to an increase in hip mobility and quality of life as well as sexual activity.Aim(1) to report the demographic factors, (2) the sexual activity before and after THA, as well as the concerns related to sexual activity after THA and (3) the patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in sexually active male patients.MethodsWe evaluated the results of patients between 18 and 65 years of age following primary cementless short femoral stem THA using a direct anterior approach (DAA) at a midterm follow-up of 4 years. A web-based questionnaire (via SurveyMonkey) was chosen to assess frequency, positions, complaints, fears, dealing with the questions and PROMs. Our patients sexual activity was via The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) validated.ResultsPatients resumed their sexual activities after 6 weeks. The two main causes of difficulty in sexual activity before surgery were pain and limitation of the range of motion of the hip joint. Patients experienced less pain and an improvement in hip range of motion after THA. 89% of patients expressed a desire for more detailed and specific information on the subject. The patients foremost concern about muscle weakness, surgical scar or fear of dislocation. After 4 years follow-up our patients presented a significant improvement of the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) from 34.1 preoperative to 92.6 after THA.ConclusionTHA improves the quality in sexual life, in relation to less pain and improvement in the range of motion, but not in the frequency of sexual activity. Men’s sexual positions required less mobility and could therefore be considered safer.

Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Bone Preserving Short Femoral Stem: Intermediate Term Clinical and Radiological Results

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the intermediate term clinical and radiological results of a Bone preserving short stem hip implant being operated through a minimally invasive anterolateral hip approach. Methods: In 20 consecutive patients suffering from osteoarthritis with 25 affected hip joints (five cases were bilateral), the clinical and radiological results of 25 hip arthroplasties performed in one hospital between October 2009 and May 2014 through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach using a cementless short stem prosthesis type Aida and a cementless cup type Ecofit with a ceramic-on-ceramic pairing were evaluated prospectively. The median age of patients at time of surgery was 60 years (range, 42-71 years), 15 male (4 were bilateral) and 5 female patients (one was bilateral) were included in the study. The median clinical follow up was 30 months (range, 2-88 months) and the median radiological follow up was 30 months (range, 2-88 months). Results: Harris Hip Score improved from a median preoperative value of 53 to a median postoperative value of 96 (range, 73-100) at follow up. 22 hips (88%) showed an excellent postoperative Harris Hip Score, 2 hips (8%) a good postoperative Harris Hip Score and one hip (4%) a fair postoperative Harris Hip Score. Only two patients complained of postoperative thigh pain. Regarding patient satisfaction, 15 patients (60%) were very satisfied, 10 patients (40%) were satisfied. None was unsatisfied. Radiological analysis showed that 19 stems (76%) were with stable bony ingrowth, two cases (8%) showed stable fibrous ingrowth. Four cases need further follow up for proper evaluation of stem fixation. Conclusion: The intermediate term survival of the Aida short stem hip implant being operated through a minimally invasive anterolateral hip approach is very promising and achieving the goals of a standard hip arthroplasty.

Accuracy of digital templating in uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty: which factors are associated with accuracy of preoperative planning?

Preoperative planning is a fundamental step for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies have highlighted the accuracy of preoperative digital templating for estimating acetabular cup and stem size. Stem design such as single-wedge metadiaphyseal (Type 1 stem) versus mid-short stem (microplasty) and surgical approach (anterior, direct lateral or posterior) have not been well investigated as predictors of THA templating accuracy. 204 patients (220 hips) who had undergone elective THA between November 2016 and December 2019 and presented a saved preoperative template were retrospectively reviewed. Templates from 5 different surgeons were involved in the analysis. 3 different approaches were used: direct lateral (DL), posterior (PA), direct anterior (DAA). 2 different stem designs were used: single-wedge metadiaphyseal and single-wedge mid-short (Biomet Taperloc Microplasty), while the acetabular component remained the same. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of accuracy. Femoral component size templating accuracy was significantly improved when using the single-wedge mid-short stem (Taperloc Microplasty) design when performing bivariate analysis. Although accuracy of cup sizing was not affected by approach, precision was significantly better in the PA group (p < 0.05). Accuracy of templating was found to be independent of BMI and gender but dependent on presence of calibration marker and stem design (p < 0.05). When striving for improved templating accuracy, acetabular and femoral component accuracy were best achieved using a calibration marker and a metaphyseal short femoral stem design.

Successful reconstruction of natural femoral anteversion using a short femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty surgery

ObjectiveTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) involves postoperative risks, such as thigh pain, periprosthetic fractures, and stress yielding. Short, anatomical, metaphyseal-fitting, cementless femoral stems were developed to reduce these postoperative risks. This study aimed to examine the “MiniMAX” prosthesis, which is a new generation, short, anatomical femoral stem made by Medacta.MethodsPatients underwent a low-dose computed tomography scan. Femoral anteversion was measured. We assessed the position and anteversion of the femoral component and compared them with the unoperated side. We also assessed the patients’ satisfaction and functional levels at 6 months postsurgery using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS).ResultsNineteen individuals were recruited in this study. We found no significant difference in femoral anteversion between the operated hip and the native hip. Using the HHS and OHS questionnaires, we found clinical improvement in the 6-month postoperative scores compared with the preoperative scores.DiscussionThe new-generation, short, anatomical femoral stem made by Medacta is successful in reproducing natural femoral anteversion, while also improving patients’ functioning and lifestyle. Future large-scale, prospective comparison trials are required to further investigate this topic.

Can We Predict Fracture When Using a Short Cementless Femoral Stem in the Anterior Approach?

BackgroundShort cementless femoral stems may allow for easier insertion with less dissection. The use of short stems with the anterior approach (AA) may be associated with a considerable perioperative fracture risk. Our aim was to evaluate whether patient-specific femoral and pelvic morphology and surgical technique, influence the perioperative fracture risk. Furthermore, we sought to describe important anatomical thresholds alerting surgeons. MethodsA single-center, multi-surgeon retrospective, case-control matched study was performed. Thirty nine periprosthetic fractures (3.4%) in 1,145 primary AA THAs using short cementless stems were identified. These were matched with 78 THA nonfracture controls for factors known to increase the fracture risk. A radiographic analysis using validated software measured femoral (canal flare index [CFI], morphological cortical index [MCI], and calcar-calcar ratio [CCR]) and pelvic (Ilium-ischial ratio [IIR], ilium overhang, and anterior superior iliac spine [ASIS] to greater trochanter distance) morphologies and surgical techniques (% canal fill). A multivariate and Receiver-Operator Curve (ROC) analysis was used to identify fracture predictors. ResultsCFI (3.7 ± 0.6 vs 2.9 ± 0.4, P < .001) and CCR (0.5 ± 0.1 vs 0.4 ± 0.1, P = .006) differed. The mean IIR was higher in fracture cases (3.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 0.5, P < .001). Percent canal fill was reduced in fracture cases (82.8 ± 7.6 vs 86.7 ± 6.8, P = .007). Multivariate and ROC analyses revealed a threshold CFI of 3.17 which was predictive of fracture (sensitivity: 84.6%/specificity: 75.6%). The fracture risk was 29 times higher when patients had CFI >3.17 and II ratio >3 (OR: 29.2 95% CI: 9.5-89.9, P < .001). ConclusionPatient-specific anatomical parameters are important predictors of a fracture-risk. A careful radiographic analysis would help identify those at a risk of early fracture using short stems, and alternative stem options should be considered.

Innovative Design Methodology for Patient-Specific Short Femoral Stems.

The biomechanical performance of hip prostheses is often suboptimal, which leads to problems such as strain shielding, bone resorption and implant loosening, affecting the long-term viability of these implants for articular repair. Different studies have highlighted the interest of short stems for preserving bone stock and minimizing shielding, hence providing an alternative to conventional hip prostheses with long stems. Such short stems are especially valuable for younger patients, as they may require additional surgical interventions and replacements in the future, for which the preservation of bone stock is fundamental. Arguably, enhanced results may be achieved by combining the benefits of short stems with the possibilities of personalization, which are now empowered by a wise combination of medical images, computer-aided design and engineering resources and automated manufacturing tools. In this study, an innovative design methodology for custom-made short femoral stems is presented. The design process is enhanced through a novel app employing elliptical adjustment for the quasi-automated CAD modeling of personalized short femoral stems. The proposed methodology is validated by completely developing two personalized short femoral stems, which are evaluated by combining in silico studies (finite element method (FEM) simulations), for quantifying their biomechanical performance, and rapid prototyping, for evaluating implantability.

Recurrent Treatment Failure in Vancouver Classification Type C Periprosthetic Fractures around a Well Fixed Short Femoral Stem: A Case Report

Recurrent Treatment Failure in Vancouver Classification Type C Periprosthetic Fractures around a Well Fixed Short Femoral Stem: A Case Report

Varus malalignment of short femoral stem not associated with post-hip arthroplasty fracture.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures are an increasingly common post-operative complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Though varus malalignment is known to increase fracture risk in standard-length femoral stems, varus malalignment is not as well studied in short stems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if varus malalignment contributes to early periprosthetic fracture risk in a cementless taper-wedged, short femoral stem. This retrospective review included 366 consecutive patients (441 THAs) having undergone THA via anterior approach by a single surgeon between July 2014 and December 2016. All patients received the same short, cementless femoral stem. Femoral component angle was measured on 6-week post-THA weight-bearing radiographs, with malalignment defined as a femoral component angle exceeding 0° ± 3°. Periprosthetic femoral fracture and aseptic loosening occurring within 2 years post-THA were recorded. The final data analysis included 426 hips with a mean follow-up time of 32.9 ± 10.2months. Varus and neutral alignment occurred in 84 (19.6%) and 342 (79.9%) of stems, respectively. Three (0.7%) periprosthetic femoral fractures occurred within 2 years, all occurring in patients with neutrally aligned femoral stems. One (0.2%) stem failed due to aseptic loosening and was malaligned. Despite nearly 20% of stems placed in varus alignment, three of the four early complications occurred in a neutrally aligned stem. Based on these results, forceful intraoperative realignment of a short femoral stem with good initial fixation may present an unnecessary increased risk of intraoperative fracture.