Source: Clegg HW, Ryan AG, Dallas SD, et al. Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with once-daily compared with twice-daily amoxicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:761–767; doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000235678.46805.92Investigators from several Charlotte, NC institutions and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, non-inferiority trial comparing once-daily (1xd) with twice-daily (2xd) amoxicillin for the treatment of group A ß-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. Patients with a positive rapid GABHS test were stratified by weight and then randomly assigned to receive either 1xd amoxicillin (750 mg if <40 kg, 1000mg if ≥40 mg) or 2xd amoxicillin (375 mg 2xd if <40 kg, 500 mg 2xd if ≥40 mg) for 10 days. Of 652 patients enrolled and randomized, 590 (90%) were evaluable: 294 in the 1xd and 296 in the 2xd group. Of the 62 patients not evaluated, 45 were excluded because they did not follow up, 11 for negative cultures following a positive rapid streptococcal test, 3 because they did not take medication, and 3 who were enrolled twice and only had their first enrollment included.At visit 2 (14 to 21 days post-therapy), bacteriologic failure rates were similar between the 1xd treatment group (20.1%) and the 2xd group (15.5%, difference non-significant). The clinical recurrence rate was also comparable for the 2 treatment groups at visit 2 (9.2% 1xd vs 7.1% 2xd). At visit 3 (28 to 35 days post-therapy) the bacteriologic failure rate was significantly higher in the 2xd group (7.1% vs 2.8%). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the 2 treatment groups (gastrointestinal symptoms being most common). This study, along with previous studies,1,2 shows that 1xd amoxicillin is not inferior to 2xd amoxicillin for the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis despite the failure rate observed.Dr. Rathore has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of a commercial product/device. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.The purpose of antimicrobial therapy for GABHS pharyngitis is both for the treatment of the acute illness and for prevention of non-suppurative post-streptococcal complications.3 Dependable rapid diagnosis has made immediate treatment of GABHS pharyngitis easier, but adherence to the antibiotic regimen may be problematic. Treatment with injectable depot penicillin is the best option to assure adherence and the only one shown to decrease non-suppurative complications of GABHS pharyngitis.4 However, the intramuscular route is frequently not acceptable to patients, parents, or physicians. Oral treatment regimens for GABHS pharyngitis have improved with time. Over the years we have decreased the frequency of daily antibiotic administration from 4 times a day to twice a day for treatment of GABHS pharyngitis.5Our ability to generalize the results of this study is limited because the patients were overwhelmingly white. Despite this limitation, the findings of this preliminary study will be welcome news for many pediatricians and parents. The next steps will be to replicate the study in other population groups and then go on to test the dogma that 10 days of antibiotic therapy are necessary for treatment of GABHS. Previous investigations have shown that the pharynx is sterile within 24 hours of antibiotic treatment for GABHS pharyngitis.6 It may be that a 5- or 7-day treatment course, or perhaps an even shorter one, would be just as effective as a 10-day course. While 1xd amoxicillin should increase adherence to treatment, a shorter course of therapy, if effective, would improve adherence even more, and a single oral dose would be best of all.