Idealized bathymetries were subjected to idealized cyclones in order to measure the storm surge response to a range of shoals, under various storm conditions, for the purpose of informing the development of bathymetry thinning algorithms. Nine bathymetries were considered, including eight large, offshore shoals and a featureless reference domain. Six storm realizations (two different sizes/intensities and three different landfall directions) were used as meteorological forcing. Shoal influence on surge was examined over the entire continental shelf throughout the surge event. Quantification of shoal impact on surge was performed prior to landfall, near the time of peak surge, and during surge recession. Three elevation difference contours (1.0, 0.5, and −0.5 m) were used to quantify the spatial variation in surge caused by the shoals at the three times examined. Positive contours (1.0 and 0.5 m) were used to show that a shoal increased surge locally and the negative contour (−0.5 m) to show that a shoal decreased surge locally. The influences of three shoal parameters (depth below mean sea level (MSL), cross-shore width, and distance from shore) were isolated and examined to see which characteristics caused the shoals to alter surge.In many cases, the shoals did not have much effect on the surge response. Only 13% of the samples used to quantify shoal impact on surge indicated any shoal influence whatsoever, and the shoals did not alter maximum elevation within the threshold considered (Δη≥|±0.5m|) anywhere in the domain. However, analysis of the elevation difference contours revealed multiple types of shoal influence. The shoals increased surge when they reduced setdown in storms with offshore winds prior to landfall and when they delayed surge recession after all storms. The shoals decreased surge when they impeded shoreward flow, delaying the arrival of surge. In cases when the shoals altered surge, 95% of the impact was caused by Shallow features (0.5 m below MSL). Also, there appears to be a maximum area over which a shoal can influence surge. All changes in surge greater than the threshold of Δη≥|±0.5m| occurred over the shoal or approximately between the shoal and the shore.The implications of our results for bathymetry thinning follow: In general, offshore shoals do not need to be resolved in bathymetry data sets used in surge modeling, especially if their impact on maximum elevation is the primary concern. Since a shoal's depth below MSL was an excellent indicator of whether it would impact storm surge, we recommend that feature depth below MSL be used as a bathymetry thinning criterion. Finally, a feature's maximum area of influence could be a useful property for determining whether it should be retained in a bathymetry dataset – if one's area of interest is outside of a feature's area of influence, the feature could be omitted regardless of its impact on surge.
Read full abstract