Isotactic polypropylene (iPP) has good comprehensive properties, viz. easy processing, high heat resistance, and good stiffness, etc., and in turn is widely used as a commodity plastic. However, under conventional processing conditions, iPP crystallizes into sizable spherulites with few tie molecules between spherulites. With such a crystalline texture, iPP exhibits very low impact toughness, especially at lower temperature, which restricts its more extensive application. Therefore, toughening of iPP has always been an open research. Up to now, four routes have been taken to improve impact strength of iPP, including copolymerizing with other olefin monomers, blending with rubber or thermoplastic elastomer, compounding with organic or inorganic fillers (e.g., nanoparticles), and adding β-nucleating agent. Without doubt, the modified iPP, more or less, increases its toughness. The enhancement of toughness is, unfortunately, at sacrifice of other properties, e.g., strength, heat resistance, etc. There are extremely few successful examples for simultaneously efficiently reinforcing and toughening iPP. It has been well established that for iPP oriented crystals (i.e., shish-kebabs) can bring out notable reinforcement on iPP, while β-form crystals of iPP can greatly increase its toughness. Flow (shear, elongational, or mixed) would induce formation of shish-kebabs whose content is governed to shear rate, shear duration, and molecular species and weight, etc. On the other hand, β-form crystals can be high production generated by addition of β-nucleating agent under quiescent conditions. This type of iPP crystals causes high toughness due to the β-R polymorphous transition and the loose structure of β-form crystals compared with R-crystals in favor of absorbing impact energy. Naturally, an idea arises that combination of flow-induced molecular orientation crystallization and β-nucleant-induced β-form crystals produces efficient reinforcement and toughening on iPP. However, as a matter of fact, there is not any example of it in the open literature. Themajor reason is that the coexistence of a β-nucleating agent and a shear flow at above a certain but low level of shear rate depresses β-form nucleation. Huo et al. performed a delicate study on iPP crystallization with β-nucleating agent and observed that as the shear rate rises, the content of β crystals constantly reduces, more greatly for higher nucleating agent content, showing counteraction between shear and β-nucleating agent for β-form formation. Apparently, it is a great practical challenge to prepare iPP parts withhighmolecular orientation and highβ-crystal proportion for the purpose of both strength and toughness enhancement. In the present work, we attempt to fabricate iPP with considerably increased strength and toughness, for the first time, utilizing the counteraction of shear-induced orientation crystallization and β-nucleating agent on β-form nucleation. The crystallization process of iPP is manipulated by two stages: one is flow-induced crystallization for high molecular orientation, and the other is β-nucleating-agent-induced nucleation for highβ-crystal content. More specifically, the oscillation shear supplied by an oscillation shear injectionmolding (OSIM) (its detailed definition is included in the Experimental Section) is imposed on β-nucleated iPP melt in the mold during injection molding. Initially, due to occurrence of shear flow and β-nucleating agent, β-form formation is restrained; thereby, the oriented R-crystals first form in the skin and intermediate layers of the sample.When the gate of the mold freezes, the shear ceases, and hereby, β-nucleating agent revives. The remainder of iPP melt in the core layer undergoes β-nucleation-induced crystallization. The results demonstrate that a large amount of shish-kebab structure appears in the surface and intermediate layers of the sample; at the same time, numerous β-form crystals form in the core layer, thus leading to prominent reinforcement and toughening for iPP.