You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD36-02 A COMPOSITE BIOMARKER APPROACH TO SPARE NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN SELECT MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER PATIENTS Joep De Jong, A. Gordon Robertson, Nick Beije, John Martens, Ellen Zwarthoff, Arno Van Leenders, Ewan Gibb, and Joost Boormans Joep De JongJoep De Jong More articles by this author , A. Gordon RobertsonA. Gordon Robertson More articles by this author , Nick BeijeNick Beije More articles by this author , John MartensJohn Martens More articles by this author , Ellen ZwarthoffEllen Zwarthoff More articles by this author , Arno Van LeendersArno Van Leenders More articles by this author , Ewan GibbEwan Gibb More articles by this author , and Joost BoormansJoost Boormans More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003334.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, NAC prior to radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with treatment-related toxicity and confers a modest survival benefit. Here, we aimed to identify MIBC patients who may avoid NAC by combining circulating tumor cell status and molecular subtypes in a composite biomarker approach. METHODS: TURBT tissue specimen were collected from clinical stage T2-T4aN0-N1M0 MIBC cases that were included within the CirGuidance study (NL3954), a prospective trial that analyzed circulating tumor cell (CTC) status in a patient’s blood sample using the CELLSEARCH system. For the present study, transcriptome-wide expression profiling was performed on 234 TURBT samples using an array-based approach. Molecular subtypes, long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) based FGFR3+ status and gene signatures were determined as described previously (de Jong et al., Genome Med. 2019). The primary endpoint of this study was cancer-specific mortality (CSM), calculated as the date of study inclusion till date of bladder cancer related death. Median follow-up was 28.8 (IQR: 16.6-40.2) months. RESULTS: Of 234 patients, 21 (9%) were treated with NAC and RC, while 213 (91%) received RC alone. A CTC-negative status was observed in 172 (81%) of RC-only cases. Molecular subtyping identified 28 luminal FGFR3+ cases with high FGFR3, SHH and p53 pathway activity, and lower EMT hallmark scores. Adjusting for clinical risk factors, both CTC and FGFR3+ status were significant predictors for cancer specific mortality on MVA (p<0.05). Of interest, the subgroup of FGFR3+ cases that were CTC-negative (N=26) showed most favorable outcomes with only one CSM event after a median of 33.4 (IQR: 24.8-44.5) months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Using a composite biomarker approach of blood-based CTC status and molecular subtyping, we identified a biologically distinct subgroup of MIBC with favorable prognosis after RC-only, validating the performance of a previously developed lncRNA based FGFR3+ classifier. Clinical trials which withhold NAC from CTC-negative, FGFR3+ MIBC patients are warranted. Source of Funding: Gene expression profiles were generated using the Decipher Bladder assay © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e980 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Joep De Jong More articles by this author A. Gordon Robertson More articles by this author Nick Beije More articles by this author John Martens More articles by this author Ellen Zwarthoff More articles by this author Arno Van Leenders More articles by this author Ewan Gibb More articles by this author Joost Boormans More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...