ABSTRACT Introduction In this paper, we explore how individuals experiencing homelessness decide whether or not to use the available shelters in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. From a rational choice perspective, we explored the justifications of individuals who opt out of the shelter system. Method We conducted a thematic analysis of data gathered from six focus groups with 44 participants (16 women and 28 men). Result Almost all of the focus group participants had sought access to the shelter on one or more occasions. All focus group participants stated they would use the shelters if they were accessible, safe, and clean. Most participants asserted that the shelter lacked enough beds, did not provide needed services, and was unsafe and unsanitary. Negative experiences at the shelter also influenced their decisions, especially disrespectful or abusive treatment by shelter staff or the perception that the shelter's policies were unreasonable. They proposed better choices, such as camping sites or tiny houses. Conclusion Focus group participants recognized that these changes to the shelter system or access to other choices must happen through the local government and asserted that they needed community members to advocate for them.