Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score Research Articles

Effectiveness of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Emotional Blunting in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Experiencing Inadequate Response to SSRI/SNRI Monotherapy in Spain: Results from the COMPLETE Study.

The multinational, open-label COMPLETE study (NCT03835715) investigated the effectiveness of vortioxetine in alleviating emotional blunting in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) experiencing inadequate response and emotional blunting while being treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). This paper presents results for the subgroup of patients enrolled in Spain. Patients with MDD (n = 67) experiencing partial response and emotional blunting during monotherapy with an SSRI or SNRI were switched to vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The primary study outcome was emotional blunting, assessed by the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ). After 8 weeks of vortioxetine, the mean (SE) change in ODQ total score from baseline was -26.0 (2.9) (P < 0.001). Respective changes in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Motivation and Energy Inventory, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores were -14.9 (0.8), +34.2 (4.5), +6.3 (1.6), and ‒9.0 (1.3) (all P < 0.001 vs baseline). At week 8, 70.4% of patients no longer reported emotional blunting and 53.7% had achieved remission from their depressive symptoms (defined as a MADRS total score ≤10). Mediation analysis showed 77.1% of the change in SDS total score to be a direct effect of the improvement in ODQ total score after switching to vortioxetine. Adverse events were reported by 35 patients (52.2%), most commonly nausea (14 patients, 20.9%). At week 8, 33/54 patients (61.1%) were receiving vortioxetine 20 mg/day. In this study investigating the effectiveness of vortioxetine in Spanish patients with MDD who experienced inadequate response and emotional blunting on SSRI/SNRI monotherapy, significant improvements in emotional blunting, core depressive symptoms (including anhedonia), sleep duration, motivation and energy, cognitive performance, and overall patient functioning were observed during the 8 weeks of treatment. Two-thirds of patients no longer reported emotional blunting and over half were in remission from their depressive symptoms at week 8.

Cognitive–behavioral therapy for patients with somatoform disorders: A pilot preliminary randomized controlled trial

Background and objective: Cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) for somatoform disorders (SFDs) is understudied in China. Western findings may not be applicable to Chinese culture. This preliminary study evaluated the efficacy of CBT for patients in China, relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU). Methods: Seventy patients with SFDs randomly received either combined CBT and TAU (CBT + TAU), or TAU alone between January 2018 to May 2019. The CBT + TAU group received 12 weekly individual 50-minute CBT sessions. Participants were blindly assessed at 4 timepoints (baseline, week 6, end of treatment: week 12; 12 weeks post-treatment: week 24) using the following outcome measures: SQSS (Self-screening Questionnaire for Somatic Symptoms); PHQ-15 (Patient-Health-Questionnaire-15) and the WI (Whiteley Index); GAD-7 (General Anxiety Disorder-7); HAMD-17 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17); Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS); Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); and the Short Form of Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF). The primary endpoint was the difference between the SQSS total score at week 24 and the baseline. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze inter- and intra-group changes from the baseline. Results: At week 24, The least-squares mean (LSM) change of the total score on the SQSS was −18.87 points and −9.69 points, respectively in the CBT + TAU group and in the TAU group (LSM difference, −9.18 points; 95% confidence interval, −15.72 to −2.64; P = 0.0068). At week 24, the LSM changes from baseline in the WI, HAMD, PHQ15, FBIS and SDS total scores were significantly different between the two groups, however, there was no significant difference in the Q-LES-Q-SF. The SQSS of group effect sizes were 0.63 at 24 weeks. The dropout rates of the CBT + TAU and TAU groups were comparable (22.9% and 19.3%). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that CBT may be helpful for improving the symptoms of patients with SFDs in China.

Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Working Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in China: A Subgroup Analysis of the RELIEVE China Study.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) causes significant functional impairments that impact on all aspects of patients' daily lives, including their ability to work, work productivity, and social life. To assess the real-world effectiveness of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine in working patients with MDD in China. RELIEVE China was an observational, prospective cohort study. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine in routine clinical practice settings were followed for 24 weeks. In this subgroup analysis, functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients in full- or part-time work or education at baseline who remained on treatment at all follow-up visits (n=424). Depressive, cognitive, and anxiety symptoms were also assessed. For all endpoints, mean change from baseline at weeks 8 and 24 was analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures. Clinically relevant and sustained improvements in patient functioning and measures of work productivity were observed over the 24 weeks of vortioxetine treatment. The adjusted mean (standard error) reduction in SDS total score from baseline was 5.4 (0.3) points at week 8 and 8.7 (0.3) points at week 24 (both P<0.001 vs baseline). Significant improvements were observed across all SDS domains and in levels of absenteeism and presenteeism (P<0.001 vs baseline for all endpoints at both time points). Significant improvements in depressive, cognitive, and anxiety symptoms were also observed over the study period (all P<0.001 vs baseline). The proportion of patients in remission (ie, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≤7) after 24 weeks of vortioxetine treatment was 65.4%. Vortioxetine was well tolerated; nausea was the most common adverse event, reported by 18.6% of patients. These findings support the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine in working patients with MDD receiving treatment in routine clinical practice settings in China.

Εfficacy and safety of vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and a meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Vortioxetine is a novel drug for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). It has been reported that vortioxetine exhibits positive effect on the acute stage of MDD, while it can effectively prevent the recurrence of MDD during the maintenance period. Currently, the results of systematic reviews on vortioxetine are insufficient since several efficacy measures, such as the 24-Items Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HADRS-24) total score and other safety factors have not been evaluated. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of vortioxetine on the treatment of adult patients with MDD via assessing more efficacy and safety indicators. The clinical, double-blind, parallel and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of vortioxetine on MDD were retrieved from PubMed\Medline, EBSCO, Embase, Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Science and clinical trial registration websites from database inception to November 2022. A total of two investigators independently screened the included references and independently evaluated their quality. The meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.0 software. The present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42018106343). In the present study 11 RCTs were included, with a total of 4,908 adult patients with MDD. More specifically, 1,158 patients were included in the 5-mg vortioxetine group, 736 in the 10-mg group, 298 in the 15-mg group, 864 in the 20-mg group and 1,852 in the placebo group. All 11 studies were randomized, double-blinded and parallel control trials, and all publications were evaluated as high quality. The meta-analysis results showed that patients in the 5-, 10- and 20-mg vortioxetine groups exhibited significantly higher Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) response (≥50%) and remission (≤10%) rates compared with the placebo group (P<0.05). The pooled analysis also revealed a statistically significant change in the total score of HADRS-24, MADRS, Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) and HADRS-24 response rate in the 10- and 20-mg vortioxetine groups compared with the placebo group (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant changes in the total score of HADRS-24, MADRS, SDS, CGI-I and HADRS-24 response rate were obtained in the 5-mg group compared with the placebo group (P>0.05). Furthermore, the most common adverse events were nausea, hyperhidrosis, insomnia and vomiting, the incidence of which was increased with higher doses of vortioxetine. Overall, the results suggested that vortioxetine administration at doses of 5-20 mg was significantly effective and safe compared with placebo in the treatment of MDD. However, 5 mg vortioxetine displayed no difference in the HADRS-24, MADRS, SDS and CGI-I total scores, and HADRS-24 response rate. Furthermore, patient treatment with increasing vortioxetine doses was associated with good tolerance and high safety. Nevertheless, more multi-center, high-quality and long-term RCTs are still needed to support the aforementioned findings.

Assessment of health-related quality of life and health status in patients with treatment-resistant depression treated with esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant

BackgroundPatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) report significant deficits in physical and mental health, as well as severely impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functioning. Esketamine effectively enhances the daily functioning in these patients while also improving their depressive symptoms. This study assessed HRQoL and health status of patients with TRD, who were treated with esketamine nasal spray and an oral antidepressant (ESK + AD) vs. placebo nasal spray and an AD (AD + PBO).MethodsData from TRANSFORM-2, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, short-term flexibly dosed study, were analyzed. Patients (aged 18–64 years) with TRD were included. The outcome assessments included the European Quality of Life Group, Five Dimension, Five Level (EQ-5D-5L), EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). The health status index (HSI) was calculated using EQ-5D-5L scores.ResultsThe full analysis set included 223 patients (ESK + AD: 114; AD + PBO: 109; mean [SD] age: 45.7 [11.89]). At Day 28, a lower percentage of patients reported impairment in the ESK + AD vs. AD + PBO group in all five EQ-5D-5L dimensions: mobility (10.6% vs. 25.0%), self-care (13.5% vs. 32.0%), usual activities (51.9% vs. 72.0%), pain/discomfort (35.6% vs. 54.0%), and anxiety/depression (69.2% vs. 78.0%). The mean (SD) change from baseline in HSI at Day 28 was 0.310 (0.219) for ESK + AD and 0.235 (0.252) for AD + PBO, with a higher score reflecting better levels of health. The mean (SD) change from baseline in EQ-VAS score at Day 28 was greater in ESK + AD (31.1 [25.67]) vs. AD + PBO (22.1 [26.43]). The mean (SD) change in the SDS total score from baseline to Day 28 also favored ESK + AD (-13.6 [8.31]) vs. AD + PBO (-9.4 [8.43]).ConclusionsGreater improvements in HRQoL and health status were observed among patients with TRD treated with ESK + AD vs. AD + PBO.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02418585.

Impact of possible tardive dyskinesia on physical wellness and social functioning: results from the real-world RE-KINECT study

BackgroundTardive dyskinesia (TD) is a persistent and potentially disabling movement disorder associated with antipsychotic use. Data from RE-KINECT, a real-world study of antipsychotic-treated outpatients, were analyzed to assess the effects of possible TD on patient health and social functioning.MethodsAnalyses were conducted in Cohort 1 (patients with no abnormal involuntary movements) and Cohort 2 (patients with possible TD per clinician judgment). Assessments included: EuroQoL’s EQ-5D-5L utility (health); Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score (social functioning); patient- and clinician-rated severity of possible TD (“none”, “some”, “a lot”); and patient-rated impact of possible TD (“none”, “some”, “a lot”). Regression models were used to analyze the following: associations between higher (worse) severity/impact scores and lower (worse) EQ-5D-5L utility (indicated by negative regression coefficients); and associations between higher (worse) severity/impact scores and higher (worse) SDS total score (indicated by positive regression coefficients).ResultsIn Cohort 2 patients who were aware of their abnormal movements, patient-rated TD impact was highly and significantly associated with EQ-5D-5L utility (regression coefficient: − 0.023, P < 0.001) and SDS total score (1.027, P < 0.001). Patient-rated severity was also significantly associated with EQ-5D-5L utility (− 0.028, P < 0.05). Clinician-rated severity was moderately associated with both EQ-5D-5L and SDS, but these associations were not statistically significant.ConclusionsPatients were consistent in evaluating the impacts of possible TD on their lives, whether based on subjective ratings (“none”, “some”, “a lot”) or standardized instruments (EQ-5D-5L, SDS). Clinician-rated severity of TD may not always correlate with patient perceptions of the significance of TD.

Vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and high levels of anxiety symptoms: An updated analysis of efficacy and tolerability

BackgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) often experience comorbid anxiety symptoms. Vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating anxiety symptoms in patients with MDD; however, efficacy and tolerability have not been assessed across the entire approved dosage range. MethodsThe efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine 5–20 mg/day were assessed in patients with MDD and high levels of anxiety symptoms (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] total score ≥ 20) using pooled data from four randomized, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled studies (n = 842). Data from a randomized, double-blind study of vortioxetine 10–20 mg/day versus agomelatine 25–50 mg/day in patients with an inadequate response to prior therapy (n = 299) were analyzed separately. Mean changes from baseline in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), HAM-A, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores were analyzed by vortioxetine dosage. ResultsThe pooled analysis of fixed-dose studies demonstrated a clear dose–response relationship for vortioxetine 5–20 mg/day for improvements in MADRS, HAM-A, and SDS total scores. Vortioxetine 20 mg/day demonstrated significant effects versus placebo from week 4 onwards. In the post-hoc analysis of the active-controlled study in patients with an inadequate response to prior therapy, vortioxetine 10–20 mg/day was superior to agomelatine across all outcome measures from week 4 onwards. Up-titration of vortioxetine to 20 mg/day was not associated with an increase in adverse events. LimitationsShort-term trials. ConclusionsVortioxetine is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with MDD and high levels of anxiety symptoms, including those with an inadequate response to prior therapy. The greatest therapeutic benefits were observed with vortioxetine 20 mg/day. Trial registrationNCT01140906, NCT01153009, NCT01163266, NCT01255787, NCT01488071.

Effectiveness of vortioxetine for major depressive disorder in real-world clinical practice: US cohort results from the global RELIEVE study.

Effective treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) involves addressing both depressive and functional symptoms, increasing patients' overall sense of well-being and quality of life (QoL). RELIEVE was an international observational, prospective study in patients ≥18 years with a current diagnosis of a major depressive episode (MDE) initiating vortioxetine in routine clinical practice; outcomes for the cohort of participants from the United States are presented here. Functioning was assessed at weeks 12 and 24 versus baseline using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Secondary effectiveness analyses assessed changes from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in functioning, depression severity, cognitive symptoms, sexual function, and QoL. 244 participants had an average of 8.2 previous MDEs; mean duration of their current MDE at baseline was 93.5 weeks. Vortioxetine was used as second- or later-line treatment for 80.5% of participants. Least-squares mean (SE) SDS total score significantly decreased from baseline by 7.19 (0.52) points at week 12 and 8.19 (0.56) points at week 24 (p < 0.0001 for both). Significant improvements were also reflected across SDS subscores, depression severity, cognitive function, sexual function, and QoL. Healthcare resource utilization and productivity parameters also improved. Adverse events were observed in 21.8% of patients, with nausea being the most common (7.3%). This real-world study demonstrated improvements in functioning, depressive symptoms, and cognitive function in patients with MDD treated with vortioxetine in routine clinical practice in the cohort of patients enrolled in the United States. Outcomes were consistent with the efficacy and safety profile of vortioxetine in randomized controlled trials.

Changes and Prediction of Social Functional Disability and Quality of Life in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder over the Course of 1-Year Medication

To investigate the changes in social function impairment and quality of life and their predictive factors in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) over the course of 1-year drug treatment. A total of 54 MDD patients were enrolled for the study. The 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17, hereafter referred to simply as HAMD), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) were used to evaluate depressive symptoms, social functioning, and quality of life, respectively, at baseline (0), as well as 1 month (1 m), 2 months (2 m), 3 months (3 m), 6 months (6 m), 9 months (9 m), and 12 months (12 m) after medication started. The symptoms and the recovery of social function at different time points was analyzed, and correlation analysis and regression analysis were done to explore the influencing factors of functional recovery. Among the 54 MDD patients, 27 completed the 12-month follow-up, and 2 patients relapsed at 12 m. The total baseline score of SDS (SDS 0) in MDD patients was higher than that in healthy controls ( t=12.161, P<0.001), and the baseline score of Q-LES-Q-SF (Q-LES-Q-SF 0) was lower than that in the controls ( t=12.260, P<0.001). Comparison of the HAMD score, SDS total score and the factor scores, and Q-LES-Q-SF total scores of the MDD patients at different time points showed significant differences, presenting an F value of 65.987, 28.944, 23.589, 27.070 and 28.668, respectively (all P<0.001). HAMD 0 was negatively correlated with age. The HAMD score was positively correlated with SDS score of the same time point and negatively correlated with Q-LES-Q-SF score of the same time point. At 3 m, the change in HAMD score (HAMD 3 m-0) was positively correlated with the change in SDS score (SDS 3 m-0) and negatively correlated with the change in Q-LES-Q-SF score (Q-LES-Q 3 m-0). At 12 m, the change in HAMD score (HAMD 12 m-0) was positively correlated with the change in SDS score (SDS 12 m-0) and negatively correlated with the change in Q-LES-Q-SF score (Q-LES-Q 12 m-0). Regression analysis revealed that SDS 0 and Q-LES-Q 0 could be used to predict SDS 3 m-0, R 2=0.391, while SDS 0 and full-time employment status could be used to predict SDS 12 m-0, R 2=0.640. Q-LES-Q 0 could be used to predict Q-LES-Q 3 m-0, R 2=0.294, while Q-LES-Q 0 and full-time employment status could be used to predict Q-LES-Q 12 m-0, R 2=0.591. Long-term regular medication can improve social dysfunction in patients with MDD and symptom relief is the basis for improvement of social function level and quality of life, while increasing employment saturability to some extent may help improve the long-term social function and quality of life.

Real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine in outpatients with major depressive disorder: functioning and dose effects

BackgroundFunctional recovery is an important treatment goal in major depressive disorder (MDD). This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with MDD, with particular focus on functioning; dose–response was also assessed.MethodsThis was a non-interventional, prospective, multicenter study conducted in Greece. Adult outpatients with MDD (n = 336) initiating vortioxetine (5–20 mg/day flexible dosing) as treatment for a current major depressive episode were followed for 3 months. Analyses were stratified according to vortioxetine dosage at 3 months: 5–10 mg/day versus 15–20 mg/day. Functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).ResultsMean ± standard error SDS total score decreased (improved) from 18.7 ± 0.3 at baseline to 12.9 ± 0.3 after 1 month of vortioxetine treatment and 7.8 ± 0.4 after 3 months (p < 0.001 vs. baseline for all comparisons). Functional recovery (SDS score ≤ 6) was achieved in 14.6% of patients after 1 month of treatment and 48.4% of patients after 3 months. Improvement from baseline in SDS total and domain scores at 3 months was more pronounced in patients receiving vortioxetine 15–20 mg/day than in those receiving vortioxetine 5–10 mg/day. The mean ± standard error change in SDS total score from baseline was 9.2 ± 0.8 in the 5–10 mg/day group and 12.1 ± 0.4 in the 15–20 mg/day group (p < 0.001). Limitations of this study include its non-interventional study design and lack of a control group or active comparator.ConclusionsStatistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in functioning were seen in patients with MDD treated with vortioxetine in a real-world setting. Higher doses of vortioxetine were associated with significantly greater improvements in functioning.

Effectiveness and Safety of Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: Results from the Single-Arm RELIEVE China Study

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) affects >163 million people worldwide and is a leading cause of disability in China. Functional impairment occurs alongside cognitive symptoms, anxiety, and depression, reducing quality of life and productivity in patients with MDD.PurposeThe multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in relieving depressive and functional symptoms of MDD in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RELIEVE China study aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine in China.Patients and MethodsThis was an observational, prospective cohort study in patients with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine at physician’s discretion in China. Participants were followed up for 24 weeks and assessed at 3 time points: baseline, week 8, and week 24. The primary objective was to assess the change from baseline to weeks 8 and 24 in functional impairment as measured by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score. Additional assessments included SDS subdomains, measures of depression severity, anxiety, and cognition. The safety and tolerability of vortioxetine were also examined.ResultsIn total, 859 patients were included in the analysis. A consistent and significant improvement in functional impairment was observed during the study, with baseline mean SDS total score (16.7 points) decreasing by 5.42 (SE, 0.22) and 8.71 (SE, 0.226) points at week 8 and week 24, respectively (P<0.0001). Improvements in other functioning, cognitive, and anxiety assessments were also observed (all P<0.0001). A total of 74.7% of patients had responded, and 63.9% had reached remission at week 24. The tolerability profile of vortioxetine in this real-world population was consistent with the established tolerability profile for this drug.ConclusionThis study demonstrated the short- and long-term effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine for patients with MDD in a real-world setting in China. These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profile observed during RCTs.

Association between baseline cognitive symptoms and the subsequent presenteeism and global function in patients with major depressive disorder

Cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) contribute to impaired functional abilities and work productivity, particularly presenteeism. We investigated the association between baseline cognitive symptoms and subsequent presenteeism, and global functional impairment in Japanese patients with MDD from PERFORM-J (Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder in Japan) – a 6-month, multicenter, epidemiological study data. A total of 518 patients initiating antidepressant monotherapy (first-line or switched from another drug) were enrolled. Assessments include Perceived Deficits Questionnaire – Depression (PDQ-D) for cognitive complaints, Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) for global function (analysed n = 318), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for presenteeism (analysed n = 122). A strong association between changes in presenteeism and changes in SDS scores (r: total = 0.636; work/school = 0.686) was observed. After adjusting for sociodemographic and MDD-related factors, patients without cognitive complaints at baseline showed lower odds of impaired presenteeism at 6 months versus patients with cognitive complaints (0.243, 95% CI: 0.079 to 0.747, p = 0.014) and also in patients with first episode of MDD against with recurrent MDD (0.327 (95% CI: 0.136 to 0.787). Similarly, patients without cognitive complaints had healthier global functioning (lower mean SDS total score) than patients with cognitive complaints (8.3 vs 11.2; 95% CI, −5.189 to −0.578; p = 0.014). First depressive episode (lower risk of presenteeism), being male, and low baseline SDS total score (better global functioning) were also associated with improved outcomes. These results highlight the potential value of baseline PDQ-D scores in predicting subsequent workplace and global functioning in patients undergoing treatment for MDD.

The effectiveness of repeated intravenous ketamine on subjective and objective psychosocial function in patients with treatment-resistant depression and suicidal ideation

BackgroundKetamine has rapid and robust antidepressant effects in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), while its effects on functional outcomes have not been sufficiently evaluated. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ketamine treatment on both subjective and objective functioning, and to explore whether improvements in depressive symptom and cognition mediated changes in functioning. MethodsAdults (n=111) with TRD and/or suicidality received six infusions of ketamine (0.5mg/kg, thrice-weekly). Depression symptoms were assessed with the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline, day 13 and day 26. Cognitive domains, including processing speed, working memory, visual learning and verbal learning were measured with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and subjective and objective functioning were measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) at the same time-points. ResultsSignificant improvement was observed in SDS total score (effect size [ES]=-1.563) and GAF score (ES=1.700) during the 26-day observation. Results from path analysis indicated that reductions of the total MADRS score and improvements in processing speed aggregately significantly mediated the reductions of SDS total score (total indirect effect coef=-3.993, 95%CI [-4.9, -3.2], direct effect coef=-1.374, 95%CI [-2.4, -0.4]) as well as the increases of GAF score (total indirect effect coef=6.022, 95%CI [4.5, 7.8], direct effect coef=3.987, 95%CI [2.1, 5.8]). ConclusionSix infusions of ketamine was associated with improvements in functional outcomes in adults with TRD and/or suicidality. Depressive symptoms severity and processing speed performance were significant partial mediators of objective and subjective functioning improvements.

The Relationship Between Cognitive Dysfunction Through THINC-Integrated Tool (THINC-it) and Psychosocial Function in Chinese Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Background: Herein, we validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it) as a screening tool for cognitive deficits in patients with major depressive disorder. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether cognitive deficits as detected by the THINC-it tool in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) are associated with workplace productivity and/or psychosocial function.Methods: Subjects aged 18–65 (n = 91) with MDD were evaluated and compared to age-, sex- and education- matched healthy controls (n = 95). Symptoms of cognitive dysfunction, workplace productivity, and psychosocial function were measured using the THINC-it tool, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP).Results: There were significant differences in THINC-it scores (p < 0.01), the average of HAMD total score (p < 0.01) and all aspects of SDS (p < 0.01) between two groups. There were significant differences in the four aspects of WPAI between the two groups in the employed status (p <0.01). THINC-it subjective cognition and SDS total score, SDS work/school, SDS social, SDS family showed significantly correlation (r ranging from 0.255 to 0.386, p <0.01). SDS and THINC-it Objective cognition, THINC-it comprehensive cognition were no correlation between two groups. HAMD total score and SDS total score, SDS social, SDS family showed significantly correlation (r ranging

PMH42 Early Improvements in Functioning and Quality of Life with AXS-05 in Major Depressive Disorder: Resultsfrom the GEMINI Trial

With existing therapies for major depressive disorder (MDD), improvements in functioning and quality of life, often trail behind depressive symptom improvement. AXS-05 (dextromethorphan-bupropion modulated delivery tablet) is a novel, oral, investigational NMDA receptor antagonist with multimodal activity being developed for MDD. Herein, we report the effects of AXS-05 on humanistic outcomes during the first 2-weeks of treatment. GEMINI (N=327) was a Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study, in which subjects with moderate-severe MDD were randomized (1:1) to receive AXS-05 (dextromethorphan HBr 45 mg-bupropion HCl 105 mg) or placebo, twice daily for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome, change from baseline in MADRS total score, demonstrated a rapid and statistically significant improvement starting at Week 1, which was maintained through Week 6 (primary timepoint). Starting at Week 1, secondary endpoints including the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were assessed. The Q-LES-Q-SF is a self-reported, 16-item scale. Scores are expressed as the percentage of maximum score, with higher percentages reflecting better quality of life. The SDS is a 3-item questionnaire evaluating impairments in work, social life/leisure, and family life/home responsibility. Improvements from baseline were statistically significant for AXS-05 versus placebo on the Q-LES-Q-SF at Week 1 (9.04% and 5.79%, respectively, p=0.031), the first timepoint measured, Week 2 (13.2% and 8.88%, respectively, p= 0.017) and at every time point thereafter. On the SDS total score, improvements from baseline were statistically significant for AXS-05 versus placebo beginning at Week 2 (6.82 and. 4.47, respectively, p=0.003) and at every time point thereafter. AXS-05 improved depression and humanistic outcomes compared to placebo within 1-2 weeks of treatment. These improvements were maintained throughout the course of the study. These findings suggest that AXS-05, as a mechanistically novel medicine, rapidly improves depressive symptoms, quality of life, and functioning.

Effectiveness of vortioxetine in real-world clinical practice: Interim results from the relieve study

IntroductionVortioxetine has demonstrated sustained efficacy and favorable safety profile in multiple clinical trials.ObjectivesThis study aims to describe the effectiveness and safety of vortioxetine in real-world clinical practice.MethodsRELIEVE is a prospective, multi-national, observational cohort study of outpatients initiating vortioxetine treatment for MDD at physician’s discretion and followed for 6 months. Data were collected at routine clinical visits. The primary outcome was functioning measured by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Depressive symptoms measured by Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9), cognitive symptoms measured by PDQ-5 and DSST were key secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes including adverse events were reported. This interim analysis presents results of 527 patients who completed the study and were followed for 6 months. Mixed models of repeated measures were used to assess improvements between baseline and month 6, adjusted for relevant confounders.ResultsA total of 527 patients (mean age, 50.2 years, 65% female) were enrolled from US, Canada, France and Italy, and included in the analysis. Mean SDS total score, PHQ-9, PDQ-5 scores decreased by 8.6, 7.4 and 4.7 respectively from baseline to last visit. Mean DSST score improved by 6.5 from baseline to last visit. Patients’ overall functioning and quality of life significantly improved, sick leave days and underproductive days (both absenteeism and presenteeism) decreased over the entire follow up period. The overall incidence of adverse events(AE) was 25%, with the most common AEs being nausea and headache.ConclusionsThe results confirm the effectiveness and good tolerability of vortioxetine in a broad range of patients in routine clinical practice.Conflict of interestDr. Mattingly has served as researcher, consultant or speaker for Akili, Alcobra, Alkermes, Allergan, Axsome, Boehringer, Forum, Genentech, Jansen, Lundbeck, Medgenics, Merck, Neos, NLS Pharma, Otsuka, Reckitt Benckiser, Roche, Sage, Shire, Sunovion, Supe

Clinical validation of the Symptom Self-rating Scale for Schizophrenia (4S) among inpatients

Purpose Self-reports of psychosis-related symptoms may be a valuable supplement to clinician-ratings, but more validation studies are required. The aim of this study was to conduct clinical validation for the Symptom Self-rating Scale for Schizophrenia (4S) in an inpatient setting. Materials and methods Inpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were invited to participate in the study. The participants completed the 4S, the 5-item World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at two time points. Trained raters assessed participants using the 6-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6). The relationship between the 4S and PANSS-6, self-reported side effects, functioning and wellbeing was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho). Results Sixty-one participants completed the 4S at least once (yielding a total of 91 completed 4S questionnaires). The 4S total score was weakly correlated with the PANSS-6 total score (rho = 0.37, p < 0.001). The rho's for individual 4S and PANSS-6 subscales and item comparisons ranged from −0.24 (thought disorder) to 0.69 (hallucinations). Finally, the 4S hallucination subscale was also sensitive to change. The 4S was strongly inversely correlated with wellbeing (WHO-5) and moderately inversely correlated with functioning (SDS total score). Conclusion The 4S holds promise as a valid self-report of core schizophrenia symptoms among inpatients. While the hallucination subscale seems superior to existing scales, the thought disorder subscale needs to be re-developed.

Efficacy of Agomelatine 25-50mg for the Treatment of Anxious Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Three Placebo-Controlled Studies.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of agomelatine on anxious symptoms and functional impairment in a pooled dataset from randomized placebo-controlled trials for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).MethodsData from three randomized, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine 25–50 mg were pooled. The short-term (12 weeks) efficacy of agomelatine was assessed in regards to (1) anxious symptoms using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), and (2) functional impairment using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Meta-analysis using a random effect model was used to assess differences between groups. Remission and response rates for the HAM-A and SDS were calculated, and analyses were repeated in participants with more severe anxiety symptoms.ResultsIn total, 669 patients (340 on agomelatine; 329 on placebo) were included in the analyses. Compared to placebo, the agomelatine group had a significant reduction in HAM-A total score at week 12 (between group difference: 6.30 ± 2.51, p = 0.012). Significant effects were also found for symptom response on the HAM-A (67.1% of patients on agomelatine vs. 32.5% on placebo) and symptom remission (38.8% of patients on agomelatine vs. 17.3% on placebo). Compared to placebo, there was a significant difference in favour of the agomelatine group at week 12 on the SDS total score (5.11 ± 1.81, p = 0.005). Significant effects were also found for functional response on the SDS (79.1% of patients on agomelatine vs. 43.2% of placebo) and functional remission (55.2% of patients on agomelatine vs. 25.4% on placebo). All findings for anxious symptoms and functional impairment were confirmed in the subset of more severely anxious patients. Agomelatine was well tolerated by patients.ConclusionThis meta-analysis confirms that agomelatine reduces anxiety symptoms and improves the global functioning of GAD patients.Supplementary InformationThe online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01583-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Anhedonia: Results from a Pooled Analysis of Short-Term Studies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

PurposeAnhedonia is a core symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD), which has important functional consequences for the patient. This post hoc analysis investigated the relationship between anhedonia and functioning in patients with MDD treated with vortioxetine.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of all 11 short-term, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of vortioxetine (fixed dose, 5–20 mg/day) in patients with MDD which included Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) assessments. A short-term, randomized, active-controlled trial of flexible-dose treatment with vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day) versus agomelatine (25–50 mg/day) was also analyzed. Mean changes from baseline to study endpoint in MADRS total, MADRS anhedonia subscale, SDS total, and SDS social-functioning scores were analyzed by a mixed model for repeated measures. The relationship between treatment effects on anhedonia and functioning was investigated using path analysis.ResultsA total of 4988 patients with MDD were included in the placebo-controlled studies and 495 in the active-comparator study. Significant dose-dependent improvements in overall depressive symptoms, anhedonia, and measures of functioning were seen in vortioxetine-treated patients compared with those who received placebo or agomelatine. Results of the path analysis for the placebo-controlled studies suggested that the effect on functioning was mostly driven by the effect of treatment on MADRS anhedonia factors.ConclusionVortioxetine showed significant short-term efficacy against anhedonia in this large population of patients with MDD. In the placebo-controlled studies, improvements in functioning associated with vortioxetine appeared to be mostly driven by the effect of treatment on MADRS anhedonia factors.

Cognition and Its Association with Psychosocial and Occupational Functioning during Treatment with Escitalopram in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A CAN-BIND-1 Report: La Cognition Et Son Association Avec Le Fonctionnement Psychosocial Et Professionnel Durant Le Traitement Par Escitalopram Chez Des Patients Souffrant De Trouble Dépressif Majeur: Une Étude Can-Bind-1.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with impairments in both cognition and functioning. However, whether cognitive deficits significantly contribute to impaired psychosocial and occupational functioning, independent of other depressive symptoms, is not well established. We examined the relationship between cognitive performance and functioning in depressed patients before and after antidepressant treatment using secondary data from the first Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression-1 study. Cognition was assessed at baseline in unmedicated, depressed participants with MDD (n = 207) using the Central Nervous System Vital Signs computerized battery, psychosocial functioning with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and occupational functioning with the Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale (LEAPS). Cognition (n = 181), SDS (n = 175), and LEAPS (n = 118) were reassessed after participants received 8 weeks of open-label escitalopram monotherapy. A series of linear regressions were conducted to determine (1) whether cognitive functioning was associated with psychosocial and occupational functioning prior to treatment, after adjusting for overall depressive symptom severity and (2) whether changes in cognitive functioning after an 8-week treatment phase were associated with changes in psychosocial and occupational functioning, after adjusting for changes in overall symptom severity. Baseline global cognitive functioning, after adjusting for depression symptom severity and demographic variables, was associated with the SDS work/study subscale (β = -0.17; P = 0.03) and LEAPS productivity subscale (β = -0.17; P = 0.05), but not SDS total (β = 0.19; P = 0.12) or LEAPS total (β = 0.41; P = 0.17) scores. Although LEAPS and SDS scores showed significant improvements after 8 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001), there were no significant associations between changes in cognitive domain scores and functional improvements. Cognition was associated with occupational functioning at baseline, but changes in cognition were not associated with psychosocial or occupational functional improvements following escitalopram treatment. We recommend the use of more comprehensive functional assessments to determine the impact of cognitive change on functional outcomes in future research.