Shared Care Model Research Articles

Mission and Future Plans for the ADPKD Centers of Excellence Program.

The Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) Centers of Excellence Program, launched by the Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation in 2022, aims to bridge the gap in specialized care for individuals with ADPKD. This program seeks to enhance the availability of specialized clinicians and simplify the process for patients seeking expert care. It is founded on three pillars: improving care for all individuals with ADPKD, educating and empowering the community, and advancing PKD research. The program draws inspiration from successful models in other diseases, such as cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy, which have demonstrated the effectiveness of standardized care centers in improving patient outcomes. Patient and clinician stakeholder interviews have identified key areas where a national program could make a significant impact, including the need for a core care team with defined referral processes, mentorship and shared care models, patient navigation services, and education around expert consensus and care guidelines. The program introduces two designations: "Center of Excellence" and "Partner Clinic" to accommodate diverse care settings and enhance patient access to specialists. The Partner Clinic designation ensures that patients in smaller community practices have access to specialized care through mentorship and guidance from experts at Centers of Excellence. The program also emphasizes the importance of specialized services, especially in underserved communities experiencing health disparities, to manage the complexities of ADPKD care. Patient focus groups have highlighted the need for care navigation services, centralized sources of knowledge, and access to local care. The program aims to address these needs by providing a structured framework for care coordination, enhancing patient self-advocacy, and improving overall outcomes for individuals with ADPKD.

The role of primary care in hepatitis B elimination in the UK migrant context, a mixed-methods study

Background300 million individuals live with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), with consequences including cirrhosis and cancer. In the UK migrants are disproportionately affected. Many are unaware of their diagnosis and face barriers accessing services. The WHO has called for elimination by 2030. Primary care (PC) is ideally placed but poorly engaged and utilised in CHB care. This study aims to explore UK PC contribution and approaches to strengthen CHB care from migrant and PC perspectives. MethodsAn online survey (21 questions on CHB knowledge/practice/barriers/care delivery) was advertised to PC practitioners. In-depth views were explored through (i) PC focus groups, (ii) semi-structured interviews with migrants with CHB lived experience. Results were analysed to give descriptive statistics and qualitative data using reflexive-thematic analysis. Findings218 survey questionnaires, five PC focus-groups (n=16), and sixteen migrant participant interviews were completed. 63·5% of PC practitioners reported regularly seeing patients from high-prevalence countries but only 14·2% had screening policies and 80·3% were unaware of WHO targets. Barriers to CHB screening and management included knowledge, unstandardised pathways, workload, and stigma. 75·8% were under-confident interpreting results. Facilitators included simplified algorithms, specialist support, translated materials and peer-support. Almost 60% stated they would be comfortable with a CHB shared-care model with specialist oversight and funding. Contact-tracing, vaccination, and re-engaging those lost-to-care were identified improvement areas. Focus-groups reflected survey data, preliminary themes included potential of integrated care and empowerment of PC. Migrant participant interview data highlighted the impact of missed opportunities for CHB care on patient experience, importance of “making that first contact count” and sharing power and knowledge through a culturally competent patient-centred approach. InterpretationIntegrated CHB care is in line with patient and provider preference and could support elimination progress. PC needs to be equipped with simplified pathways, sustainable integrated-care models, specialist support, funding, and culturally competent resources. FundingJC was funded by Hospital for Tropical Diseases Centenary Fellowship and now funded by Wellcome PhD Programme for Primary Care Professionals.

06 Eating disorder toolkit 2023: Standards of practice in the primary care setting

Abstract Background Throughout the COVID 19 pandemic, physicians across Canada began to see a 'shadow pandemic' unfold as new diagnosis of eating disorders and hospital admissions for patients with medically unstable eating disorders increased exponentially. As these rates remain high, specialists stressed the importance of the role primary care physicians play in the early recognition, assessment, and diagnosis of eating disorders as a way to improve prognosis. Further, the high volume of patients has resulted in the need to manage patients in the community or engage in collaborative care between the eating disorder specialist and primary care physician. This Eating Disorder Toolkit was created as a knowledge mobilization resource to provide primary care and community providers with Standards of Practice and improve care for eating disorder patients. Objectives 1. Provide an updated and easily readable evidence-based reference tool for PCPs 2. Clarify PCPs role in working with, monitoring, and treating EDs in a shared care model 3. Strive for early diagnosis and connection to care for improved prognosis and decreased morbidity 4. Highlight unique considerations for specific populations 5. Align with the upcoming Eating Disorders Pathway project Design/Methods The first edition of the ED Toolkit was reviewed and based on feedback sought and provided by key partners including PCPs already using the Toolkit, areas of improvement were identified. These included formatting to improve accessibility in the primary care setting, updating the guidelines, and including unique considerations for specific populations. A literature review of current guidelines and practices internationally was completed. Experienced paediatric and adult ED specialists reviewed the material to ensure it was appropriate for clinical practice. Key partners contacted for feedback and collaboration included the Provincial ED Steering Committee, Provincial ED Pathway Project Committee, UBC Continuing Professional Development, and Primary Care physicians. This ensured the resource was meeting PCPs identified needs and was usable in the primary care setting. Edits were made to reflect the feedback received. Finally, the resource was reviewed to ensure alignment with the upcoming Provincial ED Pathway Project. Results The Eating Disorder Toolkit 2023: Standards of Practice in the Primary Care Setting is now available and has been distributed widely across British Columbia. In addition, Kelty Mental Health and Compass, leading resource hubs in the province, host the live document on their sites. Finally, the toolkit is also provided to any health providers upon request to their regional ED clinic. While we have not formally studied the outcome of this resources, anecdotal reports via email and verbal feedback from nurse practitioners, paediatricians, and ED specialists across the province has been positive. Conclusion Eating disorders are complex illnesses associated with significant medical and psychiatric complications. Early recognition and management improves prognosis. Community providers play a crucial role in recognizing and managing these patients, however many do not have expertise in this area. It is hoped that this resource will support PCPs in managing ED patients in British Columbia and there may be a potential scope for use across Canada with adaptations to local guidelines and resources.

Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A report from the Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy.

The Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) aimed to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy. The Task Force conducted a systematic review and identified two studies that assessed the accuracy of four screening measures for depression and anxiety symptoms compared with a psychiatric interview. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria for treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders or symptoms. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. The evidence generated by this review followed by consensus where evidence was missing generated 47 recommendations. Those with a high level of agreement (≥80%) are summarized. Diagnosis: (1) Universal screening for anxiety and depression is recommended. Closer surveillance is recommended for children after 12 years, at higher risk (e.g., suicide-related behavior), with subthreshold symptoms, and experiencing seizure worsening or therapeutic modifications. (2) Multiple sources of ascertainment and a formal screening are recommended. Clinical interviews are recommended whenever possible. The healthcare provider must always explain that symptom recognition is essential to optimize treatment outcomes and reduce morbidity. (3) Questioning about the relationship between symptoms of anxiety or depression with seizure worsening/control and behavioral adverse effects of antiseizure medications is recommended. Treatment: (1) An individualized treatment plan is recommended. (2) For mild depression, active monitoring must be considered. (3) Referral to a mental health care provider must be considered for moderate to severe depression and anxiety. (4) Clinical care pathways must be developed. (5) Psychosocial interventions must be tailored and age-appropriate. (6) Healthcare providers must monitor children with epilepsy who are prescribed antidepressants, considering symptoms and functioning that may not improve simultaneously. (7) Caregiver education is essential to ensure treatment adherence. (8) A shared-care model involving all healthcare providers is recommended for children and adolescents with epilepsy and mental health disorders. We identified clinical decisions in the management of depression and anxiety that lack solid evidence and provide consensus-based guidance to address the care of children and adolescents with epilepsy.

Shared-Care in Complex Malignant Hematology: An Integrative Review Using the RE-AIM Evaluation Framework.

Complex malignant hematology (CMH) shared-care programs have been established to support patients with access to care closer to home. This integrative review examined what is known about CMH shared-care using the RE-AIM evaluation framework. We searched five electronic databases for articles published until 16 January 2024. Articles were included if they were qualitative or quantitative studies, reviews or discussion papers, and reported on an experience with shared-care (defined as a reciprocal, ongoing patient-sharing relationship between a specialist centre and community hospital) for patients with hematological malignancies, and examined one or more aspects of the RE-AIM framework. The search yielded 6523 articles; 10 articles describing eight shared-care experiences. Indicators of reach were reported for 65% of the programs, and emphasized some patient eligibility criteria. Effectiveness indicators were reported for 28% of programs, and suggested favourable survival outcomes within a shared-care model; however, health system impact and quality of life studies were lacking. Indicators of adoption and implementation were reported for 56% and 42% of programs, respectively, and emphasized multidisciplinary teams, infrastructure support, and communication strategies. Maintenance was not reported. Common elements contribute to the implementation of existing CMH shared-care programs; however, a formal evaluation remains an area of need.

A qualitative study on blood and marrow transplant recipients' perceptions of health professional roles following BMT and preferences for ongoing care.

Survivors of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) require life-long follow-up involving both tertiary transplant and primary care services. This paper explores the attitudes and preferences of BMT survivors and their carers regarding the transition from BMT centre care to primary care. This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with BMT survivors and carers from New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Twenty-two BMT survivors and six carers were interviewed. Two themes emerged: (1) 'Relationships with health professionals' and (2) 'Challenges of long-term care'. Participants, particularly rural/regional survivors, had diverse views on the availability of community BMT expertise and identified a range of strategies to optimise care for BMT survivors. These results highlight the importance BMT survivors and carers place on their relationships with, and ongoing access to, specialised BMT teams for long-term care. While some are happy to receive community-based care, concerns exist about the capacity of primary care providers, particularly in rural and regional areas. Improved support, communication and coordination between BMT centres and primary care may help facilitate a person-centred, sustainable shared care model. Provider education, use of telehealth and clear delineation of roles and responsibilities may assist in this transition. As BMT survivors live longer post-treatment, transitions of care and sustainable long-term care models are needed. A shared care approach, integrating specialised BMT teams and local primary care, may optimise outcomes but requires further development to balance accessibility, preferences, and specialised care needs.

Internal medicine in the 21st century: Back to the future

Healthcare systems face multiple challenges arising from demographic factors (population aging) and epidemiological factors (rise of chronic diseases and patients with multimorbidity) as well as threats to their financial sustainability when maintaining equitable access to medical and technological advances. Current healthcare models, based on specialized medical care, lead to fragmented care that can be harmful to the patient and is inefficient for the system due to the overuse of redundant, low-value medical acts. Internal medicine is the hospital-centered general medical specialty par excellence, providing a comprehensive and holistic vision that is centered on the patient and not on the disease. Internists should be the leading physicians in the hospital setting for complex patients with or those with an uncertain diagnosis. Internists must play a key role, as hospitalists do, in the continued care of acute patients hospitalized for medical or surgical diseases, establishing shared care models in multidisciplinary teams. Likewise, to guarantee continuity of care for chronic patients, internists must establish mechanisms for collaboration with primary care and nursing, participating in the development of new out-of-hospital care models that use the available technological resources. Internal medicine should play a leading role in graduate and postgraduate medical education to promote a holistic vision among medical students and residents in medical subspecialties.

Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly implanted in patients with advanced heart failure. Currently, LVAD care is predominantly concentrated at specialized tertiary care hospitals. However, the increasing workload and logistical burden for implanting centres pose significant challenges to accessing care for individual patients in remote areas. An emerging approach to LVAD patient management is the use of a shared care model (SCM), which facilitates collaboration between implanting centres and local non-implanting hospitals. This scoping review explores and synthesizes the current scientific evidence on the use of SCMs in LVAD care management. Eligible studies were identified in EMBASE, PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Findings were synthesized in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Of the 950 records screened, five articles met the inclusion criteria. Four review articles focused on the proposed benefits and challenges of using SCMs. Main benefits included improved patient satisfaction and continuity of care. Important challenges were initial education of non-implanting centre staff and maintaining competency. One prospective study showed that absence of LVAD-specific care was associated with impaired survival and higher rates of pump thrombosis and LVAD-related infections. The use of SCMs is a promising approach in the long-term management of LVAD patients. However, sufficient evidence about the impact of SCMs on patients and the healthcare system is not currently available. Standardized protocols based on prospective studies are needed to develop safe and effective shared care for LVAD patients.

Preliminary Results From the Implementation of a Primary-Tertiary Shared Care Model to Improve the Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH): A Mixed Methods Pre-Post Implementation Study

Preliminary Results From the Implementation of a Primary-Tertiary Shared Care Model to Improve the Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH): A Mixed Methods Pre-Post Implementation Study

Perspectives of General Hematologists on a Proposed Shared Care Model for HSCT in Sickle Cell Disease

Perspectives of General Hematologists on a Proposed Shared Care Model for HSCT in Sickle Cell Disease

Telerheumatology Shared-Care Model: Leveraging the Expertise of an Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-Trained Extended Role Practitioner in Rural-Remote Ontario.

A shortage of rheumatologists has led to gaps in inflammatory arthritis (IA) care in Canada. Amplified in rural-remote communities, the number of rheumatologists practicing rurally has not been meaningfully increased, and alternate care strategies must be adopted. In this retrospective chart review, we describe the impact of a shared-care telerheumatology model using a community-embedded Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-extended role practitioner (ERP) and an urban-based rheumatologist. A rheumatologist and an ACPAC-ERP established a monthly half-day hub-and-spoke-telerheumatology clinic to care for patients with suspected IA, triaged by the ACPAC-ERP. Comprehensive initial assessments were conducted in-person by the ACPAC-ERP (spoke); investigations were completed prior to the telerheumatology visit. Subsequent collaborative visits occurred with the rheumatologist (hub) attending virtually. Retrospective analysis of demographics, time-to-key care indices, patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and estimated travel savings was performed. Data from 124 patients seen between January 2013 and January 2022 were collected; 98% (n = 494/504 visits) were virtual. The average age of patients at first visit was 55.6 years, and 75.8% were female. IA/connective tissue disease (CTD) was confirmed in 65% of patients. Mean time from primary care referral to ACPAC-ERP assessment was 52.5 days, and mean time from ACPAC-ERP assessment to the telerheumatology visit was 64.5 days. An estimated 493,470 km of patient-related travel was avoided. An ACPAC-ERP (spoke) and rheumatologist (hub) telerheumatology model of care assessing and managing patients with suspected IA in rural-remote Ontario was described. This model can be leveraged to increase capacity by delivering comprehensive virtual rheumatologic care in underserved communities.

Mapping models of care for children, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A scoping review.

e13793 Background: Young cancer survivors, with decades of life ahead, encounter substantial risks for treatment-related late effects. Achieving optimal outcomes requires a comprehensive multi-dimensional approach. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the evidence on models of survivorship care for Child (0-14) and Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA, 15-39) cancer survivors aligning with the Framework for Quality Cancer Survivorship. Methods: Conducted according to PRISMA extension for scoping reviews, this study systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase for English articles from Jan 2006 to Jan 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies describing patient and health service domain for Child and AYA cancer survivorship models of care. Dual processes were used for article screening, selection, and data extraction. A deductive analysis, using Content Analysis informed results, presented in a narrative synthesis. Results: Of the 5,298 records screened 38 described Child and 10 described AYA models of care. The majority were cohort and cross-sectional studies from the USA, Canada, and the UK representing 6,101 Child and 5,283 AYA cancer survivors. Across these diverse studies, a broad range of outcomes were identified with most domains of the Framework represented. No model of care described more domains than another. Across the 13 possible elements of care and outcomes, most (68%) reported on less than five of these. The domains most represented included elements of care rather than outcomes at the service level such as the clinic structure (52%), communication and decision making (52%) and patient/carer satisfaction (50%). At the patient level, quality of life outcomes and assessment and management of physical symptoms were represented in 40% of studies. There were few studies reporting on health promotion (23%), chronic conditions (13%), mortality and healthcare utilization (5% each) and none reported on costs. In terms of outcomes, oncologist long-term follow up care showed higher adherence to risk-based recommendations compared to primary care models in some studies. Other studies suggest a shared care model increases adherence and decrease lost to follow-up. At the service level, high satisfaction with care was common in all models. Overall, there was not enough to evidence to support one model over another in either Child or AYA survivorship care. Conclusions: Despite decades of research in survivorship care, there is not enough evidence about the effectiveness and efficiency of different models of care. No single model stands out as superior, and there are notable gaps in understanding the economic and value proposition of different models. Addressing these gaps is crucial for the future development, and provision of quality survivorship care tailored for this patient population.

Optimising Palliative Care for Children with Metastatic Neuroblastoma and the Paediatrician’s Role in a Shared Care Model – Proposal from a Regional Cancer Centre in India

Optimising Palliative Care for Children with Metastatic Neuroblastoma and the Paediatrician’s Role in a Shared Care Model – Proposal from a Regional Cancer Centre in India

Implementation of a primary-tertiary shared care model to improve the detection of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH): a mixed methods pre-post implementation study protocol

IntroductionFamilial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder of lipid metabolism and a preventable cause of premature cardiovascular disease. Current detection rates for this highly treatable condition are low....

Recent Innovations in Primary Care Cancer Survivorship Roles.

Despite 2 decades of cancer survivorship research, policy, and advocacy, primary care in the United States has not fully integrated survivorship care into its generalist role. This manuscript describes innovative roles primary care physicians have adopted in survivorship care and how these roles emerged. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 10 US primary care physician innovators in survivorship care. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Our team met weekly as interviews were completed to review transcripts and write summaries. We analyzed data using an immersion-crystallization process. Innovators did not receive formal survivorship training but gained knowledge experientially and through self-guided education. All worked in academic primary care and/or cancer centers; context strongly influenced role operationalization. We delineated 4 major role-types along a spectrum, with primary care generalist orientations at one end and cancer generalist orientations at the other. Primary care generalists applied survivorship guidelines during regular visits ("GENERALISTS+") or focused on cancer treatment effects amid other comorbidities during blocked clinic time ("oncoGENERALISTS"). Cancer generalists focused on cancer-related sequalae during and after treatment; some provided continuity care to survivors ("ONCOGENERALISTS"), while others incorporated unmet primary care needs into survivorship consults ("ONCOgeneralists"). Primary care survivorship innovations are occurring in academic primary care and cancer centers settings in the US. To move beyond the work of individual innovators, systematic investments are needed to support adoption of such innovations. For wider diffusion of survivorship care into community primary care, additional strategies that include primary care survivorship education and workforce development are needed to facilitate risk-stratified and shared-care models.

P129 Interdisciplinary collaboration in the care of patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease in Wales: an interview study

Abstract Background/Aims Patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) often receive care from both rheumatologists and respiratory physicians to manage their conditions. As treatment options become increasingly complex with immunosuppressing and antifibrotic agents, there is a growing recognition of the importance of collaborative approaches to ensure accurate diagnosis, aid management decisions and deliver patient-centred care. However, there is currently no agreed optimal model for shared care, leading to significant practice variation. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of rheumatologists and respiratory physicians regarding the benefits and challenges of cross-speciality management in CTD-ILD. A better understanding of this will enhance the development of services and improve patient-centred care. Methods Semi-structured interviews, both face-to-face and virtual, were conducted with 11 respiratory physicians and nine rheumatologists working in Wales, ensuring representation from all health boards. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis to identify themes. Results Five main themes were identified: navigating complexity and uncertainty, reliance on clinical experience, prioritisation of efficiency, educational and training benefits, and inconsistent access to services for clinicians and patients. Conclusion The complexity of CTD-ILD care, combined with varying levels of physician expertise and a perceived lack of guidelines, presents significant challenges for clinicians. Cross-speciality collaboration is actively sought by physicians and is perceived to enhance patient care by improving efficiency, aiding confidence in decision-making and providing educational benefits to clinicians. However, resource limitations and geographical variations in service access hinder the implementation and development of shared care models. Physicians perceive that patients like being seen in joint clinics; future exploration of patient perspectives and experiences of joint care systems will be crucial to ensure the direction of clinical practice development remains patient-centred. In addition to implementing integrated cross-speciality clinical services, the development of joint respiratory and rheumatology guidelines as well as greater availability of training opportunities would assist physicians in delivering optimal care to patients with CTD-ILD. Disclosure P. Evans: None. K. Hett: None. N. Hutchinson: None. C. Beynon: None.

Application of implementation science for improving the utilization of an international clinical practice guidance on familial hypercholesterolemia

The International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS) published an evidence-informed guidance for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) that provides both clinical and implementation recommendations. We reference examples of strategies from the literature to explore how these implementation recommendations can be tailored into implementation strategies at the local-level for stakeholders guided by a framework proposed by Sarkies and Jones. Four authors of the IAS guidance selected two published exemplar implementation recommendations for detection, management, and general implementation. Each recommendation was described as an implementation strategy using Proctor's guidance for specifying and reporting implementation strategies. It recommends reporting the actor (who), action (what), action-target (who is impacted), temporality (how often), and dose (how much) for each implementation strategy. Detection: A centralized cascade testing model, mobilized nurses (actor) to relative's homes, after the diagnosis of the proband (temporality), once (dose) to consent, obtain a blood sample and health information (action) on relatives (action-target). A primary care initiative to improve FH management included an educational session (action) with clinicians (action-target), computer-based reminder message and message to patients to have their cholesterol screened once (dose) at a visit or outreach (temporality) by researchers (actor). General: A partnership between a statewide public pathology provider, local public hospital network, primary health network, government health ministry, and an academic university (actors) was established to implement a primary-tertiary shared care model (action) to improve the detection of FH (action-target). We demonstrate that implementation recommendations can be specified and reported for different local contexts with examples on monitoring, evaluation, and sustainability in practice.

Perspectives and Experiences of Healthcare Professionals Involved in a Community Nurse-Delivered Shared Care Model Intervention Designed to Support Outpatients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Qualitative Study Using Interviews

Background. Chemotherapy can cause a range of side effects including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and infection, which can have a significant impact on an individual’s quality of life. Survival outcomes can be impacted when side effects are poorly managed, leading to failure to complete the defined dose of treatment. Objective. This study presents clinicians’ experiences with a shared care model involving home-based community nurse (CN) support to improve side-effect management of individuals receiving chemotherapy as an outpatient. Methods. A qualitative study was conducted with CNs, cancer nurses, medical oncologists, and a general practitioner involved in the CN intervention delivered as part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at reducing unplanned presentations to hospital of cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. Semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted. Key themes were identified using thematic analysis. Findings. Twenty-three healthcare professionals were interviewed. Three themes were identified: (1) being able to enhance patient-centered care and clinical practice during chemotherapy; (2) importance of effective communication and collaborative relationships between different care settings; and (3) ways to adapt the intervention for implementation in routine clinical practice. Participants reported that it was feasible for CNs to care for this patient group, and their home visits enabled preemptive symptom management. Suggestions to improve and modify the intervention to implement this care model within existing clinical care included a flexible approach, such as a blended delivery with face-to-face visits and telephone calls; a risk- or needs-based approach to prioritize patient groups more likely to benefit from the intervention; and sharing of electronic medical records for more effective collaboration and communication. Conclusions. A CN-delivered shared care model provided a feasible approach to the provision of individualized support for outpatients receiving chemotherapy. This study suggests ways to adapt this care model into existing clinical workflow and structures. This trial is registered with ACTRN12614001113640.

Geriatric trauma: there is more to it than just the implant!

Geriatric trauma continues to rise, corresponding with the continuing growth of the older population. These fractures continue to expand, demonstrated by the incidence of hip fractures having grown to 1.5 million adults worldwide per year. This patient population and their associated fracture patterns present unique challenges to the surgeon, as well as having a profound economic impact on the health care system. Pharmacologic treatment has focused on prevention, with aging adults having impaired fracture healing in addition to diminished bone mineral density. Intraoperatively, novel ideas to assess fracture reduction to facilitate decreased fracture collapse have recently been explored. Postoperatively, pharmacologic avenues have focused on future fracture prevention, while shared care models between geriatrics and orthopaedics have shown promise regarding decreasing mortality and length of stay. As geriatric trauma continues to grow, it is imperative that we look to optimize all phases of care, from preoperative to postoperative.

Effect of the AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors Framework on Diabetes Education Management in a Shared Care Model.

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) provides diabetic patients with knowledge of diabetes, requires attention and recording of dietary habits, and increases the frequency and accuracy of blood glucose monitoring. DSME also achieves better blood glucose control, thus benefiting diabetic patients and reducing the risk of diabetes complications. However, few studies have systematically examined whether DSME follows AADE 7 Self-Care Behaviors (AADE7™). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the control effect of AADE7™-based management on laboratory test indicators of diabetic patients. The patients with diabetes who received shared care management in our hospital between June 2014 and April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the process of outpatient consultation, each patient received health education provided by diabetes education nurses and dietitians after consultation. Health education was a process from assessment to health guidance. The basic information of all patients was recorded, and AADE7™ behavior assessment and health education session were conducted through interviews. A total of 13,650 were given shared care management, requiring more than 6 follow-up visits per year, as well as health education. It was reassessed annually according to AADE standards. The impact of the patients' behavior change after the AADE7™-based management on the relevant test indicators was observed. After eight years of intervention, a total of 8319 samples were obtained after excluding the outliers. Stepwise regression analysis was performed, and the results showed that, with other conditions held constant, a greater number of days per week to follow a healthy diet, to take hypoglycemic medication as prescribed, to monitor blood glucose, and to exercise and higher education level were associated with lower levels of glycosylated hemoglobin. The change from drinking to nondrinking was associated with lower triglycerides. If low blood glucose was monitored, patients who reviewed and took immediate action showed lower levels of low-density lipoprotein, urine microalbumin, and urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio compared with those without review and immediate action. Significance tests for each term showed P value <0.05. The AADE7™ framework is a tool supporting patient-centered self-management and education. In the AADE7™ standards, successful self-management is considered as a key outcome in the care of patients with diabetes and related diseases. This tool can effectively improve patient compliance and increase the rate of blood glucose compliance rates in patients with diabetes and therefore is worthy of clinical promotion.