Pety et al. (2012) have reported the detection of eight transitions of a closed-shell, linear molecule (B11244) in observations toward the Horsehead PDR, which they attribute to the $l$-C$_3$H$^+$ cation. Recent high-level \textit{ab initio} calculations have called this assignment into question; the anionic C$_3$H$^-$ molecule has been suggested as a more likely candidate. Here, we examine observations of the Horsehead PDR, Sgr B2(N), TMC-1, and IRC+10216 in the context of both $l$-C$_3$H$^+$ and C$_3$H$^-$. We find no observational evidence of $K_a = 1$ lines which should be present were the carrier indeed C$_3$H$^-$. Additionally, we find a strong anti-correlation between the presence of known molecular anions and B11244 in these regions. Finally, we discuss the formation and destruction chemistry of C$_3$H$^-$ in the context of the physical conditions in the regions. Based on these results, we conclude there is little evidence to support the carrier is C$_3$H$^-$.