9598 Background: The 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test is the gold standard in the US for metastatic risk prediction in uveal melanoma (UM). Studies have shown that the 15-GEP is superior to and independent of other clinicopathologic and molecular risk factors, including PRAME expression status and BAP1 mutation status. Supplemental tests for PRAME and the 7-gene NGS panel ( BAP1, SF3B1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, CYSLTR2, PLCB4)are validated and can now be run clinically from the same biopsy specimen. However, the discordance between 15-GEP, PRAME and NGS in clinical specimens is unknown. This study aimed to determine whether PRAME status or DNA mutation status could be used to predict the 15-GEP result. Methods: Data from fine-needle aspiration biopsy or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded UM specimens submitted for routine comprehensive clinical testing with all three commercial tests (15-GEP, PRAME, and NGS) between February 2018 and December 2023 were collected through an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Results: Overall, 3267 tumors with comprehensive molecular testing were analyzed. 15-GEP testing yielded 65.9% (n=2152/3267) Class 1 and 34.1% (n=1115) Class 2 tumors. While Class 2 tumors were more than twice as likely to be PRAME(+) vs Class 1, 54.3% (606/1115) of Class 2 cases were PRAME(–), and 20.9% (450/2152) of Class 1 cases were PRAME(+) resulting in a PRAME/15-GEP discordance rate of 32.3% (10-56/3267). Mutations in genes associated with increasing metastatic risk ( EIF1AX, SF3B1, and BAP1, respectively) were identified in 58.7% (1918/3267) of cases. Most EIF1AX mutations (569/623, 91.3%) occurred in Class 1 tumors that were PRAME(–), while most SF3B1mutations were found in Class 1, PRAME(+) tumors (244/404, 60.4%). Most BAP1 mutations (863/976, 88.4%) occurred in Class 2 (high risk) tumors, of which 53.9% (465/863) were PRAME(–). Importantly, 56.0% (1205/2152) of Class 1 tumors did not harbor detectable EIF1AX or SF3B1 mutations, and 22.6% (252/1115) of Class 2 tumors did not harbor a detectable BAP1 mutation, yielding an NGS/15-GEP discordance rate of 44.6% (1457/3267). Conclusions: The validated PRAME and NGS tests described here, which can be performed from the same initial biopsy sample taken for 15-GEP testing, provide results that are not systematically associated with 15-GEP class. Given that the 15-GEP has been shown to be superior to both PRAME and NGS in predicting metastatic outcomes, it is recommended that these supplemental tests only be considered in the context of a 15-GEP test result to prevent potentially over or under identifying high-risk biology. An ongoing prospective study with long term outcomes for over 1700 UM patients led by the Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group (COOG2) will provide insight into how best to effectively integrate these supplementary biomarkers with the 15-GEP class result.
Read full abstract