The use of sexual differentiation as a paradigm in the understanding d development has a long and honourable history. In mammals, the main outlines of the process (where androgens pr~luced by the ~erentiated testis bring about many features of male development) are well understood at both the biochemical and genetic levels ~'~. Unfortunately, the crucial element needed to complete the model is missing;, there is no agreement as to how the male-determining gone(s) on the ~ Y chromosome initiate the whole process by inducing the indifferent embryonic gonad to differentiate as a testis, which can then secrete the androgens. More than ten years ago, Wachtel, Ohno and colleagues proposed that H-Y (male speci~c) antigen, whose expressionisposithelyregulated by the Y chromosome, has a role as the effector inthis primary sex determination ~. Recent work on the sex-reversed mouse (Sxv) and a new derivative of it (Sxr') *'s, reviewed recently by Good,low ~ and Simpson ? makes it seem unlikely, except on rather extreme ~ ~ hypo. theses ~, that the H-Y antigen as detected by cytoto~c T-cell a ~ y s or by skin transplantation -l',~s arty such primary role. Yet this may not be the end of the story; there may be more than one male-specitic antiged. H-Y antigens are defined operationally as any substances that are detected by immunological techniques on the cell surface of cells taken from males and are apparently absent from females of the same mammalian species. It is not necessarily the case that different classes of immunological techniques will always see either the same molecule or the same part of the same molecule. Although the immune-response genes controllingtherejectionofskingrafts are different from those regulating cytotoxic T cells im v~o ~, there has never been any evidence ~hat these two techniques detect separable male-specific antigens s. Thus, the antigen detected by cell-mediated assays may fairly be called the H-Y antigen. In contrast, because of cases where some animals (most notably the X0 mou~) had been typed as positive by serological techniques but were nngative for H-Y antigen, it was suggested in 1982 that serological assays Where next for mammalian male-specific (H-Y) antigen(s)?