The results of a recent meta-analysis (Reitzel & Carbonell, 2006) indicate that approximately 19% of adolescents who did not receive specialized, sexual-offense-specific treatment were subsequently charged for a sexual reoffense after a follow-up period of approximately 5 years. In contrast, approximately 7% of adolescents who received sexual-offense-specific treatment were charged with a new sexual offense during the same time period. Thus, participation in treatment to address sexual offense behavior reduces sexual offense recidivism by almost two-thirds. Like other forms of therapeutic intervention, treatment for juveniles who commit sexual offense behavior (henceforth referred to as JSOs) was adapted from interventions that had been developed for treating adults who had committed sexual offense behavior. With regard to therapy for adults who have committed criminal offense behavior, including sexual offense behavior, current best practice emphasizes the principles of Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR; Andrews & Bonta, 1998). Briefly, the Risk Principle states that the level of intervention is matched to the assessed level of recidivism risk level of the client; a low risk client should receive relatively less intervention, whereas a high-risk client should garner relatively more intervention. Applied to treatment for juveniles, the Risk Principle suggests that more resources should be allocated to juveniles whose sexual offenses were motivated by an underlying interest in sexually deviant themes (i.e. use of force, attraction to pre-pubescent children), and/or juveniles with a long-standing history of behavior. The Need Principle states that effective treatment should focus on criminogenic also known as dynamic risk i.e. factors that have are statistically associated with recidivism, and which are amenable to change. Applied to treatment for juveniles, the Need Principle suggests that therapeutic interventions should be focused on the emotions, attitudes, and behaviors that facilitate a generally delinquent or non-prosocial lifestyle, such as anger/aggression/negative affect, substance use, stability of school and social functioning, negative peer influences, and an unstable/unsupportive family environment. The Responsivity Principle refers to the use of empirically based treatment approaches and delivery of treatment in a manner that takes into account the individual needs of the client (learning style, cognitive ability; Dowden & Andrews, 2000). This principle discourages therapists from using poorly theorized approaches (e.g., psychoanalysis) or administering treatment programs in a mechanistic one size fits all fashion to improve treatment outcomes. Applied to treatment for juveniles, the Responsivity Principle suggests that treatment should be tailored to adapt to the client's level of physical, cognitive, social, emotional, and psychosexual development (Newring et. al 2010). There are many variants of the RNR approach, both in program design and delivery (Polaschek, 2011). Andrews and Bonta (2010) recently reported that RNR approaches have been shown to reduce offender recidivism by up to 35%. In their recent meta-analysis, Hanson, Bourgon, Helmus, and Hodgson (2009) found strong support for the application of RNR to sexual offender treatment programs. RNR approaches are being used successfully with sexual offenders (Harkins & Beech, 2007), intellectually disabled sexual offenders (Keeling, Beech & Rose, 2007), and personality-disordered violent forensic clients (Wong, Gordon, & Gu, 2007). NEW DIRECTIONS IN TREATMENT FOR SEXUALLY OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOR Positive and collaborative approaches. In recent years, traditional confrontation-based and avoidance-focused treatment approaches have been challenged (Marshall, Ward, Mann, Moulden, Fernandez, Serran, & Marshall, 2005; Wheeler, 2003; Wheeler, George, & Marlatt, 2006; Wheeler, George & Stoner, 2005). …
Read full abstract