9117 Background: Patient (pt) reported outcome (PROs) tools identify MUI and its impact on functional and subjective outcomes. Among outpts, PRO tools are attractive because opportunities for direct assessment are limited, but agreement between PRO tools and objective MUI measures has not been uniform. We prospectively compared an objective MUI score and 3 previously validated PRO tools. Method: The Triad Burden of Illness study is an international, 41-center, prospective study of the risk and outcomes of radiation and chemotherapy-induced MUI. At baseline and during chemoradiation therapy (CRT), pts with larynx (L), hypopharynx (H), or non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) completed a daily MUI symptom tool (OMDQ) and 2 weekly PRO tools (FACT-E quality of life, FACIT- Fatigue). Clinicians examined pts twice weekly and scored MUI (WHO scale). In this interim analysis, we used random effects linear regression to compare clinician and pt ratings and t-tests to compare PRO scores in pts with and without severe MUI. Result: To date, 29 pts have completed =2 paired assessments; 23 (79%) had L or H cancers. Ulcerative MUI (WHO = 2) was more common among L/H than NSCLC pts (39% vs 17%). Pt-rated MUI predicted clinician-rated MUI (p = 0.001). FACT-E and FACIT-F scores were significantly lower (worse) among pts with clinician-rated ulcerative MUI than pts without and among pts with pt-rated severe MUI symptoms (OMDQ= 2) than pts without. Differences were largest in the subscales for physical and functional wellbeing and esophageal symptom special concerns. Conclusion: PRO tools estimate the burden of CRT-induced MUI in outpts with L/H or NCSL cancers. MUI appears to be associated with significantly poorer quality of life, functional status, and symptom scores. 1- 9 p <0.01; 10p = 0.06. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]