Severity Of Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

e24119 Background: Current guidelines recommend prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the incidence, duration, and severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a long-acting G-CSF, in preventing neutropenia for solid tumor patients during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, patients with lung, esophageal, or cervical cancers, and an ECOG performance status of 0-2 were randomized 1:1 to the study or control group. Both groups received standard CCRT with two 21-day cycles of taxanes and platinum-based chemotherapy. In the study group, mecapegfilgrastim 6 mg was administered 24 hours after chemotherapy for each cycle, whereas the control group received no prophylaxis for neutropenia. Short-acting G-CSF was administered if neutrophil counts fell below 2.0×10^9/L. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored for 2 cycles and graded per CTCAE v5.0. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia during CCRT. Results: From Apr 2022 to Dec 2023, 97 patients were enrolled: 48 in the study group and 49 in the control group. The median age was 59 years (range 51-71) in the study group and 60 years (range 34-71) in the control group. Baseline characteristics were balanced between two groups. Eleven patients (22.9%) in the study group experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, compared to 27 (55.1%) in the control group (nominal p= 0.002). Three patients (6.3%) in the study group and 2 (4.1%) in the control group developed febrile neutropenia (FN). For 18 lung cancer patients, none of the study group experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, while 2 patients (25.0%) in the control group did. FN was not reported in either group. Among 40 esophageal cancer patients , grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 4 patients (21.1%) of the study group, compared to 12 (57.1%) of the control group, with one case of FN in each group. For 39 gynecological cancer patients, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 7 patients (36.8%) in the study group and 13 (65.0%) in the control group. Two patients of the study group and 1 of the control group developed FN. Short-acting G-CSF was required in 18 patients (37.5%) of the study group and 33 (67.4%) of the control group. TEAEs were reported in 27 patients (56.3%) of the study group and 41 (83.7%) of the control group. Notably, grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 21 patients (43.8%) of the study group and 30 (61.2%) of the control group, maily including hematologic toxicities like neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphocytopenia. Serious TEAEs were reported in 1 patient (2.1%) of the study group and 2 (4.1%) of the control group. One patient (2.1%) in the study group discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Prophylaxis with mecapegfilgrastim reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia during CCRT, with good safety. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200058551.

Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia between same-day vs next-day administration of pegteograstim in chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myelosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III trial (CONCISE, KCSG PC22-11).

TPS12149 Background: Administration of peg-GCSF 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy is usually recommended. Next-day administration (after 24 hours) resulted in fewer duration of Gr4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and decreased severity of CIN than same-day (within 4 hours). However, patients sometimes receive same-day Peg-GCSF for the sake of convenience. In addition, a few prior studies showed that the same-day method is comparable or superior to the next-day in preventing CIN, especially in regimens that include day 1 myelosuppressive agents. Thus, we aim to test hypothesis that same-day administration of pegteograstim, a new formulation of peg-GCSF, is non-inferior to next-day administration in terms of Gr4 CIN duration. Methods: This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 3 study. Patients with adjuvant/neoadjuvant or 1st palliative chemotherapy comprising intensively myleosuppressive agents on day 1 (mFOLFIRINOX, ECb, EP, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOX) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to the same-day arm or the next-day arm in a 1:1 ratio. Randomizations are stratified according to number of CIN risk (1 vs ≥2), setting (perioperative vs palliative), and interval (2- vs 3-week). In the same-day, pegteograstim 6 mg is SC injected within 4 hrs after chemotherapy, while 24-36 hrs in the next-day. CBC test is performed daily from day 5 to 9 during the cycle 1. From cycle 2 to 4, treatments are performed in accordance with general practice, including checking for febrile neutropenia (FN), dose intensity, and safety. The primary endpoint is duration of Gr4 CIN (during cycle 1), and secondary endpoints include incidence of Gr 3-4 CIN (cycle 1), severity of CIN (cycle 1), time to recovery ANC 1000/㎕ (cycle 1), incidence of FN, CIN-related dose delay, and dose intensity. In order to verify non-inferiority of 0.6 days of Gr4 CIN duration, we estimated a significance level of 5%, power of 80%, and drop-out rate of 15%. This results in the need for a total of 160 patients, 80 in each arm. We are currently recruiting patients (since Nov 2022). Clinical trial information: KCT0007694 .

Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial.

Administration of pegylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (peg-GCSF) 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy is usually recommended. Next-day administration (after 24 hours) resulted in fewer duration of grade (Gr) 4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and decreased severity of CIN than same-day (within 4 hours). However, patients sometimes receive same-day Peg-GCSF for the sake of convenience. In addition, a few prior studies showed that the same-day method is comparable or superior to the next-day method in preventing CIN, especially in chemotherapy regimens that include day 1 myelosuppressive agents. Thus, we aim to verify the hypothesis that same-day administration of pegteograstim, a new formulation of peg-GCSF, is non-inferior to next-day administration in terms of Gr4 CIN duration. This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 3 study. Patients with adjuvant/neoadjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy comprising intensively myelosuppressive agents on day 1 (mFOLFIRINOX, ECb, EP, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOX) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to the same-day arm or the next-day arm in a 1:1 ratio. The randomizations are stratified according to number of patient CIN risk factors (1 vs ≥2), chemotherapy setting (perioperative vs palliative), and interval (2-week vs 3-week). In the same-day arm, pegteograstim 6 mg is subcutaneously injected within 4 hours after completion of chemotherapy. In the next-day arm, pegetograstim is injected at 24 to 36 hours post-chemotherapy. A complete blood count test is performed daily from day 5 to 9 during the cycle 1. The primary endpoint is duration of Gr4 CIN (cycle 1), and secondary endpoints include incidence of Gr 3 to 4 CIN (cycle 1), severity of CIN (cycle 1), time to recovery absolute neutrophil count 1000/μL (cycle 1), incidence of febrile neutropenia, incidence of CIN-related dose delay, and dose intensity. In order to verify non-inferiority of 0.6 days, we estimated a significance level of 5%, power of 80%, and drop-out rate of 15%. This results in the need for a total of 160 patients, 80 in each group.

The Utility of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel

Background: Infection during the period of neutropenia following chemotherapy represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancy.(Freifeld, et al, 2011, Baden LR, et al, 2012) Several guidelines recommend granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) to reduce the duration and severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and abate infection risk.(Lyman, et al 2018, Aapro, et al, 2011, Smith, et al, 2015). Optimal GCSF administration following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy remains undefined and requires characterization. Methods: The Mayo Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective, single-center study. Electronic medical records for patients prescribed axicabtagene ciloleucel were reviewed until disease relapse, death, or a maximum of 60 days after infusion. Baseline characteristics and laboratory values were abstracted prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy. GCSF support was originally prescribed when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) declined below 500 cells/mm3 and discontinued when the ANC exceeded 1000 cells/mm3 (neutropenia) for 2 consecutive days. A practice change was made where GCSF was recommended only in those with febrile neutropenia and an increased concern for infection. The primary endpoint was the difference in the total days of neutropenia for patients receiving and not receiving GCSF. Secondary outcomes compared total days of severe neutropenia, number of neutropenia episodes, infection rates by GCSF use, and outcomes by protocol change. Neutropenia and severe neutropenia were defined as an ANC below 500 cells/mm3 and 100 cells/mm3, respectively. Updated data with more patients will be presented at the conference. Results: The 60 included patients had a median age of 59 (IQR: 44, 63) years, 38 (63%) were male and 53 (88%) were Caucasian. Significantly fewer patients were prescribed GCSF according to infection-related concerns compared to ANC-based indication, 18% vs. 94%, p<0.001. Because only 3 subjects received GCSF based on infection-related concerns, results based on GCSF use versus no use is shown here. GCSF was prescribed to 35 (58%) patients for a median of 8 (IQR: 6, 12) doses with a median cumulative dosage of 3840 mcg (IQR 2100-5400) and median time to first dose of 3 days (IQR: 1, 4) post CAR T-cell infusion. Table 1 displays additional baseline characteristics and laboratory parameters according to GCSF support utilization. GCSF prescribed: Table 2 displays outcomes by GCSF use. Total days of neutropenia were similar between groups (13 vs. 16, p=0.52) with a trend towards significantly fewer days of severe neutropenia when prescribed GCSF (6 vs. 9, p=0.129). Patients prescribed GCSF were more likely to experience multiple episodes of neutropenia (83% vs. 43% p=0.002) with a significantly greater median number of episodes (3 vs. 1, p=0.002) when compared to those not prescribed GCSF. GCSF use significantly decreased the median days of the first neutropenia episode (6 vs. 12, p=0.001). There was a trend for decreased median days of severe neutropenia in the first episode with GCSF (5.0 vs. 8.0, p=0.236). Figure 1 displays a trend towards a lower overall risk of infection (HR 0.55, 95%CI: 0.16-1.87, p=0.34) and lower risk of bacterial infection (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.18-1.31, p=0.15); however, these were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Patients prescribed GCSF according to ANC-based indication were significantly more likely to experience multiple neutropenia episodes; however, duration of first neutropenic episode and days of severe neutropenia during the first neutropenic episode were significantly reduced. Interestingly, the total days of neutropenia and severe neutropenia were similar between groups. It is possible that using the parameter of ANC more than 1000 cells/mm3 for 2 consecutive days is not the optimal criteria for stopping GCSF. Risk of overall and bacterial infection was lower with ANC-based initiation of GCSF, although non-significant likely due to small sample size. The potential benefit for using CSF and the optimal timing after CAR T-cell infusion requires further, rigorous, prospective investigation. Disclosures Ansell: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Bennani:Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Lin:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia after initial and subsequent chemotherapy cycle of non-hodgkin lymphoma

Background: Cytotoxic drugs often suppress the bone marrow's ability to produce white blood cells which lead to the induction of neutropenia and the risk of febrile neutropenia. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is major dose-limiting toxicity of systemic chemotherapy and it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Objective: Evaluating frequency and severity of CIN after initial and subsequent chemotherapy cycles among non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) children undergoing similar chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods: A prospective study performed in the Oncology Department of Child Central Teaching Hospital/Baghdad, between August 1, 2012, and January 31, 2014, which included (59) patients

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) in the management of neutropenia induced by anthracyclines and ifosfamide in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (NEUSAR).

Anthracycline and ifosfamide-based chemotherapy represents a widely used regimen both in early and advanced settings in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of biosimilar G-CSF in these patients. Between 2003 and 2013, 67 patients with soft tissue tumors under epirubicin and ifosfamide (EI) treatment receiving biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio®), originator filgrastim (Granulokine®, Neupogen®), and lenograstim (only originator Myelostim®) as primary prophylaxis for a total of 260cycles of therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics were summarized in a propensity score (PS). The incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was 44.0% in biosimilar filgrastim, 40.0% in originator filgrastim, and 45.5% in the lenograstim groups (p=0.935). All grade and G4 neutropenia were similar in the three groups with the same safety profile. The use of biosimilar filgrastim achieved cost savings of €225.25 over originator filgrastim and €262.00 over lenograstim. Biosimilar G-CSF was effective in preventing FN and in reducing the need for hospitalization in STS patients undergoing EI treatment. It also proved comparable to its reference products from both a clinical and cost-effective standpoint.

Relationship Between Severity and Duration of Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia and Risk of Infection Among Patients with Non-Myeloid Malignancies

Introduction:Neutropenia is a common adverse effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and may increase the risk of infection for cancer patients. However there is limited understanding about the quantitative relationships between severity and duration of chemotherapy induced neutropenia (CIN) and the risk of infection among patients undergoing chemotherapy to treat non-myeloid malignancies.Methods: The current study is a later analysis of data from six Amgen sponsored clinical trials. We combined individual data from adult patients with non-myeloid cancer who received no granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) during the first cycle of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and had absolute neutrophil count (ANC) measured at least 3 times per week. The primary endpoint is occurrence of an infection related hospitalization (identified from a review of hospitalization records). The secondary endpoint is occurrence of fever (≥38.2°C) or an infection related hospitalization in combination with different grades of CIN (grade 4: ANC <0.5 x 109/L or grade 3/4: ANC<1.0 x 109/L) on the same day, -1 day, or + 2 days. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterize the ANC nadir and time to ANC nadir. An additional variable was created to measure both the duration and severity of CIN: area over the curve (AOC) of ANC, which was calculated as the area below the threshold of 0.5 x 109/L (or 1.0 x 109/L) and above ANC-time response curve in the first chemotherapy cycle. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to quantify the hazard of first infection associated with duration of grade 4 or grade 3/4 CIN as well as the hazard associated with AOC, all in the first chemotherapy cycle.Results: Our study analyzed data from 271 patients who had one of four cancer types: small cell lung cancer (56.1%), non-Hodgkins lymphoma (24.4%), oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (11.4%), and breast cancer (8.1%). About 63.8% of the patients had advanced cancer and 77.5% of them received chemotherapy regimens with a high risk of developing febrile neutropenia. The ANC trajectory is shown in the figure below. The median of daily ANC reached its minimum at day 12 with a value of 0.2 x 109/L. In the first chemotherapy cycle, 18.8% had infection-related hospitalizations; 42.8% and 41.0% of patients developed grade 3/4 and grade 4 neutropenic infections, respectively. For each additional day that patients had grade 3/4 and grade 4 CIN was associated with a 28% and 30% increase in the risk of infection related hospitalization, respectively (Table 1). Each unit (day×109/L ANC) increase of AOC (below 0.5 x 109/L) was also associated with a significantly increased risk of infection related hospitalization (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.35-2.90) (Table 2).Conclusions: Risk of infection increases dramatically with each additional day of grade 3 or 4 CIN. Interventions that limit the duration and extent of CIN are of critical importance to preventing infection among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Figure. ANC Trajectory (Median and Interquartile Range) in the First Chemotherapy Cycle [Display omitted] [Display omitted] [Display omitted] DisclosuresLi:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shih:Amgen: Consultancy. Klippel:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiner:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Page:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

0150 The severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in association with PTGS-2 gene polymorphism in breast cancer patients

0150 The severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in association with PTGS-2 gene polymorphism in breast cancer patients

Pegfilgrastim: a recent advance in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a frequent complication in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia can result in febrile neutropenia and potentially life-threatening infections requiring hospitalization and intravenous anti-infectives. Chemotherapy dose may be reduced or delayed as a result of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, which can negatively impact treatment outcomes. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, such as filgrastim, stimulate neutrophil production and can therefore reduce the incidence and severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Filgrastim undergoes rapid renal clearance and needs to be administered daily. The development of pegfilgrastim represents a significant advance in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as the longer serum half-life allows once-per-chemotherapy administration, and evidence supports increased prophylactic effectiveness in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia. This paper reviews the development of pegfilgrastim and summarizes recent clinical data on the use of this simple, effective and well-tolerated option for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer.