Severe Exacerbations Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of simultaneous combined Zephyr and Spiration valve therapy in patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema

BackgroundEndoscopic lung volume reduction with valves is a minimally invasive treatment strategy for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. Two valve systems are currently available: Zephyr and Spiration valves. As these can be implanted simultaneously in the same procedure, the question arose as to the effect on lung function, exercise capacity and subjective disease perception after combined valve treatment. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients with combined, simultaneous treatment of Zephyr and Spiration valves. The decision on which and how many valves to implant was based on the individual patient anatomy. Effects on lung function, exercise capacity and atelectasis formation as well as complications were evaluated 90- and 180-days post-treatment (90d-FU and 180d-FU). ResultsAt 90d-FU (n = 90), the mean change was 86.7 ± 183.7 mL for FEV1 and -645.3 ± 1276.5 mL for RV, with responder rates of 39.8 % and 46.5 %, respectively. Complete atelectasis occurred in 16.7 % and partial atelectasis in 25.5 % of patients. Six-minute walking distance increased by 27.00 m [-1.50 – 68.50m]. The rates of pneumothorax (10.2 %) 6 months after treatment were not higher than in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Likely due to the inclusion of high-risk patients, there was a higher incidence of severe COPD exacerbation (21.3 %) and pneumonia (12.0 %) compared to RCTs. ConclusionsThe combined implantation of Zephyr and Spiration valves resulted in significant clinical and functional improvements with an acceptable risk profile. Therefore, the ability to combine both valve types in severe emphysema could be a promising option in endoscopic lung volume reduction.

Endoscopic Features of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex inflammatory condition affecting the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been implicated as a potential exacerbating factor in CRS, but the specific endoscopic features of nasopharyngeal pathology in this context remain poorly understood. Background and Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis is a multifactorial disease with various underlying etiologies, including inflammation, anatomical factors, and environmental triggers. While gastroesophageal reflux disease has been suggested as a potential contributor to chronic rhinosinusitis, the specific endoscopic features indicative of nasopharyngeal pathology in CRS patients with GERD symptoms have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim is to identify specific endoscopic features of nasopharyngeal pathology in patients with CRS associated with GERD symptoms and to propose a method for assessing the influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the mucosal layer of the nose and nasopharynx. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study involving 521 adult patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of CRS. From this cohort, 95 patients with the highest scores on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) questionnaires were selected as the main group. Endoscopic examinations were performed to assess the nasal and nasopharyngeal mucosa. Results: Our study revealed significant alterations in the nasopharyngeal mucosa of patients with CRS associated with GERD symptoms. Increased vascularity of the nasopharyngeal mucosa was observed in 91 patients (95.7%), while hypertrophy was noted in 83 patients (87.4%). Mucus was present in the nasopharynx of 77 patients (81.1%), exhibiting varying characteristics of color and consistency. Asymmetric hypertrophy of the oropharyngeal mucosa was noted in 62 patients (65.3%). Conclusions: We propose a method for assessing the influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the mucosal layer of the nose and nasopharynx, which may aid in diagnostic and management decisions. Further research is warranted to explore the potential impact of GERD symptoms on the course and severity of CRS exacerbations.

Respiratory Pathogens at Exacerbation in Chronic Bronchitis With Airway Bacterial Colonisation: A Cohort Study.

COPD and bronchiectasis are common causes of morbidity, particularly around exacerbation. Colonisation with respiratory pathogens can increase the frequency and severity of exacerbations. However, bacterial and viral presence at exacerbation in people with airway colonisation has not been well studied. A 6-month cohort study of participants (n = 30) with chronic bronchitis due to bronchiectasis (n = 26) and/or COPD (n = 13) and colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Haemophilus influenzae was proven on two sputum cultures at exacerbation in the previous 12 months. Participants were provided self-management education and collected sputum samples daily. Sputum samples at baseline (at least 14 days before or after an exacerbation) and at each exacerbation were examined for a panel of 34 respiratory pathogens using commercially available RT-PCR kits and compared to results obtained using culture methods for the detection of bacteria. Participants provided 29 baseline samples and 71 samples at exacerbation. In 17/29 baseline samples, RT-PCR analysis confirmed the organism demonstrated by culture, while 12 samples showed a discrepancy from culture results. Most exacerbations (57.7%) were not associated with acquiring new bacteria or viruses, while 19.8% showed new bacteria, 15.7% new viruses and 7% both new viruses and bacteria. Over half of exacerbations were not associated with new organisms in this cohort of participants with chronic bronchitis and colonisation. However, 26.8% demonstrated a new bacterial species in sputum, which is relevant for antibiotic therapy. Baseline RT-PCR and culture results were discordant in one-third of participants.

Rhinovirus characteristics associated with viremia in childhood asthma.

Although rhinoviruses play a major role in exacerbations of childhood asthma, the presence of rhinovirus (RV) RNA in plasma, referred to as viremia, has been investigated in a few studies. The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of rhinovirus viremia at the time of asthma exacerbation and to describe the molecular characteristics of rhinoviruses associated with viremia. We conducted an observational, prospective, multicenter study in eight pediatric hospitals (VIRASTHMA2). Preschool-aged recurrent wheezers (1-5 years) hospitalized for a severe exacerbation were included. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and molecular typing for RV/enteroviruses (EV) were performed on nasal swabs and plasma. Plasma specimens were available for 105 children with positive RT-PCR for RV/EV in respiratory specimens. Thirty-six (34.3%) had positive viremia. In plasma, 28 (82.4%) of the typable specimens were RV-C, five (14.7%) were EV-D68, and one was RV-A (2.9%). In all cases, the RV/EV type was identical in the plasma and respiratory specimens. In conclusion, RV/EV viremia is frequent in severe exacerbations of preschool recurrent wheezers, particularly in RV-C infections.

Therapeutic relevance of eosinophilic inflammation and airway viral interactions in severe asthma.

The role of eosinophils in airway inflammation and asthma pathogenesis is well established, with raised eosinophil counts in blood and sputum associated with increased disease severity and risk of asthma exacerbation. Conversely, there is also preliminary evidence suggesting antiviral properties of eosinophils in the airways. These dual roles for eosinophils are particularly pertinent as respiratory virus infections contribute to asthma exacerbations. Biologic therapies targeting key molecules implicated in eosinophil-associated pathologies have been approved in patients with severe asthma and, therefore, the effects of depleting eosinophils in a clinical setting are of considerable interest. This review discusses the pathological and antiviral roles of eosinophils in asthma and exacerbations. We also highlight the significant reduction in asthma exacerbations seen with biologic therapies, even at the height of the respiratory virus season. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of these findings in relation to the role of eosinophils in inflammation and antiviral responses to respiratory virus infection in asthma.

Comparative effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab on asthma exacerbations and systemic corticosteroid prescriptions: Real-world US ADVANTAGE study

In the United States, dupilumab is approved for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, and omalizumab is approved for managing moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. However, limited comparative effectiveness data exist for these biologics due to differing patient characteristics and treatment histories. This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab for asthma in patients in the United States. In this retrospective observational study, TriNetX Dataworks electronic medical record data were used to identify patients with asthma age ≥12 years who initiated (index) dupilumab or omalizumab between November 2018 and September 2020 and who had at least 12 months of pre- and post-index clinical information. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounding in treatment groups. Asthma exacerbation rates and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions were compared using a doubly robust negative binomial regression model, adjusting for baseline exacerbation/SCS rates and patient characteristics with ≥10% standardized differences after inverse probability of treatment weighting. All inclusion and exclusion criteria were met by 2138 dupilumab patients and 1313 omalizumab patients. After weighting, the majority of baseline characteristics were balanced (standard difference <10%) between the 2 groups. Dupilumab was associated with a 44% lower asthma exacerbation rate (P< .0001) versus omalizumab. Additionally, dupilumab treatment significantly (P< .05) reduced SCS prescriptions by 28% during the follow-up period compared with omalizumab treatment. The US ADVANTAGE real-world study demonstrated a significant reduction in severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions for patients prescribed dupilumab compared with patients prescribed omalizumab during 12 months of follow-up.

Distinguishing Childhood Asthma Exacerbations from Stable Asthma: The Utility of Inflammatory White Blood Cell Biomarkers.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by episodes of acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs), in addition to chronic airway inflammation, which has a huge impact on both the affected patients and their parents. The main objective of this study was to explore the utility of available white-blood-cell-derived inflammatory markers in diagnosing AAEs and identifying children at risk for severe exacerbations requiring admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This study was a retrospective cohort study. The medical records of 128 children diagnosed with asthma exacerbation and 131 children with stable asthma between the ages of 2 and 12 years were reviewed. A total of 259 participants were enrolled. Children with AAE demonstrated significantly higher white blood cell counts (WBC: 10.0 ± 4.2 × 103/μL vs. 7.1 ± 2.2 × 103/μL, p < 0.001), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC: 7398.5 ± 4600 cells/μL vs. 2634.8 ± 1448 cells/μL, p < 0.001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR: 7.0 ± 6.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) but significantly lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC: 1794.1 ± 1536 × 103/μL vs. 3552.9 ± 1509 × 103/μL, p < 0.001). Interestingly, blood eosinophil count displayed an opposite trend: children with stable asthma had significantly more eosinophils compared to those experiencing an exacerbation (370.1 ± 342.7 cells/mm3 vs. 0.9 ± 1.9 cells/mm3, p < 0.001). Two criteria that are indicative of AAE were identified: NLR values greater than 1.2, with good discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.94; sensitivity 82.5%; specificity 79.5%), and ANC values exceeding 3866, with moderate discriminative ability (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.91; sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 82.3%). Moreover, a comparative analysis of these markers (NLR, ANC, PLR, WBC, AEC, and ALC) in patients with AAE did not demonstrate significant differences between those requiring PICU admission and those who did not require it. This study contributes two major findings. The first is that NLR, ANC, WBC, and PLR are significantly higher in AAE patients compared to those with stable asthma. The second is that children with stable asthma have higher AEC and ALC levels compared to those with AAE. Furthermore, this study has revealed that the studied markers (NLR, ANC, PLR, WBC, AEC, and ALC) did not differentiate between AAE patients requiring PICU admission and those managed in the general ward, suggesting a need for alternative predictive factors.

Longitudinal Changes in Maximal Forced Inspiratory Flow and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COPD

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) primarily impairs expiratory flow due to progressive airflow obstruction and reduced lung elasticity. Increasing evidence underlines the importance of inspiratory flow as a biomarker for selecting inhaler devices and providing ancillary aerodynamic information. Research QuestionDoes the longitudinal changes in maximum forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax) influence acute exacerbations and lung function decline in COPD patients? Study Design and MethodsThis longitudinal study observed FIFmax in COPD patients over a 7-year period from 2004 to 2020. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on FIFmax trajectory: the increased FIFmax group and the decreased FIFmax group. Our study assessed the annual rate of acute exacerbations and the annual decline rate of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment status, with a focus on inhaled therapy and inhaler device usage. ResultsAmong the eligible 956 COPD patients, 56.5% belonged to the increased FIFmax group. After propensity score matching, the increased FIFmax group experienced lower rates of severe exacerbations (0.16/yr vs. 0.25/yr, P-value=0.017) and a slower decline in FEV1 (0 [interquartile range (IQR), -51–71] vs. -43 [IQR, -119–6] ml/yr, P-value<0.001) compared to the decreased FIFmax group. These associations were particularly prominent in patients using specific inhaler therapies, such as DPI therapies. InterpretationOur study revealed that the longitudinal changes in FIFmax are associated with clinical outcomes in COPD patients. Patients with increased FIFmax experienced a lower rate of severe exacerbations and a slower decline in lung function. These findings suggest the potential benefits of optimizing inspiratory flow in COPD management, though further studies are needed to confirm these observations due to potential confounding factors.

Dupilumab Efficacy in Children With Type 2 Asthma Receiving High- to Medium-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid (VOYAGE)

In phase 3 VOYAGE (NCT02948959), dupilumab showed clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in children (6-11 years) with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥20 ppb). We analyzed dupilumab's efficacy in children with type 2 asthma by high- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at baseline. Children were randomized to receive add-on dupilumab 100/200 mg (by body-weight ≤30 kg/>30 kg) every 2 weeks or placebo for 52 weeks and stratified by high- or medium-dose ICS at baseline. Endpoints were annualized severe exacerbation rate, changes from baseline in percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) and 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire - Interviewer Administered (ACQ-7-IA) score, proportions of ACQ-7-IA responders (improvement ≥0.5), and biomarker changes. In children receiving high- (n = 152) or medium- (n = 195) dose ICS at baseline, dupilumab versus placebo reduced severe exacerbation rates by 63% (P < .001) and 59% (P = .003), respectively. At week 52, dupilumab improved ppFEV1 by least squares mean difference versus placebo of 5.7 percentage points (P = .02) and 9.35 points (P < .001), and reduced ACQ-7-IA scores by 0.53 points (P < .001) and 0.40 points (P < .001), respectively. No significant treatment interactions between ICS subgroups were detected at week 52. Significant improvements were observed in ACQ-7-IA responder rates and most type 2 biomarker levels. Dupilumab reduced severe exacerbation rates and improved lung function and asthma control in children with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma, regardless of ICS dose at baseline.

CFTR Modulators Therapy Efficacy in Reducing Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Exacerbation and Improving Selected Spirometry Parameters: A Real-Life Study in a Single-Centre Polish Population.

Background/Objectives: Cystic fibrosis is a genetically determined disease that significantly influences and shortens life. Treatment with CFTR modulators (CFTR-T) is a new hope for patients. It can change the predictive values of a poor prognosis (e.g., exacerbation rate and FEV1 value). The aim of the study was to analyse exacerbation incidence and spirometry data before and after one year (+/- 2 weeks) of CFTR-T in 85 CF patients at the CF Centre in Poznań. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of CFTR-T efficiency in the Central-Eastern Europe population. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the spirometry and exacerbation data of 85 CF adult patients (both men and women), who in the middle of 2022 began treatment with CFTR modulators. Results: The one-year ratio of hospitalisation caused by severe exacerbations lowered from 1.25 to 0.21 per patient per year. We also saw a 66% decline in ambulatory exacerbations. The median FEV1% increased by 9.60% in absolute values and by 460 mL. Even in the group with very severe obstruction (FEV1 < 35%), there was an increase in median FEV1% of 5.9 in absolute values. We also proved the increase in FVC% (median 17.10% in absolute value and 600 mL) in the study group. Conclusions: After one year of treatment, an impressive improvement was observed in two important predictive values of poor prognosis: exacerbation rate and FEV1 values. Further observation is needed to determine how long the improvement will be present and its influence on quality of life and life expectancy.

High-flow nasal cannula and in-line aerosolised bronchodilator delivery during severe exacerbation of asthma in adults: a feasibility observational study

BackgroundAsthma is a common chronic respiratory disease affecting 1–29% of the population in different countries. Exacerbations represent a change in symptoms and lung function from the patient's usual condition that requires emergency department (ED) admission. Recently, the use of a High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) plus an in-line vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) for aerosol drug delivery has been advocated in clinical practice. Thus, this pilot observational study aims to investigate the feasibility of HFNC treatment with VMN for in-line bronchodilator delivery in patients with severe asthma. MethodsThis study was conducted from May 2022 to May 2023. Subjects ≥18 years old with a previous diagnosis of asthma who were admitted to the ED during severe exacerbation were included. The primary endpoint was the change in peak expiratory flow ratio (PEFR) after 2-h of treatment with bronchodilator delivered by HFNC with in-line VMN. Additional outcomes were changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and clinical variables before treatment. Results30 patients, mean age of 43 (SD ± 16) years, mostly female (67%) were studied. A significant change in PEFR (147 ± 31 L/m vs. 220 ± 38 L/m; p < 0.001) was observed after treatment with HFNC and in-line VMN with significant improvement in clinical variables. And no subjects required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the study. ConclusionsHFNC treatment with in-line VMN for bronchodilator delivery appears feasible and safe for patients with severe asthma exacerbation. These preliminary promising results should be confirmed with appropriately large-designed studies.

Mucus Plugs as Precursors to Exacerbation and Lung Function Decline in COPD Patients

BackgroundMucus plugs identified through chest computed tomography (CT) scans have emerged as potential prognostic factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This 5-year longitudinal study investigated their impact on exacerbations and FEV1 decline. MethodsCOPD patients with baseline chest CT and spirometric assessments were categorized based on mucus plug presence. Propensity-score matching yielded balanced groups. Exacerbation rates, time to exacerbation events, hazard ratio (HR) for exacerbations, and annual rates of FEV1 decline were evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was performed with stratification according to mucus plug scores of 0, 1–2, and ≥3. ResultsAmong 623 eligible patients, the mucus plug group was 44.3%. Through 1:1 propensity-score matching, each group was comprised of 187 individuals with balanced covariates. The mucus plug group showed higher rates of moderate-to-severe (0.51/year vs. 0.58/year, P=0.035), severe exacerbations (0.21/year vs. 0.24/year, P=0.032), and non-eosinophilic exacerbations (0.45/year vs. 0.52/year, P=0.008). Mucus plugs were associated with increased hazard of moderate-to-severe (adjusted HR=1.502 [95% CI 1.116–2.020]), severe (adjusted HR=2.106 [95% CI, 1.429–3.103]), and non-eosinophilic exacerbations (adjusted HR=1.551 [95% CI, 1.132–2.125]). Annual FEV1 decline was accelerated in the mucus plug group (β-coefficient=−62 [95% CI, −120 to −5], P=0.035). Sensitivity analysis showed higher risk of exacerbations and accelerated FEV1 decline in mucus plug score ≥3 compared to score 0. ConclusionsMucus plugs are associated with increased risks of exacerbations, particularly non-eosinophilic, and accelerated FEV1 declines over 5 years. Our study identified the potential prognostic value of mucus plugs on future exacerbation risks and lung function decline trajectories.

Mepolizumab in Severe Pediatric Asthma: Certainties and Doubts through a Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.

Although, in most children with asthma, good symptom control is achieved with a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids, a small group of patients still experiences frequent symptoms, and even severe exacerbations, impairment of lung function, and reduced quality of life. Some of these subjects with severe asthma require biologic drugs as add-on therapy. In the past decade, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved for children or adolescents with severe asthma, in addition to their increasing use in adult asthma. However, the available evidence on how to select the most appropriate biologic based on a single patient's clinical, functional, and laboratory characteristics is still scant, and is insufficient to guide clinicians in the decision-making process of a personalized treatment. We report a case series of four patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, and review the existing literature on this treatment in children and adolescents. Our patients, all with blood eosinophilia and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, developed poor symptom control despite prolonged treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, addressing the addition of a biologic drug. In all of them, a 12-month treatment with subcutaneous mepolizumab showed a reduction in the blood eosinophil count and in asthma exacerbations, as well as an improvement on the Asthma Control Test. The results of the literature search focused on the strengths and limitations of the pediatric use of mepolizumab and highlighted the areas worthy of further research. Mepolizumab has proven effective in improving symptom control in pediatric patients with severe asthma. Additional well-powered clinical trials will be helpful in developing evidence-based guidelines regarding biologic drugs in the pediatric population.

Predictive score for in-hospital mortality in patients with severe acute exacerbations of COPD

Predictive score for in-hospital mortality in patients with severe acute exacerbations of COPD

The Impact of Malnutrition on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Outcomes: The Predictive Value of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) versus Acute Exacerbations in Patients with Highly Complex COPD and Its Clinical and Prognostic Implications.

Current management of COPD is predominantly focused on respiratory aspects. A multidimensional assessment including nutritional assessment, quality of life and disability provides a more reliable perspective of the true complexity of COPD patients. This was a prospective observational study of 120 elderly COPD patients at high risk of acute exacerbations. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was administered in addition to the usual respiratory assessment. The primary outcome was a composite of moderate or severe acute exacerbations during 52 weeks of follow-up. The median MNA Short Form (SF) score was 11 (8-12), 39 participants (32.50%) had a normal nutritional status, 57 (47.5%) were at risk of malnutrition and 24 (20%) were malnourished. Our multivariate linear regression models showed that the MNA score was associated with dyspnea and respiratory symptom severity, assessed by the Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, with spirometric variables, in particular with the severity of airflow limitation based on the value of FEV1, and with poorer QoL, as assessed by the EQ-5D-3 questionnaire. Competing risk analysis according to nutritional status based on the MNA Total Score showed that COPD participants "at risk of malnutrition" and "malnourished" had a higher risk of moderate to severe acute exacerbations with sub-hazard ratios of 3.08 (1.40-6.80), p = 0.015, and 4.64 (1.71-12.55), p = 0.0002, respectively. Our study confirms the importance of assessing nutritional status in elderly COPD patients and its prognostic value.

Dupilumab 200 mg was efficacious in children (6-11 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma for up to 2 years: EXCURSION open-label extension study.

The phase 3 VOYAGE (NCT02948959) and open-label extension EXCURSION (NCT03560466) studies evaluated dupilumab in children (6-11 years) with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma. This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of add-on dupilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), the largest dose cohort in both studies, in children from VOYAGE who participated in EXCURSION. Annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations (AERs), change in prebronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1), and treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed in children with moderate-to-severe asthma who received dupilumab 200 mg q2w in VOYAGE and EXCURSION (dupilumab/dupilumab arm) and those who received placebo in VOYAGE and dupilumab 200 mg q2w in EXCURSION (placebo/dupilumab arm). These endpoints were also assessed in children with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (defined as blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells/µL or FeNO ≥20 ppb at the parent study baseline [PSBL]). In the overall population, dupilumab reduced AER and improved prebronchodilator ppFEV1 in the dupilumab/dupilumab arm (n = 158) for up to 2 years. Children receiving placebo/dupilumab (n = 85) showed similar reductions after initiation of dupilumab 200 mg q2w in EXCURSION. Similar results were observed for children with type 2 asthma at PSBL. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab. In children (6-11 years) with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma, dupilumab 200 mg reduced exacerbation rates and improved lung function for up to 2 years and showed safety consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile.

Real-world biomarker variability and effects of biologics on severe asthma in Alberta

Rationale: Guidelines recommend biomarker testing to phenotype patients with severe asthma (SA), to guide treatment. However, biomarker levels fluctuate, and individual responses to biologics are not fully understood. Objectives: This study estimated the proportion of patients experiencing biomarker variability and the real-world effectiveness of biologics in SA. Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative data from Alberta, Canada (April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2020) for patients with SA. Year-to-year variability in biomarker levels was assessed using clinical thresholds (blood eosinophil count [EOS] ≥ 300 cells/µL; immunoglobin E [IgE] ≥ 30 IU/mL) to explore category switching. Incidence rate ratios of exacerbations were estimated by biomarker level. Associations between follow-up time with biologics exposure (bio-experience), biomarker levels and exacerbation rates were modeled. Results: Up to 28% of SA patients displayed year-over-year biomarker threshold switching for EOS and up to 12% for IgE. Severe exacerbation rates were higher with blood EOS count ≥300cells/µL or IgE ≥30 IU/mL. Bio-experience was associated with lower blood EOS versus pre-bio-experience (relative mean EOS: 0.53 [0.42-0.68]), persisting >1 year following discontinuation. Bio-experience was associated with a nearly 50% reduction in exacerbation risk after initiating biologics (IRR = 0.54 [0.48, 0.62]), regardless of comorbid status. Conclusions: Higher biomarker levels were associated with higher exacerbation rates, but a proportion of patients demonstrated variability, crossing clinical thresholds. Treatments with upstream agents targeting multiple pathways of inflammation may circumvent this issue. Biologics had real-world effectiveness in reducing SA biomarkers. Their persistent temporal effect provides a groundwork for exploring cost-effective biologics use.

Linkage of serum ITIH4 with Th2 signature cytokine, inflammation, exacerbation risk and severity in childhood asthma.

Aim: ITIH4has anti-inflammatory properties toward eosinophilic/neutrophilic inflammation. This study aimed to explore clinical value of ITIH4 in childhood asthma.Materials & methods: Serum ITIH4 and inflammatory cytokines were determined in 120 childhood asthma patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Results: In the entire and acute exacerbation patients, ITIH4 positively associated with IFN-γ, but negatively related to proinflammatory cytokines. ITIH4 was lowest in patients with acute exacerbation, followed by chronic persistent, and highest in clinical remission. By receiver-operating characteristic analysis, ITIH4 potentially estimated acute exacerbation asthma risk. Moreover, ITIH4 negatively related to exacerbation severity in acute exacerbation patients.Conclusion: Serum ITIH4 negatively links with Th2 cell signature cytokine, proinflammatory cytokines, exacerbation risk and severity in childhood asthma.

Predictive role of platelets to lymphocytes ratio and neutrophil to lymphocytes ratio in COPD exacerbation

BackgroundThe hallmark of COPD is the progressive destruction of the lung parenchyma, which is frequently brought on by the body's inflammatory reaction to external stimuli (such as smoking cigarettes or pollution). According to reports, the peripheral blood's essential immune-related cell populations' absolute counts and ratios can accurately represent chronic inflammatory diseases. Complex interactions between immune-related cells, such as lymphocytes and neutrophils, are involved in inflammation, which can cause irreversible damage and loss of respiratory tissue. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), two hematological indicators of inflammation, have been studied in a variety of disease states, including solid tumors, systemic lupus erythematosus, coronary artery disease, retinal artery occlusion, chronic kidney disease, and stable COPD.AimCorrelation between NLR and PLR and outcome of COPD exacerbation.Materials and methodsThis cross-sectional study included 80 patients with COPD exacerbation who visited the outpatient clinic or were admitted to the Chest Department. CRP and calculation of NLR and PLR within 24 h from admission and 1 month after discharge were obtained to identify the prognostic value of NLR and PLR for the exacerbation, hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in patients with COPD.ResultsDuring COPD exacerbation PLR, NLR showed a statistically significant correlation with the need for hospitalization with a p value < 0.001. As regards correlation with mortality NLR was statistically significant with a p value of 0.006 while PLR showed a non-significant p value of 0.077. PLR and NLR were correlated with CRP as an inflammatory marker and both were statistically significant with p value 0.004 and < 0.001 respectively. During exacerbation, PLR and NLR were correlated with the need for mechanical ventilation and the results were statistically significant with p value < 0.001. PLR and NLR showed a significant increase during exacerbation compared to stable COPD patients 1 month after discharge with p value of < 0.001.ConclusionPLR and NLR are simple tests that could be used to predict the severity of COPD exacerbation and the need for hospitalization, MV, and mortality prediction.

Neutrophil extracellular traps promote immunopathogenesis of virus-induced COPD exacerbations

Respiratory viruses are a major trigger of exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Airway neutrophilia is a hallmark feature of stable and exacerbated COPD but roles played by neutrophil extracellular traps (NETS) in driving disease pathogenesis are unclear. Here, using human studies of experimentally-induced and naturally-occurring exacerbations we identify that rhinovirus infection induces airway NET formation which is amplified in COPD and correlates with magnitude of inflammation and clinical exacerbation severity. We show that inhibiting NETosis protects mice from immunopathology in a model of virus-exacerbated COPD. NETs drive inflammation during exacerbations through release of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) and administration of DNAse in mice has similar protective effects. Thus, NETosis, through release of dsDNA, has a functional role in the pathogenesis of COPD exacerbations. These studies open up the potential for therapeutic targeting of NETs or dsDNA as a strategy for treating virus-exacerbated COPD.