TOPIC: Pulmonary Vascular Disease TYPE: Fellow Case Reports INTRODUCTION: Prostacyclin related thrombocytopenia has been reported in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, the degree of thrombocytopenia is usually mild to moderate[1]. We present a case of severe thrombocytopenia in a patient with PAH being treated with intravenous (IV) epoprostenol (Epo) CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old African-American female with idiopathic PAH developed worsening thrombocytopenia over a few months. She had previously been treated with IV treprostinil (Trp) for 11 years but was transitioned to escalating dose of IV Epo due to disease progression. She denied taking any new medications and her outpatient regimen was unchanged and included IV Epo, ambrisentan, tadalafil, ranolazine, furosemide, spironolactone, cetirizine, esomeprazole, and escitalopram. While on IV Trp, her platelet count was ~180,000 /uL but after switching to Epo, it gradually worsened to a nadir of 16,000 /uL prompting hospital admission. Her complete blood count revealed mild anemia attributed to chronic disease. A peripheral blood smear did not reveal schistocytes and her comprehensive metabolic panel was normal. Flow cytometry did not reveal clonal proliferation while her infectious and autoimmune serologies were also negative. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was ruled out and an ultrasound of the spleen was normal. Bone marrow biopsy showed unremarkable FISH analysis and cytology. The degree of thrombocytopenia precluded safe lung transplantation and she was treated with IV steroids and IV immunoglobulins for possible ITP without improvement. Based on the temporal relation and the George scale for drug induced thrombocytopenia[2], Epo was thought to be the most likely etiology and it was switched back to IV Trp. Her hospital course was complicated by severe epistaxis causing acute hypoxemic respiratory and right ventricular failure requiring initiation of ECMO. The patient's platelet count recovered over the next few days and she was successfully transplanted. The temporal relation of Epo initiation and discontinuation correlates well with the trajectory of the platelets DISCUSSION: Around two-thirds of all patients on IV Epo have some degree of thrombocytopenia, the majority of which were mild. The mechanisms for drug-induced thrombocytopenia are many; one such mechanism could include autoantibodies[3]. It did not appear to be a class effect or related to hemodynamics as platelet counts recovered after switching back to Trp. Hence, thrombocytopenia is likely due to a direct effect of Epo on platelets CONCLUSIONS: Thrombocytopenia is a well-recognized side effect of IV Epo which can sometimes be severe. It appears to have a dose-dependent relationship and may improve with changing to an alternative prostacyclin. It is critical to recognize this phenomenon as profound thrombocytopenia can not only be dangerous, but also preclude lung transplant candidacy, should it become necessary REFERENCE #1: Hargett CW, Ahearn GS, Krichman AM, Ward VR, Thoma M, Tapson VF. Thrombocytopenia Associated with Chronic Intravenous Epoprostenol Therapy. Chest. 2004;126(4):760S. doi:10.1378/chest.126.4_meetingabstracts.760s-b REFERENCE #2: George JN, Aster RH. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis, evaluation, and management. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.153 REFERENCE #3: Bakchoul T, Marini I. Drug-Associated Thrombocytopenia. http://ashpublications.org/hematology/article-pdf/2018/1/576/1255769/hem01879.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2021. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Qamar Ahmad, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Kareem Ahmad, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Shambhu Aryal, source=Web Response no disclosure on file for Aaron Bagnola;Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Genentech Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Anne Brown, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with Vertex Please note: $1001 - $5000 by Anne Brown, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with Promedior Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Anne Brown, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee no disclosure on file for Vikramjit Khangoora;Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Genentech Please note: 2019 Added 03/10/2021 by Christopher King, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Advisory Committee Member relationship with United therapeutics Please note: 2020 Added 03/10/2021 by Christopher King, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Advisory Committee Member relationship with actelion Please note: 2019-2020 Added 03/10/2021 by Christopher King, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with actelion Please note: 2020-2021 Added 03/10/2021 by Christopher King, source=Web Response, value=Royalty Advisory Committee Member relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Please note: 2019-2020 Added 03/10/2021 by Christopher King, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Please note: 2020-2021 Added 03/10/2021 by Christopher King, source=Web Response, value=Royalty Consultant relationship with Veracyte Please note: $1001 - $5000 by Steven Nathan, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Consultant relationship with United Therapeutics Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Steven Nathan, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Consultant relationship with Bellerophon Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Steven Nathan, source=Web Response, value=Consulting fee Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Roche-Genentech Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Steven Nathan, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Boerhinger-Ingelheim Please note: $20001 - $100000 by Steven Nathan, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria No relevant relationships by Oksana Shlobin, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Anju Singhal, source=Web Response
Read full abstract