Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Articles

Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab (RoActemra or Actemra) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that acts as an interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antagonist. Intravenous tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (and no less than 4.8 mg), in combination with methotrexate, is approved in the EU for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients with inadequate response to, or who are intolerant of, prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. It may also be administered as monotherapy in patients intolerant of methotrexate or in whom methotrexate therapy is inappropriate. Tocilizumab is also approved in Japan for the treatment of polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Castleman's disease. Intravenous tocilizumab was effective and generally well tolerated when administered either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional DMARDs in several well designed clinical studies in adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Tocilizumab-based therapy was consistently more effective than placebo, methotrexate or other DMARDs in reducing disease activity, and some trials also showed significant benefits with tocilizumab in terms of reducing structural joint damage and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Notably, tocilizumab-based therapy was effective in patients with long-standing disease in whom anti-TNF therapy had previously failed. More data are required to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of tocilizumab versus other biological agents and to establish their relative cost effectiveness. However, the present data suggest that tocilizumab is an important emerging treatment option in adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Leflunomide (Arava™) is a useful DMARD in Indian (Asian) patients: a clinic-based observational study of 1-year treatment

Several drug trials, predominantly of Caucasian patients, have demonstrated the therapeutic role of leflunomide (LEF) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We report an Indian (Asian) experience from a prospective observational study. Two hundred thirty affording patients with moderately severe active RA (naïve for LEF), mostly failing methotrexate (MTX), were begun LEF (Aravatrade mark; 20 mg daily, post loading 100 mg od x 3 days) in a clinic setting and followed regularly in an open cohort as per standard of care practice guidelines. A priori, LEF was to be preferably used as a single-agent disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). One hundred forty-three patients and 87 patients were clinically assigned to the LEF monotherapy and LEF + MTX combination, respectively; less than one third received prednisolone. We focus on 146 patients (64%) completing 1 year treatment. Patients improved significantly (p < 0.05, analysis of variance) in several measures (including Health Assessment Questionnaire). Though unintended (non-randomized), the treatment subgroups matched at baseline. Of patients, 42% and 24% in LEF monotherapy and LEF + MTX, respectively showed American College of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR 50) improvement. LEF monotherapy showed a better 'time to first ACR 20 improvement' outcome over 1 year (survival function curve, Cox Hazard Ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.52, 0.96). Ten percent to 30% patients reported diarrhea, hair loss, skin rash, and dyspepsia; <3% reported abnormal liver functions. Eighty-four patients (36.5%) withdrew (8.7% adverse events and 18.7% non-affordability). LEF is an effective and safe DMARD in our ethnic patient population and may suffice as a single agent (to treat moderately severe RA) during the initial 1 year.

Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

Interleukin 6 is involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis via its broad effects on immune and inflammatory responses. Our aim was to assess the therapeutic effects of blocking interleukin 6 by inhibition of the interleukin-6 receptor with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase III study, 623 patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned with an interactive voice response system, stratified by site with a randomisation list provided by the study sponsor, to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (n=205), tocilizumab 4 mg/kg (214), or placebo (204) intravenously every 4 weeks, with methotrexate at stable pre-study doses (10-25 mg/week). Rescue therapy with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg was offered at week 16 to patients with less than 20% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with 20% improvement in signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis according to American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20 response) at week 24. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00106548. The intention-to-treat analysis population consisted of 622 patients: one patient in the 4 mg/kg group did not receive study treatment and was thus excluded. At 24 weeks, ACR20 responses were seen in more patients receiving tocilizumab than in those receiving placebo (120 [59%] patients in the 8 mg/kg group, 102 [48%] in the 4 mg/kg group, 54 [26%] in the placebo group; odds ratio 4.0 [95% CI 2.6-6.1], p<0.0001 for 8 mg/kg vs placebo; and 2.6 [1.7-3.9], p<0.0001 for 4 mg/kg vs placebo). More people receiving tocilizumab than those receiving placebo had at least one adverse event (143 [69%] in the 8 mg/kg group; 151 [71%] in the 4 mg/kg group; 129 [63%] in the placebo group). The most common serious adverse events were serious infections or infestations, reported by six patients in the 8 mg/kg group, three in the 4 mg/kg group, and two in the placebo group. Tocilizumab could be an effective therapeutic approach in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. F Hoffmann-La Roche, Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Latest news and product developments

Latest news and product developments

Latest news and product developments

Latest news and product developments

Etanercept

Etanercept (Enbrel), a soluble fusion protein that binds specifically to the cytokine human tumour necrosis factor (TNF), is approved for subcutaneous use in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing arthritis and plaque psoriasis in the US, Italy, the rest of the EU and other countries worldwide. Subcutaneous etanercept was efficacious and generally well tolerated in several large, well designed, clinical trials and in the clinical-practice setting in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, including methotrexate-naive patients with early disease and those with long-standing, treatment-resistant active disease. Etanercept plus methotrexate combination therapy was generally superior to either monotherapy in reducing disease activity and structural joint damage, as well as improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Furthermore, etanercept monotherapy was superior to placebo and at least as effective as methotrexate therapy in reducing disease activity and improving HR-QOL in patients with early or refractory disease. The beneficial effects of etanercept monotherapy or combination therapy were sustained in the long term (< or =9 years). Some pharmaco-economic analyses suggest that etanercept is a cost-effective option in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Direct head-to-head comparisons with other biological agents would help to definitively position etanercept with respect to these agents. Nevertheless, extensive clinical experience indicates that etanercept is a valuable treatment option in adult patients with long-standing moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an emerging option in those with early disease.

Etanercept in severe active rheumatoid arthritis: first Australian experience

Etanercept reduces disease activity in adults with chronic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are resistant to other therapies. Medicare Australia Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme subsidized treatment (since August 2003) restricts etanercept availability to a most drug-resistant RA population. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of etanercept in this unique group after 12 months of therapy. A prospective study of the first 50 consecutive private practice, adult RA patients whom were commenced on etanercept. The primary efficacy measures included short form 36 scores, Disease Activity Score 28, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response improvement in per cent and the ACR individual core set components at baseline, 3 and 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. There was significant improvement in all mean short form 36 component scores (P < 0.05) and all ACR core set component scores (P < 0.05) comparing 12 months to baseline. The disease activity score 28 also significantly fell from baseline at both 3 and 12 months (P < 0.05). The ACR 20% response significantly improved (P < 0.05) both at baseline to 3 months 92% (81.2, 96.9) and to 12 months 80% (67.0, 88.8). Serious adverse events occurred in 16%. At 12 months 88% completed treatment. Etanercept therapy will, by 3 and 12 months, significantly improve the short form 36, disease activity score 28, ACR 20% response and core set components. Our results are similar to international studies using etanercept in efficacy and tolerance despite our cohort being more resistant to preceding drug therapy. Etanercept offers this unique active severe refractory late RA Australian population a new therapeutic option to control their disease.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of chaperonin 10 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind randomised trial

Chaperonin 10 (heat shock protein 10, XToll) has anti-inflammatory properties related to the inhibition of Toll-like receptor signalling pathways. Our aim was to establish whether chaperonin 10 is safe and effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre study, 23 patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were randomly allocated to three treatment groups receiving intravenous chaperonin 10 twice weekly for 12 weeks at doses of 5 mg (n=8), 7.5 mg (8), or 10 mg (7). The primary outcomes were change in disease activity score (DAS28) and improvement of core disease measures (American College of Rheumatology response score) from baseline to week 12. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRNO12606000041550. Primary endpoint measures improved from day 14 in all groups and continued to improve to day 84. By end of study, a 20% improvement of core disease measures was seen in six (86%, 95% CI 43-100), a 50% improvement in four (57%, 14-86), and a 70% improvement in two (29%, 0-57) patients given the highest dose of chaperonin 10. Clinical remission (as defined by a DAS28 <2.6) was achieved in three (13%) of 23 patients. Three individuals dropped out during the study: one in the 5 mg group (rheumatoid arthritis not controlled), one in the 7.5 mg group (adverse event), and one in the 10 mg group (lost to follow-up). The most common adverse events were exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis (both during and after the study) and upper respiratory tract infection. Only one adverse event was judged to be of severe intensity. Chaperonin 10 seems to be well tolerated and efficacious in treatment of the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, at least in the short term.

A practical guide for the use of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis*

A practical guide for the use of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis*

Dose Intensification with Infliximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Infliximab, in combination with methotrexate, is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While there is anecdotal evidence that many patients beginning infliximab therapy have their dose and/or frequency of infusions increased over time ("dose intensification"), relatively little is known about actual patterns of use in clinical practice. To examine patterns of infliximab use in patients with RA. Using a large US healthcare claims database, all patients with RA who initiated infliximab therapy between January 1, 2000, and September 30, 2001, were identified. The date of each patient's first claim for infliximab was identified and designated as the index date; attention was limited to patients who received infliximab for at least one year. Patterns of infliximab use were then examined over the 12-month period following the index date, based on information on paid claims. Fifty-three patients met all entry criteria; the mean age was 61 years, and 81% were women. Twenty-eight percent of patients received >8 infusions over 12 months. The mean dose of infliximab at initial infusion was 296.2 mg; at final infusion, it was 401.9 mg (36% increase). One-half of study subjects had their dose of infliximab increased by > or =30% between the initial and final infusions; one-third had their dose increased by > or =50%. Many patients with RA beginning treatment with infliximab have their frequency of infusions and/or medication dose increased within the first 12 months.

Microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (Sandimmun Neoral®) vs Sandimmun®: comparative safety, tolerability and efficacy in severe active rheumatoid arthritis

To compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the new oral microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin A (CyA; Sandimmun Neoral) and the original CyA formulation (Sandimmun), in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), over a 12-month period. In this double-blind, multicentre study, patients were randomized to treatment with Neoral or Sandimmun, starting with 2.5 mg/kg/day, with dose adjustments after 4 weeks. Primary efficacy criteria included patients' assessment of disease activity. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed at regular intervals. Compared with Sandimmun, Neoral showed a consistent trend towards greater clinical efficacy from week 12 onwards, including a significant difference in patients' assessment of disease activity at the study end-points. A significantly lower increase in dose from baseline was observed with Neoral at week 24. Pharmacokinetic assessments at week 24 showed increased absorption and decreased variability with Neoral. No differences in safety were found between treatment groups. These observations indicate that Neoral is as safe and at least as effective as Sandimmun and have important implications for patient management given the increasing role for CyA in the treatment of severe, active RA.

Composition and function of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell harvests from patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue has been proposed as an intensive therapy for severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In view of previous observations of abnormal haemopoiesis in RA patients, the composition and function of peripheral blood stem cell harvests (PBSCH) was investigated. Compared with PBSCH from healthy allogeneic donors mobilized with the same dose of G-CSF (filgrastim; 10 microg/kg/d, n = 14), RA PBSCH (n = 9) contained significantly fewer mononuclear cells (375 v 569 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.03) and CD34+ cells (2.7 v 5.8 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.003). However, there were increased proportions of CD14+ cells (P = 0.006) and CD14+ CD15+ cells (the phenotype of previously described 'abnormal' myeloid cells, P = 0.002) in the RA PBSCH which translated into 3.5- and 7-fold increases respectively on a per CD34+ cell basis. There were no differences in T-cell activation status as judged by proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ expressing CD45RA, CD45RO, HLA-DR and CD28 (RA PBSCH, n = 7, donor PBSCH, n = 5, P = 0.2-0.7). Phytohaemagglutinin responses determined fluorocytometrically with induction of CD69 expression were reduced in CD4+ and CD8+ cells following filgrastim administration in 3/3 RA patients tested. Compared with bone marrow as a potential source of CD34+ cells, PBSCH contained 11-fold more T cells (P < 0.0005), 8-fold more B cells (P < 0.0005) and 4-fold more monocytes (P = 0.02). In short-term methylcellulose culture there were no differences in colony counts (CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM, BFU-E) per CD34+ cell from PBSCH from RA patients (n = 11) and healthy donors (n = 10). Long-term culture initiator cells were cultured successfully from cryopreserved PBSCH from RA patients (n = 9). In conclusion, PBSCH from RA patients differed significantly in composition from normal individuals, but in vitro studies support normal stem and progenitor cell function. Changes in T-cell function occur during mobilization in RA patients. This work provides reassurance for the use of PBSCH as haematological rescue and baseline data for clinical trials of graft manipulation strategies in patients with RA.

Composition and function of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell harvests from patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis

Composition and function of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell harvests from patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis

Modulation of monocyte activation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by leukapheresis therapy.

One of the hallmarks in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the intense activation of the monocyte-macrophage system. In the present investigation, the modulation of blood monocyte activation was studied with regard to the secretion of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, and to the expression of cytokine receptors. Patients with severe active RA underwent repeated leukapheresis procedures that removed all circulating monocytes. Highly enriched monocyte preparations from the first and third leukapheresis were studied. There were striking differences between the two monocyte populations. Cells obtained from the first leukapheresis constitutively released large amounts of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), neopterin, interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). In particular, IL-1 beta and neopterin production were further enhanced by stimulation with either interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or TNF-alpha without a synergistic effect. In contrast, cells derived from the third leukapheresis procedure showed a close to normal activation status with only low levels of cytokine and mediator production as well as a reduced response to cytokine stimulation. The number of the receptors for IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha was not changed between first and third leukapheresis. However, TNF-binding capacity was only detectable upon acid treatment of freshly isolated monocytes. A further upregulation was noted upon 24 h in vitro culture, suggesting occupation of membrane receptors and receptor down-regulation by endogenously produced TNF-alpha. Northern blot analysis of cytokine gene expression was in good correlation with the amount of mediators determined on the protein level. These data indicate that cells of the monocyte-macrophage system are already highly activated in the peripheral blood in RA patients with active disease. These cells can be efficiently removed by repeated leukapheresis and are replenished by monocytes that have, with respect to cytokine and mediator production, a considerably lower activation status.

Role of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs versus cytotoxic agents in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are used to modify or alter the rheumatoid arthritis disease process. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs do not demonstrate the characteristic analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory actions of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, since weeks or months of treatment are required before clinical benefit is observed. Although they have not been proved to delay, prevent, or reverse articular damage, therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, when successful, is associated with decreased pain and joint swelling and improved function. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and cytotoxic agents should not be considered as routine treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Before disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy is implemented, an optimal basic program of physical therapy, rest, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be implemented, and it must be documented that the patient still has sufficient disease to justify the costs, risks, and benefits of these treatments. Drugs that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are preferred over nonapproved drugs. Hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold salts, oral gold, D-penicillamine, and the cytotoxic drug azathioprine are the FDA-approved disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for use in rheumatoid arthritis. Many, not all, rheumatologists would employ hydroxychloroquine as the first-choice disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug in patients who have early, mild, and nonerosive disease; treatment should be continued for six months before being abandoned for lack of efficacy, and appropriate ophthalmologic examination every four to six months is indicated. An alternative would be auranofin, whose efficacy approaches that of parenteral gold, yet may be safer. For patients who have severe active rheumatoid arthritis, especially with erosive changes, parenteral gold salts are usually a first choice. D-penicillamine is also effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, but serious toxicity may occur. Azathioprine might be considered a competitor to D-penicillamine, although the FDA approval restricts its use to patients who have failed gold therapy. Two cytotoxic drugs that are not FDA approved are methotrexate and cyclophosphamide. Methotrexate can be very effective, but its side effects, particularly pulmonary and hepatic, must be carefully monitored. Cyclophosphamide is generally considered too toxic for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although it may be helpful in patients with systemic rheumatoid vasculitis or patients who have failed all other therapies. Despite limitations, both disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and cytotoxic drugs are important treatments for active rheumatoid arthritis and should be used more frequently.

Effect of Liposomal-Encapsulated Superoxide Dismutase on Active Oxygen-Related Human Disorders. A Preliminary Study

Liposomal-encapsulated superoxide dismutase was clinically applied to patient showing an increase in neutrophil active oxygen generation, and those with diseases such as severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease and progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) in which presence of a plasmatic clastogenic factor has been demonstrated. Liposomal SOD injection (2.5 mg twice a week) resulted in marked remission in 12 out of 16 patients with active Behcet's disease. The drug was impressively effective on patients with intestinal Behcet. Remission rates in the other diseases was 7 out of 8 mucocutaneous lymphnode syndrome (MCLS, Kawasaki disease) 3 out of 5 dermatitis herpetiformis, IgA linear bullous dermatosis or severe cement dermatitis, 4 out of 9 active and severe RA, 3 out of 3 PSS, 4 out of 4 Crohn's disease, 3 out of 4 colitis ulcerosa, and 2 out of 2 unresponsive (hemolytic) anemia. To be emphasized was that three severe active RA patients and two terminal-stage PSS patients with dyspnea due to lung fibrosis showed dramatic improvement after administration of liposomal SOD. In addition, in 13 out of 15 malignant neo plastic patients including cancer, malignant lymphoma and leucemia who were receiving radiotherapy (total dose, more than 4000 rads) and chemotherapy including anthracycline analogs (total over 450 mg/m2) and bleomycin, the drug also prevented the appearance of myocardiac injury and fibrosis, sometimes seen as a consequence of chemotherapy. Liposomal SOD, which shows no toxicity, has various advantages compared to free SOD preparations, and is highly and broadly applicable to various clinical disorders.

Clinico-pharmacological studies on depot tetracosactrin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

A clinico-pharmacological study of depot tetracosactrin in four fixed-dosage regimes was undertaken in 37 hospitalised patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis. The regimes were: 0.25 mg daily (6 patients), 0.25 mg alternate days (6 patients), 0.5 mg daily (10 patients) and 0.5 mg alternate days (15 patients). Marked symptom relief was associated with a fall in the articular index, E.S.R. and serum globulins but also accompanied by a high incidence of steroid side effects including mooning of the face, weight gain, fluid retention, hirsutes, pigmentation and significant hypokalaemia in the higher dosage schedules despite oral potassium supplements. Maximal plasma 11-OHCS responses increased with duration of therapy in all groups, but parallel measurements of intraocular pressure appeared to be unrelated and did not rise significantly with treatment. It is suggested that to obtain optimum results in any individual, the dosage regime is likely to require adjustment according to the activity of the disease and susceptibility to side effects.