THIS MONTH we will examine two cases center on extent to which religion may influence teaching, one illustrating influence from outside classroom and other from inside. CASE I In 1995, after teaching social studies and then language arts in middle school for several years, Gary Cole began to teach seventhgrade social studies in a school district in northern Maine. According to Cole,1 first two years went well; district's curriculum coordinator, Pamela Hallett, complimented him on his course, which covered history, culture, and religion of Europe and Asia. With her permission, he used textbook Human Heritage to teach his course, rather than outdated Europe and Soviet Union. Hallett met with Cole and Kevin Sipe, seventh-grade social studies teacher at district's other middle school, to review Maine Learning Results requirements and found that, while Cole was fully implementing requirements, Sipe was not even coming close. Hallett recommended Sipe meet with Cole to work out how to follow Cole's example. In early September, however, at his school's open house, parent of one of Cole's students confronted him, angrily expressing opposition to the religious aspects of topics Cole covered. The parent followed up a few days later with a visit to Cole's class, where she observed him mention Cro-Magnon man is at least 40,000 years old. Seeing parent's agitation, Cole met with her after class, whereupon she emphatically explained she believes every word of Bible is true, including claim Earth is probably 8,000 to 10,000 years old. She left and went directly to principal's office, withdrawing her son from Cole's class. Her sister, who also had a child in Cole's class, also spoke with him, objecting to that old ... ancient history and stuff. Cole understood stuff to refer to religion; for example, sister explained she only let her daughter be exposed to his teaching of evolution because her daughter's faith was strong. The two objecting parents were granddaughters of Rev. Blackstone, who was minister at a local church where thenchair of district's board of education was a member. Years earlier, former principal of middle school had told Cole people at church think they can run school. In mid-September, Hallett sent Cole a note notifying him of an upcoming meeting at high school to discuss changes in seventh-grade social studies curriculum. At meeting, she told Cole teacher of ninth-grade world history had complained that, when they entered high school, his students had already covered what she was going to teach, whereas students from other middle school had not. Based on this complaint, Hallett stated Cole should no longer teach about Asian history or ancient Greece. She further directed him to use as course text Europe and Soviet Union, rather than Human Heritage, to facilitate district-wide coordination. Shortly after meeting, Cole went to superintendent for clarification as to what material he should cover. For example, he understood Hallett to tell him to teach history of Europe, but not Middle Ages in Europe or any history from ninth-grade curriculum, which included European history. Pointing out directives conflicted with Maine Learning Results and they were issued in wake of two sisters' complaints, Cole suggested district was letting church run district. The superintendent did not seem to deny these accusations. On November 3, Cole wrote to Hallett for guidance, but she did not respond. At start of 1998-99 school year, Cole wrote to Hallett to summarize what he had understood to be agreement resulting from a meeting she had held with him and Sipe on implementation of Maine Learning Results, but she did not respond to his request for confirmation. …