Setting Of Stem Cell Transplantation Research Articles

Desensitization Strategies for Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA-Mismatched Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know.

In human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation settings, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) can independently lead to graft failure, including both primary graft rejection and primary poor graft function. Although several strategies, such as plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and bortezomib, have been used for DSA desensitization, the effectiveness of desensitization and transplantation outcomes in some patients remain unsatisfactory. In this review, we summarized recent research on the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies and the underlying mechanism of DSAs in the pathogenesis of graft failure. We mainly focused on desensitization strategies for DSAs, especially novel methods that are being investigated in the preclinical stage and those with promising outcomes after preliminary clinical application.

Role of WT1 in Measurable Residual Disease Follow-Up in the Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Setting.

Objectives: The Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) plays a critical role in cell development and the regulation of essential genes involved in cell growth and metabolism. In the context of hematopoietic tumors, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), WT1 has been identified as a potential marker for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains a significant challenge in AML treatment, highlighting the importance of MRD monitoring for risk stratification and treatment decisions. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of WT1 as a molecular marker for MRD and its correlation with chimerism in AML patients post-allo-SCT setting. Methods: We have included 58 patients with WT1-expression-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received allo-SCT in our center between 2016-2022. The exclusion criteria are as follows: not having WT1 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measurement at diagnosis, not receiving allo-SCT, and not having a serial measurement of WT1 post-transplant. Pre- and post-transplant assessments were made with flow cytometry, WT1 PCR, and bone marrow morphological evaluations. Statistical analyses were carried out to explore correlations between WT1 levels, MRD markers, and chimerism post-transplantation. Results: We found that WT1 had a significant correlation with flow cytometry and bone marrow morphological evaluation, but not with chimerism. Interestingly, high WT1 expressors exhibited a more robust correlation with chimerism compared to the general cohort. The negative predictive value for post-allo-SCT relapse was 91.8% for the whole WT1 cohort; for high WT1 expressors, it was similar, at 87.5%. The negative predictive value for post-allo-SCT relapse was high for the whole WT1 cohort; for high WT1 expressors, it was similar. The WT1 MRD assay showed a high negative predictive value for post-allo-SCT relapse, consistent across both the entire cohort (91.8%) and high WT1 expressors (87.5%). Conclusions: WT1 expression levels may serve as a valuable ancillary marker in MRD assessment and relapse prediction post-allo-SCT in AML patients, particularly for those lacking specific fusion genes or mutations. However, further large-scale, controlled studies are needed to standardize WT1 MRD assays and establish clear guidelines for their clinical application.

Impaired survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies before HLA-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BackgroundWhile the detrimental role of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is well-described in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), few studies focus on non donor-specific ones and with controversial results. MethodsWe here report our monocenter experience on 64 adult patients receiving allogeneic HSCT from a HLA-mismatched donor between 2014 and 2022 who were tested for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies before transplant, focusing on fifteen patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. ResultsThe survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was inferior with respect to patients without anti-HLA antibodies and similar to patients with DSAs. Median survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was 21 months (95 % CI: 9–42) vs. 61 months (95 % CI: 17–77) among the anti-HLA antibody-negative patients, with a significantly higher mortality incidence rate ratio (3.3 times-fold greater, p = 0.01). No pattern of death causes was found ConclusionsIn this monocenter series of HLA-mismatched HSCTs, impaired survival was observed in adult patients having non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies before transplant, similar to those with DSAs. Our findings support those antibodies as a negative predictive factor even if they are not directed against the donor, thus warranting further investigation on larger cohorts.

Reconstitution of norovirus-specific T cell responses following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with inborn errors of immunity and chronic norovirus infection.

Chronic norovirus infection (CNI) causes significant morbidity in immunocompromised patients. No effective prevention or treatment currently exists. Two patients with inborn errors of immunity, X- linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) and DOCK8 deficiency, were followed longitudinally for clinical course, immune reconstitution, norovirus-specific T cell (NST) response, B cell reconstitution, and norovirus-specific antibody production. Samples were obtained in the peri-hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting (HSCT) before and after CNI clearance. The norovirus strain causing CNI was followed longitudinally for norovirus stool viral loads and sequencing. The noroviruses were identified as GII.4 Sydney[P4 New Orleans] in one patient and GII.17[P17] in the other. An exacerbation of diarrhea post-HSCT in the patient with X-SCID was consistent with norovirus infection but not with graft-vs-host-disease on pathologic samples. Both patients recovered polyfunctional NSTs in the CD4 and CD8 T cell compartments which recognized multiple norovirus structural and non-structural viral antigens. T cell responses were minimal during active CNI but detectable after resolution. Mapping of norovirus-specific T cell responses between the patient with DOCK8 and his matched sibling donor were nearly identical. B cell reconstitution or new endogenous antibody production for IgA or IgG were not observed. This report is the first to demonstrate reconstitution of norovirus-specific T cell immunity after HSCT closely temporally aligned with clearance of CNI suggesting that cellular immunity is sufficient for norovirus clearance.

Assessing the impact of aprepitant on response to dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DICEP).

Despite evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of aprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), its use in stem cell transplant settings across Canada is not standard. While pharmacokinetic data exists, the clinical significance of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP 3A4) inhibition of cyclophosphamide by aprepitant is unclear. Reduced activation of cyclophosphamide may reduce the effectiveness of dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DICEP). To compare response rates to DICEP in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the presence and absence of aprepitant. A retrospective review of patients who received full-dose DICEP for relapsed/refractory HL or DLBCL between June 1995 and September 2018 at the Foothills Medical Centre (FMC) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to assess response rate, as defined by the 2007 International Working Group response criteria. Of the 218 patients included in this study, 87.6% of patients in the control group and 88.5% of patients in the aprepitant group responded to DICEP (difference 0.025 [95% CI, -0.066 to 0.114], p = 0.827). Univariate analyses for age, sex, type of cancer, stage of cancer, number of prior relapses, and relapse status were not significant. No significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes. Response rates to DICEP in relapsed/refractory HL and DLBCL patients were similar regardless of aprepitant use. Considering these results and the effectiveness of aprepitant in CINV, its addition to standard antiemetic therapy in patients receiving DICEP should be given strong consideration in the transplant setting.

The Pathology of Pulmonary Disease After Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Pulmonary complications continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality in posthematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) settings. The histopathology of pulmonary diseases in the post-HSCT context is poorly characterized, especially in the pediatric population. We sought to characterize the pathologic spectrum of pulmonary disease post-HSCT in a pediatric cohort. Fifty-six specimens, including 53 biopsy specimens, corresponding to 53 patients, were identified. Biopsy slides were reviewed and assigned to diagnostic categories (infectious, graft-versus-host disease, vasculopathy, indeterminate, and others) by consensus among 3 pediatric pulmonary pathologists, taking into consideration pathologic, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory findings. The most common diagnostic category was infection (n=20). Vasculopathy, mostly in the form of fibromyxoid intimal expansion, was very common in the entire cohort (n=26) and was the sole finding in a small subset of patients (n=5), with particularly poor outcomes. A subset of biopsies remained indeterminate (n=10), and the findings in this cohort were dominated by acute lung injury. The latter group had a poor prognosis, with a short biopsy-to-death interval. The overall clinicopathologic concordance was 40%, most commonly agreeing in the infectious category. Finally, wedge biopsies led to a change in management in 69% of cases versus 23% of limited procedures (i.e., core needle biopsies). Our results suggest that while infectious complications continue to be common post-HSCT, other findings such as vasculopathy and acute lung injury portend a particularly poor prognosis and should be actively sought and reported.

Unrelated donor transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs ATG for myelodysplastic neoplasms

AbstractIt has been reported in prospective randomized trials that antithymocyte globulin (ATG)–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has benefits in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with unrelated donors (UDs). However, the optimal GVHD prophylaxis strategy has been challenged recently by the increasing use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). We report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry the outcomes of 960 patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms who underwent allo-HSCT from UD with PTCY or ATG as GVHD prophylaxis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The disease characteristics were similar in both groups. Day 28 neutrophil engraftment was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 85%). Over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 5-year OS was 58% with PTCY, and 49% in the ATG group. The 5-year PFS was higher for PTCY at 53% vs 44% for ATG. Grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD incidence was lower when PTCY was used (23%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD at 5 years. Multivariable analyses confirmed better OS and PFS with PTCY with a hazard ratio (HR) for ATG of 1.32 (1-1.74) and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.33. This study suggests that GVHD prophylaxis using PTCY instead of ATG in this setting remains a valid option. Further prospective randomized studies would be essential to confirm these results.

A qualitative study of pediatric nurses' perception of factors affecting negotiation of care in a Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Unit.

The adoption of a "family centered care" (FCC) philosophy is essential for the care process and its negotiation. A better understanding of nurses' perception of factors that affect the process of negotiation could allow us to better address future interventions and to improve FCC. The purpose of our study was to investigate pediatric nurses' perception of factors that affect the process of negotiation of care with stem cell transplantation pediatric patients and their parents. A qualitative research design with in-depth interviews was chosen. Sixteen interviews (16 nurses) were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers conducted independently a thematic analysis of the verbatim transcripts of the interviews. Four themes emerged from the data as factors that affect the process of negotiation: 1) communication; 2) personal factors; 3) specificity; and 4) organization. These themes represent interesting points for future improvement interventions. Negotiation in the stem cell transplant setting would deserve further research, with special focus on children' and parents' perception of factors affecting this important aspect. Furthermore, in the future, negotiation guidelines could be validated and implemented effectively and an already validated tool could be used to document the negotiation process in the stem cell transplant setting.

Treatment intensity affects immune reconstitution even after childhood cancer not treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Only a few previous studies examine immune system recovery after completed cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze immune reconstitution after childhood cancer therapy in a non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting. We analyzed children (N = 79) who received chemotherapy with/without irradiation for cancer diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 at Turku University Hospital, Finland. We retrospectively collected data on baseline parameters and post-treatment immunological recovery, namely neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, IgG levels, CD19, CD4 and natural killer cell counts. Immunological parameters were followed until their normalization. Treatment intensity was stratified according to the Intensity of Treatment Rating Scale (ITR-3). We analyzed the effects of treatment intensity on normalization of immunological parameters across the entire treatment range. Treatment intensity had a major effect on immune system recovery after completion of treatment. Most patients had normal immunological parameters 1-4 months post-treatment both in high- and low-intensity treatment groups, but patients classified in the high-intensity group had low parameters more often than patients in the low-intensity group. Our data suggest a fast recovery of studied immunological parameters after the majority of current pediatric oncologic treatments. Treatment for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, medulloblastoma, and mature B-cell lymphoma was associated with prolonged recovery times for a substantial proportion of cases. High treatment intensity was associated with prolonged immunological recovery.

Therapeutic Inducers of Natural Killer cell Killing (ThINKK): preclinical assessment of safety and efficacy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant settings

BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the standard of care for chemotherapy-refractory leukemia patients, but cure rates are still dismal. To prevent leukemia relapse following HSCT, we aim to...

Diagnosing and Grading of Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant of Children, Adolescent and Young Adults treated in a Pediatric Institution with Pediatric Protocols

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS), or veno-occlusive disease, of the liver has been recognized as a complex, life-threatening complication in the posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) setting. The diagnostic criteria for SOS have evolved over the last several decades with a greater understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, with 2 recent diagnostic criteria introduced in 2018 (European Society of Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] criteria) and 2020 (Cairo criteria). We sought out to evaluate the performance characteristics in diagnosing and grading SOS in pediatric patients of the 4 different diagnostic criteria (Baltimore, Modified Seattle, EBMT, and Cairo) and severity grading systems (defined by the EBMT and Cairo criteria). Retrospective chart review of children, adolescent, and young adults who underwent conditioned autologous and allogeneic HSCT between 2017 and 2021 at a single pediatric institution. A total of 250 consecutive patients underwent at least 1 HSCT at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco for a total of 307 HSCT. The day 100 cumulative incidence of SOS was 12.1%, 21.1%, 28.4%, and 28.4% per the Baltimore, Modified Seattle, EBMT, and Cairo criteria, respectively (P < .001). We found that patients diagnosed with grade ≥4 SOS per the Cairo criteria were more likely to be admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (92% versus 58%, P = .035) and intubated (85% versus 32%, P = .002) than those diagnosed with grade ≥4 per EBMT criteria. Age <3 years-old (HR 1.76, 95% [1.04 to 2.98], P = .036), an abnormal body mass index (HR 1.69, 95% [1.06 to 2.68], P = .027), and high-risk patients per our institutional guidelines (HR 1.68, 95% [1.02 to 2.76], P = .041) were significantly associated with SOS per the Cairo criteria. We demonstrate that age <3 years, abnormal body mass index, and other high-risk criteria associate strongly with subsequent SOS development. Patients with moderate to severe SOS based on Cairo severity grading system may correlate better with clinical course based on ICU admissions and intubations when compared to the EBMT severity grading system.

Monitoring Humoral Response Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Study along with a Brief Review of Current Literature.

Data on antibody response (AR) after vaccination against SARS-CoV2 in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation setting (HSCT) were initially scarce, mainly due to the exclusion of such patients from approval studies. Shortly after the worldwide application of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in vulnerable populations such as patients with hematologic malignancies, limited single-center trials, including HSCT patients, were published. However, there was a great heterogeneity between them regarding the type of underlying malignancy, co-current treatment, type of vaccine, method of AR measurement, and time point of AR measurement. Herein, we present the results of a prospective study on AR after vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 using the BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of 54 HSCT recipients-mostly autologous from a single Unit-along with a broad review of the current literature. In our cohort, the AR positivity rate at 1 month was 80.8% and remained positive in 85.7% of patients at 3 months after vaccination. There were only nine non-responders, who were more heavily pretreated and more frequently hypogammaglobulinemic compared to responders. High antibody titers (AT), [AT ≥ 1000 U/mL], were detected in 38.5% and 30.6% of the patients at m1 and m3, respectively. A significant decline in AT between m1 and m3 was demonstrated-p < 0.0001; median AT1 and AT3 were 480.5 and 293 U/mL, respectively. A novel finding of our study was the negative impact of IgA hypogammaglobulinemia on response to vaccination. Other negative significant factors were treatment with anti-CD20 antibody at vaccination and vaccination within 18 months from HSCT. Our data indicate that HSCT recipients elicit a positive response to the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 when vaccinated at 6 months post-transplant, and vaccination should be offered to this patient population even within the post-pandemic COVID-19 era.

Serum Levels of miR-122-5p and miR-125a-5p Predict Hepatotoxicity Occurrence in Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Hepatic complications are an acknowledged cause of mortality and morbidity among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential role in the prediction of liver injury of five selected microRNAs (miRNAs)-miR-122-5p, miR-122-3p, miR-15b-5p, miR-99b-5p, and miR-125a-5p-in the setting of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). A total of 66 patients were included in the study: 50 patients (75.8%) with multiple myeloma (MM) and 16 (24.2%) with lymphoma. Blood samples were collected after the administration of the conditioning regimen, on the day of transplant (day 0). The expression levels of selected miRNAs were quantified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using the miRCURY LNA miRNA Custom PCR Panels (QIAGEN). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and the administered conditioning regimen, two miRNAs, hsa-miR-122-5p (odds ratio, OR 2.10, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.29-3.42, p = 0.0029) and hsa-miR-125a-5p (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.71, p = 0.0079), were independent for hepatic toxicity occurrence during the 14 days after transplant. Our model in 10-fold cross-validation preserved its diagnostic potential with a receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC AUC) of 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.88 and at optimal cut-off reached 72.0% sensitivity and 74.4% specificity. An elevated serum level of miR-122-5p and decreased level of miR-125a-5p on day 0 are independent risk factors for hepatotoxicity in ASCT recipients, showing promise in accurately predicting post-ASCT complications. Identifying patients susceptible to complications has the potential to reduce procedure costs and optimize the selection of inpatient or outpatient procedures.

Expedited evaluation of hereditary hematopoietic malignancies in the setting of stem cell transplantation.

Not available.

CRISPR-Cas9n-mediated ELANE promoter editing for gene therapy of severe congenital neutropenia

Severe congenital neutropenia (CN) is an inherited pre-leukemia bone marrow failure syndrome commonly caused by autosomal-dominant ELANE mutations (ELANE-CN). ELANE-CN patients are treated with daily injections of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). However, some patients do not respond to rhG-CSF, and approximately 15% of ELANE-CN patients develop myelodysplasia or acute myeloid leukemia. Here, we report the development of a curative therapy for ELANE-CN through inhibition of ELANE mRNA expression by introducing two single-strand DNA breaks at the opposing DNA strands of the ELANE promoter TATA-box using CRISPR/Cas9D10A nickases - termed MILESTONE. This editing effectively restored defective neutrophil differentiation of ELANE-CN CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in vitro and in vivo, without affecting the functions of the edited neutrophils. CRISPResso analysis of the edited ELANE-CN CD34+ HSPCs revealed on-target efficiencies of over 90%. Simultaneously, GUIDE-seq, CAST-Seq, and rhAmpSeq indicated a safe off-target profile with no off-target sites or chromosomal translocation. Taken together, ex vivo gene editing of ELANE-CN HSPCs using MILESTONE in the setting of autologous stem cell transplantation could be a universal, safe, and efficient gene therapy approach for ELANE-CN patients.

Incidence of Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Stem Cell Recipients-Should We Be "PICCy"?

The management of patients undergoing HSCT requires a multipurpose central venous catheter. Peripheral catheters (PCs), such as peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and MidLine catheters (MLCs), appear to be adequate vascular catheters to be used for stem cell infusion, although their utilization in this indication is not yet common. We analyzed the infectious complications such as blood stream infection (BSI), febrile neutropenia (FN) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLBSI) in patients undergoing stem cell infusion through PC and conventionally inserted central catchers (CICCs), and evaluated their impacts on transplantation outcomes. Our results reveal no statistically significant differences between different types of catheter in terms of FN, BSI and CLABSI. Moreover, transplantation outcomes were comparable between the groups. Interestingly, according to our data, there were no differences in terms of abovementioned infectious complications between individuals who received antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not. Our study has shown that infection complications are independent of the intravenous device and antibiotic prophylaxis. Considering that PCs are not associated with life-threatening complications, they should be considered more frequently in the stem cell transplantation setting.

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study of Ciprofloxacin vs Rifaximin as Neutropenia Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Loss of microbiota diversity has been clearly associated with poor outcomes in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting. However, the choice of the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis during the pre-engraftment phase remains unclear. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare our standard-of-care neutropenia prophylaxis (ciprofloxacin) with rifaximin. We enrolled 38 consecutive adult patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting and were randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin (20 patients) or rifaximin (18 patients) at day -1. Pretransplant and transplant characteristics did not differ between groups. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-vs-host disease grade II to IV and moderate/severe chronic graft-vs-host disease was similar in both groups. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 6.8-30.2) in surviving patients, the 1-year CI of relapse was 20.8% in ciprofloxacin vs 17.8% in rifaximin (P = .616). Importantly, the 1-year CI of treatment-related mortality was significantly reduced in the ciprofloxacin group (10.2% vs 27.8%, P = .032), leading to higher 1-year overall survival (88.9% vs 74.6%, P = .038). In Cox-regression multivariate analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis remained the only predictor of overall survival, independently of donor type, disease risk index, and moderate/severe chronic graft-vs-host disease. Further studies are needed to assess the effects on microbiota diversity and confirm these outcomes.

How to get over with medication errors underestimation? Improving indices of medication errors with focus on intravenous medications in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting; a direct observation study.

The administration of intravenous (IV) medications is a technically complicated and error-prone process. Especially, in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) setting where toxic drugs are frequently used and patients are in critical immunocompromised conditions, medication errors (ME) can have catastrophic reactions and devastating outcomes such as death. Studies on ME are challenging due to poor methodological approaches and complicated interpretations. Here, we tried to resolve this problem using reliable methods and by defining new denominators, as a crucial part of an epidemiological approach. This was an observational, cross-sectional study. A total of 525 episodes of IV medication administration were reviewed by a pharmacist using the disguised direct observation method to evaluate the preparation and administration processes of 32 IV medications in three HSCT wards. We reported errors in 3 ratios; 1) Total Opportunities for Error (TOE; the number of errors/sum of all administered doses observed plus omitted medications), 2) Proportional Error Ratio (the number of errors for each drug or situation/total number of detected errors) and, 3) Corrected Total Opportunities for Errors (CTOE; the number of errors/ Sum of Potential Errors (SPE)). A total of 1,568 errors were observed out of 5,347 total potential errors. TOE was calculated as 2.98 or 298% and CTOE as 29.3%. Most of the errors occurred at the administration step. The most common potential errors were the use of an incorrect volume of the reconstitution solvent during medication preparation and lack of monitoring in the administration stage. Medication errors frequently occur during the preparation and administration of IV medications in the HSCT setting. Using precise detection methods, denominators, and checklists, we identified the most error-prone steps during this process, for which there is an urgent need to implement effective preventive measures. Our findings can help plan targeted preventive measures and investigate their effectiveness, specifically in HSCT settings.

Persistent Hypogammaglobulinemia after Receiving Rituximab Post-HSCT Is Not Caused by an Intrinsic B Cell Defect.

In the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), Rituximab (RTX) is used for the treatment and prevention of EBV-associated post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease or autoimmune phenomena such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Persistent hypogammaglobulinemia and immunoglobulin substitution dependence has been observed in several patients after RTX treatment despite the normalization of total B cell numbers. We aimed to study whether this is a B cell intrinsic phenomenon. We analyzed four patients with different primary diseases who were treated with myeloablative conditioning and matched unrelated donor HSCT who developed persistent hypogammaglobulinemia after receiving RTX treatment. They all received RTX early after HSCT to treat EBV infection or AIHA post-HSCT. All patients showed normalized total B cell numbers but absent to very low IgG positive memory B cells, and three lacked IgA positive memory B cells. All of the patients had full donor chimerism, and none had encountered graft-versus-host disease. Sorted peripheral blood naïve B cells from these patients, when stimulated with CD40L, IL21, IL10 and anti-IgM, demonstrated intact B cell differentiation including the formation of class-switched memory B cells and IgA and IgG production. Peripheral blood T cell numbers including CD4 follicular T-helper (Tfh) cells were all within the normal reference range. In conclusion, in these four HSCT patients, the persistent hypogammaglobulinemia observed after RTX cannot be attributed to an acquired intrinsic B cell problem nor to a reduction in Tfh cell numbers.

Prevention of CINV in Patients with Multiple Myeloma or Lymphoma Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: NEPA Versus Ondansetron. a Monocentric Real-Life Experience

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are adverse events that compromise quality of life and treatment compliance in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Polychemotherapy regimens, used as conditioning regimens for ASCT in lymphomas, and high-dose melphalan (≥140 mg/mq), used in multiple myeloma (MM), have high emetogenic risk. Control of CINV is difficult and there is no uniformity for its prophylaxis. Antiemetic guidelines recommend, for prophylaxis, co-administration of a triplet regimen of a serotonine (5-HT3) receptor antagonist (RA), as Ondansetron, a neurokinin-1 RA, and dexamethasone. Netupitant-Palonosetron (NEPA), an oral formulation derived from the combination of Netupitant (NK1-RA) and Palonsetron, has been approved as prophylaxis of CINV but its experience in the stem cell transplant setting is still limited. AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Ondansetron versus NEPA in terms of reduction of CINV in patients affected by lymphoma or MM who undergone ASCT. The secondary aims included comparing the duration of CINV, based on the use of Ondansetron or NEPA, and their safety profile in terms of reduction of extrahaematological toxicity (as mucositis or diarrhea). METHODS: In this retrospective monocentric study, we enrolled 76 patients (48 with MM and 28 with lymphoma), who underwent ASCT between March 2021 and March 2022. All patients with MM received high dose of melphalan, those with lymphoma received FEAM. Regarding antiemetics patients were divided according to whether they received NEPA or Ondansetron . Patients' characteristics are in Table 1. RESULTS: Among all, fifty patients (65%) reported CINV of any grade. In particular, the group experiencing CINV included about half of patients treated with NEPA (56%) and almost all those treated with Ondansetron (91%). Among the 26 patients who didn't report CINV (35%), the majority received NEPA (92%) (P = 0.0032) (Fig. 1a). Focusing on patients with MM, 33 experienced CINV (68%), and they were 59% of MM patients treated with NEPA and 93% of those treated with Ondansetron. Fifteen patients did not experience CINV (32%) and almost all of them (93%) had been treated with NEPA (P = 0.037) (Fig. 1b). Sixty-one percent of the 28 patients with lymphoma reported CINV (P= 0.1914) (Fig. 1c). Mean duration of CINV was significantly shorter for patients treated with NEPA than for those treated with Ondansetron (4.8 days vs 9.2 days) (P= 0.002) (Fig. 1d). Regarding extraematological toxicity of chemotherapy, as mucositis and diarrhea, we didn't find any significant difference between the two groups of patients. Regarding the outcome to NEPA, complete response rate (no emesis, no rescue medication) was 37% during overall phases of CINV, 28% of patients had complete control (complete response with no more than mild nausea) and 31% had uncontrolled nausea. Conversely, in the Ondansetron group, only 5% of patients had complete response and 95% had uncontrolled nausea (Fig. 1e). All patients with uncontrolled nausea required a rescue therapy. According to CTCAE, 69% of patients receiving NEPA had grade 1 nausea and 6% had none, while all patients receiving Ondansetron had CINV and 85% of them had grade 2 nausea. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, NEPA has shown superiority in the prevention of CINV, in highly emetogenic regimens in both patients with myeloma or lymphoma, with advantages on the severity and the duration of CINV. Given the high burden of CINV in the whole population analyzed in the study, regardless of the antiemetic used, it would be useful to identify patients at greatest risk and standardize CINV prophylaxis and treatment protocols depending on the different chemotherapy regimens and their emetogenic risk.