Workplace safety concerns or violations are often underreported, which can result in small issues manifesting into a mishap or accident. Safety underreporting can also be difficult to track since, by definition, workers are knowingly failing to report issues. Unfortunately, underreporting remains pervasive even in high-risk occupations where safety issues may produce exceptionally dangerous and costly outcomes. This study investigated safety underreporting in the context of naval operations using a multi-level, multi-factor approach to evaluate underreporting with three study aims: 1) determine the prevalence of safety underreporting in a naval environment; 2) estimate the link between underreporting and real-world safety incidents; and finally, 3) identify the relative contribution of different factors to underreporting. Analyzes examined a large (N>11,000) sample of active-duty servicemembers who voluntarily participated in a routine online anonymous safety climate survey. Approximately 30% of respondents underreported safety incidents despite the high-risk occupational setting, and Monte Carlo simulations provided estimates for safety underreporting frequency aboard different ship-classes. Additional regression analyses linked safety underreporting aboard ship to actual safety issues (e.g., fire and electrical shock) thereby underscoring the real-world relationship. Finally, hierarchical logistic regression estimated that the most consistent predictor of safety underreporting was making prior reports of safety incidents. For every additional safety event reported, there was a 65 % increase in the likelihood of failing to report safety issues. The next most significant predictors were non-compliance attitudes toward safety regulations at the individual and crew level. Taken together, these results demonstrate the prevalence of underreporting in a naval environment while implicating several key contributing factors, including frequency of safety incidents in the work environment and non-compliance attitudes. This study’s findings highlight the importance of actively leveraging approaches to counter underreporting (e.g., anonymous reporting systems) and promoting positive safety climates to improve safety reporting and reduce negative outcomes (e.g., mishaps and accidents).
Read full abstract