This exploratory study focused on the Maltese mens football Premier Leaguein light of a proposed increase in the foreign player quota. Currently, there seems to betwo main diverging fronts vis--vis this development: those in favour, as represented bytop clubs, and the players union, which is largely against. The research paradigm chosento investigate the attitudes around this quota increase consisted of a web-based survey(N=436). Maguires (2011) theoretical framework based on three points of conflict betweenclubs and national federations, with regard to prioritising winning and commercialisationover player development, was used as a basis for the study. Data analysis involved acombination of descriptive and inferential statistics to test a series of hypotheses, usingthe respondents role in local football as the independent variable, and attitude towardsthe foreign quota proposal as the main outcome of interest. The findings indicated generalscepticism towards any positive effects resulting from a foreign quota increase, withthe parents/guardians being the category least supportive of a prospective increase.Results generally suggested that the foreign quota should not be viewed in isolation, butas one of a set of important decisions needed to overcome several perennial problems ofMaltese football. Most respondents considered Maltese players to be at a disadvantagevis--vis foreigners, with a majority also considering that foreign influx has had a positivespillover on the level of local players. Moreover, it is unlikely that a quota increase wouldimprove the leagues competitive balance or attract more fans at stadia. In line with theliterature reviewed, findings indicated that the identification of a roadmap that satisfies allstakeholders is unlikely.
Read full abstract