Sessile Serrated Adenomas Research Articles

Artificial intelligence fails to improve colonoscopy quality: A single centre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND Limited data currently exists on the clinical utility of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Colonoscopy (AIAC) outside of clinical trials. AIM To evaluate the impact of AIAC on key markers of colonoscopy quality compared to conventional colonoscopy (CC). METHODS This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study included all patients undergoing colonoscopy at a secondary centre in Brisbane, Australia. CC outcomes between October 2021 and October 2022 were compared with AIAC outcomes after the introduction of the Olympus Endo-AID module from October 2022 to January 2023. Endoscopists who conducted over 50 procedures before and after AIAC introduction were included. Procedures for surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Patient demographics, proceduralist specialisation, indication for colonoscopy, and colonoscopy quality metrics were collected. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) were calculated for both AIAC and CC. RESULTS The study included 746 AIAC procedures and 2162 CC procedures performed by seven endoscopists. Baseline patient demographics were similar, with median age of 60 years with a slight female predominance (52.1%). Procedure indications, bowel preparation quality, and caecal intubation rates were comparable between groups. AIAC had a slightly longer withdrawal time compared to CC, but the difference was not statistically significant. The introduction of AIAC did not significantly change ADR (52.1% for AIAC vs 52.6% for CC, P = 0.91) or SSLDR (17.4% for AIAC vs 18.1% for CC, P = 0.44). CONCLUSION The implementation of AIAC failed to improve key markers of colonoscopy quality, including ADR, SSLDR and withdrawal time. Further research is required to assess the utility and cost-efficiency of AIAC for high performing endoscopists.

Advantage of magnifying narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia associated with sessile serrated lesions.

This study aimed to extract endoscopic findings for diagnosing colorectal neoplasia associated with sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), which are of significant interest. To compare the magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) findings with microscopic morphology, we classified SSLs into two groups: Group A SSLs included the majority of uniform SSLs and any dysplasia other than that classified as group B SSLs. Group B SSLs included SSLs with intramucosal and invasive carcinoma. We also quantitatively assessed visible vessels using ImageJ software. This study included 47 patients with 50 group B SSLs who underwent endoscopic resection between 2012 and 2020. The results were retrospectively compared with those of 237 patients with 311 group A SSLs that underwent endoscopic resection. Using conventional white-light endoscopy, significantly more group B SSLs had uneven shapes and some reddening compared to group A SSLs. The diagnostic odds ratios for group B SSLs were as follows: lesions with a diameter ≥10 mm, 9.76; uneven shape, 3.79; reddening, 15.46; and visible vessels with NBI, 11.32. Regarding visible vessels with NBI, the specificity and diagnostic accuracy for group B SSLs were 94.9% and 93.1%, respectively. The percentage of the vascular tonal area of NBI images was significantly larger for group B SSLs than for group A SSLs (3.97% vs. 0.29%; p < 0.01). SSLs with reddening and/or a diameter ≥10 mm are suspected to contain cancerous components. Moreover, visible vessels observed using magnifying NBI can serve as objective indicators for diagnosing SSLs with cancerous components with a high degree of accuracy.

Colorectal serrated lesions and polyps in the Danish population: A large nationwide register-based cohort study

Abstract Background and study aims Colorectal serrated lesions and polyps (SPs) include hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated lesions-/+dysplasia (SSL/SSL-D), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA). From 20% to 30% of colorectal cancers (CRC) develop from SP. We present incidence and baseline characteristics of SP in a Danish cohort. Patients and methods We used The Danish Pathology Registry to include all SPs in the Danish population from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2021. Based on the unique Danish personal identification number and SNOMED-codes, combined with the age and sex of patients, and date of procedure, we determined the incidence of the SP subtypes, anatomical location, and changes over time. Results During the period from 2000 to 2021, a total of 292,761 SPs were removed from 163,840 patients: 51,649 SSLs, 5959 SSL-Ds, 224,860 HDs, and 10,293 TSAs. The median age of patients was 64.1 years (range 55.2–71.6) and 53.3% were male. We found a general increase in SPs from 3525 in 2000 to 25,853 in 2021 and a rise in the SSL proportion from 1.7% in 2006 to 38% in 2021. Half of all patients had more than one lesion at endoscopy with conventional adenomas being the most common. CRC was found along with SPs in 3.3% of procedures, while 1% to 2.5% of the patients developed metachronous CRC. Conclusions We found an increasing number of SPs, especially SSLs. From 2019 to 2021 the number of SPs seem to stabilize, while the proportion of SSLs keeps rising. Synchronous lesions were common along all subtypes of SP.

Endorobotic submucosal dissection of rectal lesions using the single port robot DaVinci-SP: initial experience of the first 10 cases.

Endoluminal surgery is increasingly recognized as a mode of treatment for colorectal neoplasms with the latest robotic single port platform Da Vinci-SP (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale) facilitating submucosal dissection of benign rectal neoplasm. In this study, we present our initial experience with endorobotic submucosal dissection in the management of benign rectal neoplasms using the Da Vinci-SP (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale) between 2020 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the successful completion of submucosal dissection. During the study period, 10 patients underwent endorobotic submucosal dissection for benign rectal neoplasms. The median age of the patients was 68 (range: 59-78) years, and the mean BMI was 29.38 (range: 22.9-38.5). The mean size of the lesion was 42.3 mm (range: 20-65 mm) and was located 7.3 cm (mean) from the anal verge (range: 2-10 cm). The mean operative time was 91.3 minutes (range: 57-137 minutes). All 10 dissections were completed successfully en bloc. There were no intraoperative complications or mortality. All patients were discharged on the same day and commenced on a normal diet. Late bleeding was observed in one patient receiving anticoagulation, and one patient had urinary retention. Pathology revealed two adenocarcinomas, six tubulovillous adenomas, one tubular adenoma, and one sessile serrated adenoma. There was no recurrence in all other patients during the median follow-up of 6 months (range: 4-16 months). Endorobotic submucosal dissection using a single-port robotic platform is safe and feasible for benign rectal mucosal neoplasms. The semiflexible platform offers an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection with favourable outcomes.

Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Literature Review

AbstractSerrated polyposis syndrome is considered the most prevalent colonic polyposis syndrome in the world. Its importance has been increasingly discussed due to the significant increase in the risk of developing colorectal cancer in its affected individuals, similarly to other well-known polyposis syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis.Serrated lesions of the colon play a major role in this syndrome represented by hyperplastic polyps, serrated sessile lesions and traditional serrated adenomas. Among these lesions, the sessile serrated lesion stands out, considered the main precursor lesion of the serrated pathway of colon carcinogenesis.Diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome is given through colonoscopy examination. Diagnostic criteria are: 1) 5 or more serrated lesions proximal to the rectum, all &gt;4mm in size, with at least two &gt;9mm in size; or 2) 20 serrated lesions of any size located anywhere in the large intestine, with &gt;4 lesions proximal to the rectum.The ideal treatment is removal of all relevant serrated lesions by colonoscopy. In case of failure of endoscopic therapy, surgery is indicated. This manuscript is based on two case reports and a literature review and aims to broaden the discussion about the subject.

Lansoprazole inhibits the development of sessile serrated lesions by inducing G1 arrest via Skp2/p27 signaling pathway.

Although the serrated-neoplasia pathway reportedly accounts for 15-30% of colorectal cancer (CRC), no studies on chemoprevention of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) have been reported. We searched for effective compounds comprehensively from a large series of compounds by employing Connectivity Map (CMAP) analysis of SSL-specific gene expression profiles coupled with in vitro screening using SSL patient-derived organoids (PDOs), and validated their efficacy using a xenograft mouse model of SSL. We generated SSL-specific gene signatures based on DNA microarray data, and applied them to CMAP analysis with 1309 FDA-approved compounds to select candidate compounds. We evaluated their inhibitory effects on SSL-PDOs using a cell viability assay. SSL-PDOs were orthotopically transplanted into NOG mice for in vivo evaluation. The signal transduction pathway was evaluated by gene expression profile and protein expression analysis. We identified 221 compounds by employing CMAP analysis of SSL-specific signatures, which should cancel the gene signatures, and narrowed them down to 17 compounds. Cell viability assay using SSL-PDOs identified lansoprazole as having the lowest IC50 value (47µM) among 17 compounds. When SSL-PDO was orthotopically transplanted into murine intestinal tract, the tumor grew gradually. Administration of lansoprazole to mice inhibited the growth of SSL xenograft whereas the tumor in control mice treated with vehicle alone grew gradually over time. The Ki67 index in xenograft lesions from the lansoprazole group was significantly lower compared with the control group. Cell cycle analysis of SSL-PDOs treated with lansoprazole exhibited a significant increase in G1 phase cell population. Microarray and protein analysis revealed that lansoprazole downregulated Skp2 expression and upregulated p27 expression in SSL-PDOs. Our data strongly suggest that lansoprazole is the most effective chemopreventive agent against SSL, and that lansoprazole induces G1 cell cycle arrest by downregulating Skp2 and upregulating p27 in SSL cells.

Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Control for Patients with Serrated Polyposis Syndrome

Introduction: Despite advances in endoscopic treatment, patients with serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) occasionally require surgery due to numerous or unresectable polyps, recurrence, and treatment-related adverse events. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with SPS undergoing diagnosis and treatment at Omori Red Cross Hospital from 2011 to 2022. Resection of all polyps ≥3 mm in size was planned during the clearing phase; endoscopic control was defined as complete, endoscopic polyp removal. During the surveillance phase, patients underwent annual colonoscopy and resection of newly detected polyps ≥3 mm in size. Results: Thirty-eight patients (88%) achieved endoscopic control, two (5%) required surgery after endoscopic treatment because of colorectal cancer (CRC), and three (7%) have not yet achieved endoscopic control and are planning treatment. Endoscopic control was achieved with a median of four colonoscopies at 8 months. Ten polyps (median value) were resected per patient during the clearing phase. Three polyps ≥50 mm in size, six located in the appendiceal orifice, and seven with severe fibrosis could be resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). All patients underwent treatment with a combination of cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection/hot polypectomy, and/or ESD. No case required surgery due to difficulty with endoscopic treatment. Delayed bleeding was observed in 2 cases (0.3%). Twenty-one patients underwent colonoscopies during the surveillance phase. Fifty-three polyps were resected using CSP; no CRC, sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia, or advanced adenoma were detected. Conclusion: SPS can be effectively, efficiently, and safely controlled with appropriate endoscopic management.

Understanding colorectal polyps to prevent colorectal cancer

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Most CRCs arise through carcinogenesis pathways from precancerous lesions, such as adenoma and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Understanding the characteristics of such precancerous colorectal polyps and the carcinogenesis pathways helps to develop CRC preventive strategies via screening, colonoscopic polypectomy, and surveillance.Current Concepts: Benign colorectal tumors can be classified as conventional adenomatous and serrated polyps. Conventional adenoma is one of the most prevalent precancerous polyps detected on screening colonoscopy, but most are small. Small colorectal adenomas are less likely to contain advanced histology, such as villous features, high-grade dysplasia, or invasive cancer. A small adenoma may progress slowly over 10 years to become an invasive cancer via the chromosomal instability pathway. SSL is a recently established precancerous lesion and is estimated to account for approximately 15% of sporadic CRC. Most SSLs are not dysplastic and progress very slowly through the serrated carcinogenesis pathway. Conversely, SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) may progress more rapidly, as a mismatch repair gene product is defective. According to colonoscopy studies, SSLD comprises only 4% to 8% of SSLs, with a prevalence of 0.1% to 0.9%. Most precancerous lesions detected on colonoscopy progress slowly to CRC and are appropriate targets for colonoscopic polypectomy for the prevention of CRC.Discussion and Conclusion: Colorectal adenoma and SSL are representative precancerous lesions of CRC and most are slow progressing enough to be detected and removed via colonoscopy before CRC development.

Classification and endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps

Background: Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and a major health concern in Korea. The increased use of screening colonoscopies has led to improved survival of patients with colorectal cancer despite its high prevalence; this highlights the importance of early detection and removal of neoplastic polyps such as adenoma and sessile serrated lesions. Therefore, optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial in deciding whether the lesion requires removal and if endoscopic procedures can be used for its removal.Current Concepts: Several image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) techniques and classifications can be used to improve the optical diagnosis of different polyps that match the histopathologic findings. Kudo’s pit pattern classification is based on features of pit patterns observed from different types of polyps via chromoendoscopy. The Narrow-Band Imaging (NBI) International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification is an international classification based on patterns observed from NBI findings. The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification identifies different patterns observed from magnified images with NBI. The Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis (WASP) classification helps to differentiate hyperplastic polyps from sessile serrated lesions. Endoscopy manufacturers have also developed IEE techniques such as I-scan, flexible spectral imaging color enhancement, and blue laser imaging/linked color imaging to highlight, delineate, and differentiate various polyps.Discussion and Conclusion: Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using IEE such as NBI with different classifications such as NICE, JNET, and WASP is important for differentiating neoplastic polyps and removing them with an appropriate method.

Strategy for post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: focus on the revised Korean guidelines

Background: The risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia is linked to the presence of polyps on initial colonoscopy. Consequently, it is crucial to establish an appropriate colonoscopy surveillance period post-polypectomy.Current Concepts: The US Multi-Society Task Force, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the British Society of Gastroenterology revised their respective foreign guidelines in the 2020s. In Korea, a revised edition of post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance was announced in 2022, with the following risk factors: (1) adenoma ≥10 mm in size; (2) 3 to 5 (or more) adenomas; (3) tubulovillous or villous adenoma; (4) adenoma containing high-grade dysplasia; (5) traditional serrated adenoma; (6) sessile serrated lesions containing any grade of dysplasia; (7) serrated polyps of at least 10 mm in size; and (8) 3 to 5 (or more) sessile serrated lesions. In these guidelines, suitable surveillance periods are suggested for each risk factor.Discussion and Conclusion: The evidence supporting the best practices for post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance has strengthened, helping to support both close follow-up for some populations and less intense follow-up for others.

Incidence of occult appendiceal neoplasm in patients over 40 years with acute appendicitis: A single-institution review.

To investigate the incidence of occult appendiceal neoplasm in patients aged 40 years and over who underwent appendicectomy for appendicitis. The clinical coding electronic database was used to identify patients aged 40 years and over who were diagnosed with appendicitis from September 2010 to September 2022. Patients were included if they were managed operatively. Retrospective cohort study. Modified Monash category 3 (large rural town). Patients aged 40 years and over undergoing appendicectomy for appendicitis. Incidence of appendiceal neoplasm within appendicectomy specimen. A total of 279 patients aged 40 years and over underwent appendicectomy, with a median age of 53 years (range 40-95). Nineteen patients (7%) were found to have a primary neoplastic lesion within the appendix: seven neuroendocrine neoplasms (37%), six sessile serrated lesions (32%), two colonic-type adenocarcinoma (11%), two goblet cell adenocarcinoma (11%) and two appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (11%). Additionally, one patient had a metastatic adenocarcinoma of pancreaticobiliary aetiology. Occult appendiceal neoplasm was higher than reported in the literature in our cohort. This would support appendicectomy as the treatment of choice for patients aged 40 years and over with acute appendicitis and caution against nonoperative management in this demographic.

Validation of hypermethylated DNA regions found in colorectal cancers as potential aging-independent biomarkers of precancerous colorectal lesions

BackgroundWe previously identified 16,772 colorectal cancer-associated hypermethylated DNA regions that were also detectable in precancerous colorectal lesions (preCRCs) and unrelated to normal mucosal aging. We have now conducted a study to validate 990 of these differentially methylated DNA regions (DMRs) in a new series of preCRCs.MethodsWe used targeted bisulfite sequencing to validate these 990 potential biomarkers in 59 preCRC tissue samples (41 conventional adenomas, 18 sessile serrated lesions), each with a patient-matched normal mucosal sample. Based on differential DNA methylation tests, a panel of candidate DMRs was chosen on a subset of our cohort and then validated on the remaining part of our cohort and two publicly available datasets with respect to their stratifying potential between preCRCs and normal mucosa.ResultsStrong statistical significance for the difference in methylation levels was observed across the full set of 990 investigated DMRs. From these, a selected candidate panel of 30 DMRs correctly identified 58/59 tumors (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.998).ConclusionsThese validated DNA hypermethylation markers can be exploited to develop more accurate noninvasive colorectal tumor screening assays.

Lymphoglandular Complex-Like Colorectal Carcinoma-A Series of 20 Colorectal Cases, Including Newly Reported Features of Malignant Behavior.

Distinguishing colon carcinoma that is surrounded by well-circumscribed lymphoid tissue from adenomas involving lymphoglandular complexes can be difficult. We assessed a multi-institutional international cohort of 20 colorectal carcinomas with associated prominent lymphoid infiltrates, which we referred to as lymphoglandular complex-like carcinoma (LGCC). We collected clinical and endoscopic features, including lesion size, endoscopic appearance, location, procedure, follow-up, AJCC stage, and mismatch repair status. We recorded the presence of the following histologic features: haphazard gland distribution, gland angulation, gland fusion, solid nest formation, single-cell formation, stromal desmoplasia, presence of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion, presence of lamina propria, cytologic atypia as low- or high-grade, presence of goblet cells in the invasive component, and the presence of a surface lesion. Most cases (9 of 13) were described endoscopically as sessile polyps with an average size of 1.56 cm. Most cases (90%) were associated with a surface lesion, of which the majority were tubular adenomas, though a subset was associated with sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia (3 of 18). All cases of LGCC demonstrated haphazard gland distribution and either gland angulation, fusion, or solid nest formation. A portion of cases demonstrated single-cell infiltration (35%) and desmoplasia (50%), and rarely lymphovascular invasion was present (5%). A subset (10%) of cases invaded beyond the submucosa. Deficient mismatch repair was present in 22% (2 of 9) of cases for which it was performed. In cases of colectomy or completion colectomy, nodal metastasis was present in 38% (3 of 8). No cases demonstrated disease recurrence or disease-specific mortality. Overall, LGCC represents an enigmatic subset of carcinomas that is important to distinguish from adenomas involving lymphoglandular complexes due to its varying prognostic outcomes.

Additional 30-Second Observation of the Right-Sided Colon for Missed Polyp Detection With Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Compared with Narrow Band Imaging: A Randomized Trial.

The efficacy of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) in the novel light-emitting diode endoscopic system for polyp detection has not been examined. We aimed to evaluate the noninferiority of the additional 30-second (Add-30-s) observation of the right-sided colon (cecum/ascending colon) with TXI compared with narrow band imaging (NBI) for detecting missed polyps. We enrolled 381 patients ≥40 years old who underwent colonoscopy from September 2021 to June 2022 in 3 institutions and randomly assigned them to either the TXI or NBI groups. The right-sided colon was first observed with white light imaging in both groups. Second, after reinsertion from hepatic flexure to the cecum, the right-sided colon was observed with Add-30-s observation of either TXI or NBI. The primary endpoint was to examine the noninferiority of TXI to NBI using the mean number of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions per patient. The secondary ones were to examine adenoma detection rate, adenoma and sessile serrated lesions detection rates, and polyp detection rates in both groups. The TXI and NBI groups consisted of 177 and 181 patients, respectively, and the noninferiorities of the mean number of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions per patients in the second observation were significant (TXI 0.29 [51/177] vs NBI 0.30 [54/181], P < 0.01). The change in adenoma detection rate, adenoma and sessile serrated lesions detection rate, and polyp detection rate for the right-sided colon between the TXI and NBI groups were not different (10.2%/10.5% [ P = 0.81], 13.0%/12.7% [ P = 0.71], and 15.3%/13.8% [ P = 0.71]), respectively. Regarding Add-30-s observation of the right-sided colon, TXI was noninferior to NBI.

S333 The Impact of CADe on Sessile Serrated Adenomas Detection Rate During Colonoscopy

S333 The Impact of CADe on Sessile Serrated Adenomas Detection Rate During Colonoscopy

S728 Impact of a Polyp Detection Poster on Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rate

S728 Impact of a Polyp Detection Poster on Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rate

The incremental yield of adenoma detection with I-Scan versus high-definition white light colonoscopy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.

The incremental yield of I-Scan virtual chromoendoscopy compared to high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in detection of colorectal adenomas has not been thoroughly elucidated. A systematic search from inception to April 2023 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing I-Scan to HD-WLE for detection of adenomas. A random effects model was used to compute risk difference (RD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in adenoma detection rate (ADR). Influence analysis was done to assess robustness of findings. The number needed to diagnose was computed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and explored further by subgroup analyses defined a priori. Certainty in effect estimates was assessed using the GRADE approach. We identified four studies (I-Scan n = 730, HD-WLE n = 765). I-Scan increased adenoma detection by 9% (risk difference (RD), 0.09; 0.04, 0.14; I2 02%; certainty, low). Influence analysis revealed that the gain in yield remained statistically significant with exclusion of all but one study. The number needed to capture one additional adenomatous polyp with I-Scan use was 11.2. I-Scan 1 use was associated with a statistically significant gain in ADR, whereas no significant difference in ADR was noted with I-Scan use on subgroup analysis. In conclusion, I-Scan increases the yield of adenoma detection by 9% compared to HD-WLE, with low certainty in the estimate of this effect. Data on the gain in yield of detecting large polyps, sessile serrated lesions, and on the impact of formally training endoscopists and trainees in I-Scan use and similar technology on adenoma detection rate are needed.

Dietary Inflammatory Potential and the Risk of Serrated and Adenomatous Colorectal Polyps

Studies of dietary inflammation potential and risks of colorectal cancer precursors are limited, particularly for sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). This study examines the association using the energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index (E-DIITM), a measure of anti- and/or pro-inflammatory diet, in a large US colonoscopy-based case-control study of 3246 controls, 1530 adenoma cases, 472 hyperplastic polyp cases, and 180 SSL cases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from logistic regression models. Analyses were stratified by participant characteristics, and urinary prostaglandin E2 metabolite (PGE-M) and high-sensitivity plasma C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, inflammation biomarkers. Highest E-DII™ intake was associated with significantly increased risks of colorectal adenomas (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11, 1.67), and hyperplastic polyps (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06, 1.98), compared with participants consuming the lowest E-DII™ quartile. A similar, but non-significant, increased risk was also observed for SSLs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.82, 2.41). The positive association was stronger in females (pinteraction <0.001), normal weight individuals (ptrend 0.01), and in individuals with lower inflammatory biomarkers (ptrend 0.02 and 0.01 for PGE-M and hs-CRP, respectively). A high E-DII™ is associated with colorectal polyp risk, therefore promoting an anti-inflammatory diet may aid in preventing colorectal polyps.

Cap-assisted colonoscopy can increase the rate of sessile serrated lesion detection at the left lateral decubitus position: A retrospective case-control study.

We investigated the effectiveness of cap-assisted colonoscopy conducted with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position at both the colonoscope's insertion and withdrawal timepoints compared to the effectiveness of colonoscopy without a cap conducted in the supine position at withdrawal. This was a case-control study, based on historical comparisons of patients over 2 time periods. The first group of patients underwent colonoscopies with a transparent cap and the patient was in the left lateral decubitus position at both the insertion and withdrawal timepoints from April to June 2019. The subsequent group underwent colonoscopies without a cap and with the patient in the supine position at withdrawal from July to September 2019. The rates of successful intubation, cecal intubation time, and number, size, shape, and location of the detected adenomas and sessile serrated lesions were compared between the 2 groups. Data from 644 colonoscopies (cap-assisted colonoscopy + left lateral decubitus position, n=320; other colonoscopies, n=324) were analyzed. The demographic characteristics and technical performances were similar. The SSL detection rate was significantly higher with cap-assisted colonoscopy and the left lateral decubitus position than with other colonoscopies (3.4% vs 0.93%, P=.029). The adenoma detection rates in the 2 groups were similar (31% and 28%, respectively, P=.43).Cap-assisted colonoscopy in the left lateral decubitus position may increase the detection rate of sessile serrated lesions compared to colonoscopy without a cap and supine position at withdrawal.

Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) can reduce the risks associated with electrocautery during colon polyp resection. Data on efficacy are variable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled efficacy and safety rates of CS-EMR. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple databases, from inception to March 2023, for studies addressing outcomes of CS-EMR for colon polyps. The weighted pooled estimates with 95 %CIs were calculated using the random effects model. I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. 4137 articles were reviewed, and 16 studies, including 2592 polyps in 1922 patients (51.4 % female), were included. Overall, 54.4 % of polyps were adenomas, 45 % were sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), and 0.6 % were invasive carcinomas. Polyp recurrence after CS-EMR was 6.7 % (95 %CI 2.4 %-17.4 %, I2 = 94 %). The recurrence rate was 12.3 % (95 %CI 3.4 %-35.7 %, I2 = 94 %) for polyps ≥ 20 mm, 17.1 % (95 %CI 4.6 %-46.7 %, I2 = 93 %) for adenomas, and 5.7 % (95 %CI 3.2 %-9.9 %, I2 = 50 %) for SSLs. The pooled intraprocedural bleeding rate was 2.6 % (95 %CI 1.5 %-4.5 %, I2 = 51 %), the delayed bleeding rate was 1.5 % (95 %CI 0.8 %-2.7 %, I2 = 18 %), and no perforations or post-polypectomy syndromes were reported, with estimated rates of 0.6 % (95 %CI 0.3 %-1.3 %, I2 = 0 %) and 0.6 % (95 %CI 0.3 %-1.4 %, I2 = 0 %), respectively. CS-EMR demonstrated an excellent safety profile for colon polyps, with variable recurrence rates based on polyp size and histology. Large prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.